Skip to main content

orbitplan

Feasibility planner for inference in orbit — find the constraint that's actually stopping you.

Three things decide whether a model can run in space, and they fight each other: the array has to make the power, the radiator has to shed the heat that power becomes, and the ground link has to carry whatever data survives. Optimising one in isolation is how orbital compute plans die. orbitplan reconciles all three against a real sensor or serving load and names the binding constraint.

Part of a set:

  • orbitherm — sizes the radiator (used automatically when installed)
  • radshield — keeps the model correct under radiation-induced bit flips

Install

pip install orbitplan            # core
pip install orbitplan[thermal]   # + orbitherm for the full thermal model

Quick start

import orbitplan as op

plan = op.MissionPlan(
    sensor=op.Sensor(burst_gb_per_s=10, duty_cycle=0.002),      # SAR instrument
    workload=op.Workload.preset("sar_segmenter", input_mb=800, output_mb=2),
    accelerator=op.Accelerator.preset("jetson_agx_orin"),
    power=op.PowerBudget(array_area_m2=8),
    thermal=op.ThermalBudget(radiator_area_m2=2),
    link=op.LinkBudget(band="x_band"),
)

r = plan.evaluate()
print(r.bottleneck)     # -> 'none'
print(r.summary())

Drop the onboard inference (output_mb=800) and the same satellite becomes downlink-bound: 1,728 GB/day of raw data against 72 GB/day of X-band capacity. That gap is the entire business case for processing in orbit.

Does a laser mesh fix it?

link = op.LinkBudget(band="x_band", relay=op.RelayLink(
    constellation_size=100, ground_stations=10))

print(link.gb_per_day)             # 694 GB/day, up from 72
print(link.relay.limiting_factor)  # 'ground segment'

Ten-fold more capacity — and the raw-downlink case is still infeasible. The optical terminals could carry ~600,000 GB/day; the constellation's share of ten ground stations is 622. Relaying through 100 satellites into 10 stations buys a tenth of ten stations. Widen the ground segment (20 sats / 30 stations → 9,400 GB/day) and it finally closes.

What it models

Power — solar array output derated for cell efficiency, packing, eclipse fraction, battery round-trip and PMAD losses, minus bus overhead.

Thermal — the heat-rejection ceiling on sustained compute. Delegates to orbitherm when installed; falls back to a bare Stefan-Boltzmann estimate otherwise.

Downlink — contact time × rate × passes, derated for protocol overhead, versus the data actually produced. Anything the payload can't process has to go down raw.

Inter-satellite relay (optional) — a laser crosslink mesh. A mesh doesn't create bandwidth, it creates reach: instead of storing data until this satellite flies over a station, it hands off to a neighbour that can see one now. So it's capped by the crosslink and by this satellite's share of the constellation's total ground pipe — and in practice the ground segment binds first, which is the part most mesh plans get wrong.

Workload — energy and latency per inference from real accelerator efficiency (peak TOPS derated by an achievable-utilisation factor, which is where most naive estimates go wrong).

Verdicts

evaluate() returns a PlanResult whose bottleneck is one of:

value meaning
power the array can't sustain the processing load
thermal the radiator can't shed the heat that load produces
downlink compute keeps up, but the results still don't fit the link
none all three close, with margin

Every result carries the numbers behind the call — margins, watts required versus available, GB/day generated versus downlinked — so you can see how far off you are, not just that you failed.

Presets

Accelerators: jetson_orin_nx, jetson_agx_orin, nvidia_l4, nvidia_h100. Workloads: resnet50, vit_b16, yolov8m, sar_segmenter, llm_1b_token. Bands: s_band, x_band, ka_band, optical. All overridable.

Scope

First-order feasibility triage — for architecture trade studies, go/no-go calls and sanity-checking orbital compute claims. Not a substitute for detailed mission design: it assumes circular LEO, worst-case (β=0) eclipse geometry, an isothermal radiator, and steady-state operation.

License

Apache-2.0

Metadata

Release files for orbitplan 0.2.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for orbitplan 0.2.0
File Size Uploaded
orbitplan-0.2.0.tar.gz 15.9 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for orbitplan 0.2.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
orbitplan-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 32.1 kB

Release files / orbitplan-0.2.0.tar.gz

Download URL orbitplan-0.2.0.tar.gz
Size 15.9 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
5f36872a705d7acc8bb8257830a9d4970f2db576a7e220795fc77bb9246c37b4
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ffd2174449b80e4b21ce8aa9840d992b16aa4e80b73d310a09853edadaa9b70f
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 31, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / orbitplan-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL orbitplan-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 16.2 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
bb10ad63aba69ba7398936c5d8bdc6bc30a70c3b9deb58c8525916574e5bdd85
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
4df53385697d14736c934e39f5e8991df4995cd6d1e92860f04a6c2b3e2b89e5
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 31, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

0.4.0

2 release files

0.3.0

2 release files

This release

0.2.0 This release

2 release files

0.1.0

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page