pyattacker 0.3.2

English | 简体中文

Run tens of thousands of independent tasks to completion — resumably, observably, and without reimplementing endpoint pools, retries and "which rows already ran" for the fifth time.

The situation this is for

Picture a long workflow test, a model benchmark, or any experiment made of many independent items. Three hours in, one network request fails. The process dies — and you have no idea which stage each item actually reached. Rerunning from scratch means paying for every request that already succeeded, so you start writing a results.jsonl and a "skip what's already in there" check.

Then the provider starts rate-limiting you. A single API key serialises your parallel requests into a queue, so you add a second key, a third, and now you need to decide which request goes where, what happens when one endpoint starts returning 429s, and whether a failure means retry or give up. Somewhere in there, asyncio.Semaphore stops being enough and you are writing a scheduler.

pyattacker is that scheduler, extracted and made boring:

• a failure costs you one task, not the run — every task's output is persisted the moment it is produced, so resume continues from durable task checkpoints; external side effects still need idempotency when a crash occurs before checkpoint persistence;
• endpoints are a pool, not a global variable — capacity, health, and quota per endpoint, leased through async with, with seven policies for choosing which one to use and how to wait;
• the record is queryable, not a log file — every attempt, every retry decision ({retry, reason, delay_s, error_class}), every intermediate artifact, in SQLite you can SELECT from while the run is still going.

It does not touch the network: you write the openai/anthropic calls, it handles everything around them. The base install has no dependencies at all — the only third-party code in the project is a YAML parser, it is optional, and only a .yaml/.yml config needs it.

New here? The tutorial goes from a five-line program to a sharded, resumable model evaluation. Every snippet in it is executed by the test suite.

Install

uv add pyattacker            # or: pip install pyattacker
uv add "pyattacker[yaml]"    # only for .yaml/.yml configs; JSON and TOML need no extra

From a clone:

git clone https://github.com/Hazer-BJTU/pyattacker && cd pyattacker
uv sync
uv run pyattacker demo       # zero-config smoke test: 50 simulated pipelines, retries, a report

Requires Python 3.11+. import pyattacker, the CLI and every config format except YAML work with no third-party package installed; a .yaml/.yml config without the extra is a config error (exit code 2) that names the extra to install.

Core Model

Five concepts, and that is the whole vocabulary:

30-Second Quickstart (SDK)

The program below is complete: it defines every name it uses, runs offline, and is executed by the test suite on every commit. Only the built-in simulation is involved — no API key, no network.

# example/readme_quickstart.py
"""A first run: one custom task, a pool of two simulated endpoints, four pipelines, one report."""
from pyattacker import Pool, Resource, Retrying, Runner, pipeline, task


@task("fetch", resource="apis", algorithm="backoff",
      retry=Retrying(max_attempts=4, base=0.5, cap=30.0), timeout_s=60)
async def fetch(row: dict, ctx) -> dict:
    async with ctx.acquire() as lease:                     # returned on exit; returned on exception too
        await ctx.clock.sleep(0.001)                       # stand-in for the network call
        lease.report(ok=True, usage={"tokens": 128})       # report health/quota back to the pool
        return {"q": row["q"], "a": f"answer from {lease.resource.id}"}


def dataset_rows():
    """Your dataset. A generator works too: `map` streams it, so memory stays O(concurrency)."""
    return [{"q": f"question-{i}"} for i in range(4)]


pool = Pool("apis",
            [Resource.create("llm", id=f"api-{i}", capacity=4) for i in range(1, 3)],
            algorithm="backoff")

template = pipeline("qa", fetch)

with Runner(store="runs/qa.db", pools=[pool], concurrency=8) as runner:
    report = runner.run(template.map(dataset_rows()))
    print(report.summary())
    report.export_jsonl("runs/qa.jsonl")

ctx.acquire() falls back to the task's declared resource, and lease.report(ok=...) feeds the pool's health and quota accounting.

