pillory 1.1.1

A linter to scrutinize how you are using mocks in Python.

Pillory

A linter to scrutinize how you are using mocks in Python.

If you often hear or make the comment "patch the import not the definition" or spend a lot of time explaining or helping people debug mocks, this linter could help you.

Usage

Install from PyPI with pip:

pip install pillory

Run pillory on the current directory:

python -m pillory

Or give a specific file, directory, or glob:

python -m pillory 'tests/**/test_*.py'

Rules

PM101 patched implementation : You patched the implementation of a class or function instead of where it is imported to in the module under test. e.g. "parsers.Parser" where Parser is defined instead of "main.Parser" where it is used. This means you may not have affected the module under test at all, or you have replaced the target in a way which will affect other code that uses it, which is bad for test isolation (making sure tests don't affect other tests, and that each test tests what is intended and don't change how other parts of the code work). There is a warning about not affecting the right module in the Python Standard Library docs, but there is an even better article by Ned Batchelder explaining how it works and the additional problems with test isolation.

PM102 patched is not a top level module attribute : You patched something like a method on a class. Because class methods can't be imported by themselves, this means all uses of the class will be affected, not just the module under test.

PM103 patched builtins : You patched the builtins module instead of the built-in function in the module under test. Built-ins are actually added to every module and that's where they should be patched, to avoid similar issues to patching the implementation. There is a CPython detail that means the builtins module may be added to the lookup of each module, so patching the builtins module can work, but it's not guaranteed and it still has problems with test isolation.

Known issues

• No --help text.
• No console script entry point (pillory command), have to use with python -m.
• Only takes one path or glob.
• Only tested with Python 3.10.
• No config file support.
• No comments to ignore rules.
• Not fast.
• Globs have to be relative to the current directory.
• No further explanations for the errors.
• No pretty error handling, just tracebacks.
• Will error when mocking something in the module under test, which is arguably "OK".
• No pre-commit integration.

What's with the name?

I thought it was funny that mock can also mean "make fun of" as well as the meaning of "mimic" that we use in testing. I imagined the linter cruelly calling out how you are using mocks incorrectly. Except I couldn't call it "mock", or "mock mocker", that would be confusing! So I picked a name with a similar meaning, and starting with a P for that Python feeling.

Contributing

Thank you for your interest in making a contribution.

Please talk to the maintainer before making a pull request to make sure what you are adding is wanted.

This project uses the Apache License 2.0. You will be credited in the git history, but for ease of maintenance copyright stays with the maintainer.

There are linters, formatters, and tests as part of the CI. You can check them yourself locally too. To set up the linters as a pre-commit hook:

# Install the dev dependencies if not done already
pip install -r dev-requirements.txt
# Install the pre-commit hooks
pre-commit install

You can run the linters on command with:

pre-commit run -a

The unit tests are supposed to be fast tests for testing logic in a test driven developement style. They shouldn't have mocking or accounting for side effects. You can run them with:

python test_pillory.py

The example tests have a more complicated setup to include the file system and command line args. Try to limit the number of example tests. The tests use doctest to easily check the outputs. You can run them with:

python test_example.py -v

To run all the different tests and see the coverage given you can use:

make

The default make target is the coverage report in HTML format. You can look at the file in a browser, or if you don’t want to leave the terminal but still want a line by line coverage report, you can use browsh as your browser. You can run the tests, start a HTTP server, and view the report in browsh with this oneliner:

( make && cd build/htmlcov && python -m http.server 8081 &>/dev/null & browsh http://localhost:8081 ; kill $! )