pretest-did 0.1.1

Conditional extrapolation pre-testing for difference-in-differences in Python

pretest

Conditional Extrapolation Pre-Testing for Difference-in-Differences

Overview

pretest implements the conditional extrapolation pre-test and interval-reporting rule of Mikhaeil and Harshaw (2026) as a typed Python API. Given pre-treatment violations, a covariance structure, and an analyst threshold M, it returns a PretestResultSnapshot containing the pass/fail decision, conditional confidence interval, conventional comparison interval, and all diagnostic scalars.

Under the conditional extrapolation assumption, if pre-treatment violations do not exceed M, the conditional interval becomes reportable:

Assumption 3 (Conditional Extrapolation): If S_pre ≤ M, then S_post ≤ S_pre.

First Run:

import pretest

df, dgp = pretest.generate_did_data_from_preset("small_violation", n_units=200, seed=42)
snapshot = pretest.pretest_from_dataframe(
    df, outcome="outcome", treatment="treatment", time="time",
    threshold=1.0, treat_time=6, mode="iterative", seed=42,
)
print(snapshot.reporting_summary()["decision"])  # "PASS" or "FAIL"

Requirements

Requirement	Description
Python	3.11 or higher
Minimum 3 time periods	Tpre ≥ 2. Iterative violations ν̂t are defined for t ≥ 2.
Block adoption design	All treated units share a single treatment time t0. Staggered adoption is not supported.
Binary treatment	Coded as 0 (control) or 1 (treated).
Complete time-group cells	Each period must have observations in both groups.

Data Completeness

When some time periods lack observations for either group, the covariance matrix cannot be computed. The API returns an invalid PretestResultSnapshot:

• snapshot.reporting_summary()["decision"] → "INVALID"
• snapshot.reporting_summary()["data_valid"] → 0
• snapshot.conditional_interval() → None

Two-Period Designs

This package cannot be used for canonical 2×2 DID designs with only two time periods (T_pre < 2).

Installation

pip install pretest-did

From GitHub:

pip install "git+https://github.com/gorgeousfish/pretest-py.git#subdirectory=pretest-py"

Verify:

python -m pretest --version

Quick Start

import pretest

# Generate a DID dataset with a small pre-treatment violation
df, dgp = pretest.generate_did_data_from_preset("small_violation", n_units=200, seed=42)

# Run the full pre-test pipeline
snapshot = pretest.pretest_from_dataframe(
    df,
    outcome="outcome",
    treatment="treatment",
    time="time",
    threshold=1.0,
    treat_time=6,
    p=2.0,
    alpha=0.05,
    mode="iterative",
    simulations=5000,
    seed=42,
)

# Inspect the result
summary = snapshot.reporting_summary()
summary["decision"]              # "PASS", "FAIL", "INVALID", or "UNKNOWN"
summary["S_pre"]                 # pre-treatment severity
summary["threshold"]             # analyst threshold M
summary["conditional_interval"]  # conditional CI bounds (None if FAIL)
summary["conventional_interval"] # comparison interval bounds

API Reference

Core Functions

Function	Description	Reference
pretest_from_dataframe(...)	End-to-end pre-test from a DataFrame	Theorems 1–2
compute_pretest_snapshot(...)	Snapshot from pre-computed kernel inputs	Theorems 1–2
compute_severity(...)	Compute Ŝpre from violations	§2.1
classify_pretest(...)	Decision φ = 𝟙{Ŝpre > M}	Theorem 1
compute_kappa(...)	Bias-bound constant κ	Theorem 2
compute_ci_half_width(...)	Conditional CI half-width	Theorem 2
compute_critical_value(...)	Monte Carlo critical value f(α, Σ̂)	§3

Pipeline

Function	Description
compute_pretest_snapshot_from_records(...)	Snapshot from group-time CSV records
compute_pretest_kernel_inputs_from_records(...)	Extract kernel inputs from records
load_prop99_window_iter_records_from_csv(...)	Load Proposition 99 example records

Simulation

Function	Description
simulate_coverage(...)	Coverage from draw-level sequences
simulate_coverage_from_covariance(...)	Coverage from covariance specification
compute_section6_violation_path(...)	Section 6 violation path generator
run_monte_carlo_coverage(...)	Full Monte Carlo coverage experiment

