Skip to main content

Mini SWE Agent - A simple AI software engineering agent

Project description

mini-swe-agent banner

The minimal AI software engineering agent

📣 Run mini-swe-agent on our new & extremely challenging benchmark, ProgramBench
📣 New tutorial on building minimal AI agents
📣 Gemini 3 Pro reaches 74% on SWE-bench verified with mini-swe-agent!
📣 New blogpost: Randomly switching between GPT-5 and Sonnet 4 boosts performance

Docs Slack PyPI - Version

[!WARNING] This is mini-swe-agent v2. Read the migration guide. For the previous version, check out the v1 branch.

In 2024, we built SWE-bench & SWE-agent and helped kickstart the coding agent revolution.

We now ask: What if our agent was 100x simpler, and still worked nearly as well?

mini is

  • Widely adopted: Used by Meta, NVIDIA, Essential AI, IBM, Nebius, Anyscale, Princeton University, Stanford University, and many more.
  • Minimal: Just some 100 lines of python for the agent class (and a bit more for the environment, model, and run script) — no fancy dependencies!
  • Performant: Scores >74% on the SWE-bench verified benchmark; starts much faster than Claude Code
  • Deployable: Supports local environments, docker/podman, singularity/apptainer, bublewrap, contree, and more
  • Compatible: Supports all models via litellm, openrouter, portkey, and more. Support for /completion and /response endpoints, interleaved thinking etc.
  • Built by the Princeton & Stanford team behind SWE-bench, SWE-agent, and more
  • Tested: Codecov
More motivation (for research)

SWE-agent jump-started the development of AI agents in 2024. Back then, we placed a lot of emphasis on tools and special interfaces for the agent. However, one year later, as LMs have become more capable, a lot of this is not needed at all to build a useful agent! In fact, the mini agent

  • Does not have any tools other than bash — it doesn't even need to use the tool-calling interface of the LMs. This means that you can run it with literally any model. When running in sandboxed environments you also don't need to take care of installing a single package — all it needs is bash.
  • Has a completely linear history — every step of the agent just appends to the messages and that's it. So there's no difference between the trajectory and the messages that you pass on to the LM. Great for debugging & fine-tuning.
  • Executes actions with subprocess.run — every action is completely independent (as opposed to keeping a stateful shell session running). This makes it trivial to execute the actions in sandboxes (literally just switch out subprocess.run with docker exec) and to scale up effortlessly. Seriously, this is a big deal, trust me.

This makes it perfect as a baseline system and for a system that puts the language model (rather than the agent scaffold) in the middle of our attention. You can see the result on the SWE-bench (bash only) leaderboard, that evaluates the performance of different LMs with mini.

More motivation (as a tool)

Some agents are overfitted research artifacts. Others are UI-heavy frontend monsters.

The mini agent wants to be a hackable tool, not a black box.

  • Simple enough to understand at a glance
  • Convenient enough to use in daily workflows
  • Flexible to extend

Unlike other agents (including our own swe-agent), it is radically simpler, because it:

  • Does not have any tools other than bash — it doesn't even need to use the tool-calling interface of the LMs. Instead of implementing custom tools for every specific thing the agent might want to do, the focus is fully on the LM utilizing the shell to its full potential. Want it to do something specific like opening a PR? Just tell the LM to figure it out rather than spending time to implement it in the agent.
  • Executes actions with subprocess.run — every action is completely independent (as opposed to keeping a stateful shell session running). This is a big deal for the stability of the agent, trust me.
  • Has a completely linear history — every step of the agent just appends to the messages that are passed to the LM in the next step and that's it. This is great for debugging and understanding what the LM is prompted with.
Should I use SWE-agent or mini-SWE-agent?

You should consider mini-swe-agent your default choice. In particular, you should use mini-swe-agent if

  • You want a quick command line tool that works locally
  • You want an agent with a very simple control flow
  • You want even faster, simpler & more stable sandboxing & benchmark evaluations
  • You are doing FT or RL and don't want to overfit to a specific agent scaffold

You should use swe-agent if

  • You want to experiment with different sets of tools, each with their own interface
  • You want to experiment with different history processors

What you get with both

  • Excellent performance on SWE-Bench
  • A trajectory browser
CLI (mini) Batch inference

mini

swebench

Trajectory browser Python bindings

inspector

agent = DefaultAgent(
    LitellmModel(model_name=...),
    LocalEnvironment(),
)
agent.run("Write a sudoku game")

Let's get started!

Option 1: If you just want to try out the CLI (package installed in anonymous virtual environment)

pip install uv && uvx mini-swe-agent
# or
pip install pipx && pipx ensurepath && pipx run mini-swe-agent

Option 2: Install CLI & python bindings in current environment

pip install mini-swe-agent
mini  # run the CLI

Option 3: Install from source (developer setup)

git clone https://github.com/SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent.git
cd mini-swe-agent && pip install -e .
mini  # run the CLI

Read more in our documentation:

Attribution

If you found this work helpful, please consider citing the SWE-agent paper in your work:

@inproceedings{yang2024sweagent,
  title={{SWE}-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering},
  author={John Yang and Carlos E Jimenez and Alexander Wettig and Kilian Lieret and Shunyu Yao and Karthik R Narasimhan and Ofir Press},
  booktitle={The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems},
  year={2024},
  url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15793}
}

Our other projects:

SWE-agent    SWE-ReX    SWE-bench    SWE-smith    CodeClash    sb-cli

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

mini_swe_agent-2.4.1.tar.gz (66.6 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

mini_swe_agent-2.4.1-py3-none-any.whl (114.8 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file mini_swe_agent-2.4.1.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: mini_swe_agent-2.4.1.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 66.6 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12

File hashes

Hashes for mini_swe_agent-2.4.1.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 6c77d4b89eb772278b89859bcc5d21200d64e08716a49dbf1a19dd88f42cab59
MD5 c6703b6a12b742c1899c232c67ec4d61
BLAKE2b-256 fb10496fa06f390722c79f63f058975195584363740e63c0b7ee959826014041

See more details on using hashes here.

File details

Details for the file mini_swe_agent-2.4.1-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: mini_swe_agent-2.4.1-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 114.8 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12

File hashes

Hashes for mini_swe_agent-2.4.1-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 4e93926fcf52c8777f67af928092d6a6af1afe102569e29e721a6f18f3313628
MD5 e7a4475ce0ac70fe10bddfaa14869b20
BLAKE2b-256 be192550335331bcb82e324705b76128a3258323d63dcd2d9fe9a0121f29a817

See more details on using hashes here.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page