navigera
navigera — extremely fast browser automation for AI agents, from the
shell, one command per step.
It is a single native binary (Rust, no Node) that speaks the Chrome DevTools
Protocol directly:
- It reads pages as a compact accessibility tree with
[ref=N]handles. - It acts with real mouse and keyboard events.
- A warm browser behind a named session survives between shell calls.
- New tabs, iframes, shadow DOM and
alert/confirmdialogs are handled for you.
Faster software for a better planet — less energy, less compute, more time for life.
Install
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/andrey-usa/navigera/master/install.sh | sh
Windows (PowerShell):
irm https://raw.githubusercontent.com/andrey-usa/navigera/master/install.ps1 | iex
Or with a package manager — each one installs the same prebuilt binary:
| npm | npm install -g navigera (or npx navigera …) |
| pip / uv | pip install navigera · uv tool install navigera |
| Cargo | cargo install --locked navigera |
| Homebrew | brew install andrey-usa/tap/navigera |
| Scoop | scoop bucket add andrey-usa https://github.com/andrey-usa/scoop-bucket then scoop install navigera |
Then give your agent the usage guide:
navigera install-skill # -> ./.agents/skills (Gemini CLI, Codex, Cline, Kilo, …)
# --claude -> ./.claude/skills, --continue -> ./.continue/skills
Linux, macOS and Windows are supported. On Windows the session socket is a loopback TCP port that only accepts clients presenting a random token from the session file in your temp directory, CDP runs over a DevTools WebSocket, and Chrome sits in a kill-on-close job object, so it still exits when navigera dies.
navigera finds Chrome or Chromium on its own: a system install,
$CHROME_BIN, or a Playwright/Puppeteer browser cache. For the fastest
cold start, point it at
chrome-headless-shell:
npx @puppeteer/browsers install chrome-headless-shell@stable gives the same
Chrome without its browser UI layer. In the benchmark it cut cold start from
0.32 s to 0.11 s and the scripted session from 0.66 s to 0.32 s.
navigera uses a system Chrome first; with none installed it picks
chrome-headless-shell (or Chromium) from a Playwright or Puppeteer cache.
Set $CHROME_BIN to choose explicitly.
Use (agents and people)
navigera -s work start # warm headless browser behind a local socket
navigera -s work goto example.com
navigera -s work --raw ax # page as an indented tree, [ref=N] on actionable nodes
navigera -s work click 12 # act on a ref
navigera -s work fill 31 "hello" && navigera -s work press Enter
navigera -s work wait --text "Saved"
navigera -s work quit
page "Checkout — Acme" http://shop.test/checkout
- main:
- heading "Checkout" [level=1]
- textbox "Full name" [ref=21]
- combobox "Country" [ref=22] value="Select…" options: "Canada", "Mexico", …
- radio "Express (1–2 days)" [checked, ref=25]
- Iframe "Card payment":
- document "Card details":
- textbox "Card number" [ref=41]
- button "Place order" [ref=30]
The commands are goto, ax, click, fill, type, press, select,
hover, drag, scroll, upload, wait, eval, back/forward/reload,
screenshot, pdf, the tab-* commands, dialog and quit, with get
and is for one value, console and network for what the page logged and
fetched, cookies, storage and state save|load (Playwright's
storageState format) for sign-ins, set for viewport, device, media, geo
and the like, and route to fail or answer requests.
- Targets: elements can be named by ref,
--selector <css>,--text "<visible text>",--role/--name,--label,--placeholderor--testid. - Output: every command prints one JSON line, or just the result with
--raw. - Help:
navigera help <command>. - Agent guide: the version-matched guide is
skills/navigera/SKILL.md, also printed bynavigera skill. - Reference: docs/navigera.md has the full reference, and llms.txt is an index for LLMs.
Your own browser. navigera -s me start --attach works in the Chrome
you already have open (Chrome 144+, after turning on
chrome://inspect/#remote-debugging once; Chrome asks you to Allow the
connection), with your logins, settings and extensions.
navigera -s me start --profile work keeps a separate visible browser on
its own persistent profile instead: sign in once and it stays open between
sessions. Either way navigera works in a window of its own, and quit only
disconnects. Details: docs/navigera.md.
Programs can keep one browser on a pipe instead: navigera serve reads
one JSON command per stdin line, for example
{"id":1,"op":"goto","url":"https://example.com"}. The session socket speaks
the same protocol.
