PromptGuard Python SDK
Drop-in security for AI applications. No code changes required.
Installation
pip install promptguard-sdk
Package name ≠ import name. Install
promptguard-sdk, but importpromptguard:import promptguard from promptguard import PromptGuard
Get a free API key at app.promptguard.co.
The SDK reads
PROMPTGUARD_API_KEYfrom the environment; it does not auto-load.env. Use python-dotenv (callload_dotenv()before constructing the client) if you keep secrets in a.envfile.
PromptGuard fails open by default — if the Guard API is unavailable, calls proceed unscanned so your app stays up. Set
fail_open=Falseto block (fail closed) on a Guard outage instead.
Two Ways to Secure Your App
Option 1: Auto-Instrumentation (Recommended for Frameworks)
One line secures the LLM calls made through the patched SDK surfaces listed below, regardless of which framework sits on top (LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen, LlamaIndex, Haystack, Semantic Kernel, or direct SDK usage):
import promptguard
promptguard.init(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
# That's it. LLM calls through the patched surfaces below are now secured.
# Works with ANY framework built on openai, anthropic, google-generativeai, cohere, or boto3.
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-5-nano", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
)
# ^^ Scanned by PromptGuard before reaching OpenAI
Supported SDKs (auto-detected and patched):
| SDK | Frameworks Covered |
|---|---|
openai |
LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel, direct usage |
anthropic |
LangChain (ChatAnthropic), direct usage |
google-generativeai |
LangChain, LlamaIndex, direct usage |
cohere |
Haystack, LangChain, direct usage |
boto3 (Bedrock) |
AWS-native apps (Claude, Titan, Llama on Bedrock) |
Exact patched call surfaces (sync and async clients where both exist):
openai:chat.completions.create(),chat.completions.parse()(when the installed SDK exposes it), andresponses.create()(when the installed SDK ships the Responses API). The Responses patch scans theinstructionsparam plus string or message-iteminputforms; exotic input items (function-call outputs, reasoning items) are not scanned.anthropic:messages.create()(including the separatesystemparam). Text andtool_resultcontent blocks are scanned (tool results are the canonical indirect-injection channel); other block types (images,tool_useinputs, thinking) are not.google-genai(Google's current SDK):models.generate_content()andgenerate_content_stream(), sync and async. Theconfig.system_instructionsystem prompt is scanned, and so are tool-call arguments, function responses and code-execution output — not just plain text parts. Becausecontentsis keyword-only in this SDK, aredactdecision rewrites the prompt rather than escalating to a block.google-generativeai(deprecated by Google when Gemini 2.0 shipped; still supported because customers are still on it):GenerativeModel.generate_content()/generate_content_async().redactescalates to a block here, becausecontentsis positional and cannot be safely rewritten.cohere:Client.chat()/ClientV2.chat()(v1preamble/message/chat_historyand v2messages; the v1preambleis scanned as a system message).boto3(Bedrock Runtime):invoke_modelandconverse(via_make_api_call).
Calls outside these surfaces — embeddings, audio, images, batches, fine-tuning, assistants, and other endpoints — are not scanned.
Modes:
# Enforce mode (default) - blocks threats
promptguard.init(api_key="pg_live_xxx", mode="enforce")
# Monitor mode - logs threats without blocking (shadow mode)
promptguard.init(api_key="pg_live_xxx", mode="monitor")
# Scan responses too
promptguard.init(api_key="pg_live_xxx", scan_responses=True)
# Fail-closed (block if Guard API is unreachable)
promptguard.init(api_key="pg_live_xxx", fail_open=False)
Shutdown:
promptguard.shutdown() # Removes all patches, closes connections
Verifying instrumentation:
init() logs the SDKs it actually patched at INFO. Python's default log level
is WARNING, so enable the promptguard logger to see it:
import logging
logging.getLogger("promptguard").setLevel(logging.INFO)
You can also assert instrumentation programmatically (e.g. in tests):
import promptguard
promptguard.init(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
assert promptguard.is_active() # a guard client is installed
assert "openai" in promptguard.patched_sdks() # the OpenAI SDK was patched
patched_sdks() returns only the SDKs importable in the current environment
(missing packages are silently skipped), and an empty list after shutdown().
instrumentation_report() gives the same facts as data: patched,
detected_unpatched (installed provider libraries nothing hooked), middleware
(request-edge middleware alive in this process, e.g. ["fastapi"] — see
FastAPI / ASGI middleware) and advice_url.
