logsite
Find the line of code behind every production error, noisy log line and failing test.
logsite reads your code and the logs you already have (Loki, OpenSearch / Elasticsearch, CloudWatch or a file), maps every log line back to the code that wrote it, and turns thousands of stack traces into a few causes, each pointing at your line of code. It remembers every error, so a regression comes with the fix that worked last time, and it gives AI coding assistants the same production context. No SDK, no agent in your services. Python, Java and Go.
Thousands of stack traces, a few causes
logsite errors groups production errors by cause (the exception chain and the frames in
your code). IDs, timestamps and framework frames don't split a group; new and spiking come first.
820 errors in the last 24h · 3 group(s) · 3 new · before: 0
# TREND COUNT ERROR RAISED AT LOGGED AT
1 new 400 IllegalStateException: Shipping label reque… CarrierApiClient.java:58 —
2 new 400 Record processing failed topic=shipment-eve… — ShipmentEventListener.java:91
3 new 20 Consumer lag increasing group=shipment-proc… — ShipmentEventListener.java:96
━━ 1. IllegalStateException: Shipping label request failed ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 400 new
Root cause SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out (java.net)
Chain ListenerExecutionFailedException › IllegalStateException › ResourceAccessException › SocketTimeoutException
Raised at src/main/java/com/example/shipping/CarrierApiClient.java:58 requestLabel()
58 │ return restTemplate.postForObject(carrierUrl + "/labels", request, LabelResponse.class);
Call path ShipmentEventListener.consume › ShipmentProcessor.process › CarrierService.createLabel › CarrierApiClient.requestLabel › java.net
Example logsite trace tr-6e6948
The incident, and what changed before it
logsite investigate links the groups that belong together and finds the deploy and the
commit behind them:
━━ Incident 1 · since 19:22 UTC (60 min) · 820 errors · 3 group(s) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ new
Cause IllegalStateException: Shipping label request failed (400)
Root cause SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out (java.net)
Raised at src/main/java/com/example/shipping/CarrierApiClient.java:58
Then 19:22 Record processing failed topic=shipment-events … (400) new started together
19:22 Consumer lag increasing group=shipment-processor … (20) new started together
Deploy v1.4 at 2026-10-17 19:18 UTC, 4 min before it started
Suspects 854fbb95 2026-10-17 Maya: Lower carrier read timeout to 3s
When the same error was fixed before, the history says so, with the commit that fixed it, so the new suspect is easy to judge:
History ↩ came back · seen 3 Aug 2026 → 3 Sep 2026, gone after v1.3
Fixed by 41bdce40 2026-09-03 Maya: Retry carrier timeouts with backoff
logsite investigate --report ranks the explanations (the change, more traffic, a failing
dependency, a pool or a limit running out) with the evidence for and against each, including
the warnings logged in the same requests, and the next check to tell them apart. A
benchmark of incidents with known causes
runs on every build.
Spikes are measured as rates, so a busy day isn't an incident. logsite errors --since-deploy $TAG --fail-on-new turns it into a CI gate that stops a bad release.