Where the real call goes — this part is yours, and it comes after the framework is already working:

@task("ask", resource="apis", retry={"max_attempts": 3}, timeout_s=60)
async def ask(row: dict, ctx) -> dict:
    async with ctx.acquire(model="gpt-4o") as lease:
        text = await lease.client.chat(row["q"])         # lease.client is built by resource.factory
        return {"q": row["q"], "a": text}

pool = Pool("apis",
            [Resource.create("llm", capacity=4, options={"model": "gpt-4o"},
                             factory=lambda res: MyClient(res.options)) for _ in range(8)],
            algorithm="backoff")

MyClient is your client class. factory is called once per resource, lazily, on the first lease, and whatever it returns is lease.client — pyattacker never opens a socket itself.

Want pass@k? template.map(rows, repeats=3) — the same seed expands into three independent pipelines.

Lease Safety: The Framework's Hardest Guarantee

Resource leasing is the most critical point of interaction between your code and the framework, so:

async with ctx.acquire(resource) as lease:   # ← the only recommended form
    for chunk in chunks:                      # repeatedly acquiring/releasing inside a loop is fine too
        ...

• An exception, a cancellation, a timeout_s timeout — always returned;
• Forgot to release through the escape hatch await ctx.acquire_lease()? It is force-reclaimed when the task ends, and a lease.leaked event is recorded;
• Reclaim is a pure synchronous function, and CancelledError cannot interrupt it — this is why "a task never holds a resource after it ends" holds;
• When you need something stricter, strict_leases=True: a leak immediately fails that task (LeaseLeakError).

Scheduling That Keeps Its Promises

• A retry backoff does not hold a worker. When the policy wants another attempt, the pipeline is parked in a delay queue and the worker immediately picks up other work. concurrency therefore means attempts in flight, not pipelines sitting out a 30-second backoff.
• A parked pipeline is never mistaken for a dead one. The end of a run waits for parked pipelines too; a stop records them as interrupted with their checkpoints intact, so resume picks them up.
• Pool wakeups are targeted. Releasing one resource wakes only the waiters whose selector can use it, instead of every blocked pipeline.
• History is batched, checkpoints are not. Attempts and events are written in batches (size, interval, heartbeat, and end-of-run), while artifacts and checkpoints are always committed immediately. SIGKILL can cost you the last batch of history, never a checkpoint. --no-write-behind opts out.
• Waiting is measured. Pool stats report waits_total, wait_ms_avg, p50, p95 and max, and a wait beyond slow_wait_ms emits an acquire.slow_wait event you can alert on.

Semantic Recovery

Every successful task persists its artifact and advances the checkpoint. On resume:

runner.run(template.map(rows), resume=True)   # or pyattacker resume -c config.yaml

• Already successful pipelines with matching task/input identity → skipped outright;
• Failed pipelines → continue from the first task that produced no artifact: if task C died, only task C reruns when task B's checkpoint is durable;
• The seed artifact is persisted too → recovery does not depend on the original dataset file;
• A pipeline that handed off (handoffs) resumes at the station it jumped to, with the entry state the ledger recorded — the task that handed off is not re-run;
• Changed a task's source code (spec_digest includes source digests) → treated as a new pipeline, so old results are not incorrectly reused. Factory parameters, fanout children, retry/algorithm policies and explicit task config/version are included too. Explicit keys reject changed definitions or inputs.

Upgrading an existing store: fingerprint v2 changes default IDs and shard assignment; legacy work may rerun and old explicit keys conflict. Finish old runs with the old package, then use a new store. See the resume identity and idempotency reference for migration guidance, dynamic functions and external configuration.

Handoffs (Opt-In)

Handoffs, forward jumps and rewinds are supported control-flow features, enabled explicitly through control.

A task can decide that the rest of the chain no longer needs to run, and say so instead of inventing a failure or hiding the branch inside one step. It returns a directive — Handoff.to(target, value) to continue at a declared later station, Handoff.end(value) to finish the pipeline right there:

# example/readme_handoff.py
"""A gate that skips the stations it does not need, and records why."""

from pyattacker import Handoff, Runner, pipeline, task


@task("prepare")
def prepare(seed: dict) -> dict:
    return {"q": seed["q"], "confidence": seed["confidence"]}


@task("ask")
async def ask(row: dict, ctx) -> dict:
    await ctx.clock.sleep(0.001)                       # <- your HTTP call
    return {**row, "answer": f"answer-for:{row['q']}"}