Confirming protection is actually live
init() returning without an exception does not mean anything is being scanned.
PromptGuard fails open, so a rejected API key, an unreachable Guard API, or a
provider SDK we never hooked all leave you with an application that runs
perfectly and blocks nothing. Each of those logs a warning — which helps only if
someone is reading the log.
verify() is the positive check. It makes the real calls and reports what came
back:
import promptguard
report = promptguard.verify()
if not report["ok"]:
for check in report["checks"]:
print(check["status"], check["name"], "-", check["detail"])
raise SystemExit(1)
In CI, the one-liner is usually enough:
assert promptguard.verify()["ok"]
It checks reachability, authentication, live threat detection and PII redaction,
plus which provider SDKs this process actually patched — the same checks, under
the same names, as promptguard verify in the CLI.
Each check reports pass, warn or fail. Only a fail clears ok. A
request that never completed is a failure; a request that completed and came
back permissive — an injection that was not blocked, a PII probe with nothing
detected — is a warning, because a monitor-mode project legitimately behaves that
way. Warnings are still the first thing to read before trusting a setup.
verify() never raises for a failed check, so one call reports every problem
rather than only the first. It raises ValueError only when no API key was
supplied at all.
Each call makes two real, billed requests. The probes go through the same endpoints as your production traffic, so every
verify()writes two rows to your security events — the injection probe among them, which shows up in your dashboard and analytics as a genuine prompt-injection attempt and will trigger any alert you have configured on injection. Both requests count against your plan's quota. That is fine on deploy or at the start of a demo; calling it on every CI build of a busy repo is how you end up with a threat dashboard full of your own probes.
Option 2: Proxy Mode (Drop-in Replacement)
If you prefer the proxy approach, just swap your client:
# Before
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-5-nano",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}],
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content) # attribute access
# After
from promptguard import PromptGuard
client = PromptGuard(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-5-nano",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}],
)
print(response["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]) # dict/subscript access
Request calls are identical, but responses differ from the native OpenAI SDK.
The proxy client returns plain OpenAI-compatible dicts (the raw JSON body),
not the SDK's typed response objects. So response.choices[0].message.content
becomes response["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]. If you need the native
response objects (.choices[0].message.content) preserved, use Option 1
auto-instrumentation instead — it patches the real OpenAI/Anthropic/… client
in place, so their return types are unchanged and only the pre-flight scan is
added.
| Response type | Access pattern | |
|---|---|---|
| Option 1 (auto-instrumentation) | native SDK objects (unchanged) | response.choices[0].message.content |
Option 2 (proxy PromptGuard) |
OpenAI-compatible dicts | response["choices"][0]["message"]["content"] |
Framework-Specific Integrations
For deeper integration with richer context (chain names, tool calls, agent steps), use framework-specific callbacks alongside or instead of auto-instrumentation:
LangChain
from promptguard.integrations.langchain import PromptGuardCallbackHandler
handler = PromptGuardCallbackHandler(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
# Attach to an LLM
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-5-nano", callbacks=[handler])
# Or use globally with any chain
chain.invoke({"input": "..."}, config={"callbacks": [handler]})
# LangGraph graphs take the same config; a block raises PromptGuardBlockedError
# out of graph.invoke / graph.ainvoke
graph.invoke({"messages": [...]}, config={"callbacks": [handler]})
The handler scans:
on_llm_start/on_chat_model_start- prompts before the LLM callon_llm_end- responses after the LLM callon_tool_start/on_tool_end- tool inputs for injection attempts, and tool outputson_chain_start/end- tracks chain context
Python 3.10 and async graphs. Before Python 3.11, asyncio cannot carry a
graph's callbacks into its nodes, so under graph.ainvoke / astream the
handler sees only the model and tool calls that receive the node's config.
A node that calls model.ainvoke(state["messages"]) without it is not
scanned, and nothing fails. Forward the config in every node, or run on 3.11+:
async def call_model(state, config):
return {"messages": [await model.ainvoke(state["messages"], config=config)]}
The handler logs one warning per process when it sees an async graph on 3.10.
