Skip to main content

Kirok

English | 日本語

tests License: MIT Python 3.12+ Version 1.4.2

Persistent memory for AI agents, over MCP. Kirok (記録, "record") is a Model Context Protocol server that gives an agent a durable, searchable memory: Retain what matters, Recall it with hybrid semantic + keyword search, and Reflect to distil accumulated memories into reusable insights. A background consolidation loop turns raw memories into higher-level observations on its own.

Why Kirok

Most "agent memory" is either a flat vector store (recall is a bare cosine top-k, no keyword grounding, no forgetting) or a pile of markdown the agent has to re-read every turn. Kirok is a small, self-hostable server that does the retrieval engineering properly:

  • Hybrid retrieval, not just vectors. Semantic KNN and FTS5 BM25 are fused with Reciprocal Rank Fusion, so an exact keyword match and a semantic match reinforce each other instead of competing.
  • A calibrated relevance floor. Naive cosine thresholds don't work on real embedding distributions (see Search quality); Kirok's floor is measured against live data, and there's an evaluation harness to keep it honest.
  • Autonomous consolidation. Memories are periodically synthesised into observations, and destructive LLM decisions are soft-deleted with an audit trail rather than executed blindly.
  • Reliability first. Atomic writes, soft deletes, startup auto-snapshots, and a fail-open background pipeline that never loses a retain.

Not local-first: storage is a local SQLite file you own, but embedding and LLM inference are sent to Google's Gemini API. If everything must stay on-device, Kirok is not for you (yet).

Architecture

flowchart TB
    client["MCP Client<br/>(Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Cursor / …)"]
    subgraph server["Kirok MCP Server (FastMCP)"]
        direction TB
        tools["19 MCP tools<br/>Retain · Recall · Reflect · consolidate · CRUD"]
        pipeline["Hybrid search (RRF) · Smart dedup<br/>Consolidation · Auto-refresh"]
    end
    subgraph storage["Local SQLite (WAL)"]
        direction LR
        fts["FTS5 trigram<br/>(BM25 keyword)"]
        vec["sqlite-vec<br/>(KNN, brute-force fallback)"]
        tables["memories · observations<br/>mental_models · banks · system_events"]
    end
    gemini["Google Gemini API<br/>gemini-embedding-001 (3072-d)<br/>gemini-2.5-flash-lite"]

    client <-->|"stdio (JSON-RPC 2.0)"| tools
    tools --> pipeline
    pipeline <--> storage
    pipeline <-->|embeddings · entity extraction<br/>reflection · consolidation| gemini

Storage is a single SQLite database at ~/.kirok/memory.db. sqlite-vec provides per-bank vector KNN; if the native extension can't load, Kirok falls back to a NumPy brute-force scan with identical results. See docs/architecture.md for the full design.

🚀 Quick start

Requirements: Python 3.12+, uv (for uvx), and a Gemini API key (free tier is plenty).

Kirok ships on PyPI — nothing to clone. Put your key in ~/.kirok/.env (one line: GEMINI_API_KEY=AIza...), then verify the setup:

uvx --from kirok-mcp kirok-doctor   # offline sanity check

Connect an MCP client

Claude Code CLI:

claude mcp add kirok -s user -- uvx kirok-mcp

Claude Desktop — edit claude_desktop_config.json (macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/, Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kirok": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["kirok-mcp"] }
  }
}

Then restart the client. The server reads GEMINI_API_KEY from ~/.kirok/.env; an env block in the client config also works and takes precedence.

From source (development)

git clone https://github.com/TadFuji/kirok-mcp.git
cd kirok-mcp
uv sync                       # installs deps, including sqlite-vec
cp .env.example .env          # then put your key in it: GEMINI_API_KEY=AIza...
uv run kirok-doctor           # offline sanity check of the whole setup

Point your MCP client at the checkout with uv run --directory /absolute/path/to/kirok-mcp kirok-mcp instead of uvx kirok-mcp.

[!TIP] If uv run fails to launch the server (common on Windows or cloud-synced folders — uv run re-syncs on every launch and can hit locked .venv files or an in-use entry-point .exe), invoke the venv's Python directly to skip the sync entirely:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kirok": {
      "command": "/absolute/path/to/kirok-mcp/.venv/bin/python",
      "args": ["-m", "kirok_mcp.server"],
      "env": { "PYTHONPATH": "/absolute/path/to/kirok-mcp/src" }
    }
  }
}

On Windows use .venv\\Scripts\\python.exe and double-backslash paths in JSON.