@task("judge")
def judge(row: dict) -> Handoff | dict:
    if row["confidence"] >= 0.9:
        return Handoff.end({**row, "verdict": "confident"}, reason="already good enough")
    if row["confidence"] >= 0.5:
        return Handoff.to("report", {**row, "verdict": "ok"}, reason="metrics not needed")
    return {**row, "verdict": "needs-metrics"}


@task("metrics")
def metrics(row: dict) -> dict:
    return {**row, "score": round(row["confidence"] * 10, 1)}


@task("report")
def report(row: dict) -> dict:
    return {**row, "reported": True}


# Edges are declared, never derived: judge may continue at report, or end the pipeline.
template = pipeline("qa", prepare | ask | judge | metrics | report,
                    control={"edges": {"judge": ["report", "end"]}})

with Runner(store=":memory:", concurrency=4) as runner:
    report_obj = runner.run(template.map([
        {"q": "2+2", "confidence": 0.95},                        # judge ends the pipeline here
        {"q": "17*23", "confidence": 0.6},                       # judge skips metrics, continues at report
        {"q": "prove sqrt(2) is irrational", "confidence": 0.2},  # no handoff: the whole chain runs
    ]))
    print(report_obj.summary())
    store = runner.store
    for record in store.pipelines():
        ran = [t.name for t in store.tasks(record.pipeline_id)]
        hops = store.handoffs(pipeline_id=record.pipeline_id)
        print(f"{record.state}  ran={ran}  skipped={len(template.tasks) - len(ran)}  handoffs={len(hops)}")

• Declared forward edges. A Handoff along an undeclared edge, or from a pipeline with no control block, is a fatal configuration error — never retried, never a silent jump. Destinations must be strictly later than their source; end from the last task is refused because it would do nothing.
• A handoff is a disposition, not a failure. It is a return value, so the retry policy never sees it and a task-side except Exception: cannot swallow it; leases are released exactly as on success, and a cancelled or timed-out attempt never reaches the return.
• It is a durable checkpoint. The jump is committed atomically (source task, attempt, entry artifact, ledger row and cursor together), so a killed process resumes at the target with the recorded entry state and does not re-run the source task. On a control-enabled pipeline n_tasks_done is a position, not a progress count: skipped stations have no task rows. watch counts commits in the selected run by default (--run-id all selects all history); /pipelines.handoffs counts active execution records and handoffs_historical counts all ledger records. A resume can use an earlier run's active handoff while recording no new handoffs. Pipeline exports include ledger identity and the watermark to distinguish the scopes.
• Opt-in and inert. Without the control block nothing changes — not one row, not one counter, and not a byte of spec_digest.
• Backward traversal is separately declared. Handoff.rewind(target, value) sends author-selected state to an earlier task; Handoff.retry_all() restarts from the original bound seed. Declare control.rewind / control.retry_all and a finite control.max_handoffs. Optional HistoryArtifact payloads provide explicit snapshots and restoration; ordinary dictionaries remain author-controlled. Visits and exact artifact occurrences retain history and make recovery safe. The APIs, budgets and recovery boundaries are in reference → backward traversal, with working programs in tutorial steps 16–17.

The API is one class (Handoff), one declaration — control={"edges": {...}} for forward jumps, control.rewind / control.retry_all / control.max_handoffs for backward traversal — and one optional store capability; a custom store that cannot commit a handoff atomically is refused up front instead of writing a jump that would not survive a crash. Walkthrough: tutorial step 15. Model and rules: design §4.8.

When a pipeline restarts from the seed, previous task rows and chain artifacts are reset atomically with the cursor/watermark; previous handoffs stay in its history but no longer act as checkpoints. A later resume follows only the current execution's handoffs, and completion selects one final artifact. Custom stores supporting handoffs must persist the durable handoff_floor watermark alongside the cursor and implement atomic reset_pipeline(record); see the recovery contract.

