mkdocs-decision-records 1.2.2

Manage decision records with mkdocs in a customizable and minimal fashion.

mkdocs-decision-records

Manage decision records with mkdocs in a customizable and minimal fashion.

Features

• Customizable status colors and lifecycle
• Enforces information to be present for ADRs
• Allows description being kept as markdown

Demo

You can find a Demo on GitHub Pages

Installation

1. Install mkdocs-decision-records from the PyPi registry using your favorite package manager
2. Configure your mkdocs.yml

   plugins:
   - decision-records:
       # Folder where your decision records are located, defaults to adr
       decisions_folder: adr
       # Optional prefix to prepend to ticket numbers
       ticket_url_prefix: https://ticket.example.com/
       # Configure amount of required deciders
       required_deciders_count: 1
       # Configure available stages and the badge colors
       lifecycle_stages:
         {status}: {color}
   

3. Create your ADRs ensuring to add the frontmatter meta data:

   ---
   id: 000
   status: proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by
   date: YYYY-MM-DD
   deciders:
      - decider 1
      - decider 2
   # Optional ticket
   ticket: FOO-1
   ---
   
   ## Context and Problem Statement
   
   [Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
   
   ## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
   
   * [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
   * [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
   * … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
   
   ## Considered Options
   
   * [option 1]
   * [option 2]
   * [option 3]
   
   ## Decision Outcome
   
   Chosen option: "[option 1]",
   because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
   
   ## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
   
   ### [option 1]
   
   [example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
   
   * Good, because [argument a]
   * Good, because [argument b]
   * Bad, because [argument c]
   * … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
   
   ### [option 2]
   
   [example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
   
   * Good, because [argument a]
   * Good, because [argument b]
   * Bad, because [argument c]
   * … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
   
   ### [option 3]
   
   [example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
   
   * Good, because [argument a]
   * Good, because [argument b]
   * Bad, because [argument c]
   * … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
   
   ## Links <!-- optional -->
   
   * [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
   * … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
   

Motivation

I love ADRs and documenting decisions in general. This plugin makes it a bit easier, enforcing basic meta information while keeping the format open enough so you can do your thing.

Contributing

I love your input! I want to make contributing to this project as easy and transparent as possible, whether it's:

• Reporting a bug
• Discussing the current state of the configuration
• Submitting a fix
• Proposing new features
• Becoming a maintainer

To get started please read the Contribution Guidelines.

Development

Requirements

• Python 3.12+
• Poetry

Build

poetry install

Alternatives

• mkdocs-material
  • Needs to use the theme
  • ADR graph
• mkdocs-macros-adr-summary
  • works entirely with macros
  • no metadata table at the top