jevcheck

pytest for Jev. Pin what production is allowed to do, eval a candidate model, and fail the upgrade when answers flip or confidence drops.

Probabilities and model versions move. A raw 0.94 is not a release decision. jevcheck records a production contract (baseline model + fixtures + expected answers) and evals a candidate against that fixture.

New here? Walk through the first-run tutorial (about 10 minutes, offline replay). Copy the examples pack into your repo.

v0.1 eval is fixture-versus-candidate. v0.2 adds two-model execution: record a baseline model's answers, then compare a candidate against that snapshot (or fetch both models live). See docs/adr-009-two-model-compare.md.

The repo’s jev-1.13 / jev-1.14 strings are unverified example pin labels used by fixtures. A documented TypeSafe version pin (2026-09-19 model list) is jev-1.13.0. Floating aliases jev-latest and jev-preview are rejected unless you pass --allow-unpinned. With that opt-in, a response whose model is the concrete resolved ID (for example jev-1.13.0) is accepted; the eval report prints that resolved model. Concrete pins still require exact identity.

pin contract  →  ship on the pinned model  →  jevcheck eval     →  compatible or breaking
                                          →  record → compare  →  compatible or breaking   (v0.2)

Reports: unchanged / confidence regressions / answer flips, with exact diffs (billing→general, 0.94→0.71) and a nonzero exit on failure.

Install

pip install jevcheck

Auth is TYPESAFE_API_KEY only. Set it for live Jev calls and never commit the key. Unit tests mock the network.

Pin → eval → upgrade

1. Write a contract (see docs/contract.md) against the model you ship.
2. Call Jev with that explicit model. jev-latest and jev-preview are rejected unless you opt in. Concrete pins require response.model to match exactly. An opted-in alias may resolve to a nonempty concrete (non-alias) response model, which is reported.
3. Before upgrading, eval the candidate (example fixture label — not a verified live ID):

# Live call. Pin a catalog version such as jev-1.13.0 in production.
# The example below matches this repo's replay fixtures only.
jevcheck eval fixtures/support-triage.json --candidate-model jev-1.14

Replay recorded answers (CI / no key):

jevcheck eval fixtures/support-triage.json \
  --candidate-model jev-1.14 \
  --answers fixtures/replay-breaking.json

4. Compatible (exit 0) → change the pin. Breaking (exit 1) → read the diffs; do not upgrade.

Upgrade flow (v0.2): record baseline → compare candidate

Two-model execution is a v0.2 capability. eval above stays the v0.1 fixture path and is unchanged.

1. Record answers from the model you ship. The file is the same replay JSON eval --answers already accepts:

# Live (needs TYPESAFE_API_KEY). Pin a catalog version such as jev-1.13.0 in production.
jevcheck record fixtures/support-triage.json --out baseline-answers.json

# CI / no key: copy a previously recorded snapshot through the same command.
jevcheck record fixtures/support-triage.json \
  --answers fixtures/replay-baseline.json \
  --out baseline-answers.json

record writes only after every answer kind matches the contract question (choice / noul / score). A mismatch is exit 2. Opted-in aliases print the resolved response model in the summary (jev-preview → jev-1.13.0).

2. Compare the candidate against that snapshot:

# Live candidate against recorded baseline
jevcheck compare fixtures/support-triage.json \
  --from baseline-answers.json \
  --to jev-1.14

# CI / no key: recorded baseline + candidate replay
jevcheck compare fixtures/support-triage.json \
  --from fixtures/replay-baseline.json \
  --to jev-1.14 \
  --answers fixtures/replay-breaking.json

3. Or fetch both models in one step (live; needs a key):

jevcheck compare fixtures/support-triage.json \
  --from-model jev-1.13 \
  --to jev-1.14

--from and --from-model are mutually exclusive. Identity rules are the v0.1 pins: concrete names must match response.model exactly; jev-latest / jev-preview still need --allow-unpinned. Exit codes stay 0 compatible / 1 breaking / 2 usage-or-identity / 3 ops.

Verified System One fields: docs/jev-api.md.