Failing tests, for you and your AI assistant
logsite agent -- pytest (or go test, mvn test, npx jest, vitest, tsc…) runs the command and prints the
causes instead of hundreds of lines, then what changed after each fix:
$ logsite agent -- pytest
pytest: 30 failed, 12 passed · 2 cause(s) · exit 1
1. 27 test(s) sqlite3.OperationalError: no such column: discount_code
raised app/orders/repository.py:10 in get()
2. 3 test(s) AssertionError: assert total(<n>) == <n>
raised tests/test_tax.py:4 in test_tax_0()
$ logsite agent -- pytest # after fixing the first one
pytest: 3 failed (was 30), 39 passed · 1 cause(s) · exit 1
✓ fixed sqlite3.OperationalError: no such column: discount_code (27 test(s))
Production context for your AI assistant
Before Claude Code (or any MCP client) changes a function, production_context tells it
what that code does in production, so it doesn't undo an earlier fix. logsite about is the
same in the terminal:
$ logsite about src/main/java/com/example/shipping/CarrierApiClient.java:58
errors in the last 24h:
660 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Shipping label request failed (raised here, back)
root cause: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
↩ came back: gone after v1.3, fixed by 41bdce40 Retry carrier timeouts with backoff
last changed:
0df4dac1 2026-10-18 Maya: Lower carrier read timeout to 3s
41bdce40 2026-09-03 Maya: Retry carrier timeouts with backoff
The Claude Code plugin sets it all up: the MCP server, a hook that runs
the assistant's tests through agent mode, and /logsite:investigate, /logsite:fix-error
and /logsite:log-cost:
/plugin marketplace add rajpaynaik/logsite
/plugin install logsite@logsite
And more
- In your editor: production counts above every log call (
1.2M in 24h,▲ 8.0x), the line that raised an error marked with how often it did, and log-quality warnings as you type. VS Code, or any LSP editor withlogsite serve. - Cost per line of code: which
logger.info(...)calls make up your log bill. → Cost and leaks - Grafana: a generated dashboard of cost and errors per code line, with "back after a fix" markers on the graphs; the error summary in your alert notifications (Slack / webhook); Alloy rules that drop or sample noisy lines before they're shipped; one Docker container. → Grafana, alerts and Alloy
- Lint for logging: lost stack traces, failures logged at
info, secrets and card numbers in log calls, logs in hot loops, missing context likerequest_id. → Lint rules - History: "seen before, fixed by
a1b2c3din v1.3, back since v1.4": logsite remembers every error group, so a regression comes with the fix that worked last time. → History - Leaks: secrets and personal data that actually reached production logs, per log call.
- Request timeline:
logsite trace <id>, every line of one request across services. - MCP server: AI assistants ask "what's failing in production, and why?" and get the incidents, groups and code lines. → MCP server
Install
pip install logsite # the command-line tool
pip install "logsite[lsp,mcp]" # + the editor language server and the MCP server
pipx install "logsite[lsp]" # once for your user, e.g. for Java and Go projects
Quick start
cd your-service
logsite lint # logging problems in the code, no backend needed
logsite agent -- pytest # failing tests grouped by cause
# point it at your logs: logsite.toml
cat > logsite.toml <<'TOML'
[backend]
type = "loki"
url = "http://localhost:3100"
selector = '{service_name="checkout"}'
TOML
logsite errors # production errors grouped by cause
logsite investigate # ... linked into incidents, with the deploy and commits
logsite about app/checkout.py:42 # what production says about this code, before you change it
logsite sync --backfill 30d # fill the history: seen before, fixed by, came back
logsite cost --price-per-gb 0.5 # what each log call costs per month
Supported
| Languages | Python (logging, structlog, loguru), Java (SLF4J, Log4j 2, java.util.logging, Lombok), Go (slog, zap, zerolog, logrus, logr, klog) |
| Log stores | Loki, OpenSearch / Elasticsearch, CloudWatch Logs, log files |
| Tests and builds | pytest, go test, Maven, Gradle, Jest, Vitest, tsc, javac, gcc-style compilers |
| Editors | VS Code; Neovim, JetBrains, Helix, Zed through LSP |
| AI assistants | Claude Code plugin; any MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, …) |
| Dashboards and alerts | Grafana (dashboard, Error groups panel, history markers), Alloy, Slack / webhooks, Docker |
Documentation
Commands · Configuration · Errors, incidents and the CI gate · Agent mode · History · Grafana, alerts and Alloy · Languages · Lint rules · Cost and leaks · Request timeline · MCP server · Claude Code plugin · How it works · Roadmap
Status
Early (0.x): feedback and contributors welcome. Formerly loglens: loglens.toml and
[tool.loglens] configs keep working. See CONTRIBUTING.md;
a new log backend is a good first PR.
License
MIT
Metadata
Release files for logsite 0.3.2
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| logsite-0.3.2.tar.gz | 281.1 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| logsite-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 465.6 kB
Release files / logsite-0.3.2.tar.gz
| Download URL | logsite-0.3.2.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 281.1 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c02bd648545cfc7260e15335da990f98a66dc918d5c64db4a60c49e93dcba28e
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
6c17d2127c401f94757919c55cbd7a6a67859c0ae3a8f1541ebc7f998e9d4954
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 19, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / logsite-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | logsite-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 184.5 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
e92ae756ec64c2fa2c8e28e4de93613d1eaefa68c10f43305b01b1aab4da42c2
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
3275907106ed7bc434efecb854f003e2563e36029d7dd85dac37e6a555cbcf9a
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 19, 2026.
Transparency log