Skip to main content

mozbridge-cli

A laptop CLI for the Mozbridge deployment platform. You sign in once via browser-based SSO (Logto's device-authorization flow — no password, no long-lived API key typed into a dotfile), link a local directory to a Mozbridge org + project, and push builds from there. It never holds a production credential of its own: every request it makes rides the same human Logto session mozbridge login cached, hitting the same REST API the Mozbridge web dashboard uses.

macOS-only for v1 — there are no Windows code paths.

Install

There is no published package yet (no PyPI entry, no mozbridge-cli on any index) — install from this checkout:

pip install -e cli/
# or, for an isolated global install:
pipx install ./cli

Either one registers a mozbridge console script (from cli/pyproject.toml's [project.scripts]: mozbridge = "mozbridge_cli.main:app_main"). Confirm it's on your PATH:

mozbridge --help

Requires Python >= 3.10.

Quickstart

mozbridge login                                   # opens a browser to sign in
cd ~/code/my-project
mozbridge link --org acme --project web-app        # bind this directory
mozbridge publish                                  # build + upload + trigger a build
mozbridge status                                   # watch it land

Run mozbridge link with no flags to pick org/project from a numbered list interactively instead of naming slugs up front.

Commands

mozbridge login                                   # device-code SSO via Logto
mozbridge whoami                                  # show the signed-in identity (refreshes the token if needed)
mozbridge logout                                  # delete the cached local session
mozbridge link [--org SLUG] [--project SLUG]      # link this directory to a Mozbridge org + project
mozbridge build                                   # zip the current directory (does not upload)
mozbridge publish                                 # build + upload + trigger a build on the linked project
mozbridge diff                                    # preview what `publish` would do right now — makes no mutating call
mozbridge status                                  # show the linked project + its 5 most recent deployments
mozbridge rollback [--to ID] [--yes]              # roll back the linked project's deployment

Full flag-by-flag reference, example output, and every documented failure mode: docs/commands.md.

How project linking works

mozbridge link writes .mozbridge/link.json in the current directory — not in the CLI's own ~/.config/mozbridge. It records which org/project that specific repo checkout is bound to:

{
  "org_id": 1,
  "org_slug": "acme",
  "project_id": 10,
  "project_slug": "web-app"
}

This is per-repo working-tree state, not per-user CLI state — a fresh clone of the same repo on another machine has no link file until mozbridge link is run there too. It is not committed. link best-effort appends .mozbridge/ to an existing .gitignore in the current directory (and tells you so); if there's no .gitignore there yet, it prints a note asking you to add the entry yourself rather than creating one. Either way: make sure .mozbridge/ is actually gitignored in real repos, since the file contains real org/project identifiers.

build, publish, status, and rollback all read this file and fail with a clear message if it's missing (see docs/commands.md for the exact text).

How multi-component publish works

Most real Mozbridge tenants are multi-service (a backend + a frontend + workers), not a single whole-directory image. mozbridge publish detects this from a Compose file in the current directory and, when it finds one, publishes each buildable service as its own image — one create_source_upload → PUT → trigger_build cycle per component — instead of the single zip-the-whole-directory flow.

Discovery order (Docker Compose's own file-discovery order, checked in this exact sequence, first match wins): docker-compose.yml, compose.yaml, docker-compose.yaml.

What counts as a "component": any top-level service in that file with a build: key — either the short form (build: ./backend) or the mapping form (build: {context: ..., dockerfile: ...}). A service with only an image: key (no build:) is not a component and is skipped — that's how a redis: or postgres: service in the same compose file is correctly ignored.

Shared-context de-duplication: two components whose resolved build context is the same directory — even if spelled differently in YAML (. vs ./) — are zipped and uploaded exactly once, then each triggers its own build reusing that one upload_id. This is genuinely a byte-savings and correctness behavior, not just a nicety: two services building from the same monorepo root would otherwise ship two identical uploads.

Per-component image naming: each component's image name is computed client-side as ghcr.io/{GHCR_ORG}/mozbridge-tenants/{org_slug}/{project_slug}-{service_name} (the same base the backend computes by default for a single-component publish, with -{service_name} appended so N components never collide on one image).

Partial failure: every component is attempted even if an earlier one fails — one broken service's build failing does not stop the others from being attempted. At the end, publish prints a summary line (Publish summary: N succeeded, M failed (of TOTAL)) followed by one OK or FAIL line per component, and exits non-zero if anything failed.

