Skip to main content

Ossuary

OSS Supply Chain Risk Scoring - Where abandoned packages come to rest.

Ossuary is a governance-risk triage system for open source packages. It scores each package on observable governance evidence (0-100) so that a reviewer can decide where limited attention should go before an incident becomes known.

What It Detects

Ossuary targets the subset of supply chain attacks where governance weakness is a precondition - social engineering takeovers, abandoned packages, governance disputes. High maintainer concentration isn't inherently dangerous (pciutils has been maintained by one person for 28 years), but combined with other signals it becomes meaningful.

Can Detect Cannot Detect
Social engineering takeover (xz pattern) Account compromise (stolen tokens)
Abandoned packages Dependency confusion
Governance disputes (left-pad pattern) Typosquatting
Newcomer takeover patterns CI/CD exploits
Economic frustration signals Active maintainer sabotage

Quick Start

# Install from PyPI
pip install ossuary-risk

# Set GitHub token for API access (optional but recommended)
export GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_xxxxxxxxxxxxx

# Initialize database
ossuary init

# Score a single package
ossuary score event-stream -e npm
ossuary score numpy -e pypi
ossuary score serde -e cargo

# Score with historical cutoff (T-1 analysis)
ossuary score event-stream -e npm --cutoff 2018-09-01

# Score an entire dependency tree
ossuary score-deps transformers -e pypi

# Score every component in an SBOM (CycloneDX or SPDX)
ossuary score-sbom product.cdx.json
ossuary score-sbom product.spdx.json --enrich enriched.cdx.json --annex-vii report.json

# Estimate the implied maximum CRA support period
ossuary support-period lodash -e npm
ossuary support-period-sbom product.cdx.json

# Show dependency tree with risk scores
ossuary deps express

# Generate xkcd-2347 tower visualization
ossuary xkcd-tree transformers -e pypi --tower -o tower.svg

# Batch score from seed file (--repo-aware groups sibling packages
# that share a repo so the snapshot cache is warmed once per repo)
ossuary seed-custom my-seed.yaml --repo-aware

# Show packages with biggest score changes
ossuary movers

# Show cache state
ossuary cache-stats

Supported Ecosystems

npm, PyPI, Cargo, RubyGems, Packagist, NuGet, Go, GitHub

Scoring Methodology

Final Score = Base Risk + Activity Modifier + Protective Factors
             (20-100)      (-30 to +20)        (-105 to +45)

Base Risk from maintainer concentration. Activity Modifier rewards active maintenance, penalizes abandonment. Protective Factors include maintainer reputation, funding (GitHub Sponsors), org ownership, visibility (downloads/stars), community size, and responsibility-shift detection.

Responsibility-shift detection: compares a contributor's recent commit share against its historical baseline. A shift from 2% to 50% on a mature project raises an alert that deserves review; it does not imply malicious intent, only that responsibility changed enough to justify a look. Guards prevent false positives for established contributors, long-tenure maintainers, and internal org handoffs.

See the methodology for full details.

Visualization

The xkcd-tree command generates dependency tower diagrams inspired by xkcd 2347. Block color = risk score, block width = contributor count, arrow = most structurally critical dependency.

ossuary score-deps transformers -e pypi  # score all deps first
ossuary xkcd-tree transformers -e pypi --tower -o tower.svg

CRA Compliance Workflow

Ossuary plugs into a Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/2847) workflow:

  • ossuary score-sbom consumes the manufacturer's SBOM (CycloneDX or SPDX) and scores every component, mapping CRA Article 13(5) due-diligence on third-party components to a per-component governance signal.
  • --enrich writes the SBOM back with scores attached as CycloneDX components[].properties[] entries or SPDX 2.3 package-level annotations[] entries (validated against the official SPDX 2.3 JSON Schema in CI; an optional interop test round-trips through spdx-tools).
  • --annex-vii produces a structured, timestamped, methodology-versioned record suitable for inclusion in the Annex VII technical documentation required by Article 13(4).
  • ossuary support-period[-sbom] derives the implied maximum support period a manufacturer can defensibly claim under Article 13(8), bounded by the worst-governance critical dependency.

These outputs do not change the underlying scoring methodology; they are derivations on top of it. See methodology §12 for full details and the heuristic mapping behind the support-period derivation.