A bundled agent skill in skills/kirok/ teaches the agent when and how to use the memory tools on its own — point your client at skills/kirok/SKILL.md to enable it.

🛠️ Tools

19 MCP tools. One-line summaries below; full parameter tables in docs/tools-reference.md.

Core

Tool Purpose
KIROK_retain Store a memory: entity/keyword extraction + embedding + smart ADD/UPDATE/NOOP dedup
KIROK_recall Hybrid semantic + keyword search (RRF), observations shown first
KIROK_reflect Synthesise memories into a mental model (insight), optionally auto-refreshing
KIROK_smart_retain Score importance (1–10) first, then retain only if it clears a threshold
KIROK_consolidate Manually run observation consolidation for a bank

Memory management

Tool Purpose
KIROK_get_memory / KIROK_list_memories Fetch one memory / browse a bank with pagination
KIROK_update_memory Edit content or context (re-extracts and re-embeds on content change)
KIROK_forget Delete a single memory (irreversible)

Mental models

Tool Purpose
KIROK_list_mental_models / KIROK_get_mental_model List / inspect insights from Reflect
KIROK_refresh_mental_model Re-analyse against current memories
KIROK_delete_mental_model Delete a mental model (irreversible)

Banks

Tool Purpose
KIROK_list_banks / KIROK_stats List banks with counts / detailed per-bank stats incl. background failures
KIROK_clear_bank Delete a bank's memories + observations (requires confirm=true; previews otherwise)
KIROK_delete_bank Delete a bank entirely (requires confirm=true; previews otherwise)

Config

Tool Purpose
KIROK_set_bank_config / KIROK_get_bank_config Set / view a bank's retain & observation "missions" (what to focus on)

⚙️ Configuration

Everything is set via environment variables (typically in .env). Only GEMINI_API_KEY is required.

Variable Default Description
GEMINI_API_KEY — Required. Google Gemini API key.
KIROK_DB_PATH ~/.kirok/memory.db SQLite database location.
KIROK_DEDUP_THRESHOLD 0.85 Cosine similarity above which retain invokes the LLM dedup (ADD/UPDATE/NOOP) decision.
KIROK_RECALL_MIN_SIMILARITY 0.62 Similarity floor for semantic memory hits in recall. Keyword/FTS hits are exempt.
KIROK_OBS_MIN_SIMILARITY 0.62 Similarity floor for observation hits in recall.
KIROK_CONSOLIDATION_BATCH_SIZE 5 Run auto-consolidation only once this many memories are pending (1 = every retain).
KIROK_CONSOLIDATION_TIMEOUT 120 Consolidation timeout, seconds.
KIROK_REFLECT_TIMEOUT 300 Reflect timeout, seconds.
KIROK_AUTO_SNAPSHOT_HOURS 24 Min hours between startup auto-snapshots (0 disables).
KIROK_SNAPSHOT_KEEP 5 Auto-snapshot generations to keep before rotating out the oldest.

🔍 Search quality

Recall runs semantic KNN and FTS5 BM25 in parallel and fuses them with Reciprocal Rank Fusion (k=60). Short Japanese keyword queries get special handling: 1–2 character kanji/katakana tokens fall below the trigram tokenizer's 3-char window and can never MATCH, so they're rescued by an exact-substring LIKE supplement appended after the BM25 hits (hiragana-only short tokens stay excluded — function words would substring-match half a bank; tokens are OR-joined, matching the MATCH side).

Three details keep the hybrid honest: each source is fetched deeper than the final page (max(limit*3, 30)) so RRF can promote an item ranked just outside the cut in both lists; all FTS text is NFKC-normalized on both the index and query side, so width variants (MCP vs MCP, バグ vs バグ) actually match; and observations get the same hybrid treatment as memories — semantic hits floored, keyword hits floor-exempt — instead of being reachable only through the semantic floor.

The similarity floor is calibrated on real data. A naive cosine threshold doesn't work here: on live gemini-embedding-001 vectors the distribution is narrow — off-topic queries score 0.55–0.62 against unrelated banks while true hits score 0.66–0.73. So the usable floor sits just above the off-topic ceiling, at 0.62. Without it, an unrelated query still returns a full page of memories from any non-empty bank (context pollution); much lower and the floor filters nothing (the old hardcoded 0.4 sat below even off-topic scores). FTS keyword hits bypass the floor entirely — a literal term match is independent evidence, not a weak vector score.