Running It Across Processes (Sharding)

SQLite takes one writer and the kernel is a single event loop, so scale means processes with their own stores, joined afterwards. A pipeline's shard comes from its content-addressed key, so the same dataset always splits the same way and --resume puts every pipeline back where it was:

# convenience: N children, then a merged report
uv run pyattacker run -c examples/qa_eval.yaml --shards 4 --jobs 4 --store runs/qa.db
# -> runs/qa.shard0of4.db … runs/qa.shard3of4.db

# or drive each shard yourself (cluster, scheduler, four terminals)
uv run pyattacker run -c examples/qa_eval.yaml --shard 0/4 --store runs/qa.shard0.db
uv run pyattacker resume -c examples/qa_eval.yaml --shard 0/4 --store runs/qa.shard0.db

# one coherent answer out of N files (de-duplicated, statistics recomputed)
uv run pyattacker report runs/qa.shard*of4.db
uv run pyattacker export runs/qa.shard*of4.db runs/all.jsonl
uv run pyattacker export runs/qa.shard*of4.db runs/tasks.csv --rows tasks --format csv

--rows picks the shape: pipelines (nested, default — its tasks, artifacts and handoffs included), tasks, attempts (including each retry decision), events, artifacts. --format picks jsonl, json or csv.

Declarative (Simple Tasks)

The YAML describes composition and resources; the logic stays in Python (use: my_pkg.tasks:ask). Reading a .yaml/.yml file is the only part of pyattacker that needs a third-party library, so it lives in the yaml extra; the same config written as JSON or TOML is read with the standard library. The loader decides per file, from the suffix, and says which extra to install when the parser is missing.

The block below is a complete config — every use: target is a built-in, so it validates as it stands. Save it as qa.yaml; examples/qa_eval.yaml is the same shape with more comments.

# example/readme_qa_eval.yaml
run:   { store: runs/demo.db, concurrency: 8, label: demo }
pools:
  apis:
    kind: llm
    algorithm: backoff
    resources: [ { id: api-1, capacity: 4, options: { model: gpt-4o } } ]
pipeline:
  name: qa
  tasks:
    - { use: pyattacker.tasks:echo }
    - use: pyattacker.tasks:simulate_llm            # a factory: `kwargs` are its arguments
      resource: apis
      algorithm: backoff
      kwargs: { latency_ms: 5, fail_rate: 0.1, tokens: 64 }
      retry: { max_attempts: 3, "on": [RetryableError, TimeoutError] }
source: { kind: range, n: 100 }

A bare on: is a YAML 1.1 boolean key, not the retry field: retry keys must be quoted. The loader detects the mistake and says so rather than silently ignoring the policy.

uv run pyattacker validate -c qa.yaml            # parse, check, print the effective config
uv run pyattacker run      -c qa.yaml --progress
uv run pyattacker watch    runs/demo.db          # open another process to monitor it live
uv run pyattacker report   runs/demo.db --errors 20
uv run pyattacker export   runs/demo.db out.jsonl
uv run pyattacker serve    runs/demo.db          # HTTP dashboard + JSON endpoints
uv run pyattacker plugins                        # installed plugins

Exit codes: 0 all succeeded / 1 some failed / 2 config error / 130 interrupted. Every flag of every subcommand: docs/cli.md.

Records and Monitoring

The complete story of one pipeline = six tables queried by pipeline_id: state and checkpoint, the final state of each task, the full attempt history (including every retry decision {retry, reason, delay_s, error_class}), intermediate and final artifacts, the control-flow ledger (handoffs, empty for an ordinary pipeline), and the structured event stream. pyattacker report/watch consumes these facts directly.

Extending It

Plugins are ordinary importlib.metadata entry points — install a package and its names become usable from any config:

[project.entry-points."pyattacker.tasks"]
my_judge = "my_pkg.tasks:my_judge"        # a TaskSpec, or a factory returning one
[project.entry-points."pyattacker.algorithms"]
my_algo  = "my_pkg.algo:MyAlgorithm"
[project.entry-points."pyattacker.stores"]
s3       = "my_pkg.s3:open_store"         # keyed by URI scheme: store = "s3://bucket/runs.db"

uv run pyattacker plugins                 # what is installed, and what failed to load

Built-ins resolve first (a plugin cannot shadow echo), and a plugin that raises on import is recorded rather than fatal. A complete worked example: examples/plugin_package/.