IDE agents (MCP)
navigera mcp is a Model Context Protocol server for Cline, Roo Code, Kilo
Code, Continue, VS Code, Claude Desktop and Cursor, with the same tree, refs and
waits as the CLI and a tool list half the size of Playwright MCP's. Add it as
{"command": "navigera", "args": ["mcp"]}, or without installing anything as
{"command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "navigera", "mcp"]}; per-client snippets
are in docs/navigera.md. In the MCP
Registry it is io.github.andrey-usa/navigera. Agents that run
shell commands (Kilo, Cline CLI, Gemini CLI, Codex) can use the CLI and the
skill directly: navigera install-skill writes it to .agents/skills, where
they look for it.
Decisions by a fast model (optional)
Two small decisions an agent otherwise spends a page tree and an LLM turn on,
which element and did it work, can go to a System One model:
TypeSafe's Jev when TYPESAFE_API_KEY is set, or
any endpoint with the same API through NAVIGERA_DECIDER_URL.
navigera -s work click --find "accept the cookies" # acts on the element the model picks
navigera -s work check "Is an error message shown?" # {"yes":0.02,"answer":false}
find returns the ref, its probability and the runners-up; below 0.5,
--find refuses and lists the candidates instead of acting. start reports
"decider" when one is configured, and MCP clients get browser_find and
browser_check only then. Nothing leaves the machine otherwise; typed values
are sent as (filled).
Measured (2026-10-14). On 39 decisions with known answers, Jev picked
25/25 elements and answered 14/14 yes/no questions (151 ms median; $0.0086
for all 39). Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite reading the same tree got 23/25 and 14/14
(724 ms median) and once chose the button that text planted in the page
pointed at. In the agent eval, Gemini CLI told to prefer --find on two large
reference pages (56–95 KB trees) used about half the Gemini tokens of the runs
that read the tree (114–119K against a median of 250K; small samples).
Unprompted, it read the tree and never used the decider. Details and caveats:
docs/multi-model.md.
Measured again (2026-10-21, run 39530836547). On 78 decisions (50
elements, 28 yes/no questions, public pages included), Jev got 50/50 and
27/28 at an 80 ms median, $0.017 for all of them; DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
reading the same tree got the same 50/50 and 27/28 at a 2.0 s median.
Neither followed text planted in the page. Since start and long trees
tell the agent how to use the decider, Gemini CLI used it unprompted in 3 of
15 runs and in 14 of 15 when the prompt asked (run 39561380436, three runs
of five tasks per arm); median tokens per run were 199K without the
decider, 172K with it and 190K when told, a spread within the run-to-run
noise at this sample size.
Supported browsers
CI runs the full end-to-end suite on:
- the current Chrome Stable and the three milestones before it (about four months of releases, covering Extended Stable), all from Chrome for Testing;
- chrome-headless-shell;
- Chrome Beta, as a non-blocking early warning;
- the runner's own Chrome, on Linux and on Windows.
The suite is weekly as well as on every push, so a new Chrome release is
caught before agents hit it. In its first runs the matrix caught two real
bugs that the runner's Chrome alone missed: Chrome 151 segfaulted with one of
the automation flags (--disable-features=OptimizationHints, bisected with
chrome-bisect.yml), and on Chrome 153 an Enter-submitted form returned
before its redirect landed. Both are fixed.
Each run also checks CDP protocol correctness. navigera records
every command it sends (NAVIGERA_CDP_TRACE), and
tools/cdp_check.py validates every method, parameter
and enum value against the /json/protocol that that browser serves.
Deprecated or unknown usage fails the build. Edge and Brave are covered by
the benchmark.
Lightpanda 1.0 (--engine lightpanda) runs the same end-to-end suite in
CI, on 1.0.1 and the nightly. It is a different engine (one tab, no layout),
so navigera fills in what its CDP leaves out: shadow roots and password
fields in ax, confirm()/prompt() answers, navigations a click starts.
The differences that remain are listed in
docs/navigera.md.
Benchmarks
Same scripted session (launch → goto listing → title/count/extract evals →
fill+click filter → visible-count eval → screenshot → new tab → goto detail →
title/row-count evals → close) driven against the same headless browser by
each driver. Fixtures are deterministic and local (500-card listing,
1000-row detail). Run in CI via .github/workflows/bench.yml.
