kombu-pgmq
Kombu transport for PGMQ — use PostgreSQL as the Celery broker, without Redis or RabbitMQ.
Installation
kombu-pgmq ships two Transport classes, each talking to PGMQ a different way. Neither is installed by default — pick the one you need (or both):
pip install kombu-pgmq[pgmq] # TransportPGMQ (default): the official `pgmq` client
pip install kombu-pgmq[psycopg] # TransportPsycopg: raw SQL over psycopg 3
pip install kombu-pgmq[all] # installs both
Both ultimately run on psycopg 3 — kombu-pgmq[pgmq] already installs it too, since the official pgmq client depends on it directly. So psycopg itself isn't the differentiator; the choice is really about the pgmq package (the official client) and its extra dependencies (pgmq itself, orjson, psycopg_pool):
Which one to use:
TransportPGMQ(recommended default) — the official client. Less to think about: it already knows how to pool connections and tracks PGMQ's SQL API upstream. Costs two extra dependencies (pgmq,orjson) and couples you to that library's own API surface and quirks (e.g. it currently emits a deprecation warning onlist_queues()).TransportPsycopg— raw SQL calls overpsycopg3 directly, nopgmq/orjsondependency. Smaller footprint, full visibility/control over the exact SQL executed, no exposure to the official client's own release cycle or behavior changes. Pick this if any of that matters more to you than the convenience of the official client.
kombu-pgmq[all] installs both — useful if you want to pick the backend at runtime (via transport_options) without reinstalling, which is exactly why this project's own test suite uses it.
PostgreSQL setup
kombu-pgmq requires the pgmq extension to be installed in your PostgreSQL database. It does not install or enable the extension automatically — this must be done once by a superuser:
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pgmq;
If the extension is not present when the first connection is made, kombu-pgmq raises a RuntimeError with a clear message. To disable this check (e.g. if the extension is managed externally or your provider blocks pg_extension reads), set:
app.conf.broker_transport_options = {
"check_extension": False,
}
Provider compatibility
The pgmq extension is not bundled with standard PostgreSQL — it must be installed separately, and not all managed providers allow it.
| Provider | PGMQ | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted / Docker | ✅ | Use the ghcr.io/pgmq/pg18-pgmq:v1.10.0 image (this repo's docker-compose.yml) |
| Supabase | ✅ | Available — run CREATE EXTENSION pgmq; once |
| Neon | ✅ | Available — run CREATE EXTENSION pgmq; once |
| Tembo Cloud | ✅ | Available — run CREATE EXTENSION pgmq; or enable via the dashboard |
| AWS RDS | ❌ | Not in the RDS supported extensions list |
| AWS Aurora | ❌ | Same as RDS |
| Google Cloud SQL | ❌ | Not in the Cloud SQL extensions list |
| Azure Database for PostgreSQL | ❌ | Not in the Azure supported extensions |
| DigitalOcean Managed PostgreSQL | ❌ | Not in the managed extension list |
| Aiven | ❌ | Not in the Aiven extension list |
| Render Managed PostgreSQL | ❌ | Custom extensions not supported |
If your provider is not supported, options are: (1) run your own PostgreSQL on a VM/container with the extension installed, or (2) use Supabase or Neon as a compatible managed alternative.
Self-hosted / Docker
The quickest way to get a PGMQ-enabled Postgres running locally is with the pre-built Docker image from Tembo:
docker run -d \
--name pgmq \
-e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=postgres \
-p 5432:5432 \
temboio/pg16-pgmq:latest
Then enable the extension once:
psql postgresql://postgres:postgres@localhost:5432/postgres \
-c "CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pgmq;"
This repo's docker-compose.yml already does both steps — docker compose up -d is enough for local development.
Usage
from celery import Celery
app = Celery(
"myapp",
broker_transport="kombu_pgmq.transport:TransportPGMQ", # or TransportPsycopg
broker_url="postgresql://user:pass@localhost:5432/mydb",
)
app.conf.broker_transport_options = {
"visibility_timeout": 60, # seconds, default 30
"pool": True, # see "Connection pooling" below, default varies per transport
}
kombu_pgmq.transport:Transport is also exported as an alias for TransportPGMQ, and the pgmq:// broker URL scheme (registered on import kombu_pgmq) always resolves to TransportPGMQ too — use broker_transport explicitly to pick TransportPsycopg.
Fanout, topic exchanges, and remote control
Both transports support direct, topic and fanout exchanges, backed by a small bindings table (kombu_pgmq_bindings, created automatically on first use) instead of Kombu's default in-memory-only bindings — which is what actually makes this work across separate worker processes, not just within one. celery inspect/celery control (pidbox) and celery events both ride on top of this (they're plain fanout/topic exchanges under the hood) and need no special configuration.
Two things worth knowing:
- PGMQ caps queue names at 47 characters. Celery generates longer auto-named queues for things like pidbox replies (
<uuid>.reply.celery.pidbox);kombu-pgmqshortens any queue name over the limit deterministically (same input always maps to the same shortened PGMQ queue) before it reaches PGMQ — transparent, nothing to configure. - Unbinding a queue from an exchange without deleting the queue itself (
queue_unbind) isn't reliable against a persisted bindings table — the same limitation exists in Kombu's own Redis transport. In practice this doesn't come up: pidbox/events/normal usage always bind once and later drop the whole queue, never unbind-in-place.