Dashboard

# Install with dashboard dependencies
pip install "ossuary-risk[dashboard]"

# Run dashboard
ossuary dashboard

Features: risk overview, ecosystem breakdown, package detail with score history, delta detection (biggest movers).

REST API

ossuary api
curl http://localhost:8100/score/pypi/flask
curl http://localhost:8100/check/npm/express

Interactive docs at http://localhost:8100/docs.

The API binds to 127.0.0.1 by default. If you deliberately expose it with --host 0.0.0.0, put it behind an authenticated, rate-limited reverse proxy: scoring performs outbound registry/GitHub requests and repository clones.

Validation

Validated on 184 packages across 8 ecosystems with a formal scoped validation framework (methodology v6.4.3; current-state cutoff 2026-08-15, fixed per-incident T−1 cutoffs retained):

Metric All incidents In-scope only (Scope B)
Accuracy 83.7% 92.6%
Precision 94.7% 94.1%
Recall 56.2% 76.2%
F1 Score 0.706 0.842

Ossuary detects governance risk, not all supply chain attacks. The "in-scope" metrics count only incidents where governance weakness was observable before the attack — governance decay, protestware, weak-governance compromise, and governance risk. Out-of-scope incidents (credential theft on healthy projects, CI/CD exploits) are included in the dataset but not counted against recall.

2 false positives (jsonwebtoken, Newtonsoft.Json). The 10 in-scope false negatives are listed with package-level mechanisms in the validation report. The v6.4.3 measurement correction excludes standard GitHub [bot] commits from the activity count; this moves telnyx from 55 to 85 because 502 of its 513 current-year commits were authored by stainless-app[bot]. Commit frustration is also restricted to the top non-[bot] contributor; four false technical-phrase hits disappear without changing a final score or classification.

See the validation report for full analysis. The separate post-freeze diagnostic ML experiment publishes its sanitized matrix, fixed model protocol, OOF predictions, and reviewed same-population comparisons. It is methodological support, not an independent prospective validation set.

Development

git clone https://github.com/anicka-net/ossuary-risk.git
cd ossuary-risk
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e ".[dev,dashboard]"
cp .env.example .env  # add GITHUB_TOKEN
ossuary init

Configuration

GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_xxxxxxxxxxxxx     # GitHub API access (recommended)
DATABASE_URL=sqlite:///ossuary.db  # Default; supports PostgreSQL
OSSUARY_CACHE_DAYS=7               # Score freshness threshold

License

MIT

Academic Context

MBA thesis research on OSS supply chain risk (VŠE Prague, due Dec 2026).

AI assistance declaration: AI agents from several providers were used extensively for implementation, research, validation, adversarial review and thesis drafting. Substantial repository contributions are attributed in Git history. The full workflow, verification process and author contribution are documented in the thesis AI-use appendix.

Key contribution: governance-based risk indicators are observable in public metadata before incidents occur, supporting governance-risk triage across a declared attack subset rather than a universal detector.

Agent Contract

This repository accepts AI agent contributions. See AGENTS.md for the repository contract and spec/ for the machine-facing version. The contract emphasizes correctness, reproducibility, and academic honesty: agents must not overclaim results, fabricate sources, or let methodology, validation, code, and public documentation drift out of sync.

Metadata

Release files for ossuary-risk 1.0.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for ossuary-risk 1.0.0
File Size Uploaded Provenance Actions
ossuary_risk-1.0.0.tar.gz 1.7 MB Without provenance Details for ossuary_risk-1.0.0.tar.gz

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for ossuary-risk 1.0.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform Actions
ossuary_risk-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details for ossuary_risk-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl

Total release size: 3.5 MB

Release files / ossuary_risk-1.0.0.tar.gz

Download URL ossuary_risk-1.0.0.tar.gz
Size 1.7 MB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
8e8755c6e839e7e4311792f1538a41ca762fbc2915a53be3a1c3255977abc167
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
7bce9b09d0c646f69a6d5e210fbc48fad045af508790d4fb9adaa494fd0dd44f
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.13

Release files / ossuary_risk-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL ossuary_risk-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 1.7 MB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
32e0e1c8cfeb197b8e5472d2920a19bf4e1b04197737bb20751776072e9b1ddb
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
e11c2023be9b3a7be7ecf43c88450391f651941c700cc63ebfb8129aeb6d6078
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.13

Security for ossuary-risk 1.0.0

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

No provenance found

None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page