| contender | session wall (best of 3) | warm eval mean (200×) | cold start (best of 5) | driver CPU (own) | driver peak RSS (own) | browser memory (PSS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nv-shell (this repo on chrome-headless-shell) |
0.34s | 0.42 ms | 0.08s | <10 ms | 6 MB | 225 MB |
nv-brave (this repo on Brave) |
0.59s | 0.53 ms | 0.31s | <10 ms | 6 MB | 528 MB |
nv-serve (this repo on Chrome) |
0.60s | 0.59 ms | 0.28s | <10 ms | 6 MB | 370 MB |
nv-edge (this repo on Edge) |
0.71s | 0.55 ms | 0.34s | <10 ms | 6 MB | 763 MB |
gorod (go-rod 0.116.2, Go) |
0.71s | 0.57 ms | 0.29s | 20 ms | 16 MB | 391 MB |
chromiumoxide 0.7 (Rust) |
0.82s | 1.00 ms | 0.32s | 20 ms | 9 MB | 426 MB |
chromey 2.x (Rust, maintained chromiumoxide fork) |
0.94s | 1.08 ms | 0.35s | 50 ms | 21 MB | 472 MB |
chromedp 0.19.1 (Go) |
1.02s | 0.61 ms | 0.47s | 40 ms | 13 MB | 479 MB |
puppeteer-core (Node) |
1.03s | 0.83 ms | 0.63s | 0.39 s | 81 MB | 420 MB |
playwright-core (Node) |
1.31s | 1.36 ms | 0.77s | 0.71 s | 150 MB | 418 MB |
nv-lightpanda (this repo on Lightpanda, 1 tab) |
0.18s | 0.39 ms | 0.11s | <10 ms | 6 MB | 14 MB |
Measured 2026-10-21 on GitHub-hosted ubuntu-latest (AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor — 4 vCPU · Chrome 155.0.8059.39).
Every driver produced byte-identical extracted data and counts (correctness
gate); wall is best-of-N.
The ladder reruns weekly (bench.yml) against
the latest contender releases. GitHub runners vary between runs, so compare
rows within one run.
How driver CPU/RSS are measured. Each driver's own utime+stime,
read from its zombie's /proc/<pid>/stat before reaping (waitid with
WNOWAIT), and its own VmHWM. The kernel counts CPU in 10 ms ticks, so
values under ~50 ms are a tie. Not wait4: its rusage is RUSAGE_BOTH and
adds in every child the driver reaped. navigera, chromedp, puppeteer
and playwright wait() on their Chrome, so wait4 charged them Chrome's
CPU and RSS; go-rod (its leakless helper reaps Chrome) and chromiumoxide
were never charged. Earlier versions of this table reported exactly that
artifact ("0.82s vs 0.03s"). Browser memory is the whole browser process
tree (every renderer/GPU/utility process), sampled as summed PSS every
250 ms (shared pages counted once).
Reading the table. Session wall order: nv-shell 0.34s, nv-brave 0.59s, nv-serve 0.60s, nv-edge 0.71s, gorod 0.71s, chromiumoxide 0.82s, chromey 0.94s, chromedp 1.02s, puppeteer 1.03s, playwright 1.31s. navigera's best (nv-shell) ranks #1 of 10; on regular Chrome, nv-serve (0.60s) is ahead of the fastest other driver, gorod (0.71s). All native drivers (navigera, go-rod, chromiumoxide, chromedp) spend tens of milliseconds of their own CPU or less; the Node drivers spend hundreds and carry 80–150 MB of their own RSS.
Real-world (public internet, best of 3, same run)
example.com goto → title/h1: 10 of 10 pass; nv-shell 0.20s, gorod 0.41s, nv-serve 0.45s, chromey 0.45s, nv-brave 0.47s, chromiumoxide 0.48s, nv-edge 0.51s, chromedp 0.57s, puppeteer 0.75s, playwright 0.87s.
GitHub browse (awesome-list scroll + trending click-through): 10 of 10 pass; nv-shell 3.46s, gorod 3.63s, chromiumoxide 3.88s, nv-brave 3.90s, chromey 3.92s, puppeteer 4.22s, nv-edge 4.28s, nv-serve 4.37s, playwright 4.48s, chromedp 4.53s.
Live pages change between runs, so these are informational, not part of the
correctness gate. (The scroll check used to fail at random for every driver:
GitHub sets CSS scroll-behavior: smooth, so scrollY was read mid-animation;
contenders now scroll with behavior: 'instant'.)
chrome-headless-shell (the same Chrome build without its browser UI layer): cold start 0.28s → 0.08s, session 0.60s → 0.34s, browser memory 370 MB → 225 MB.
CDP transport A/B (same build and run): --remote-debugging-pipe (default on Linux/macOS)
vs a DevTools WebSocket port: cold start 0.28s vs 0.30s,
session 0.60s vs 0.63s. No speed difference: the WebSocket handshake itself is ~10 ms. The pipe is the default for two other reasons:
it opens no TCP port that another local process could attach to, and Chrome exits when
navigera dies (EOF on its command pipe), so a killed agent leaks no browser
(tests/edge_cases.rs: over a WebSocket port the browser outlives its driver).
