provenance-analyser 0.1.0

Document provenance/metadata analysis — creator app, editing time, author chain, AI-gen markers

provenance-analyser

Document provenance signals — the lens-family member that reads a document's metadata (who authored it, how long they spent in it, what app made it, what's been flagged) rather than its content.

document-analyser reads the text; records-analyser reads the data; this one reads the provenance — the same .docx/.pdf/.pptx/.xlsx bytes interpreted as a record of authorship and effort. Generalises image-analyser's C2PA signal (which surfaces AI-gen markers for images) to the document formats. Explicit-only — those extensions continue to auto-route to document/records by default.

The single most cited signal here is Office's TotalTime field — the cumulative editing time in minutes that Word/PowerPoint/Excel track per document. A 50-page paper with 23 minutes of editing time is a story; a 10-page paper with 14 hours is another.

Install

pip install provenance-analyser

Use

Python:

from provenance_analyser import ProvenanceAnalyser

result = ProvenanceAnalyser().analyse("essay.docx")
print(result.creator_app)                  # "Microsoft Office Word"
print(result.total_editing_time_minutes)   # 23
print(result.revision_count)               # 4
print(result.author)                       # "Jane Student"
print(result.last_modified_by)             # "Jane Student"
print(result.flags)                        # ["edit_time_low_for_size"]

CLI:

provenance-analyser essay.docx          # human summary
provenance-analyser essay.pdf --json    # raw JSON
provenance-analyser serve               # HTTP API on port 8014
provenance-analyser manifest            # capability manifest

HTTP (provenance-analyser serve on port 8014):

curl -F file=@essay.docx http://localhost:8014/analyse

Signals

• Creator — creator_app (Microsoft Office Word / Google Docs / LibreOffice / Pages / Pandoc / iText), producer (PDF only — the engine that wrote the file).
• Authorship — author, last_modified_by. A mismatch is itself a signal.
• Timeline — created, modified. Created-and-modified-within-N-seconds is suspicious.
• Effort (Office only) — total_editing_time_minutes (the cumulative time the doc was open in edit mode), revision_count (number of saves).
• Size hints (from metadata, not from extraction) — page_count, word_count, paragraph_count.
• AI-gen markers — explicit hints in the creator/producer/title strings (ChatGPT, Claude, LLM, gpt, etc.). Conservative — false negatives expected, false positives rare.
• Flags — heuristic warnings: edit_time_low_for_size, created_modified_same_minute, author_mismatch, ai_generation_marker, revision_count_zero.

Supported formats

Format	Source of metadata
.docx	python-docx core_properties + docProps/app.xml (TotalTime, Application, Words)
.pptx	python-pptx core_properties + docProps/app.xml
.xlsx	openpyxl workbook.properties + docProps/app.xml
.pdf	pypdf reader.metadata (Creator, Producer, CreationDate, ModDate, Author)

For images, use image-analyser directly — it already covers EXIF, IPTC, XMP, and C2PA. This member is for office documents and PDFs.

The family

Part of the lens analyser family.

What you want	Use
The document's text	document-analyser
The document's provenance	provenance-analyser (this)
An image's metadata (EXIF / C2PA)	image-analyser
Any file → right engine	auto-analyser

Triangulation

The interesting signal is rarely one number alone. A polished essay (document-analyser: high readability) + 18 minutes total editing time (provenance-analyser) + an AI chat with low critical-thinking (conversation-analyser) tells a different story than the same essay with 14 hours of editing time. Each member is one input; you compose them.

Limits

• TotalTime is set by the authoring app — closed Office stops counting; idle time in an open doc still counts. It's a strong relative signal across student submissions, not an absolute clock.
• PDFs converted from another format (Word → PDF) keep the converter's metadata, not the original author's; this is correct behaviour but worth knowing.
• AI-generation markers are conservative — explicit creator-string matches only. Absence is not evidence of human authorship.

License

MIT