Sensitivity

Function	Description
compute_m_sensitivity(...)	M-sensitivity analysis over a threshold grid

Data Generating Processes

Function	Description
generate_did_data(...)	Generate DID data from a DGPConfig
generate_did_data_from_preset(...)	Generate data from named presets
compute_true_covariance(...)	Population covariance for a DGP

Options

Option	Default	Description
threshold	—	Acceptable violation threshold M > 0 (required)
p	2	Severity norm p ≥ 1
alpha	0.05	Significance level
mode	"iterative"	"iterative" or "overall"
simulations	5000	Monte Carlo draws for critical value
seed	12345	Random seed
cluster	None	Column name for cluster-robust SE

Key Formulas

Pre-test (Theorem 1)

φ = 𝟙{Ŝ_pre > M}

φ = 0 → PASS (conditional interval reportable); φ = 1 → FAIL.

Average DID Estimand

Important: δ̄̂ is not the traditional ATT.

δ̂_t = (Ȳ_t,D=1 − Ȳ_t₀,D=1) − (Ȳ_t,D=0 − Ȳ_t₀,D=0)

δ̄̂ = (1/T_post) × Σ_t=t₀^T δ̂_t

Aspect	Paper's δ̄̂	Traditional ATT
Reference point	Treatment time t0	Pre-treatment average
δ̂t₀	Always 0 (by construction)	N/A
Interpretation	Incremental change from t0	Total treatment effect

Conditional Confidence Interval (Theorem 2)

Iterative mode (default):

I = δ̄̂ ± {κ · Ŝ_pre + f(α, Σ̂) / √n}

Overall mode:

I^Δ = δ̄̂ ± {Ŝ^Δ_pre + f^Δ(α, Σ̂^Δ) / √n}

κ Constant (Iterative Mode Only)

κ = ((1/T_post) · Σ_t=1^T_post t^q)^1/q

where q is the Hölder conjugate of p. In overall mode κ = 1 (no multiplier).

Result Object

PretestResultSnapshot fields accessible via reporting_summary():

Field	Description
decision	"PASS", "FAIL", "INVALID", or "UNKNOWN"
data_valid	1 if input data passed validation
S_pre	Pre-treatment severity
threshold	Analyst threshold M
phi	Pre-test indicator (0 = pass, 1 = fail)
kappa	Bias-bound constant κ
delta_bar	Average DID estimate δ̄̂
se_delta_bar	Standard error of δ̄̂
f_alpha	Simulated critical value
simulations	Number of Monte Carlo draws
seed	Random seed used
conditional_interval	(lower, upper) or None if test fails
conventional_interval	(lower, upper) comparison interval
mode	"iterative" or "overall"

Additional methods:

snapshot.conditional_interval()   # -> tuple[float, float] | None
snapshot.conventional_interval()  # -> tuple[float, float] | None
snapshot.reporting_summary()      # -> dict with all fields above

Mode Selection: Iterative vs. Overall

Feature	Iterative Mode (Default)	Overall Mode (overall)
Assumption	Violations accumulate period-to-period	Violations bounded by cumulative total
Sensitivity	Sensitive to volatility/noise	Sensitive to drift/trend
Blind Spot	May pass smooth linear trends	May fail even if period-to-period changes are small
Bias Bound	Scaled by κ (∝ √Tpost)	No multiplier (κ = 1)
CI Width	Includes iterative κ multiplier	Appendix C kappa-free half-width

Reporting guidance:

1. Choose the mode before reading the conditional interval.
2. Use iterative mode when bounding period-to-period violations; overall mode when bounding cumulative divergence.
3. If the two modes disagree, treat the result as a diagnostic contrast.

