lintsmith

Generate lean, pinned Super-Linter images that contain only the linters a repository uses, to cut the cold pull-and-unpack time in CI.

Formerly superlint-lean. The old PyPI package and repository URL keep working, but new releases are published as lintsmith.

Status: working, early. On GitHub-hosted runners a lean image pulls 5x to 8x faster than upstream slim:

Cold pull, median of 3, upstream v9.0.0. All profiles, the method and the caveats are in docs/benchmarks.

Idea

1. A repository declares the linters it needs, or they are discovered from the VALIDATE_* flags in its Super-Linter workflow.
2. A compiler builds an overlay image: same Python/Alpine base as upstream, plus only the needed tool paths copied from the upstream release image.
3. A PR check fails when a change adds file types the current image does not cover.
4. A scheduled job rebuilds when upstream publishes a new release.
5. The workflows are distributed through the ghwm registry; see Run the lean image with the ghwm registry workflows.

Install

The CLI is a Python package, managed with uv:

uv tool install lintsmith    # or: pipx install lintsmith
uvx lintsmith --help         # run without installing

The latest unreleased code is available with uvx --from git+https://github.com/ghwfxlab/lintsmith lintsmith --help.

Commands:

Layout

Development

make install          # uv sync
make setup-precommit  # pre-commit hooks (super-linter and the tests)
make test             # pytest with coverage
make lint             # ruff
make type-check       # mypy
make lang             # textlint for the docs
make super-linter     # super-linter via Docker
make build            # sdist and wheel

See CONTRIBUTING.md for the workflow, AGENTS.md for the guide used by coding agents, docs/ARCHITECTURE.md and docs/reference/cli.md for the internals and the command reference, docs/verifying-images.md to check a pulled image, and docs/repository-settings.md for the repository settings. Report vulnerabilities as described in SECURITY.md.

Configuration

Nothing is fixed. The base and the toolchains are plain env files with VALIDATE_*=true lines, and the generator takes any combination of them:

• leave the base out, or write your own
• stack several toolchains (--env toolchains/python.env --env toolchains/rust.env)
• drop single linters from a combination with --exclude NATURAL_LANGUAGE
• add tools Super-Linter does not ship: Alpine packages (--extra-apk), npm packages (--extra-npm) and pip packages (--extra-pip), plus --extra-check commands that must succeed in the built image. They can also be written in an env file (EXTRA_APK=, EXTRA_NPM=, EXTRA_PIP=, EXTRA_CHECK=), see examples/with-extras.env. Extras are installed at build time from the package registries, in their own layers (/opt/extras), and npm installs run with --ignore-scripts

The toolchains in this repository, and the numbers in docs/benchmarks, are examples of combinations, not the supported set.

The reason for an opinionated base is that a repository using one linter has no use for Super-Linter. The value is in running a broad set of checks, so the base is broad and each toolchain adds a stack on top.

Block pull requests that outgrow the image

The image only contains the linters you enabled. If a pull request adds a file type whose linters are not enabled (a .rs file when no Rust linter is on), Super-Linter would silently skip it. The drift blocker fails that pull request and says which linter to enable:

jobs:
  drift:
    permissions:
      contents: read
    uses: ghwfxlab/lintsmith/.github/workflows/drift-blocker.yml@main
    with:
      workflow: .github/workflows/super-linter.yaml   # the workflow with the super-linter step
      allow_ext: "txt lock"                    # file types you deliberately do not lint

The configuration is read from the env: of the Super-Linter step, with the upstream rules: if any VALIDATE_X is true, only those linters run; if only false values are set, everything else runs. FILTER_REGEX_INCLUDE and FILTER_REGEX_EXCLUDE are respected. The same discovery works in the compiler: lintsmith generate --workflow .github/workflows/super-linter.yaml .... Content-based detections (OpenAPI, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, ARM, AWS States, Ansible) are not modelled, so a YAML file of those kinds is only checked as plain YAML.

Try it locally

lintsmith generate --env base/opinionated.env --env toolchains/python.env \
  --upstream-tag v9.0.0 --upstream-dockerfile <upstream Dockerfile at that tag> --out build/python
docker buildx build build/python -t lean-python
docker run --rm -v "$PWD/build/python/checks.sh:/checks.sh:ro" --entrypoint bash lean-python /checks.sh

Profiles marked as needing the upstream standard image (dotnet, rust) are compared against standard, not slim. Upstream has no Svelte-specific linter, so the Svelte profile covers the JS, TS, CSS and HTML around it.

Limitations

• Only linters in the mapping (src/lintsmith/data/linters.json, 95 flags for upstream v9.0.0) can be selected. An unknown flag stops generate with a message, and new upstream linters start as drafts that need a review (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
• The generator reads upstream's published image and Dockerfile. A release that moves tools around can break the mapping; upstream-sync reports it before the pin moves.
• The image is rebuilt after a change reaches main. A pull request that changes the enabled linters is still linted with the previous image, and the drift check only catches file types that no enabled linter covers.
• The saving comes from leaving linters out. With every mapped linter enabled the image is only about 11% smaller than upstream standard.
• A runner that already holds the upstream image gains nothing: the pull is a no-op either way.
• Pulling a private image needs credentials: packages: read for GHCR in the same organization, otherwise a registry login.
• Only linux/amd64 is tested. Images are not signed yet.
• zstd layers are published and pull 0% to 15% faster than gzip; that is small next to leaving linters out.

Licence

This repository is MIT licensed (see LICENSE). It contains no third-party linters. A generated image is built by copying files out of the published Super-Linter image, so it contains Super-Linter (MIT) and the linters you select, each under its own licence. If you publish such an image you redistribute those tools and must follow their licences; check them for the linters you pick. The smoke test reads Super-Linter's test fixtures at build time and does not copy them into this repository or into an image.