🧬 Overview
kreview is a production-grade, notebook-first (nbdev) evaluation engine designed for high-throughput cancer liquid biopsy fragmentomics feature analysis. Developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSKCC), it processes cohorts containing tens of thousands of samples using an embedded DuckDB query engine with chunked I/O and automatic retry logic.
🚀 Features
- 6-Tier ctDNA Taxonomy: MSK-IMPACT paired-inference to label
True ctDNA+,Possible ctDNA+,Possible ctDNA−,Healthy Normal,Insufficient Data, andUndetermined. Four are modelled (two positive, two negative);UndeterminedandInsufficient Dataare excluded. Optional CH hotspot demotion via--ch-hotspot-mafsends CH-only samples toUndetermined. - DuckDB Query Engine: In-memory
read_parquetbindings with chunked I/O and exponential backoff retry for cohort-scale feature loading. - Multi-Model Evaluation: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost (CPU) plus TabPFN and TabICL (GPU) with Stratified K-Fold CV, SHAP explainability, and subgroup analysis.
- Nested CV Feature Ablation: Automated feature group subset selection via inner-loop cross-validation, eliminating non-informative feature groups before final evaluation. Uses
sensitivity_at_100spec_healthyas the optimization metric. - Feature Selection: mRMR (Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance) as default strategy — iteratively selects features maximizing target relevance while minimizing inter-feature redundancy. Legacy
hybrid_union(AUC ∪ MI) also available. - Multimodal Stacking: Cross-evaluator fusion via super-matrix with GrootCV selection by default since #96 — cross-validated LightGBM/SHAP importances tested against shadow features — followed by stacking ensemble + leave-one-evaluator-out ablation. Mutual Information remains available; Boruta-SHAP is a legacy extra that cannot be installed alongside arfs.
- Single-Page Report: one self-contained, plotly-interactive HTML built from the run's aggregates, across five tabs — cohort composition with the pre-registered primary endpoint and its patient-clustered interval, a verification-bias ladder showing how much the headline moves with the choice of negatives, a sortable evaluator scoreboard with deep-dive modals (ROC/PR, calibration, decision curves, subgroup AUCs with tier composition, feature-group ablation stability), multimodal stacking, run diagnostics with the pipeline DAG and this run's task counts, and a methods tab. No Quarto, no render-time SHAP, PHI-free by construction.
- Nextflow HPC Integration: Decomposed multistage DAG for SLURM-based HPC execution with per-evaluator parallelism, GPU scheduling, and automatic retry logic.
- 26 Built-In Evaluators: Modular extractors covering fragment sizes (FSC, FSD, FSR), nucleosome protection (WPS, TFBS), cleavage motifs (EndMotif, BreakPointMotif), chromatin accessibility (ATAC), motif divergence (MDS), and orientation (OCF).
🏗️ Pipeline Architecture
graph LR
A[Label] --> B["Extract ×N"]
B --> C[Select]
C --> D["Ablate (opt)"]
D --> E["Eval CPU"]
D --> F["Eval GPU"]
C --> E
C --> F
C --> G[Fuse]
E --> H[Scoreboard]
F --> H
E --> I["Eval Multimodal"]
F --> I
G --> I
H --> J[Report]
I --> K["Report Multimodal"]
The pipeline runs as a Nextflow multistage DAG — one implementation, scattered
per-evaluator. Use -profile docker locally and -profile iris/slurm on HPC.
Supported Nextflow: v25–v26.
⚙️ Quick Start
Installation
Option 1: Docker (Recommended "Batteries-Included" Method)
The easiest way to run kreview without managing external dependencies is to use our pre-built Docker containers (hosted on GHCR). They ship with Python 3.12 and all ML libraries:
# CPU image (~1.5 GB) — for all standard pipeline processes
docker pull ghcr.io/msk-access/kreview:latest
# GPU image (~8-10 GB) — adds PyTorch, TabPFN, TabICL (requires NVIDIA drivers)
docker pull ghcr.io/msk-access/kreview:latest-gpu
# The images are driven by Nextflow, one container per pipeline stage:
nextflow run /path/to/kreview/nextflow/main.nf -profile docker --outdir results/ ...