Example

import numpy as np
import pretest

# Upstream event-study coefficients (e.g., from PyFixest or statsmodels)
relative_terms = (-2, -1, 0, 1, 2)
event_coefficients = np.array([0.125, -0.076, -0.271, -0.311, -0.240])
event_covariance = np.diag([0.0016] * 5) + 0.0008

# Extract pre/post indices
pre_idx = [i for i, t in enumerate(relative_terms) if t < 0]
post_idx = [i for i, t in enumerate(relative_terms) if t >= 0]
ordered = pre_idx + post_idx

# Compute kernel inputs
nu_vector = tuple(float(event_coefficients[i]) for i in pre_idx)
cov_matrix = tuple(
    tuple(float(event_covariance[r, c]) for c in ordered)
    for r in ordered
)
post_weights = np.ones(len(post_idx)) / len(post_idx)
delta_bar = float(post_weights @ event_coefficients[post_idx])
se_delta_bar = float(np.sqrt(
    post_weights @ event_covariance[np.ix_(post_idx, post_idx)] @ post_weights
))

# Run pretest
snapshot = pretest.compute_pretest_snapshot(
    "pretest outcome, treatment(treated) time(year) treat_time(2019) threshold(0.3)",
    pretest.DatasetProfile(
        time_periods=(2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021),
        treatment_values=(0, 1),
    ),
    nu_vector=nu_vector,
    covariance_matrix=cov_matrix,
    delta_bar=delta_bar,
    se_delta_bar=se_delta_bar,
    sample_size=240,
    simulations=5000,
    seed=42,
)

summary = snapshot.reporting_summary()
print(f"Decision: {summary['decision']}")
print(f"S_pre: {summary['S_pre']:.4f}")
print(f"Conditional CI: {summary['conditional_interval']}")
print(f"Conventional CI: {summary['conventional_interval']}")

For a minimal snapshot from already-computed scalars:

import pretest

snapshot = pretest.compute_pretest_snapshot(
    "pretest cigsale, treatment(treated) time(year) treat_time(1989) threshold(5)",
    pretest.DatasetProfile(
        time_periods=(1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991),
        treatment_values=(0, 1),
    ),
    nu_vector=(1.0, 2.0, 3.0),
    f_alpha=2.5,
    delta_bar=1.5,
    sample_size=100,
)
snapshot.reporting_summary()["decision"]
snapshot.conditional_interval()

M-Sensitivity Analysis

compute_m_sensitivity(...) evaluates how the pre-test decision and conditional interval respond to a grid of threshold values:

import pretest

result = pretest.compute_m_sensitivity(
    snapshot,
    m_grid=[0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0],
)
result.pass_threshold  # smallest M where the test passes
result.results          # list of per-M snapshots

Not Implemented in 0.1.0

• Triple difference-in-differences designs
• Staggered treatment adoption
• Covariate-adjusted estimation
• Threshold-sensitivity plots over a continuous range of M values

References

Mikhaeil, J. M., & Harshaw, C. (2026). Valid Inference when Testing Violations of Parallel Trends for Difference-in-Differences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.26470v3. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26470

Rambachan, A., & Roth, J. (2023). A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends. Review of Economic Studies, 90(5), 2555–2591. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad018

Roth, J. (2022). Pretest with Caution: Event-Study Estimates after Testing for Parallel Trends. American Economic Review: Insights, 4(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20210236

Authors

Python Implementation:

• Xuanyu Cai, City University of Macau Email: [e-mail]
• Wenli Xu, City University of Macau Email: [e-mail]

Methodology:

• Jonas M. Mikhaeil, Department of Statistics, Columbia University
• Christopher Harshaw, Department of Statistics, Columbia University

License

AGPL-3.0. See LICENSE for details.

Citation

If you use this package in your research, please cite:

APA Format:

Cai, X., & Xu, W. (2026). pretest: Conditional Extrapolation Pre-Testing for Difference-in-Differences (Version 0.1.0) [Computer software]. https://github.com/gorgeousfish/pretest-py

Mikhaeil, J. M., & Harshaw, C. (2026). Valid Inference when Testing Violations of Parallel Trends for Difference-in-Differences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.26470v3. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26470

BibTeX:

@software{cai2026pretest,
  author    = {Cai, Xuanyu and Xu, Wenli},
  title     = {pretest: Conditional Extrapolation Pre-Testing for Difference-in-Differences},
  year      = {2026},
  version   = {0.1.0},
  url       = {https://github.com/gorgeousfish/pretest-py}
}

@misc{mikhaeil2026validinferencetestingviolations,
      title={Valid Inference when Testing Violations of Parallel Trends for Difference-in-Differences},
      author={Jonas M. Mikhaeil and Christopher Harshaw},
      year={2026},
      eprint={2510.26470},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={stat.ME},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26470},
}