layoutlens 1.4.0

AI-powered UI testing framework with natural language visual validation

LayoutLens: AI-Powered Visual UI Testing

The Problem

Traditional UI testing is painful:

• Brittle selectors break with every design change
• Pixel-perfect comparisons fail on minor, acceptable variations
• Writing test assertions requires deep technical knowledge
• Cross-browser testing multiplies complexity
• Generic analysis lacks domain expertise - accessibility, conversion optimization, mobile UX
• Accessibility checks need specialized tools and expertise

The Solution

LayoutLens lets you test UIs the way humans see them - using natural language and domain expert knowledge:

# Basic analysis
result = await lens.analyze("https://example.com", "Is the navigation user-friendly?")

# Expert-powered analysis
result = await lens.audit_accessibility("https://example.com", compliance_level="AA")
# Returns: "WCAG AA compliant with 4.7:1 contrast ratio. Focus indicators visible..."

Instead of writing complex selectors and assertions, just ask questions like:

• "Is this page mobile-friendly?"
• "Are all buttons accessible?"
• "Does the layout look professional?"

Get expert-level insights from built-in domain knowledge in accessibility, conversion optimization, mobile UX, and more.

✅ 95.2% accuracy on real-world UI testing benchmarks

Quick Start

Installation

pip install layoutlens
playwright install chromium  # For screenshot capture

Basic Usage

from layoutlens import LayoutLens

# Initialize (uses OPENAI_API_KEY env var)
lens = LayoutLens()

# Test any website or local HTML
result = await lens.analyze("https://your-site.com", "Is the header properly aligned?")
print(f"Answer: {result.answer}")
print(f"Confidence: {result.confidence:.1%}")

That's it! No selectors, no complex setup, just natural language questions.

Key Functions

1. Analyze Pages

Test single pages with custom questions:

# Test local HTML files
result = await lens.analyze("checkout.html", "Is the payment form user-friendly?")

# Test with expert context
from layoutlens.prompts import Instructions, UserContext

instructions = Instructions(
    expert_persona="conversion_expert",
    user_context=UserContext(
        business_goals=["reduce_cart_abandonment"],
        target_audience="mobile_shoppers"
    )
)

result = await lens.analyze(
    "checkout.html",
    "How can we optimize this checkout flow?",
    instructions=instructions
)

2. Compare Layouts

Perfect for A/B testing and redesign validation:

result = await lens.compare(
    ["old-design.html", "new-design.html"],
    "Which design is more accessible?"
)
print(f"Winner: {result.answer}")

3. Expert-Powered Analysis

Domain expert knowledge with one line of code:

# Professional accessibility audit (WCAG expert)
result = await lens.audit_accessibility("product-page.html", compliance_level="AA")

# Conversion rate optimization (CRO expert)
result = await lens.optimize_conversions("landing.html",
    business_goals=["increase_signups"], industry="saas")

# Mobile UX analysis (Mobile expert)
result = await lens.analyze_mobile_ux("app.html", performance_focus=True)

# E-commerce audit (Retail expert)
result = await lens.audit_ecommerce("checkout.html", page_type="checkout")

# Legacy methods still work
result = await lens.check_accessibility("product-page.html")  # Backward compatible

4. Batch Testing

Test multiple pages efficiently:

results = await lens.analyze(
    sources=["home.html", "about.html", "contact.html"],
    queries=["Is it accessible?", "Is it mobile-friendly?"]
)
# Processes 6 tests in parallel

5. High-Performance Async (3-5x faster)

# Async for maximum throughput
result = await lens.analyze(
    sources=["page1.html", "page2.html", "page3.html"],
    queries=["Is it accessible?"],
    max_concurrent=5
)

6. Structured JSON Output

All results provide clean, typed JSON for automation:

result = await lens.analyze("page.html", "Is it accessible?")

# Export to clean JSON
json_data = result.to_json()  # Returns typed JSON string
print(json_data)
# {
#   "source": "page.html",
#   "query": "Is it accessible?",
#   "answer": "Yes, the page follows accessibility standards...",
#   "confidence": 0.85,
#   "reasoning": "The page has proper heading structure...",
#   "screenshot_path": "/path/to/screenshot.png",
#   "viewport": "desktop",
#   "timestamp": "2024-01-15 10:30:00",
#   "execution_time": 2.3,
#   "metadata": {}
# }

# Type-safe structured access
from layoutlens.types import AnalysisResultJSON
import json
data: AnalysisResultJSON = json.loads(result.to_json())
confidence = data["confidence"]  # Fully typed: float

7. Domain Experts & Rich Context

Choose from 6 built-in domain experts with specialized knowledge:

# Available experts: accessibility_expert, conversion_expert, mobile_expert,
# ecommerce_expert, healthcare_expert, finance_expert