Search parameters aren't tuned by vibes. scripts/search_eval.py runs a golden query set through the exact recall pipeline the server uses (extracted as hybrid_search_memories, so the harness can't drift from production) and reports hit@1/hit@5/hit@k and MRR:

cp scripts/search_eval.example.json my_golden.json   # add 30–50 real cases
uv run python scripts/search_eval.py my_golden.json --limit 10

🛡️ Reliability

  • Atomic consolidation. Every create/update embedding is generated before any DB write; all observation changes plus the "consolidated" mark commit in a single transaction. A failure at any step leaves the database exactly as it was, with the source memories still pending for a later retry — never a half-applied batch.
  • Failures surface, never fake success. A consolidation LLM failure raises and is recorded to system_events — the batch stays pending for a later retry, instead of being silently marked consolidated with nothing produced. Runs are serialized per bank, so two retains landing together cannot double-process the same batch into duplicate observations.
  • Soft deletes with audit trail. An observation the consolidation LLM decides to remove is stamped deprecated_at (excluded from search/list/stats) instead of destroyed, and a dedup UPDATE records the pre-merge content in the same transaction as the merge itself — both logged to system_events so a bad LLM decision is recoverable, not silent data loss.
  • Startup auto-snapshot. On launch, if the newest auto-snapshot is older than KIROK_AUTO_SNAPSHOT_HOURS, a VACUUM INTO + integrity_check snapshot is written under ~/.kirok/backups/, keeping the newest KIROK_SNAPSHOT_KEEP generations. A snapshot that fails partway leaves no broken file behind, and manual backups are never rotated.
  • Concurrency. Connections set PRAGMA busy_timeout=30000, so a second MCP client waits out a busy writer instead of failing with database is locked.
  • Fail-open background work. Auto-consolidation and mental-model refresh run behind retain and can never fail it — errors are swallowed, recorded to system_events, and surfaced via KIROK_stats so silent degradation stays visible.

💾 Backup & restore

All state is one SQLite file. The offline kirok-backup CLI needs no API key:

uv run kirok-backup snapshot        # byte-level DB copy (safe while server runs)
uv run kirok-backup export          # portable JSON of all banks + memories + observations + models
uv run kirok-backup import ~/.kirok/backups/kirok-export-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS.json

snapshot and export write timestamped files under ~/.kirok/backups/ and refuse to overwrite. import runs in one transaction (all-or-nothing), skips existing IDs rather than overwriting, and rebuilds the FTS + vector indexes so search works immediately. Use --db to target a different database file.

🩺 Diagnostics

uv run kirok-doctor            # offline: Python version, .env, key presence (never printed),
                               # required modules, FTS5, sqlite-vec, DB writability
uv run kirok-doctor --json     # machine-readable, for automation
uv run kirok-doctor --online   # adds one live embedding call to verify Gemini connectivity

🧑‍💻 Development

uv sync
uv run --no-sync pytest        # 164 offline tests; no API key or network needed

The suite is fully offline — importing kirok_mcp.server is side-effect-free (the API key is checked at startup, not import) and tests swap in fake Gemini clients. CI runs the same suite on Ubuntu and Windows on every push (.github/workflows/test.yml). See CONTRIBUTING.md before opening a PR.

📚 Documentation

📄 License

MIT — see LICENSE.

Acknowledgements

Metadata

Release files for kirok-mcp 1.4.2

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for kirok-mcp 1.4.2
File Size Uploaded Provenance
kirok_mcp-1.4.2.tar.gz 172.0 kB With provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for kirok-mcp 1.4.2
File Interpreter ABI Platform
kirok_mcp-1.4.2-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 238.1 kB

Release files / kirok_mcp-1.4.2.tar.gz

Download URL kirok_mcp-1.4.2.tar.gz
Size 172.0 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
6f2ddab1531d26de7fbb676639ef4683e90dfe4a97ace5354299662e81920a37
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
f941d47f0317519fe40ae4de936d4b2648231d83aeaa484b269433c91a5f0b11
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 20, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / kirok_mcp-1.4.2-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL kirok_mcp-1.4.2-py3-none-any.whl
Size 66.1 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
b5f8459b1321de1450ab7f10790cd0ee8243817391334ad95d4346549e29612c
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
c125b358eddce11102ad30301d284501f0c66d2080ddbb897460162997733177
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 20, 2026.

Transparency log

Security for kirok-mcp 1.4.2

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

Full provenance

All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.

Select from 2 files

Attestation for kirok_mcp-1.4.2.tar.gz

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 20, 2026.

Transparency log

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page