metrust 0.2.5

Rust-powered drop-in replacement for MetPy -- 150/150 calc functions plus 36 extras, 10-93000x faster

metrust

Rust-powered meteorology toolkit with MetPy-compatible Python APIs.

metrust uses a Rust backend for core meteorological calculations and exposes a Python surface that aims to feel familiar to MetPy users. The core metrust.calc module covers the large majority of metpy.calc with native Rust — no MetPy dependency required for typical calc workflows. A handful of MetPy-specific surfaces (plots, xarray accessor, Level2File) optionally forward to MetPy when it is installed.

# Before
from metpy.calc import cape_cin, potential_temperature
from metpy.units import units

# After — same code, faster results
from metrust.calc import cape_cin, potential_temperature
from metrust.units import units

p = [1000, 925, 850, 700, 500] * units.hPa
T = [25, 20, 15, 5, -15] * units.degC
Td = [20, 15, 10, -5, -25] * units.degC

Scalars and arrays both work — pass a single value or a full grid:

import numpy as np
from metrust.calc import potential_temperature, saturation_vapor_pressure
from metrust.units import units

# Scalar
theta = potential_temperature(850 * units.hPa, 20 * units.degC)

# 2D grid (e.g., HRRR 1059x1799)
p_grid = np.full((1059, 1799), 850.0) * units.hPa
t_grid = np.random.uniform(15, 30, (1059, 1799)) * units.degC
theta_grid = potential_temperature(p_grid, t_grid)  # shape preserved

Installation

Core install:

pip install metrust

For optional features (plots, xarray accessor, Level2File), install MetPy separately:

pip install metpy

From source:

git clone https://github.com/FahrenheitResearch/metrust-py
cd metrust-py
python -m pip install -e .

What Works Well Today

Native Rust implementations cover a large portion of the day-to-day meteorology surface:

• Thermodynamics: potential temperature, equivalent potential temperature, CAPE/CIN, parcel profiles, LCL/LFC/EL, virtual temperature, wet bulb, precipitable water, thickness, stability indices
• Wind and severe weather: wind components, bulk shear, storm-relative helicity, Bunkers storm motion, Corfidi vectors, STP, SCP, critical angle
• Kinematics: divergence, vorticity, advection, frontogenesis, geostrophic and ageostrophic wind, potential vorticity, deformation
• Smoothing and interpolation: Gaussian, rectangular, circular, n-point, generic window convolution, 1-D interpolation, log interpolation, NaN fill, isosurface, IDW, natural neighbor
• I/O: Level-III, METAR parsing, station lookup, GINI, GEMPAK grid/sounding/surface, WPC surface bulletin parsing
• Constants: the core meteorological constants used by the calculation layer

On the Python side, metrust normalizes wrapper mismatches that previously blocked MetPy-style use:

• All thermodynamic and humidity functions accept scalars, 1D arrays, and 2D grids with shape preservation
• 28 hot-path functions have dedicated Rust array bindings (zero Python loop overhead)
• Remaining functions use a Python-side vectorizer (_vec_call) for automatic scalar/array dispatch
• Offset temperatures work with Pint quantities like 20 * units.degC
• saturation_vapor_pressure() returns Pa
• saturation_mixing_ratio() returns dimensionless kg/kg
• relative_humidity_from_dewpoint() returns a dimensionless fraction
• Common MetPy signatures such as cape_cin(p, t, td, parcel_profile=...) are accepted
• compute_cape_cin supports top_m parameter for capped CAPE (e.g., SB3CAPE at 3 km AGL)

Compatibility Model

metrust is best thought of as:

• A fast Rust-backed replacement for much of metpy.calc
• A MetPy-compatible Python package for common workflows
• A partial shim over MetPy for surfaces that are still Python-specific

That last point is important. Some compatibility paths intentionally delegate to MetPy when it is installed. This keeps the public API usable while the native Rust/PyO3 surface catches up.

