sflow
Write the workload once. Run it on a workstation, Slurm or Kubernetes by swapping one file.
sflow splits a GPU workflow into a workload file (what runs, in what order, on how many
GPUs, and how to tell it is healthy) and a backend file (how this platform launches it).
The workload never mentions srun, docker run or a pod spec, so moving platforms means
changing one -f:
cd examples/modular/backend_agnostic
sflow run -f backends/docker.yaml -f workloads/vllm_serve.yaml -f benchmark.yaml # one workstation
sflow run -f backends/slurm.yaml -f workloads/vllm_serve.yaml -f benchmark.yaml # Slurm cluster
sflow run -f backends/k8s.yaml -f workloads/vllm_serve.yaml -f benchmark.yaml # Kubernetes
It is built around the hardest case, multi-node disaggregated LLM serving, and handles placement, readiness, retries and teardown for you. Why sflow →
Install
Using an AI coding agent? Paste this into Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or any other coding agent. It installs sflow, checks that it runs, and installs the sflow skills for that agent:
Set up sflow for me by following
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/nv-sflow/main/docs-site/agents-src/setup.md
step by step, then tell me what you installed and where.
By hand:
uv tool install nv-sflow # sflow on PATH everywhere; or `uv pip install nv-sflow` inside a venv
sflow --version
Already installed? Upgrade in place — no incantation to remember:
sflow upgrade # latest PyPI release; --branch <ref> for a git branch, --dry-run to preview
Coming from v0.3.1 or earlier? The distribution is now nv-sflow on PyPI. Either
pip install nv-sflow, or run sflow upgrade twice (the first lands on the current
GitHub build, the second moves it to PyPI). The next sflow command tidies up the old
sflow install record by itself. Never pip install sflow — that name on pypi.org is an
unrelated project — and don't pip uninstall sflow.
No uv? pip install uv (or curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh).
Optional extras: nv-sflow[s3] (S3 uploads), nv-sflow[monitor] (PNG hardware charts).
Contributing? Skip to Development Setup for the editable install.
What is sflow
A declarative workflow descriptor for massive GPU clusters that separates what to deploy from where to deploy it.
One semantic across every platform — backend agnostic by design. A deployment's logic never changes: start etcd and NATS, launch a frontend, spin up workers, run the benchmark. Only the infrastructure glue does — and today that glue is rewritten from scratch for every platform. sflow consolidates it into a single portable YAML: tasks, dependencies, resources, and launch methods. The same sflow.yaml runs on Docker, Slurm, and Kubernetes — swap the backend fragment, rewrite nothing. Backends delegate to each platform's native ecosystem (srun/MPI, docker run, pods and MPI jobs) rather than reimplementing it.
Cluster-level orchestration at scale. Topology-aware node and GPU placement, multi-node replicas and sweeps, readiness/failure probes, and batch submission — so one descriptor drives hundreds of GPUs instead of a pile of hand-written bash.
All four backends ship today: local, docker, slurm, and kubernetes (k8s / k8s_mpi). It is light enough to write and debug a recipe on your laptop and submit that same file to the cluster.
Define what to run in a sflow.yaml — tasks, dependencies, how to launch each task, and required resources. sflow executes the DAG in order, collects logs, and organizes outputs into a consistent directory structure. Example of a dynamo PD disaggregation LLM inference service workflow:
What it's for
Any workload that runs in steps that depend on each other: build → train → evaluate, start a service → wait for it → drive load against it → collect results, stage data → process shards in parallel → merge. If you would otherwise write a shell script that launches things in order, polls until something is ready, and tidies up afterwards, that script is a workflow — and sflow already does the tedious parts.
Distributed LLM inference is the hardest case it is designed around, not the only one: a dozen processes across several nodes that must come up in the right order, find each other, share GPUs correctly, and be torn down cleanly when any one of them dies. Whatever survives that tends to handle simpler pipelines comfortably.
The parts you don't write again
Each of these is a YAML field, not a page of bash:
| Instead of hand-rolling… | You declare |
|---|---|
until curl -sf …; do sleep 5; done |
probes.readiness (HTTP / TCP / log-watch) with a timeout |
| retry loops and backoff arithmetic | retries: {count, interval, backoff} |
stray-process cleanup, trap handlers |
teardown runs on success, failure and Ctrl-C |
mkdir -p logs/$(date +%s), tee, scattered output |
one run directory per workflow, a log per task, a run summary |
grep/awk over logs into a CSV |
result: parsing (regex, named patterns, or JSON) → result.json |
aws s3 cp sprinkled through the script |
uploads: per task on COMPLETED, credentials from boto3's chain |
| copying config/data files onto nodes by hand | artifacts: staged and mounted at the same path on every backend |
for cfg in …; do sbatch …; done |
replicas:, or batch over a CSV of parameter rows |
| hard-coding hosts, ports and device ids | ${{ }} expressions over variables, backend nodes and task services |
Plus a live TUI, --dry-run for the whole plan, and per-task GPU/CPU/network sampling —
none of which you have to build.