Large payloads can live outside the database:

uv run pyattacker run -c examples/qa_eval.yaml --artifact-backend file:///data/blobs
# or, in the config:  artifact_backend = { kind = "file", root = "/data/blobs", min_bytes = 262144 }

Files are content-addressed, written atomically, and hydrated back on read — so a resumed run reuses spilled checkpoints transparently. null keeps digests and drops bytes; inline (default) keeps everything in the store.

A zero-dependency monitoring endpoint:

uv run pyattacker serve runs/qa.db        # http://127.0.0.1:8787
# /  dashboard   /stats  /metrics  /events  /pipelines  /resources  /errors   (JSON)

It opens a fresh read-only connection per request, so it runs happily beside a live run. It has no authentication and binds to loopback: there is no artifact route, but it does expose what your run recorded — event data and stored error messages — so treat it as a debug view over your own data and do not put it on a public interface without your own proxy in front. Applications can publish live values with runner.report_metric("accuracy", value, display="percent"); the framework displays them without calculating the metric. See examples/live_metrics.py.

Branching inside a step — fanout(a, b) runs several tasks on the same input concurrently and returns {task_name: value}. Retry granularity becomes the group, which is the honest price of not turning pipelines into a DAG. The group is the only spec the Runner sees, so resource, algorithm and timeout_s are inherited from the children when all of them agree (a timeout_s then bounds the whole group).

Benchmarking the Algorithms

Which acquisition algorithm should a workload use? The pool ships seven, and the honest answer depends on the provider — so there is a simulation for it. A scenario states the assumptions (a capacity cycle, a token bucket that tightens under pressure, latency with a slow tail, independent failures and correlated storms, three endpoints of different character), the client is a closed loop of workers driving the real Pool and the real algorithm, and time is simulated, so a ten-minute scenario costs seconds.

uv run pyattacker bench                       # the scenario's 5 algorithms x 3 seeds, about 13 seconds
uv run pyattacker bench --list                # the scenarios, the algorithms, and what each metric means
uv run pyattacker bench --algorithms wait,backoff --seeds 5 --json runs/bench.json

It is a black box on purpose: the provider never exposes its state to the algorithm, its mood is a function of time rather than of who is asking, and each request's draws are indexed by its ordinal — so two algorithms meet the same exogenous randomness and the same weather, and the comparison is between algorithms rather than between moods. (Their realized provider state still diverges, because the bucket and the in-flight count react to what each of them did — that divergence is the measurement.) It reports a vector of metrics (throughput, tail latency, retries, refusals provoked, capacity utilisation, fairness across endpoints) instead of one weighted score, and it names the winner per metric — including when the winner is "nobody", when there was only one algorithm left to compare, and never for an algorithm that completed a fraction of the work: a strategy that abandons the queue cannot win a rate by keeping its denominator small.

docs/benchmark.md has the assumptions, the metrics, the current numbers, and what they do not say.

Documentation

Examples

uv run python examples/quickstart.py
uv run python -m examples.llm_eval.demo
uv run python examples/sharded.py
uv run pyattacker run -c examples/qa_eval.yaml --limit 40

Out of Scope

These are design decisions, not missing features:

• Network requests — you write the openai/anthropic protocols yourself. The kernel never opens a socket.
• Semantic reduction — accuracy, pass@k, F1 and any cross-pipeline aggregation. Export the artifacts and compute it outside, or write a sink pipeline out of the primitives.
• DAG orchestration — a pipeline is a linear chain; branch inside a task with fanout. The one qualification is the opt-in handoff: it changes the traversal of the chain along declared edges, never its topology (no joins, no second entry point, no cross-pipeline jumps).
• A serving gateway — the only HTTP surface is the read-only debug endpoint above.
• Distributed scheduling — scale out with --shard; multi-process is the ceiling.

Sections 1 and 11 of docs/design.md state the boundary precisely, and section 8 lists every known tradeoff with its reason.

Status

0.3.2 — experiment suites and supported control flow. Independent experiments can share resource pools and global concurrency, with unified run/resume/report commands and optional per-experiment output directories. Durable run histories preserve earlier outcomes after resume. Handoffs, forward jumps, rewinds and retry-all are supported public features, enabled through explicit control declarations. See the Suite guide and release notes.

