Build any specialist LLM agent declaratively. Persona, frameworks, probes, red flags, and themes as data — you get a typed, cited, safety-aware agent. Domain-agnostic, provider-agnostic.
Project description
personakit
Build any specialist LLM agent declaratively. Describe a role — persona, frameworks, probes, red flags, recommendation themes — as a single data object, and get a typed, cited, safety-aware agent. No chain wiring, no graph building, no orchestration code.
Works with any LLM provider. Domain-agnostic: engineering, fintech, customer support, product, legal, clinical, education, delivery — one library, one pattern.
Created by Majidul Islam.
pip install personakit
The idea
A specialist agent is rarely about retrieval — it's about role, tone, knowledge frameworks, diagnostic questions, safety triggers, and output shape. All of that can be captured declaratively:
- A code reviewer has frameworks (OWASP, SOLID), probes (does it have tests? what's the blast radius?), and red flags (hard-coded secrets, SQL injection).
- A fintech compliance officer has frameworks (AML/BSA, OFAC, FATF typologies), probes (amount, country pair, velocity), and red flags (sanctioned counterparty, structuring).
- A customer support triage agent has frameworks (refund policy, escalation matrix), probes (order ID, sentiment), and red flags (chargeback language, data request).
- A scrum master has frameworks (Scrum Guide, DORA), probes (days remaining, WIP count), and red flags (scope creep, external blocker without owner).
personakit turns that shape into a library. One Specialist object = one
declarative agent. Ship it via Python, or hand a YAML file to a domain expert
and let them author without touching any chain code.
The distinctive primitives:
| Concept | What it gives you |
|---|---|
| Specialist | Frozen dataclass — the entire agent definition, authorable in YAML |
| Framework | Body of knowledge with a citation key, cited in output |
| Probe | Diagnostic question; becomes a typed field in the structured response |
| RedFlag | Trigger → severity → action → citation, matched deterministically AND semantically |
| Theme | User-selectable recommendation category |
| Priority | Always-on checks reported as met / unmet / unknown |
| Tool (optional) | @tool decorator — opt-in for external memory, DB, APIs |
Core has just two runtime deps: pydantic and httpx.
Quickstart — any domain in 20 lines
import asyncio
from personakit import Agent, Specialist, Framework, Probe, RedFlag, Severity, Theme
product_manager = Specialist(
name="product_manager",
display_name="Senior Product Manager",
persona="You are a senior B2B SaaS PM. You sharpen feature specs and find edge cases.",
frameworks=[Framework(name="Jobs-to-be-Done"), Framework(name="RICE scoring")],
probes=[
Probe(question="What is the user's job-to-be-done?"),
Probe(question="What is the current workaround cost?", value_type="string"),
Probe(question="Is there a measurable success metric proposed?",
value_type="boolean", weight="high"),
],
red_flags=[
RedFlag(
trigger="No success metric defined",
severity=Severity.HIGH,
action="Block PRD review. Require a quantitative success metric before scoping.",
),
],
themes=[Theme(name="Refinements"), Theme(name="Edge cases"), Theme(name="Open questions")],
)
agent = Agent(specialist=product_manager, model="gpt-4o-mini")
async def main():
result = await agent.analyze(
"PRD: Add a 'dark mode' toggle to settings. Shipping next quarter."
)
print(result.pretty())
asyncio.run(main())
Bundled specialists across domains
from personakit.examples import (
CODE_REVIEWER, # engineering — PRs, OWASP, SOLID
CONTRACT_REVIEWER, # legal — M&A redlines, GDPR
CUSTOMER_SUPPORT_TRIAGE, # support — SaaS B2C, refund policy, escalation
FALLS_PREVENTION_NURSE, # clinical — NICE guidelines, post-fall protocol
FINTECH_TRANSACTION_REVIEWER, # finance — AML/fraud, OFAC, FATF typologies
MATH_TUTOR, # education — Socratic, minimal shape
SCRUM_MASTER, # delivery — sprint health, blockers, WIP limits
)
Each one is a template. Copy, edit, ship your own.
Real agent types you can build in one file
| You want an agent that... | Define these concepts |
|---|---|
| Reviews pull requests for security and correctness | Framework(OWASP), RedFlag(sql_injection, hardcoded_secret), Theme(Security, Performance) |
| Screens fintech transactions for AML / sanctions | Framework(BSA/AML, OFAC), RedFlag(sanctioned_counterparty, structuring), typology Themes |
| Triages customer support messages | Probe(order_id, sentiment), RedFlag(chargeback_language), Theme(Resolution, Escalation) |
| Coaches a sprint team as a scrum master | Framework(Scrum Guide, DORA), RedFlag(scope_creep, external_blocker), Theme(At-risk stories, Retro candidates) |
| Reviews M&A contracts for legal risk | Framework(English common law, UCC), RedFlag(unlimited_liability), Theme(Liability, IP) |
| Runs a post-fall clinical assessment | Framework(NICE NG161, NICE CG176), RedFlag(LOC, head_contact_on_anticoagulant), clinical probes |
| Writes product specs against JTBD | Framework(Jobs-to-be-Done, RICE), RedFlag(no_success_metric), Theme(Edge cases, Open questions) |
| Tutors a student without giving away answers | Theme(Concept check, Next hint, Common pitfall), Constraint(no direct answer first) |
| Does equity research on a public SaaS name | Framework(DCF, Rule of 40), RedFlag(NDR_below_100, negative_fcf_plus_decel), Theme(Thesis, Risks) |
YAML authoring — hand off to a domain expert
name: code_reviewer
persona: Senior staff engineer reviewing PRs. Correctness, security, perf, in that order.
frameworks: [OWASP Top 10, SOLID, 12-Factor App]
probes:
- question: Does the change include tests?
key: has_tests
value_type: boolean
weight: high
red_flags:
- trigger: Hard-coded secret or API key
severity: critical
action: BLOCK merge. Rotate the secret. Move to a secret manager.
match: both
patterns: ['sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20,}', 'AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}']
themes: [Correctness, Security, Performance, Maintainability, Tests]
from personakit import Specialist, Agent
spec = Specialist.from_yaml("code_reviewer.yaml")
agent = Agent(specialist=spec, model="claude-sonnet-4-6")
Red flags — the feature no-one else has
Every RedFlag is a trigger → severity → action → citation contract, matched in two phases:
- Deterministic pre-match — regex / keywords on raw input. Fast, offline, quotable.
