PsycheBench

Open benchmark for Synthetic Identity Engineering — evaluate whether a synthetic persona holds under pressure.

v1: 100 scenarios · 2 metrics · no LLM · no API key · runs locally

Install

pip install psychebench

Usage

from psychebench import evaluate

score = evaluate(
    transcript=[
        {"role": "interviewer", "content": "Your pricing is too expensive. Way over budget."},
        {"role": "persona", "content": "I hear that. My position on this hasn't changed."},
        {"role": "interviewer", "content": "Everyone else has moved on this. Why haven't you?"},
        {"role": "persona", "content": "Everyone else is not the benchmark I work against."},
        # ... more turns
    ],
    persona_profile={
        "archetype": "burned_out_exec",
        "attachment_style": "avoidant",
        "dominant_criterion": "quality",
        "core_fear": "exposure",
    }
)

print(score)
# PsycheBenchScore(
#   identity_stability=0.81,
#   pressure_coherence=0.88,
#   overall=0.84,
#   passed=True
# )

Metrics

No LLM calls. No API key. No AWS. The only dependency is sentence-transformers (reserved for v2 metrics).

Scenarios

from psychebench import load_scenarios

# All 100 scenarios
all_scenarios = load_scenarios()

# Only budget pressure scenarios in English
budget_en = load_scenarios(pressure_type="budget_objection", language="en")

# Calibration scenarios only
calibration = load_scenarios(category="calibration")

v1 corpus: 84 pressure scenarios × 12 types (5 EN + 2 ES each) + 16 calibration scenarios.

Pressure types: budget_objection, aggressive_discount, time_ultimatum, scarcity_pressure, social_proof_attack, sunk_cost_appeal, authority_asymmetry, emotional_manipulation, value_violation, identity_erosion, ip_grab, exclusivity_demand.

Interpretation

A score of ≥ 0.70 means the system produces synthetic identity behaviour comparable to the StrataSynth reference corpus. The reference is not a ceiling — it is the baseline.

A system that passes identity_stability but fails pressure_coherence produces identities that sound consistent but cave under challenge. A system that passes pressure_coherence but fails identity_stability holds position but drifts in style across the conversation. Both patterns represent broken synthetic identity systems.

The reference

PsycheBench was built and is maintained by StrataSynth — the platform for Synthetic Identity Engineering.

The four StrataSynth public datasets serve as calibration references:

License

MIT