Skip to main content

PDF OCR Confidence

Optimize your Docling pipeline at scale — Pre-filter PDFs to skip unnecessary OCR processing and route documents to the right backend.

What It Does

Analyzes PDF documents before expensive OCR processing to:

  • ✅ Skip Docling entirely for native text PDFs (10x faster)
  • ✅ Route to optimal OCR backend (Tesseract vs EasyOCR)
  • ✅ Batch triage 10K+ PDFs into priority queues
  • ✅ Estimate processing time/cost before committing resources

Why Use This?

Problem: Docling initialization takes 2-3 seconds per PDF. For native text documents, that's pure overhead.

Solution: Pre-analyze PDFs in milliseconds, extract native text directly, and only use Docling when necessary.

Performance Gains

Processing 1000 mixed-quality PDFs:

Method Time Cost
Without pre-filtering 50 min 100%
With pre-filtering 23 min 54% faster ✅

Assumes 60% native text, 30% high-quality scans, 10% low-quality scans

Installation

pip install pdf-ocr-confidence

Quick Start: Docling Integration

1. Fast-path for Native Text PDFs

from pdf_ocr_confidence import should_use_docling, extract_native_text

if not should_use_docling("report.pdf"):
    # Skip Docling - extract text directly (10x faster)
    text = extract_native_text("report.pdf")
else:
    # Use Docling for scanned/low-quality PDFs
    from docling.document_converter import DocumentConverter
    doc = DocumentConverter().convert("report.pdf")
    text = doc.export_to_markdown()

2. Batch Triage & Optimal Routing

from pdf_ocr_confidence import get_docling_strategy

# Analyze each PDF
strategy = get_docling_strategy("invoice.pdf")

if not strategy["use_docling"]:
    # Native text - skip Docling
    text = extract_native_text("invoice.pdf")
elif strategy["ocr_backend"] == "tesseract":
    # High quality - use fast OCR
    doc = DocumentConverter(
        pipeline_options=PipelineOptions(
            do_ocr=True,
            ocr_backend="tesseract"
        )
    ).convert("invoice.pdf")
else:
    # Low quality - use robust OCR
    doc = DocumentConverter(
        pipeline_options=PipelineOptions(
            do_ocr=True,
            ocr_backend="easyocr"
        )
    ).convert("invoice.pdf")

3. Cost Estimation Before Processing

from pdf_ocr_confidence import estimate_processing_time

estimate = estimate_processing_time("large_doc.pdf")
print(f"Expected time: {estimate['time_seconds']}s")
print(f"Recommended backend: {estimate['recommended_backend']}")
print(f"Page count: {estimate['page_count']}")

Advanced Usage

Standalone Analysis (Without Docling)

from pdf_ocr_confidence import analyze_pdf

result = analyze_pdf("document.pdf")

print(f"Confidence: {result.confidence:.2f}")
print(f"Recommendation: {result.recommendation}")

# Per-page details
for page in result.pages:
    print(f"Page {page.number}: {page.confidence:.2f}")

Custom Thresholds

from pdf_ocr_confidence import analyze_pdf, ConfidenceConfig

config = ConfidenceConfig(
    expensive_ocr_threshold=0.4,  # Below this = expensive OCR
    cheap_ocr_threshold=0.7,      # Above this = cheap OCR
    sample_pages=5,               # Pages to analyze (None = all)
    min_dpi=150,                  # Minimum acceptable DPI
)

result = analyze_pdf("document.pdf", config=config)

How It Works

  1. Native Text Detection: Checks if PDF has extractable text layer
  2. Image Quality Analysis:
    • DPI/Resolution check
    • Blur detection (Laplacian variance)
    • Contrast analysis (histogram)
    • Edge density (text clarity)
  3. Confidence Scoring: Weighted combination of metrics
  4. Routing Recommendation: Native text / Tesseract / EasyOCR

Real-World Example

from pdf_ocr_confidence import get_docling_strategy, extract_native_text

def process_pdf_batch(pdf_paths):
    native_count = 0
    docling_count = 0
    
    for pdf_path in pdf_paths:
        strategy = get_docling_strategy(pdf_path)
        
        if not strategy["use_docling"]:
            # Fast path: skip Docling
            text = extract_native_text(pdf_path)
            native_count += 1
        else:
            # Use Docling with optimal backend
            doc = DocumentConverter().convert(pdf_path)
            text = doc.export_to_markdown()
            docling_count += 1
    
    print(f"Processed {native_count} PDFs without Docling (fast)")
    print(f"Processed {docling_count} PDFs with Docling (OCR)")

Result: If 60% of your PDFs have native text, you save 60% of Docling initialization overhead.

Examples

See examples/docling_integration.py for:

  • Complete pipeline integration
  • Batch processing with queues
  • Cost estimation
  • Priority-based routing

Run it:

python examples/docling_integration.py your_document.pdf

Use Cases

✅ Large-scale document processing (thousands of PDFs)
✅ Mixed-quality document pipelines (invoices, reports, scans)
✅ Cost optimization for cloud OCR services
✅ Pre-filtering before Docling/Tesseract/EasyOCR
✅ Queue-based batch processing

❌ Small batches (< 100 PDFs) — overhead not worth it
❌ All scanned documents — if everything needs OCR, skip pre-analysis
❌ Single OCR backend — if you only use Tesseract, limited benefit

Performance

Operation Time (avg)
Native text detection 0.05s per page
Quality analysis 0.1s per page
Docling initialization 2-3s per PDF

Breakeven point: If >30% of your PDFs have native text, pre-filtering is worth it.

Dependencies

  • PyMuPDF (fitz) - PDF text extraction and rendering
  • Pillow - Image processing
  • numpy - Numerical operations
  • opencv-python - Advanced image analysis

Roadmap

  • Batch API for parallel analysis
  • Rotation/skew detection
  • Language detection for OCR model selection
  • Table/form detection heuristics
  • Integration examples for AWS Textract, Google Vision

Contributing

PRs welcome! Focus areas:

  • Better quality heuristics
  • Docling integration patterns
  • Performance benchmarks
  • Real-world use cases

License

MIT

Metadata

Release files for pdf-ocr-confidence 0.2.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for pdf-ocr-confidence 0.2.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform Actions
pdf_ocr_confidence-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details for pdf_ocr_confidence-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl

Release files / pdf_ocr_confidence-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL pdf_ocr_confidence-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 14.4 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
55ff9b89bdb5b99982948b7252207c118893914e42382b84561b49e7bff082b4
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
d63e58b03ce65aab4f254f53e594dc214d204994213049b28366b3c4f8cfdfeb
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/6.2.1.dev29+g03adccea5 CPython/3.11.4

Security for pdf-ocr-confidence 0.2.0

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

No provenance found

None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

This release

0.2.0 This release

1 release file No provenance

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page