license-radar

Scan a project's dependency manifests (requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, setup.cfg, Pipfile, package.json) for license compliance risk before a GPL/AGPL dependency turns into a legal problem for a closed-source product.

Why

Pulling in a GPL- or AGPL-licensed dependency can obligate a company to open its own source, or expose it to a lawsuit — and it usually happens by accident, several dependency layers deep. Existing SCA/security scanners focus on vulnerabilities; license risk is often an afterthought bolted onto an expensive enterprise product. This is a small, focused tool that does just the license check, fast, in CI.

Install

pip install license-radar

Usage

license-radar scan .                 # scan a directory tree (recurses into subprojects)
license-radar scan requirements.txt   # scan a single manifest
license-radar scan . --online         # also query PyPI/npm for packages not in the local DB
license-radar scan . --json           # machine-readable output for CI
license-radar scan . --policy policy.json

Directory scans recurse into subdirectories, so monorepos with manifests in nested subprojects (e.g. services/api/requirements.txt, frontend/package.json) are covered in a single run. Vendored and environment directories (node_modules, .venv, vendor, dist, VCS/cache dirs, …) are skipped so the scan reflects what the project itself declares, not the manifests bundled inside its dependencies.

Within each manifest, every section that declares the project's own dependencies is scanned — not just the primary one. For pyproject.toml that includes PEP 621 [project.optional-dependencies] extras and Poetry [tool.poetry.group.*.dependencies] groups; for legacy setup.cfg it includes [options] install_requires and [options.extras_require]; for Pipenv Pipfile it includes [packages] and [dev-packages]; for package.json it includes optionalDependencies and peerDependencies. A copyleft dependency hidden in a test/docs extra or an optional group is exactly the kind of accidental exposure this tool exists to catch.

Requirements files that pull in other files with pip's -r other.txt / --requirement other.txt directive are followed (resolved relative to the including file, with cycle guarding), so a dependency declared only in an included file — e.g. a thin requirements.txt that does -r prod.txt — is scanned too. -c/--constraint files only pin versions of already-required packages, so they are not followed.

Exit code is 1 if any dependency violates the policy (useful as a CI gate), 0 otherwise.

pre-commit

This repo is a pre-commit hook source. Add to a project's .pre-commit-config.yaml:

repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/Hiro-012/claude-
    rev: <commit SHA of a published license-radar version>
    hooks:
      - id: license-radar

(This repo doesn't tag releases yet — pin a commit SHA from the history of pyproject.toml version bumps until versioned tags are published.)

The hook runs on any commit that touches requirements*.txt, pyproject.toml, setup.cfg, Pipfile, or package.json, and blocks the commit if a new dependency violates policy.

Policy

By default, any strong-copyleft (GPL/AGPL/SSPL) or unknown license is a violation. Override with a JSON file:

{
  "fail_at_or_above": "weak-copyleft",
  "treat_unknown_as_violation": false
}

How it classifies

Licenses are normalized to an SPDX id and bucketed into four tiers: permissive < weak-copyleft < strong-copyleft < unknown. See license_radar/classify.py for the exact lists.

Limitations

The offline database (license_radar/license_db.py) is a hand-curated table of ~220 common PyPI/npm packages (each entry verified against the live registry JSON API), not a registry mirror — use --online for full coverage against live PyPI/npm metadata (adds a network dependency and is not covered by the deterministic test suite).

Because the offline table is keyed by package name only, a package whose license changed across its version history cannot be pinned to a single correct value. Such packages are deliberately left out of the table and reported as unknown (flagged for review) rather than guessed — for example chardet, which is LGPL-2.1-or-later up to 5.2.0 but relicensed to 0BSD in its 6.x/7.x line. Use --online with a pinned version, or check the specific version you depend on, when a dependency is reported this way.

To keep the offline table honest as upstream licenses change, every real entry is reconciled against the live PyPI/npm registries by scripts/audit_db.py, which compares each package's stored risk tier with the registry's current declared license and reports any drift. It runs on a schedule and on any change to the database in CI (.github/workflows/audit-license-db.yml); the chardet relicensing above is the kind of drift it exists to catch. The classifier recognizes registries' free-text and compound license strings where they are tier-unambiguous (Apache License 2.0, 3-Clause BSD License, LGPL-2.1, CC0-1.0, MIT-CMU, and AND/OR expressions); entries the registry still leaves genuinely ambiguous or unlabeled are reported as UNVERIFIABLE and left for human review rather than guessed. A recent live run reconciled 219 entries as 214 OK / 0 drift / 5 unverifiable.

License

MIT

Support

license-radar is built and maintained independently under the HiroCheck name. It's free under the MIT license, its default scan runs entirely on your machine, it sends no telemetry, and no paid tier gates the core check.

If it caught a license problem for you — or you'd just like to see the offline database and manifest coverage keep growing — a one-off contribution funds the time that goes into it:

→ https://buy.stripe.com/bJeeVe2te0U16Ln1yudMI00

Not in a position to chip in? Starring the repo, or opening an issue when the database gets a package's license wrong, helps just as much and costs nothing.