0.3.1 — application-reported live metrics. Applications can publish values such as accuracy to the read-only monitoring dashboard through Runner.report_metric() or TaskContext.report_metric(). A completion callback receives committed pipeline results; the application owns the calculation. The dashboard and watch now follow one run consistently by default. See examples/live_metrics.py.

0.3.0 — control flow (opt-in), and the documentation in Chinese. Tasks can now hand off: return a Handoff to skip declared stations or finish the pipeline early, recorded in a durable ledger that recovery resumes from. It is opt-in and inert — a pipeline without a control block writes no new rows and keeps a byte-identical spec_digest. Handoffs and backward traversal were experimental in 0.3.0 and became supported features in 0.3.2 (see 0.3.2 release notes). Backward traversal adds declared rewind and retry-all with visits and optional payload history. The whole documentation set also ships in Simplified Chinese (README.zh-CN.md, docs/zh-CN/), kept in sync by CI. One rename to know about when upgrading: MergedReport.events_total is now source_events_total, because that is the one counter a merged report does not de-duplicate (the old name still works as a deprecated alias).

0.2.0 — a benchmark, stricter identity, and three correctness fixes. New: pyattacker bench, a simulated provider world that compares the acquire algorithms on a vector of metrics instead of a weighted score (docs/benchmark.md); Retrying.decide, the retry decision as a method on the policy; and paged whole-kind reads (pyattacker.store.iter_*, backed by the optional PagedStore extension) so exporting a large store no longer materialises it. 0.1.x itself had implemented everything planned for M0–M4: the kernel, persistence and task-level recovery, retries and error classification, the resource pool with 7 acquisition algorithms, delayed continuations and write-behind batching, sharding and merged reports, five export shapes in three formats, entry-point plugins, external artifact backends, the fan-out helper, and the HTTP monitoring endpoint.

Three changes are worth reading before upgrading. PyYAML is no longer a dependency — the base install has none at all, so a .yaml/.yml config needs pip install "pyattacker[yaml]". with_overrides distinguishes "not given" from None: an omitted keyword keeps the value, an explicit None now clears resource/algorithm/timeout_s/version, and the new UNSET sentinel means "not given" when a caller forwards a dict. One shared validation entry now backs validate and every run mode, so a config it accepts is one that can run: unknown fields, wrong types, bad pool references, malformed artifact backends and typos fail with exit 2 and a field path before anything starts. Export limit also means one thing per row kind now, and None means complete.

Fixed since 0.1.1: shell_run leaked its child when the task was cancelled and killed without reaping on timeout — every exit path, process creation included, now kills and reaps, and on POSIX it signals the whole process group; exporting events silently stopped at the newest 100 000 rows; the declarative run: block dropped artifact_backend, write-behind and the batch knobs, --no-write-behind was never applied in a single process, and --artifact-backend never reached shard children; resume now rejects a pipeline key whose task or seed digest changed instead of quietly reusing a stale result; and the benchmark collected a list of its own fixes (see the changelog). The API is young: it follows semantic versioning from here, but expect refinement before 1.0.

Left for later: a distributed scheduler, Parquet export, blob garbage collection, and first-class Parallel/Gather nodes.

Development

uv sync                      # create the venv + install the dev group (which includes the optional yaml extra)
uv run pytest                # the whole suite: zero network, a few seconds
uv run ruff check            # lint (configuration lives in pyproject.toml, with reasons for each exception)
uv run pyattacker demo       # end-to-end smoke test
uv run pyattacker bench      # compare the acquire algorithms in simulation (about 13 seconds)
uv build                     # sdist + wheel

Tests are offline and deterministic (time goes through an injectable Clock). The tutorial's code blocks are extracted and executed by tests/test_tutorial.py, so documentation that rots fails CI.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.

Experiment suites

Combine existing configuration files under one Runner with shared resource pools and total concurrency. Optional per-experiment directories separate checkpoints, results and file artifacts. Suite reports include prior successes across resumes. See the Suite guide and runnable configuration.