Current shimmed surfaces:

• metrust.io.Level2File forwards to MetPy when available
• metrust.plots forwards to metpy.plots
• metrust.xarray forwards to metpy.xarray
• Core metrust.calc functions are 100% native Rust with no MetPy fallback

Performance

The benchmark suite (benches/) measures performance at three tiers to give an honest picture:

Tier	What it measures	Import path
T1: Raw Rust	Pure FFI, no Pint overhead	metrust._metrust.calc
T2: metrust + Pint	Rust backend with Pint unit wrappers	metrust.calc
T3: MetPy + Pint	Pure Python + Pint baseline	metpy.calc

The fair comparison is T3 vs T2 (both use Pint). T1 shows the raw Rust ceiling.

Representative numbers (p50, AMD Ryzen 9):

Operation	MetPy (T3)	metrust+Pint (T2)	Raw Rust (T1)	Fair speedup (T3/T2)
potential_temperature (scalar)	129 us	7.4 us	60 ns	17x
equivalent_potential_temperature	300 us	7.5 us	95 ns	40x
wet_bulb_temperature (scalar)	724 us	8.1 us	201 ns	90x
dewpoint_from_rh (scalar)	120 us	2.7 us	76 ns	44x
parcel_profile (100 levels)	2.55 ms	71 us	56 us	36x
cape_cin (100-level sounding)	1.60 ms	137 us	20 us	12x
divergence (100x100 grid)	994 us	12.6 us	12.6 us	79x
storm_relative_helicity (100 levels)	579 us	16.5 us	532 ns	35x

A few operations are not faster — this is expected and the benchmarks don't hide it:

• wind_speed at small arrays (1k elements): metrust+Pint is ~2x slower than MetPy because Pint wrapper overhead dominates a sub-microsecond Rust call. At 10k+ elements they converge.
• smooth_gaussian: MetPy delegates to scipy's heavily-optimized C gaussian_filter. The pure Rust implementation is ~10x slower on large grids. The raw Rust API (T1) avoids any Pint cost but the algorithm itself is less optimized.

Run the benchmarks yourself:

# Rust (Criterion, HTML reports in target/criterion/)
cargo bench --package metrust

# Python three-tier (requires metrust; MetPy optional for T3)
python benches/bench_python.py              # T1+T2 only
python benches/bench_python.py --tier 1,2,3 # all three tiers
python benches/bench_python.py --json       # machine-readable output

Known Limits

This is not a full package-level replacement for all of MetPy yet.

• metrust.plots and metrust.xarray are compatibility shims, not native reimplementations
• Level-II access currently relies on MetPy from the Python surface
• Numerical agreement is close for most shared calculations, but not bit-identical
• moist_lapse still needs more scrutiny before being treated as high-confidence parity work
• Grid kinematics (divergence, vorticity, etc.) require scalar dx/dy grid spacings — variable-resolution grids are not yet supported

Known numerical differences include:

• Saturation vapor pressure and saturation mixing ratio use different empirical fits than MetPy on the native Rust path
• LCL and wet-bulb calculations use different approximations than MetPy
• STP and SCP cutoff behavior is not identical in every weak-shear environment
• Some constants come from slightly different textbook/reference values

Verification

The repo currently verifies two different things:

1. The Rust workspace itself via cargo test --workspace
2. Python compatibility expectations via tests/test_python_compat.py

The Python compatibility tests cover the specific wrapper issues that most affect "drop-in" use:

• Offset temperature handling
• Wrapper return units for key thermodynamic functions
• MetPy-style function signatures such as cape_cin(..., parcel_profile=...)
• Public I/O exports
• plots and xarray shim forwarding

The older tests/verify_*.py scripts are still useful for exploratory comparisons, but they are reference scripts, not the authoritative CI gate.

Running Checks

cargo test --workspace
python -m pytest tests/test_python_compat.py -q

Optional exploratory comparisons:

python tests/verify_thermo.py
python tests/verify_wind.py
python tests/verify_kinematics.py
python tests/verify_severe_atmo.py
python tests/verify_smooth_interp.py

Should You Use It

Use metrust if:

• You want MetPy-style calculations with much lower runtime overhead
• Your workload is dominated by metpy.calc-type operations
• You are comfortable with a project that is converging toward broader MetPy compatibility

Keep MetPy in the loop if:

• You depend heavily on the full plotting stack
• You rely on the xarray accessor layer
• You need exact behavioral parity rather than close compatibility

License

MIT