Connection pooling
Each transport can either check out a connection from a psycopg_pool.ConnectionPool on every call, or hold a single connection open and reuse it. Set it explicitly via transport_options["pool"] (True/False) — both transports default to pool=True.
Single-threaded access (pytest tests/test_performance.py -m perf -s, one Channel, sequential calls) consistently showed no pooling being faster for both transports — checking a connection in/out of the pool costs more than it saves when nothing else is contending for connections:
| send | read+ack | |
|---|---|---|
| psycopg, no pool | ~1700 msg/s | ~600–680 msg/s |
| psycopg, pool | ~860–1080 msg/s | ~700–880 msg/s |
| pgmq client, no pool | ~1400–2450 msg/s | ~750 msg/s |
| pgmq client, pool | ~930–980 msg/s | ~505–510 msg/s |
tests/test_performance.py measures both the raw Channel primitives (test_channel_primitives_throughput, skipping Kombu's Producer/Consumer/QoS layer) and the actual Kombu Channel (test_channel_throughput, i.e. Producer.publish / basic_get / ack) — the numbers above are consistent across both, meaning Kombu itself adds negligible overhead on top of the PGMQ calls.
Concurrent access tells a different story. tests/test_performance_concurrency.py shares one Channel across N threads sending concurrently (pytest tests/test_performance_concurrency.py -m perf -s) — with pool=False every thread fights over the same underlying connection (psycopg serializes concurrent use of one connection internally, so it's safe, just increasingly congested); with pool=True each thread can get its own connection, up to the pool's max size:
| threads | psycopg, no pool | psycopg, pool | pgmq, no pool | pgmq, pool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1166 msg/s | 582 msg/s | 1661 msg/s | 991 msg/s |
| 2 | 1090 msg/s | 1506 msg/s | 1613 msg/s | 1755 msg/s |
| 4 | 1074 msg/s | 2561 msg/s | 1788 msg/s | 2443 msg/s |
| 8 | 1665 msg/s | 2547 msg/s | 2079 msg/s | 2542 msg/s |
| 16 | 1390 msg/s | 2439 msg/s | 2445 msg/s | 3044 msg/s |
Across repeated runs, pooling starts winning consistently once ~4 threads share the same Channel — below that, a single connection is still faster (or roughly tied); the more threads pile on beyond that, the bigger the pool's advantage, since a single shared connection caps out while the pool can actually parallelize across its connections.
So: the pool=True default is the safer choice if you don't know how many threads will share a Channel. If you're certain a Channel is only ever used by one thread at a time (the common case — one Celery worker process/thread per connection), set pool=False for the small sequential-throughput edge shown in the table above.
How does it compare to Redis / RabbitMQ?
tests/test_performance_brokers.py runs the exact same send / read+ack loop (Producer.publish / Queue.get / ack, N=200, sequential, single connection) against Redis and RabbitMQ using Kombu's own built-in transports, so the numbers are directly comparable to the ones above:
| broker | send | read+ack |
|---|---|---|
| kombu-pgmq (pgmq client) | ~700–1000 msg/s | ~400–450 msg/s |
| kombu-pgmq (psycopg) | ~1000–1030 msg/s | ~470–495 msg/s |
| Redis | ~2500–3000 msg/s | ~840–910 msg/s |
| RabbitMQ | ~19000 msg/s | ~2750–2800 msg/s |
RabbitMQ and Redis are purpose-built message brokers (persistent connection, purpose-built wire protocol, in-memory or Erlang-native queue engine) — they're 3–20x faster here, and that's expected. PGMQ's pitch was never raw throughput: it's "no extra infra, your queue lives in the same Postgres you already run and backup, with real transactional guarantees (a task enqueue can commit atomically with the business-logic row that triggered it)". If you need RabbitMQ/Redis-level throughput, use RabbitMQ/Redis; if you want one less moving part in your stack and PGMQ's throughput is enough for your workload, that's what kombu-pgmq is for.
Run it yourself: docker compose up -d (also starts redis and rabbitmq, only needed for this file) then pytest tests/test_performance_brokers.py -m perf -s.
Development
Start a local PostgreSQL instance with the PGMQ extension pre-installed:
docker compose up -d
This exposes Postgres on localhost:5432 (user postgres, password postgres, db postgres) with the pgmq extension already created.
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file kombu_pgmq-0.2.0.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: kombu_pgmq-0.2.0.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 134.2 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via:
uv/0.12.10 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.12.10","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Ubuntu","version":"24.04","id":"noble","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
0be62221ca6a998dc007ff9b400c86b7ed10bd62c96a8be9f9192ba1e96f4be7
|
|
| MD5 |
eebf6bcc9ac2c12afaea0ae0beedda17
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
abb2ab1383203def125a8b31d781fed1548cee6c13bc207ab14317ff61b6e67c
|
File details
Details for the file kombu_pgmq-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: kombu_pgmq-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 10.6 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via:
uv/0.12.10 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.12.10","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Ubuntu","version":"24.04","id":"noble","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
0385002c6b353fcfc34eb2e6681ee930eb216ed22fd66417e69ee4b940d6e181
|
|
| MD5 |
0eab6f36ade005a11970e975d417c9c8
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
89d25ee288558063b869507cb0529ea0d6750953257468aef422af66b87a8fa2
|