No compose file, or none of its services build: publish falls back unchanged to the original single-component flow — zip the whole current directory, one upload, one trigger_build call, with no image_name, context_path, or dockerfile_path override sent, so the backend's own defaults apply exactly as they always have. This is the fallback path, not a separate mode you opt into — an ordinary non-Compose project (a single Dockerfile app, or no Dockerfile at all) publishes exactly as it did before multi-component support existed.

Security model

  • Device-flow SSO, not a stored password or long-lived API key. mozbridge login runs Logto's OAuth 2.0 Device Authorization Grant (RFC 8628) against a real, provisioned Logto Native (public) client. You approve the login in a browser; the CLI never sees or handles your credentials directly.
  • Session cache: the resulting access/refresh/ID tokens are cached at ~/.config/mozbridge/session.json. The directory is created 0700 and the file is written 0600 on every save (verified against real filesystem state, not mocked — see cli/tests/test_session_permissions.py), the same posture the project's SSH-broker design used for private key material. An expired access token is refreshed transparently before any command that needs one; if refresh itself fails (dead/revoked refresh token, or none was ever cached) you're told to mozbridge login again rather than being left in a half-authenticated state.
  • What the CLI does NOT hold: no service-token, no deploy credential, no SSH key, no registry password. Every request uses the plain human Logto bearer token login cached, sent exactly like a browser session would send it.
  • A real, documented platform gap — stated plainly, not alarmingly: today, request-level authorization for mutating project actions (publish, rollback) beyond ordinary org/project membership is not yet enforced on the backend for human-authenticated callers. Concretely: require_deploy_scope (backend/app/features/identity/token_scopes.py) is built on require_token_scopes(...), whose check body returns immediately — a complete no-op — for any caller that is not a mz_-prefixed ServiceToken (is_service_identity(user) is False for a plain human Logto token). The real gate a human session hits is ordinary org/project membership (get_current_org + get_valid_project), not a deploy-scope check. The rollback/{deployment_id} route has no scope dependency on it at all. This is a backend finding, not something introduced by or specific to this CLI — it applies equally to the web dashboard's own session tokens, and it was surfaced (independently, twice) while building this CLI's publish and rollback commands. It's tracked as a known platform gap in .llm/plans/gap-register.md and in the session notes at the end of .llm/plans/mozbridge-agent.md — not something this doc oversells or that the CLI works around.

What's NOT built yet

  • mozbridge deploy — the platform-orchestrated deploy path (/cicd/deploy). publish uses a different, already-working mechanism (create_source_upload + trigger_build with source_type="upload") that builds fresh source into a new image — it does not go through /cicd/deploy today.
  • Build-time secrets for multi-component publish.
  • Windows support.

mozbridge diff (preview what publish would do, no mutating calls) is now built — see docs/commands.md. It compares local components against the most recent deployment record only, not the actually-deployed compose content — the platform doesn't expose that anywhere yet, so a full semantic compose diff is still not built.

See .llm/plans/mozbridge-agent.md (the "Session progress and reconciliation" section at the end) for the full roadmap and how the CLI's scope compares to that plan's original acceptance criteria — not duplicated here.

CI / headless use

Every command above assumes an interactive human at a terminal — mozbridge login opens a browser. A CI pipeline has neither, so instead of that stored session, set MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN in the pipeline environment:

export MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN=<service-token>
mozbridge link --org acme --project web-app
mozbridge publish

When MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN is set, it is used directly as the bearer token for every command — whoami, link, status, rollback, diff, and both publish and publish --local's upload/registration calls — instead of the on-disk session mozbridge login produces. It's checked before anything session-file-related, so nothing under ~/.config/mozbridge/ is read, written, or permission-checked in this path at all. Because of that, mozbridge login itself refuses cleanly when MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN is set (these are mutually exclusive auth modes — a CI token in the environment means "don't attempt an interactive login") — unset it first if you actually want to run the device flow.

Where the token comes from: a project- or org-scoped Mozbridge ServiceToken. Mint one directly from this CLI — mozbridge token create --scope deploy (requires an active mozbridge login session; see mozbridge token create --help) — or out of band via the dashboard/API (create_service_token). Set it as your CI platform's secret store, never as a --token flag (it would leak into shell history and process listings) and never committed to the repo.

MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN vs MOZBRIDGE_BUILD_TOKEN — do not confuse these:

MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN MOZBRIDGE_BUILD_TOKEN
Authenticates every command, as a project-scoped identity only publish --local's one GET /cicd/runtime-secrets call
Replaces the entire mozbridge login session nothing — it's used alongside your regular session, which still does the actual build registration
Scope needed whatever the platform grants a CI/service identity for the commands you run (link/publish/status/rollback) the build scope specifically (registry/build credentials only, never a deploy host key)

They are two separate credentials for two separate purposes and are never read from, or substituted for, one another anywhere in this CLI — see session.py and runtime_secrets.py's module docstrings.