Windows has no pipe transport here and uses the WebSocket, with a kill-on-close
job object giving the same guarantee (killed_session_server_takes_its_browser_down
runs there too).
This build vs the previous one, same machine and run (nv-baseline,
built from the previous master by the ladder's baseline_ref A/B):
session 0.62s → 0.60s (-3%), cold start 0.30s → 0.28s (-5%), browser CPU per session 1.14s → 1.16s. The session now also records what pages log and fetch (console, network).
Where navigera's cold start goes (NAVIGERA_TIMINGS, best run): browser up
159 ms, first page 110 ms, close 2 ms.
Agent tools (scripted, warm session, best of 3)
How an agent's tool calls drive a browser: CLI tools run one process per
step (a shell tool), MCP servers get one tools/call per step over a
persistent connection. Same canonical session plus one page snapshot.
| tool | kind | total wall | mean per step | snapshot | snapshot size | gate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
navigera (this repo) |
CLI | 0.84s | 43 ms | 190 ms | 36 KB | ✓ |
navigera on chrome-headless-shell |
CLI | 0.50s | 32 ms | 160 ms | 36 KB | ✓ |
agent-browser (Vercel Labs, Rust) |
CLI | 1.24s | 89 ms | 207 ms | 73 KB | ✓ |
playwright-cli (Microsoft) |
CLI | 10.07s | 801 ms | 430 ms | 50 KB | ✓ |
| Playwright MCP (Microsoft) | MCP | 5.32s | 403 ms | 76 ms | 50 KB | ✓ |
| Chrome DevTools MCP (Google) | MCP | 3.35s | 200 ms | 121 ms | 34 KB | ✓ |
Per-step time includes process start (CLI) or JSON-RPC (MCP), the hop to
the daemon, and the CDP work. playwright-cli and Playwright MCP share Playwright's tool
backend, which waits a fixed 500 ms after every action (timeouts.settle); playwright-cli
also starts a Node process per step.
Lightpanda (experimental) passes the same correctness gate in 0.18s with ~14 MB of browser memory. It has no rendering engine and one tab (the session opens the second page in the same tab), so it is listed apart from the Chrome-family ranking.
Agent eval: how a generic agent copes with each tool
Benchmarks time scripted steps. The agent eval asks the question that
matters for agents: can a generic coding agent, given only the tool and its
own documentation, finish real tasks? agent-eval.yml
runs Gemini CLI headless on a
free-tier API key against the local Acme Supply site, with navigera,
playwright-cli and agent-browser in turn:
- skilled: the tool is installed and its vendor's own Agent Skill is in
the workspace (
.agents/skills/); - onboard: the agent gets only the tool's name and repository URL and must install it from its docs, then do a short task.
The six tasks are a price lookup, a purchase with a coupon and an iframe
payment form, a login plus a paginated order table, docs in a new tab with a
collapsed FAQ, a support form inside an iframe, and four named changes on a
170-line settings form that must leave everything else as it was. Success is judged from
the site's recorded state and the final answer, never from the agent's
claim. Every run also records model requests, tokens, shell commands and
off-tool workarounds (curl, ad-hoc scripts). Model, prompt template, Chrome
and site are identical across tools. os: windows (or both) runs the same
jobs on Windows runners, where the agent's shell is PowerShell.
The three tools run as parallel jobs. Keys live in the main environment,
one slot per tool, because Gemini's free quota is per Google Cloud project:
GEMINI_API_KEY (navigera), GEMINI_API_KEY_2 (agent-browser) and
GEMINI_API_KEY_3 (playwright-cli). An empty slot falls back to
GEMINI_API_KEY. Without any key only the scripted baseline runs: it checks
the site, the success checks and the harness with known-good navigera
command plans. Runs that die on a model quota or outage are reported as
⚠ infra, not counted as a tool failure.
agent: openai runs the same tasks, prompt, turn limit and timeout with
any OpenAI-compatible model instead of Gemini CLI (DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
through SiliconFlow by default; OPENAI_BASE_URL, SILICONFLOW_API_KEY), so
a result can be checked against a second model family.
navigera+jev runs navigera with the decider configured, and
navigera+jev-told also asks for --find / check in the prompt; the
TypeSafe key (TYPESAFE_API_KEY in main) stays in a local relay that the
agent's shell never sees, and each run records the decider's calls and
tokens. decisions: true adds the Jev-against-Gemini decision comparison
above (bench/decide/compare.py).
