moltric 1.0.0

Moltric Molecular Metric

For installation of Moltric, use pip: pip install moltric

For questions or suggestions for features to add, contact Kazuumi Fujioka: [e-mail]

How do you best overlap two molecules?

Finding the best algorithm to do this is a Holy Grail

Many groups have searched for this, but there is no consensus on a best method. For example:

• ArbAlign, 2017: [github] [paper]

• FASTOVERLAP, 2017: [github] [paper]

• MolAlignLib, 2023: [github] [paper]

• OTMol, 2025: [github] [paper]

Comparing Software

We can see which software best optimizes the molecular overlap by seeing whether they find the minimum RMSD (among the permutations checked). The software above are compared (ArbAlign, MolAlign, OTMol, and FASTOVERLAP "FO" with and without Branch-and-Bound "BnB").

The RMSDs are compared over a few different sets of data, or benchmarks:

• C10H9 (Bimolecular Reaction of CH + C₉H₈ and C₂H₄ + C₈H₅)
• BrCH5 (Bimolecular Reaction of HBr⁺ + CH₄)
• Ne20 (20-atom Subsets of a Neon₂₀₀ Cluster) [source]
• Ne180 (180-atom Subsets of a Neon₂₀₀ Cluster) [source]
• FGG (FGG tripeptide C₁₃H₁₇N₃O₄ Conformers) [source]
• SMAW (Sulfate-Methylammonium-Water Cluster CH₉NO₅S Conformers) [source]

These software are designed to optimize overlap by minimizing RMSD. If instead, we want to minimize the distance matrix deviation (DMD), we could instead use Moltric. We can now see how these "optimal overlaps" work for DMD.

Usage

Comparing two sets of molecules:

From a terminal, prepare two xyz files of the two sets of molecules. Then call Moltric, like so:

moltric-cli examples/fromFujioka_CH.indene_19atoms.xyz examples/fromFujioka_CH.indene_19atoms.xyz

this produces:

# Number of points found in 'examples/fromFujioka_CH.indene_19atoms.xyz': 81
# Number of points found in 'examples/fromFujioka_CH.indene_19atoms.xyz': 81
#    i    j      DMD
     0    0      0.0000
     0    1      2.1084
     0    2      3.9254
     0    3      3.9358
     0    4      1.7824
     0    5      2.6834
     0    6      5.1325
     0    7      3.6761
     0    8      6.9604
     0    9      2.2738
.
.
.

Benchmarking the RMSD or DMD:

Moltric and other methods can be compared with the benchmarking scripts like benchmarking/compare_methods.py from the terminal on an example xyz file:

cat examples/fromFujioka_H5CBr_7atoms.xyz | benchmarking/compare_methods.py 0.00001 output.xyz

this produces:

.
.
.
 DMDbound#      i      j    ArbAlign    OTMol MolAlign  Umeyama      FAQ    GOATf     GOAT   minimum (Nf) (N)
Adding index        0 to the training set ...   Sparsity 1.0000  = 1/1
   1.5928#      1      0     25.4432  31.6604  19.0167  13.8631  17.9570  21.2356   4.2362    4.2362 (21) (467)
Adding index        1 to the training set ...   Sparsity 1.0000  = 2/2
   2.4458#      2      0     39.6316  29.3163  32.7360  11.1385  26.1334  21.7794   5.2278    5.2278 (26) (482)
   1.7212#      2      1     33.6609  12.9877   9.0464   3.5600   3.5600   3.5600   3.5600    3.5600 (18) (389)
Adding index        2 to the training set ...   Sparsity 1.0000  = 3/3
   1.8722#      3      0     33.3322  21.9517  28.5810   9.6538  21.7277  21.1000   4.4000    4.4000 (20) (449)
   1.5957#      3      1     24.4360  17.1308  17.4071   3.6724   3.6724   3.6724   3.6724    3.6724 (16) (403)
   0.9671#      3      2     29.2970  22.7893  20.3330   2.0084   2.0084   2.0084   2.0084    2.0084 (18) (474)
Adding index        3 to the training set ...   Sparsity 1.0000  = 4/4
   2.8128#      4      0     41.7131  22.6670  23.5538  11.3122  23.8455  22.5683   6.1147    6.1147 (21) (461)
   2.3773#      4      1     34.7580  31.9236  32.2770   4.3386   4.3386   4.3386   4.3386    4.3386 (17) (390)
   0.3376#      4      2      8.8606   6.1540  15.8762   0.7083   0.7083   0.7083   0.7083    0.7083 (18) (385)
   0.7713#      4      3     17.4316   4.9512   8.0874   1.3402   1.3402   1.3402   1.3402    1.3402 (17) (360)
Adding index        4 to the training set ...   Sparsity 1.0000  = 5/5
   0.9072#      5      0     19.7347  18.7131  22.0875   2.7445  14.5171  14.5171   2.4299    2.4299 (18) (432)
   0.9114#      5      1     19.6808   3.3077   3.3077  12.6573   3.3077   3.3077   1.8983    1.8983 (16) (366)
   1.9796#      5      2     37.5165   9.5294  11.2601  14.6674   8.1114   6.3697   4.8420    4.8420 (18) (396)
   1.6283#      5      3     23.7955  15.7882  18.5697   9.7445   5.6637   5.6637   4.1777    4.1777 (17) (443)
   2.3768#      5      4     43.0193  24.0932  29.3850  19.2532   6.4887   6.4887   5.0040    5.0040 (17) (396)
.
.
.