A realistic Woodpecker pipeline step:

steps:
  publish:
    image: python:3.12-slim
    environment:
      MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN:
        from_secret: mozbridge_token
    commands:
      - pip install --quiet mozbridge-cli   # or: pip install -e ./cli, per your setup
      - mozbridge link --org acme --project web-app
      - mozbridge publish

A GitHub Actions step looks the same, just spelled with env: and ${{ secrets.MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN }}:

      - name: Publish to Mozbridge
        env:
          MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN }}
        run: |
          mozbridge link --org acme --project web-app
          mozbridge publish

mozbridge link still needs to run once per checkout (it writes .mozbridge/link.json into the working directory, which a fresh CI checkout never has) — there is no way to skip it by pre-seeding the link file today, so it belongs in the same pipeline step, before publish.

Configuration (advanced / override)

Env var Default Purpose
MOZBRIDGE_LOGTO_ENDPOINT https://auth.mozbridge.com Logto tenant endpoint
MOZBRIDGE_LOGTO_CLIENT_ID 7zkurxlp5x98iw217wrhw Logto Native app client id (public client, device-flow-capable)
MOZBRIDGE_PUBLIC_API_URL (falls back to PUBLIC_API_URL) https://api.mozbridge.com Mozbridge API base
MOZBRIDGE_GHCR_ORG jessin01 GHCR org used to compute default image names for multi-component publish
MOZBRIDGE_CONFIG_DIR ~/.config/mozbridge Where the session file lives (mainly for tests)
MOZBRIDGE_TOKEN unset CI/headless auth — see CI / headless use above

All of these have real, working defaults — the CLI works out of the box against production Mozbridge. The env vars exist for pointing at a non-production instance (and for test isolation).

Troubleshooting

"Not logged in. Run mozbridge login first." — no session file exists yet at ~/.config/mozbridge/session.json (or whoami/link/etc. was run before ever logging in). Run mozbridge login.

"Session expired and cannot be refreshed. Run mozbridge login again." — your cached session has no refresh token. Re-run mozbridge login.

"Session refresh failed: ... — run mozbridge login again." — the access token was expired and the cached refresh token was rejected by Logto (revoked, or itself expired). Re-run mozbridge login.

"Session is no longer valid. Run mozbridge login again." (from whoami specifically) — the API returned 401 even with a token that looked valid client-side (e.g. revoked server-side). Re-run mozbridge login.

"This directory is not linked to a Mozbridge project. Run mozbridge link first." — build/publish/status/rollback all require a .mozbridge/link.json in the current directory. Run mozbridge link (from the same directory you'll run these commands in).

A failed publish — each step (create_source_upload, the PUT upload, trigger_build) surfaces the backend's own error detail text verbatim, prefixed with what it was trying to do, e.g.:

Could not upload the build source: Zip too large
Could not create a source upload session: Not a member of this organization
Could not trigger the build: <backend detail text>

For a multi-component publish, a failure on one component does not stop the others — you get a per-component OK/FAIL summary at the end (see docs/commands.md for the exact shape) and the process exits non-zero if anything failed.

Metadata

Release files for mozbridge-cli 0.13.1

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for mozbridge-cli 0.13.1
File Size Uploaded Provenance
mozbridge_cli-0.13.1.tar.gz 133.8 kB Without provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for mozbridge-cli 0.13.1
File Interpreter ABI Platform
mozbridge_cli-0.13.1-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 215.2 kB

Release files / mozbridge_cli-0.13.1.tar.gz

Download URL mozbridge_cli-0.13.1.tar.gz
Size 133.8 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
55f45ff8b11930e8ea6017f12ff717ccca1ba56b00a5a5c7b8faabcb022f8cc7
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
37db71dd166a40c8ee67b3a2506bc4dcdf61d0cc44075626b8e7b76ecc8eb720
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via uv/0.10.4 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.10.4","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"macOS","version":null,"id":null,"libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":null}

Release files / mozbridge_cli-0.13.1-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL mozbridge_cli-0.13.1-py3-none-any.whl
Size 81.4 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
db2641ec63a569f1a1420757b3bf03aa5bb7c1127c9385061c0178a84336d547
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
1ba55b11ed77c70a384478c9f24229fb951021ae0ac17783fbf74beb0a056791
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via uv/0.10.4 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.10.4","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"macOS","version":null,"id":null,"libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":null}

Security for mozbridge-cli 0.13.1

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

No provenance found

None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page