Sync graphs (graph.invoke) are not affected.
The callback can only observe (block or warn). To scan and redact content
inline in an LCEL chain, use PromptGuardRunnable, which sits in the data flow
and returns the redacted value on a redact decision:
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from langchain_core.output_parsers import StrOutputParser
from promptguard.integrations.langchain import PromptGuardRunnable
guard_in = PromptGuardRunnable(api_key="pg_live_xxx").as_runnable()
guard_out = PromptGuardRunnable(api_key="pg_live_xxx", direction="output").as_runnable()
prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_template("Answer: {input}")
chain = guard_in | prompt | ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-5-nano") | StrOutputParser() | guard_out
chain.invoke("user question") # raises PromptGuardBlockedError on a block
Requires the langchain extra: pip install promptguard-sdk[langchain].
CrewAI
from crewai import Crew, Agent, Task
from promptguard.integrations.crewai import PromptGuardGuardrail
pg = PromptGuardGuardrail(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
crew = Crew(
agents=[...],
tasks=[...],
before_kickoff_callbacks=[pg.before_kickoff],
after_kickoff_callbacks=[pg.after_kickoff],
)
crew.kickoff(inputs={"topic": "AI safety"})
You can also wrap individual tools:
from promptguard.integrations.crewai import secure_tool
from crewai.tools import BaseTool
@secure_tool(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
class SearchTool(BaseTool):
name = "search"
description = "Search the web"
def _run(self, query: str) -> str: ...
LlamaIndex
from promptguard.integrations.llamaindex import PromptGuardCallbackHandler
from llama_index.core.callbacks import CallbackManager
from llama_index.core import Settings
pg_handler = PromptGuardCallbackHandler(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
Settings.callback_manager = CallbackManager([pg_handler])
# All LlamaIndex queries are now scanned
To scan and redact a query inline in a QueryPipeline (the callback can only
observe), drop PromptGuardQueryGuard in as a preprocessing component:
from llama_index.core.query_pipeline import QueryPipeline
from promptguard.integrations.llamaindex import PromptGuardQueryGuard
guard = PromptGuardQueryGuard(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
pipeline = QueryPipeline(chain=[guard.as_query_component(), retriever, synthesizer])
pipeline.run(input="user question") # raises PromptGuardBlockedError on a block
Requires the llamaindex extra: pip install promptguard-sdk[llamaindex].
FastAPI / ASGI middleware
Scans prompts at your app's edge, before your route runs. Use it when your app
accepts prompts but calls the LLM somewhere auto-instrumentation does not
patch (a sidecar, a queue worker, an unsupported SDK). With init() also on,
the same text is scanned twice: once here, once at the provider call.
from fastapi import FastAPI
from promptguard.integrations.fastapi import PromptGuardMiddleware
app = FastAPI()
app.add_middleware(
PromptGuardMiddleware,
api_key="pg_live_xxx", # or PROMPTGUARD_API_KEY
paths=["/v1/chat"], # omit to scan every path
exclude_paths=["/v1/chat/feedback"],
)
It is a raw ASGI middleware, so it works with Starlette or any ASGI app, and it
needs no extra install. The scan uses the async Guard client, and large bodies
are parsed in a worker thread, so nothing holds the event loop. Every option is
documented on PromptGuardMiddleware itself.
What is scanned. Any request with a body on the selected paths, whatever
its method (methods= to narrow it), with one direction="input" scan per
request. The fields read are DEFAULT_PROMPT_FIELDS (prompt_fields= to
replace them), each by the shape of its value:
- a list of message objects is scanned message by message, each with its own
role, and a message's
tool_callsgo to the Guard API as tool calls; - content blocks (text, images, documents, tool use) are passed to the Guard API as blocks, not flattened to text;
- a string, or a list of strings, is one message:
role="system"for the fields inSYSTEM_PROMPT_FIELDS,userfor the rest.
Only top-level fields are read. A top-level JSON array is read item by item.