- Semantic post-match — the LLM evaluates whether the trigger applies in context. Catches paraphrase, synonyms, implicit meaning.
Results merge, with deterministic evidence winning on ties:
RedFlag(
trigger="Hard-coded secret, token, or credential",
severity=Severity.CRITICAL,
action="BLOCK merge. Rotate secret. Move to secret manager.",
citation="OWASP A02:2021",
match=MatchMode.BOTH,
patterns=[r"sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20,}", r"AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}"],
)
Structured output — derived from the Specialist
You never write a JSON schema by hand. The probes, red flags, and themes are the schema:
result = await agent.analyze(input_text)
result.summary # narrative summary
result.probes_answered # {probe_key: typed_value_or_null}
result.probes_unanswered # list[Probe] — next-round questions
result.red_flags_triggered # list[TriggeredRedFlag] with evidence + source
result.recommendations # themed list with citations
result.citations_used # framework citation keys referenced
result.priorities_status # per-priority met / unmet / unknown
result.has_urgent # convenience boolean
Tools — opt-in, for external memory & APIs
Core has zero coupling to tool calling. When you want tools, decorate functions and attach:
from personakit.tools import tool
@tool
def lookup_order(order_id: str) -> dict:
"""Fetch an order from the order database."""
return order_db.get(order_id)
@tool
def search_knowledge_base(query: str, top_k: int = 5) -> list[str]:
"""Semantic search against the internal KB — your vector store."""
return kb.search(query, k=top_k)
support_agent = Agent(specialist=CUSTOMER_SUPPORT_TRIAGE, model="gpt-4o-mini")
support_agent = support_agent.with_tools([lookup_order, search_knowledge_base])
OpenAI and Anthropic tool-calling happen through the same interface. Schemas are auto-built from your function signatures and docstrings.
Registry — one app, many specialists
from personakit import SpecialistRegistry
registry = SpecialistRegistry.from_directory("personas/")
# Route by domain
engineering_agents = registry.by_domain("engineering")
finance_agents = registry.by_domain("finance")
# Route by name
support = registry.get("support_triage")
Providers
| Extra | Install | Default model |
|---|---|---|
personakit[openai] |
openai>=1.0 |
gpt-4o-mini |
personakit[anthropic] |
anthropic>=0.20 |
claude-sonnet-4-6 |
personakit[yaml] |
pyyaml>=6.0 |
— |
personakit[all] |
all of the above | — |
MockProvider ships in the core for offline testing — no API key needed:
from personakit.testing import MockProvider
provider = MockProvider(responses={"summary": "...", "recommendations": [...]})
Testing helpers
from personakit.testing import assert_triggered, assert_cited
result = await agent.analyze("Customer: 'I want to chargeback this transaction.'")
assert_triggered(result, "legal_or_chargeback_language_attorney_lawsuit_chargeback_small_claims_bbb")
Design principles
- Specialist is pure data. No behaviour, no side effects, serializable.
- Schema is derived. Probes, red flags, themes are the output contract.
- Deterministic where possible, semantic where needed. Red flags run both.
- Tools are opt-in. Core has zero coupling to tool calling.
- Minimal dependencies.
pydantic+httpx. Everything else is an extra. - Domain-neutral. Engineering, support, fintech, legal, clinical, education, delivery, product — one library.
- Provider-agnostic. Same Specialist, any model.
Works alongside the rest of the LLM toolchain
personakit focuses on declarative specialist definition. It intentionally does not try to be:
- a chain-composition library — use LangChain when you need to wire up complex multi-step LLM pipelines
- a multi-agent orchestration framework — use CrewAI when you need a team of agents collaborating on a shared goal
- a branching control-flow engine — use LangGraph when you need conditional routing and loops across nodes
They compose nicely. A LangChain chain can invoke a personakit Agent as one
of its steps. A CrewAI crew member can be a personakit Specialist. A
LangGraph node can call agent.analyze() and route on result.has_urgent.
Use personakit for what it's best at — the declarative specialist layer — and reach for the others when the problem actually needs chains, crews, or graphs.
Status
Alpha — API may evolve. See CHANGELOG.md.
Author
Majidul Islam — @Majidul17068
personakit is an independent open-source project. Contributions welcome.
License
MIT © 2026 Majidul Islam.
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file personakit-0.1.2.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: personakit-0.1.2.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 41.1 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.12.8
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
d0cb108607292d7d6749788237900dade291f803519c1bac5db6e76e011edebd
|
|
| MD5 |
c7ca23531e7590e0e109499eac7cef97
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
b182e21a5434e5cb6dad92f7800ca04e1017fe3abd409c660278e09a0d1781e7
|
File details
Details for the file personakit-0.1.2-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: personakit-0.1.2-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 47.6 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.12.8
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
7732c8ba82749967593e939f3d9ae4233e2d94283e9ecd1aba370d277b67d232
|
|
| MD5 |
2bbb4ee4b94890ab1e50efc8fa47149e
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
30bdecfdaabc42e35416b251f82c5986dfdb951e1889f916841d53878cf452e6
|