One recipe, laptop to cluster
At cluster scale:
- Multi-node placement —
resources.nodes(indices/count/exclude) andresources.gpus(count, orindicesto pin exact device ids) pack tasks onto specific nodes and devices, with conflict detection at plan time rather than a failure ten minutes into the run. On Slurm the plan is re-applied inside the step by GPU UUID, soslurmstepdand container renumbering cannot silently land every rank on device 0. - Real ordering —
depends_onwaits for a process to start; readiness probes (HTTP, TCP, log-watch) make dependents wait for a service to actually be up.required_byexpresses the reverse edge so a workload fragment can attach itself to a benchmark. - Distributed launchers —
srunwith MPI/pmix on Slurm,k8sandk8s_mpion Kubernetes, where a multi-node task becomes one pod per reserved node (GPUs via the device plugin or DRA) and co-located GPU tasks can be merged into a single pod. - Fleet-scale runs —
replicasfor fan-out,release_afterso a later task can reuse a still-running server's GPUs, plusbatch/ bulk-input CSV sweeps over a parameter grid. - Results you can compare —
result:parsing,uploads:to S3, and a passive hardware monitor that samples GPU/CPU/network per task, withmonitor.windowlog markers to clip a report to the phase you actually measured. - Run output that explains itself —
sflow_summary.logrecords planned vs. observed GPU assignment, node topology, and external command health (kubectl/srun/dockerlatency and failures); a stalled event loop dumps every thread's stack toloop_stalls.txt.
On one machine:
localbackend, no scheduler — the Quickstart below runs a DAG in a few seconds.--dry-runrenders the full plan — placement, GPU slices, and the exact commands — without touching a cluster, so most recipe mistakes surface before you queue anything.dockerbackend runs the same containerized tasks on one box, reserving GPUs per task so severalsflow runsessions can share a workstation without colliding.- Composable fragments — a workload YAML pairs with a backend fragment, so the recipe you
proved locally is the one you submit to the cluster. See
examples/modular/backend_agnostic/.
The same workload, three platforms. examples/modular/backend_agnostic/
composes a backend fragment + a workload + a benchmark. Multi-process engines take the MPI
flavour of the backend (slurm_mpi.yaml, k8s_mpi.yaml), which is still one swapped file:
# Dynamo + TensorRT-LLM, one MPI rank per GPU: Kubernetes, then Slurm
sflow run -f backends/k8s_mpi.yaml -f workloads/dynamo_common.yaml -f workloads/dynamo_trtllm.yaml -f benchmark.yaml
sflow run -f backends/slurm_mpi.yaml -f workloads/dynamo_common.yaml -f workloads/dynamo_trtllm.yaml -f benchmark.yaml
CLI at a Glance
| Command | Purpose | Key Flags |
|---|---|---|
sflow run |
Execute a workflow | --dry-run --tui --set -f (multi-file) --ssh |
sflow batch |
Generate / submit sbatch scripts | --submit --bulk-input --row |
sflow compose |
Merge multiple YAMLs | --resolve --missable-tasks -o |
sflow watch / sflow fetch <receipt> |
Reconnect to an --ssh run: follow its logs / copy its output back |
--once / --all -o |
sflow visualize |
Render DAG graph | --format png/svg/mermaid |
sflow sample |
List / copy examples | --list -o |
sflow skill |
Install AI agent skills (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) | --target claude|cursor|codex|all --global --list |
sflow upgrade |
Upgrade to the latest PyPI release in place (alias: sflow update) |
--sflow-version --branch --dry-run --force |
Introduction
Start here:
- User docs:
docs/user/intro.md - Release notes:
docs/release_notes/— start with v0.3.2 for the current breaking changes and upgrade checklist - PLC docs:
- SPP:
docs/plc/sflow_spp.md - SRD:
docs/plc/sflow_srd.md - SADD:
docs/plc/sflow_sadd.md
- SPP:
Quickstart
If you just want to validate the workflow engine locally (no Slurm required):
uv venv
source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
sflow run --file examples/self_contained/local/hello_world.yaml --tui
That example is the whole file — no backend block, no operator, no boilerplate:
version: "0.1"
variables:
WHO:
description: "who to greet"
value: Nvidia
workflow:
name: local_hello_world
tasks:
- name: hello
script:
- echo "Hello ${WHO}"
With nothing declared, sflow runs on the local backend with its default operator. Add a
backends: block later and the same tasks run under Docker, Slurm or Kubernetes.
Development Setup
This guide will help you set up the development environment for contributing to sflow.
Prerequisites
-
Python 3.10 or higher
python --version # Check your Python version
-
uv (Python package installer and resolver)
If you don't have
uvinstalled, you can install it using:curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
Or via pip:
pip install uv
Getting Started
-
Clone the repository
git clone <repository-url> cd sflow
-
Create a virtual environment
uv venv -
Activate the virtual environment
source .venv/bin/activate
-
Install the project with development dependencies
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
This will install:
- The
sflowpackage in editable mode - All runtime dependencies (typer, pydantic, pyyaml, etc.)
- Development tools (pytest, pytest-cov, ipython, etc.)
- The
-
Run unit tests to validate your setup
pytest
Contributing to the project
Please follow the Git Flow process defined here: https://coda.io/d/_d0pJwz5IXhP/Manage-Git-branches-and-workflows_suLlBLYx
Metadata
Release files for nv-sflow 0.3.2
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nv_sflow-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for nv_sflow-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl |
Release files / nv_sflow-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | nv_sflow-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 1.1 MB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
cbf6bacc6d57f3e5154f2d8a0092a1bbb122f8d8aa820ebe82274030dafed46d
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
71e62a26b1963426c4ed38577955db1b67181f8581b13ed4a60d7574212bdf16
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
No |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.14.8
|
Security for nv-sflow 0.3.2
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
No provenance found
None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.
A note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.