Example

from jevcheck import JevClient, evaluate, load_contract

contract = load_contract("fixtures/support-triage.json")
client = JevClient(model="jev-1.14")  # example fixture label; pin a catalog version in production

report = evaluate(
    contract,
    lambda case: client.system_one(
        state=case.state,
        questions=case.questions,
        model="jev-1.14",
    ),
    candidate_model="jev-1.14",
)
print(report.summary())
if report.breaking:
    raise SystemExit(1)

A Gate helper exists for auto / ask-human / reject thresholds. It is optional and is not the product.

GitHub Action

Reuse jevcheck from other repos as a composite action. The action sets up Python, installs jevcheck from PyPI, and runs eval (default), compare, or record. A nonzero CLI exit fails the job (exit 1 is a breaking contract).

Composite actions live in a subdirectory, so the uses: ref must point at a commit or tag that contains .github/actions/jevcheck. Pin @v0.2.2. @v0.2.1 is the first tag that includes this action:

- uses: sathariels/jevcheck/.github/actions/jevcheck@v0.2.2
  with:
    contract: contracts/support.json
    command: compare
    from: fixtures/baseline.json
    to: jev-1.14
    answers: fixtures/candidate-replay.json

v0.2.0 does not contain .github/actions/jevcheck. Pin @v0.2.2 (or a later tag). @v0.2.1 is the first tag that includes the Action.

This repo’s example workflow is the green CI proof: eval (and compare) on fixtures/support-triage.json + fixtures/replay-unchanged.json. No TYPESAFE_API_KEY. A breaking replay (fixtures/replay-breaking.json) exits 1; do not mark a job that uses it as a required check.

Inputs

Input	Default	Maps to
contract (required)	—	CLI positional (JSON or JSONL)
command	eval	eval / compare / record
candidate-model	—	eval --candidate-model (also fills compare --to if to is empty)
to	—	compare --to (also fills eval --candidate-model if that input is empty)
baseline-model	—	--baseline-model (contract / JSONL override; not a live fetch)
from-model	—	compare --from-model (live baseline; exclusive with from)
from	—	compare --from (recorded baseline replay)
answers	—	--answers (candidate replay for eval/compare; baseline replay for record)
out	—	record --out (required when command is record)
allow-unpinned	false	--allow-unpinned
python-version	3.12	actions/setup-python
jevcheck-version	0.2.2	pip install jevcheck==…
working-directory	—	cd before the CLI; paths are relative to it

candidate-model and to are aliases for the same candidate id. If both are set they must match. from and from-model stay mutually exclusive, same as the CLI.

Live calls

Omit answers (and use from-model instead of from) only when the job has a TypeSafe key:

- uses: sathariels/jevcheck/.github/actions/jevcheck@v0.2.2
  env:
    TYPESAFE_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.TYPESAFE_API_KEY }}
  with:
    contract: contracts/support.json
    command: compare
    from-model: jev-1.13.0
    to: jev-1.14

record is the same: pass answers to copy a snapshot in CI, or set the key and out, then upload the file as an artifact.

Develop

pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest
python -m jevcheck eval fixtures/support-triage.json \
  --candidate-model jev-1.14 \
  --answers fixtures/replay-unchanged.json
python -m jevcheck compare fixtures/support-triage.json \
  --from fixtures/replay-baseline.json \
  --to jev-1.14 \
  --answers fixtures/replay-unchanged.json

Related

jevtriage is an optional PR triage gate (ready / needs_review / risky). This repo’s pr-triage workflow runs it only when the TYPESAFE_API_KEY repository secret is set, so public forks and default CI stay green without the secret.

For agents / audits

v0.2 two-model lock: docs/adr-009-two-model-compare.md.

The v0.1 audit (docs/release-readiness-audit-v0.1.md) and recheck (docs/release-readiness-audit-v0.1-recheck.md) are historical. Each P1/P2 finding in the recheck is resolved in be58041 (v0.2.0).

Release history: CHANGELOG.md. Tag and publish steps: RELEASING.md.

MIT.