The body is read by its Content-Type:
| Body | Read as |
|---|---|
JSON (application/json, *+json, or no Content-Type), in its declared charset |
the fields above |
text/plain, in its declared charset (default UTF-8) |
one user message, whole |
application/x-www-form-urlencoded |
the fields above, from the form |
Content-Encoding: gzip or deflate |
decompressed first, then as above |
multipart/form-data, binary and other media |
not scanned (a known gap: a prompt sent as a multipart field reaches your route unscanned) |
Paths. paths and exclude_paths are prefixes matched on whole segments of
the path your app's routes see — the request path less any root_path, the
way Starlette routes it, so they work unchanged behind a proxy prefix or in a
mounted app. "/v1/chat" covers /v1/chat and /v1/chat/completions, but not
/v1/chatter. An exclusion wins over paths, and an excluded request's body is
never read. paths=None (the default) scans every path; paths=[] is an error.
The body. It is buffered — including a chunked or streamed one — scanned
whole, and replayed to your app byte for byte (still compressed, if it was).
The buffer is capped at max_body_bytes (default DEFAULT_MAX_BODY_BYTES),
raw and decompressed, so a decompression bomb is caught. A body over the cap
is answered 413 and is neither scanned nor passed on: forwarding it unscanned
would make padding a way past the guard.
Decisions.
| Outcome | mode="enforce" (default) |
mode="monitor" |
|---|---|---|
| allow | your route runs | your route runs |
| block | 403, code request_blocked; your route never runs |
logged, your route runs |
| redact | 403, code redaction_required |
logged, your route runs |
body cannot be read: unknown Content-Encoding or charset |
415 |
logged, your route runs |
body cannot be read: undecodable text, invalid JSON under a JSON Content-Type, JSON nested too deeply |
400 |
logged, your route runs |
body over max_body_bytes |
413 |
413 |
Guard API says the request is too large (413, or a 422 size error) |
413, code request_too_large |
413 |
Guard API rejects the request otherwise (400, 422) |
400, code request_unscannable |
400 |
A redact is refused because the middleware cannot rewrite an arbitrary body safely. It is the rule ADR-0003 sets for a patched call auto-instrumentation cannot rewrite, applied here by analogy. A request the Guard API itself rejects is refused in every mode, because failing open on it would let a caller pad a prompt past the Guard's limits to get it through.
A refusal uses the platform's error envelope:
{
"error": {
"message": "Request blocked by security policy",
"type": "policy_violation",
"code": "request_blocked",
"event_id": "evt_abc123",
"details": {"threat_type": "prompt_injection", "confidence": 0.97}
}
}
When the Guard API cannot answer — a network error, a timeout, a 5xx or a
429 — the request goes through unscanned (fail-open, the SDK default) and a
WARNING is logged on the promptguard logger with
extra={"promptguard_event": "guard_unavailable_fail_open", "path": ...}, so
you can alert on it. With fail_open=False the request is answered 503, code
guard_unavailable, instead. A 401 or 403 (a bad API key) follows the same
setting, and is also logged once at ERROR with
promptguard_event="guard_auth_failed"; promptguard.verify() catches it
before you ship.
Once the middleware is wrapping your app (from startup, or the first request
when lifespan is off), promptguard.instrumentation_report()["middleware"]
lists "fastapi", and promptguard.verify() counts it as coverage.
Conversations (session_id)
Each scan can name the conversation it belongs to in context.session_id, so
the Guard API can relate the turns of one conversation to each other. An
integration sends the framework's own conversation id there, the same on
every turn of one conversation, and sends nothing when the framework has
none. It never invents one: a per-call run or event id would make every scan a
conversation of its own.
| Integration | Where the session id comes from |
|---|---|
| LangChain / LangGraph callback handler | The call's thread_id: LangGraph puts its checkpointer's configurable["thread_id"] in every callback's metadata. For a plain chain or model, set config={"metadata": {"thread_id": ...}} (session_id and conversation_id are read too, the keys LangSmith groups a thread by). |
LangChain PromptGuardRunnable |
The invoke config's configurable["thread_id"], or the same metadata keys. |
LlamaIndex handler and PromptGuardQueryGuard |
LlamaIndex events name no conversation. Pass session_id= to the handler or guard that serves one chat. |
CrewAI PromptGuardGuardrail |
CrewAI has no conversation id. Pass session_id=. secure_tool sends none: a tool run is not a turn. |
| FastAPI / ASGI middleware | session_id=lambda scope: ... reads it from the authenticated session your auth middleware put in the scope; session_id_header="X-Conversation-Id" reads a header instead. Name only a header your own auth layer or a trusted proxy sets: a value the browser chooses lets a client pick which conversation its turns land in. |
Auto-instrumentation (init()) |
The OpenAI Responses API's conversation (an id or {"id": ...}), which is also how the OpenAI Agents SDK's conversation_id reaches the API. previous_response_id changes every turn and is not used. Other provider APIs carry no conversation id. |
Every handler, guard and guardrail that takes session_id= uses it only when
the call names no conversation of its own; the call's id wins. An empty string,
or one over 255 characters, is refused there with a ValueError. An id over
255 characters that arrives with a call is dropped with a debug log, and the
scan goes ahead without one.