# Use any expert with custom analysis
result = await lens.analyze_with_expert(
    source="healthcare-portal.html",
    query="How can we improve patient experience?",
    expert_persona="healthcare_expert",
    focus_areas=["patient_privacy", "health_literacy"],
    user_context={
        "target_audience": "elderly_patients",
        "accessibility_needs": ["large_text", "simple_navigation"],
        "industry": "healthcare"
    }
)

# Expert comparison analysis
result = await lens.compare_with_expert(
    sources=["old-design.html", "new-design.html"],
    query="Which design converts better?",
    expert_persona="conversion_expert",
    focus_areas=["cta_prominence", "trust_signals"]
)

CLI Usage

# Analyze a single page
layoutlens https://example.com "Is this accessible?"

# Analyze local files
layoutlens page.html "Is the design professional?"

# Compare two designs
layoutlens page1.html page2.html --compare

# Analyze with different viewport
layoutlens site.com "Is it mobile-friendly?" --viewport mobile

# JSON output for automation
layoutlens page.html "Is it accessible?" --output json

CI/CD Integration

GitHub Actions

- name: Visual UI Test
  run: |
    pip install layoutlens
    playwright install chromium
    layoutlens ${{ env.PREVIEW_URL }} "Is it accessible and mobile-friendly?"

Python Testing

import pytest
from layoutlens import LayoutLens

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_homepage_quality():
    lens = LayoutLens()
    result = await lens.analyze("homepage.html", "Is this production-ready?")
    assert result.confidence > 0.8
    assert "yes" in result.answer.lower()

Benchmark & Evaluation Workflow

LayoutLens includes a comprehensive benchmarking system to validate AI performance:

1. Generate Benchmark Results

# Run LayoutLens against test data
python benchmarks/run_benchmark.py --api-key sk-your-key

# With custom settings
python benchmarks/run_benchmark.py \
  --api-key sk-your-key \
  --output benchmarks/my_results \
  --no-batch \
  --filename custom_results.json

2. Evaluate Performance

# Evaluate results against ground truth
python benchmarks/evaluation/evaluator.py \
  --answer-keys benchmarks/answer_keys \
  --results benchmarks/layoutlens_output \
  --output evaluation_report.json

3. Structured Benchmark Results

The benchmark runner outputs clean JSON for analysis:

# Example benchmark result structure
{
  "benchmark_info": {
    "total_tests": 150,
    "successful_tests": 143,
    "failed_tests": 7,
    "success_rate": 0.953,
    "batch_processing_used": true,
    "model_used": "gpt-4o-mini"
  },
  "results": [
    {
      "html_file": "good_contrast.html",
      "query": "Is this page accessible?",
      "answer": "Yes, the page has good color contrast...",
      "confidence": 0.89,
      "reasoning": "WCAG guidelines are followed...",
      "success": true,
      "error": null,
      "metadata": {"category": "accessibility"}
    }
  ]
}

4. Custom Benchmarks

Create your own test data and answer keys:

# Use the async API for custom benchmark workflows
from layoutlens import LayoutLens

async def run_custom_benchmark():
    lens = LayoutLens()

    test_cases = [
        {"source": "page1.html", "query": "Is it accessible?"},
        {"source": "page2.html", "query": "Is it mobile-friendly?"}
    ]

    results = []
    for case in test_cases:
        result = await lens.analyze(case["source"], case["query"])
        results.append({
            "test": case,
            "result": result.to_json(),  # Clean JSON output
            "passed": result.confidence > 0.7
        })

    return results

Configuration

Simple configuration options:

# Via environment
export OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-..."

# Via code
lens = LayoutLens(
    api_key="sk-...",
    model="gpt-4o-mini",  # or "gpt-4o" for higher accuracy
    cache_enabled=True,   # Reduce API costs
    cache_type="memory",  # "memory" or "file"
)

Resources

• 📖 Full Documentation - Comprehensive guides and API reference
• 🎯 Examples - Real-world usage patterns
• 🐛 Issues - Report bugs or request features
• 💬 Discussions - Get help and share ideas

Why LayoutLens?

• Natural Language - Write tests like you'd describe the UI to a colleague
• Domain Expert Knowledge - Built-in expertise in accessibility, CRO, mobile UX, and more
• Rich Context Support - Business goals, user personas, compliance standards, and technical constraints
• Zero Selectors - No more fragile XPath or CSS selectors
• Visual Understanding - AI sees what users see, not just code
• Async-by-Default - Concurrent processing for optimal performance
• Simple API - One analyze method handles single pages, batches, and comparisons
• Structured JSON Output - TypedDict schemas for full type safety in automation
• Comprehensive Benchmarking - Built-in evaluation system with 95.2% accuracy
• Production Ready - Used by teams for real-world applications

---

Making UI testing as simple as asking "Does this look right?"