0.5.0 (2026-10-22), skilled, the six tasks twice per tool:
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (run 39699303497): navigera passed 12/12 at a median 50K tokens and 9 model turns, and 12/12 on Lightpanda (121K); playwright-cli 11/12 (96K), agent-browser 12/12 (153K). With the decider on, navigera passed 12/12 at 43K and the agent used it in 3 of 12 runs unprompted; asked to, in 11 of 12 (12/12, 62K).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (run 39691538974): navigera 12/12 at 127K, and 12/12 on Lightpanda (167K).
0.4.1 (2026-10-14), Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, skilled: navigera passed 10/10 runs of the five tasks (2 each), median 7 model turns and 103K tokens.
0.3.0 vs 0.2.1, same model, launched together (purchase + account, 2
runs each, all passed): ax now waits for data a page is still fetching,
and the skill teaches chaining sure steps in one shell call. Median model
turns 18 → 10, median tokens 288K → 167K; every 0.3.0 run used fewer tokens
than every 0.2.1 run of the same task.
The scripted session didn't slow down: 0.51 s vs 0.49 s, cold start 0.23 s
both.
Natural checks (agent-check.yml,
every master push, PRs and nightly): Gemini is told in plain words to buy
something with navigera and its skill. On the local shop, once on Linux
and once on Windows through PowerShell (real checks, judged from the
recorded order), and once on Sauce Labs' public demo
shop saucedemo.com, which exists for automation
practice and takes no real payment (informational, judged from the
confirmation and the order total).
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for building, the test suites, reading CI results, A/B benchmarks and releasing.
Layout
src/protocol.rs: CLI parsing, the JSON-lines protocol andDriver(theOPStable is--help)src/browser.rs:BrowserSession: browser discovery (incl. chrome-headless-shell), launch flags, tabssrc/cdp/: from-scratch CDP engine: pipe/WebSocket transport, JSON-RPC client (NAVIGERA_CDP_TRACE), page ops,ax.rs(snapshot tree),events.rs(dialogs, popups, navigation),procjob.rs(Windows job object)src/session.rs: named sessions: socket server (Unix socket; loopback TCP + token on Windows), client, detachedstartsrc/cdp/attach.rs:--attach(your running browser) and--profile(persistent navigera browser)src/mcp.rs:navigera mcp, the Model Context Protocol server on stdiosrc/decide.rs:find/check: the decision model's client and how page elements become optionssrc/timing.rs:NAVIGERA_TIMINGS=1launch/close phase timings on stderrtests/: browser e2e: serve protocol, sessions, and the Acme Supply scenariobench/site/server.py: Acme Supply, a deterministic local shop (SPA, iframes, shadow DOM, dialogs, popups, login, upload)bench/ladder/: driver ladder and agent-tool benchmark (publish.jsonper run,gen_readme.py)bench/agent-eval/: Gemini CLI agent eval across navigera, playwright-cli and agent-browserbench/decide/: decision benchmark (compare.py), TypeSafe relay (relay.py) and a stand-in for runs without a key (mock_jev.py)tools/:cdp_check.py(protocol correctness),protocol_dump.sh,cft_matrix.py(Chrome version matrix)skills/navigera/SKILL.md: the agent guide (compiled into the binary:navigera skill).github/workflows/:ci.yml(tests, Chrome matrix, protocol check),bench.yml,agent-eval.yml,release.yml,chrome-bisect.yml,vendor.yml
Metadata
Release files for navigera 0.5.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Built distributions (wheels)
| File | Reset | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| navigera-0.5.0-py3-none-win_amd64.whl | Python 3 | none | Windows x86-64 | Details |
| navigera-0.5.0-py3-none-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.musllinux_1_1_x86_64.whl | Python 3 | none | Linux glibc 2.17+ x86-64, Linux musl 1.1+ x86-64 | Details |
| navigera-0.5.0-py3-none-manylinux_2_17_aarch64.manylinux2014_aarch64.musllinux_1_1_aarch64.whl | Python 3 | none | Linux glibc 2.17+ ARM64, Linux musl 1.1+ ARM64 | Details |
| navigera-0.5.0-py3-none-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl | Python 3 | none | macOS 11.0+ ARM64 | Details |
| navigera-0.5.0-py3-none-macosx_10_12_x86_64.whl | Python 3 | none | macOS 10.12+ x86-64 | Details |
Total release size: 6.3 MB
Security for navigera 0.5.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 5 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for navigera-0.5.0-py3-none-win_amd64.whl
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 22, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.