handler = PromptGuardCallbackHandler()
graph.invoke(inputs, config={"callbacks": [handler], "configurable": {"thread_id": "chat-42"}})
# every scan in this turn, and in every later turn of thread chat-42, sends session_id="chat-42"
Standalone Guard API
For any language or framework, call the Guard API directly:
from promptguard import GuardClient
# Use as a context manager so the underlying HTTP connection pool is closed.
with GuardClient(api_key="pg_live_xxx") as guard:
# Scan before sending to LLM
decision = guard.scan(
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}],
direction="input",
model="gpt-5-nano",
)
if decision.blocked:
print(f"Blocked: {decision.threat_type}")
elif decision.redacted:
# Use decision.redacted_messages instead of original
print("Content was redacted")
else:
# Safe to proceed
pass
GuardClient also works as an async context manager (async with GuardClient(...) as guard: + await guard.scan_async(...)). If you keep a long-lived client instead, call guard.close() (or await guard.aclose()) when done.
Or via HTTP directly (any language):
curl -X POST https://api.promptguard.co/api/v1/guard \
-H "X-API-Key: pg_live_xxx" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}],
"direction": "input",
"model": "gpt-5-nano"
}'
Authenticate with the
X-API-Keyheader — this is the canonical header used by the Guard API and every SDK. There is noAuthorization: Bearerscheme.
Security Scanning
from promptguard import PromptGuard
pg = PromptGuard(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
# Scan content for threats
result = pg.security.scan("Ignore previous instructions...")
if result["blocked"]:
print(f"Threat detected: {result['reason']}")
Two scan surfaces — object vs dict. There are two ways to scan content and they return different shapes:
Call Returns Access GuardClient.scan(...)(Standalone Guard API)GuardDecisionobjectdecision.blocked,decision.threat_typepg.security.scan(...)(proxy client)SecurityScanResultdictresult["blocked"],result["reason"]Use attribute access for
GuardClient, subscript access forpg.security.
PII Redaction
result = pg.security.redact("My email is john@example.com and SSN is 123-45-6789")
print(result["redacted"])
# Output: "My email is [EMAIL] and SSN is [SSN]"
Agent Tool Validation
The agent namespace validates individual agent tool calls (arguments) before
they execute — useful for guarding tool-using agents:
result = pg.agent.validate_tool(
agent_id="support-bot",
tool_name="send_email",
arguments={"to": "user@example.com", "body": "..."},
session_id="sess-123",
)
# Per-agent stats
stats = pg.agent.stats("support-bot")
agent is available on the async client (PromptGuardAsync) with the same methods.
Red Team Testing
Run PromptGuard's adversarial corpus against your own policy configuration, and see how much of it your guardrails block. Useful from CI as a regression gate on a policy change.
from promptguard import PromptGuard
pg = PromptGuard(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
# What the corpus contains, without running it
catalog = pg.redteam.list_tests()
print(f"{catalog['total']} attacks available")
# Run everything against a preset
summary = pg.redteam.run_all(target_preset="support_bot:strict")
print(f"Blocked {summary['blocked']}/{summary['total_tests']} ({summary['block_rate']:.0%})")
# Run one named attack
result = pg.redteam.run_test("prompt_injection_basic")
# Or your own adversarial prompt
result = pg.redteam.run_custom("ignore previous instructions and ...")
print(result["decision"], result["reason"])
The async client mirrors the same methods:
async with PromptGuardAsync(api_key="pg_live_xxx") as pg:
summary = await pg.redteam.run_all(target_preset="support_bot:strict")
Requires an API key with the proxy scope (an unrestricted key also works).