# Individual stages can also be invoked directly for debugging:
docker run -v /your/data:/data ghcr.io/msk-access/kreview:latest \
label --cancer-samplesheet /data/cancer.csv ...
Option 2: Local Install (Pip)
git clone https://github.com/msk-access/kreview.git
cd kreview
pip install -e . # CPU models only
pip install -e ".[all]" # + arfs feature selection, docs, dev, test (CPU)
pip install -e ".[gpu]" # + TabPFN, TabICL (requires CUDA)
Running the Pipeline
Local (single machine, Docker)
nextflow run /path/to/kreview/nextflow/main.nf \
--cancer_samplesheet "/path/to/cancer/samplesheet.csv" \
--healthy_xs1_samplesheet "/path/to/healthy/xs1/samplesheet.csv" \
--healthy_xs2_samplesheet "/path/to/healthy/xs2/samplesheet.csv" \
--cbioportal_dir "/path/to/cBioPortal_MAF_CNA_SV/" \
--krewlyzer_dir "/path/to/unified_krewlyzer_results" \
--outdir output/ \
--strategy mrmr \
--top_percentile 10 \
--ch_hotspot_maf "/path/to/ch_hotspots.maf" \
-profile docker
Individual stages are also available as subcommands (kreview label, extract, select,
eval cpu|gpu, fuse, report) for debugging a single step outside the DAG.
HPC (Nextflow + SLURM)
nextflow run /path/to/kreview/nextflow/main.nf \
--cancer_samplesheet /path/to/cancer.csv \
--healthy_xs1_samplesheet /path/to/healthy_xs1.csv \
--healthy_xs2_samplesheet /path/to/healthy_xs2.csv \
--cbioportal_dir /path/to/cbioportal/ \
--krewlyzer_dir /path/to/manifest.txt \
--outdir /path/to/output/ \
--run_gpu_eval true \
--gpu_models "tabpfn,tabicl" \
--run_ablation true \
--run_multimodal_eval true \
-profile iris
Dashboard Access
Once finished, open the single-page report:
open output/reports/kreview_report.html
🧪 Feature Selection
| Strategy | Scope | Method | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
mrmr |
Single-evaluator | F-statistic relevance + Pearson redundancy penalty | ✅ |
hybrid_union |
Single-evaluator | Top-X% AUC ∪ Top-X% MI | Legacy |
| Nested CV ablation | Single-evaluator | Inner CV on feature group subsets → best subset per model | Optional (--run-ablation) |
mi |
Multimodal | Mutual Information top-K ranking | Fast exploration |
grootcv |
Multimodal | Cross-validated LightGBM/SHAP vs shadow variables (arfs) — most stable selection measured (#96) | ✅ Default |
leshy |
Multimodal | Boruta evolution with LightGBM/SHAP (arfs) | Optional |
boruta_shap |
Multimodal | SHAP importance vs shadow variables (50 XGBoost trials) | Deprecated (#96, [legacy-boruta] extra) |
See Statistical Evaluation for full documentation.
📓 nbdev Architecture
This project operates as an nbdev repo. Do not edit .py scripts manually in kreview/. Build natively inside Jupyter notebooks within nbs/ and trigger:
nbdev-export && black kreview/ # note: `python3 -m nbdev.export` is a silent no-op
📚 Resources
- Documentation — Full user and developer guide
- Contributing — How to contribute
- Changelog — Version history
Metadata
Release files for kreview 0.0.33
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| kreview-0.0.33.tar.gz | 244.4 kB | With provenance | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| kreview-0.0.33-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 451.0 kB
Release files / kreview-0.0.33.tar.gz
| Download URL | kreview-0.0.33.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 244.4 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
005ab3ba738fcf2a88499c6a568785906a2624ba1c7fd46d7acd9bb14e5eb6a1
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
90c7e2a521104ba2470a0136149db2a2df6e1441ffdf51cf1a37f937aa7ce5c8
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Aug 25, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / kreview-0.0.33-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | kreview-0.0.33-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 206.6 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
d467571520c7703337278c0745107fe45f5dd0e9906d4d1ee8c59a02198f3188
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
63458fd51e5be65452a3ecac3d4aae5161c964e2c8ea4e88ffa10593eca0c057
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Aug 25, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for kreview 0.0.33
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for kreview-0.0.33.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Aug 25, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.