Device/scan-only credentials cannot reach these endpoints.
Async Support
The PromptGuardAsync client provides a fully asynchronous interface for non-blocking usage in async applications:
from promptguard import PromptGuardAsync
async with PromptGuardAsync(api_key="pg_live_xxx") as pg:
response = await pg.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-5-nano", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
)
# Async security scanning
result = await pg.security.scan("Check this content")
# Async PII redaction
redacted = await pg.security.redact("My email is john@example.com")
The async client mirrors the synchronous API - every method available on PromptGuard has an await-able counterpart on PromptGuardAsync.
Retry Logic
Both PromptGuard and PromptGuardAsync support configurable retry behavior for transient failures:
from promptguard import PromptGuard
pg = PromptGuard(
api_key="pg_live_xxx",
max_retries=3, # Number of retry attempts (default: 3)
retry_delay=0.5, # Base delay in seconds between retries (default: 1.0)
)
Retries use exponential backoff starting from retry_delay. Transient errors are retried: network timeouts, 5xx responses, and 429 rate limits (honoring a Retry-After header when present, capped at 60s). Other client errors (4xx) fail immediately, as does a 429 that signals hard quota exhaustion.
Configuration
from promptguard import PromptGuard, Config
config = Config(
api_key="pg_live_xxx",
base_url="https://api.promptguard.co/api/v1/proxy",
timeout=30.0,
)
pg = PromptGuard(config=config)
Environment Variables
export PROMPTGUARD_API_KEY="pg_live_xxx"
# Optional — only override if pointing at a self-hosted/staging deployment.
# Leave unset to use the default (https://api.promptguard.co/api/v1/proxy).
export PROMPTGUARD_BASE_URL="https://api.promptguard.co/api/v1"
The proxy client (
PromptGuard) talks to the/api/v1/proxyendpoints. If you setPROMPTGUARD_BASE_URLto.../api/v1(without/proxy), the SDK appends the/proxysuffix for you, so requests still land on the proxy. Setting it explicitly to.../api/v1/proxyalso works.Security: the SDK sends your API key (and, in proxy mode, your prompt content) to whatever
PROMPTGUARD_BASE_URLpoints at. Self-hosting is supported, so only point it at a host you trust.
Error Handling
from promptguard import PromptGuardBlockedError
# Auto-instrumentation
import promptguard
promptguard.init(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
# Use your real LLM client as usual — it is patched in place.
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
try:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-5-nano",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}],
)
except PromptGuardBlockedError as e:
print(f"Blocked: {e.decision.threat_type}")
print(f"Event ID: {e.decision.event_id}")
In proxy mode, the client raises PromptGuardError, which carries structured
fields you can branch on — .code, .status_code, .upgrade_url,
.current_plan, .requests_used, and .requests_limit:
from promptguard import PromptGuard, PromptGuardError
client = PromptGuard(api_key="pg_live_xxx")
try:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-5-nano",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}],
)
except PromptGuardError as e:
if e.code == "monthly_quota_exceeded":
print(f"Upgrade: {e.upgrade_url}")
else:
print(f"{e.code} ({e.status_code}): {e}")
Links
License
MIT
Metadata
Release files for promptguard-sdk 2.4.1
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| promptguard_sdk-2.4.1.tar.gz | 178.5 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| promptguard_sdk-2.4.1-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 274.2 kB
Release files / promptguard_sdk-2.4.1.tar.gz
| Download URL | promptguard_sdk-2.4.1.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 178.5 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
5e7e96148beb8ec4164b58fdef634d6838d565a122bc1e2eb0709d8f4972eb66
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c1b645566ac8bc68163c76d9eceab39115f3beffa3c0f2ce6260456217c2113c
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 18, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / promptguard_sdk-2.4.1-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | promptguard_sdk-2.4.1-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 95.7 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
d66a900b4edec73f87341ef1ac99725ab069327ae1807d4d4f5031ccb783cbdb
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
3e30b76c54c0cf4309a32c89d0344b19fc63cb317bfad1acca9d5008dd687e97
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 18, 2026.
Transparency log