pyflightstream
Version-aware, didactic Python driver for the FlightStream panel-method solver. Successor of the author's legacy research scripts. MIT licensed.
Status: v0.4.0 is public on PyPI, archived on Zenodo (DOI recorded in CITATION.cff). CHANGELOG.md carries the release history.
pip install pyflightstream
A first taste, no solver required (build time is where errors surface):
from pyflightstream.commands import CommandNotInVersionError
from pyflightstream.script import Script
script = Script(version="26.120") # the FlightStream version is explicit input
script.emit("NEW_SIMULATION")
script.emit("IMPORT", "METER", "STL", "wing.stl", clear=True)
script.emit("SOLVER_SET_AOA", 4.0)
script.emit("START_SOLVER")
print(script.render()) # validated ASCII script, ready for the solver
try:
Script(version="26.0").emit("SOLVER_SET_AOA", 4.0)
except CommandNotInVersionError as error:
print(error) # refused: no recorded evidence for that version
The worked examples in examples/ take it from here to executed
polars, campaign matrices, a static wing deflection, and a Campbell
diagram. No example runs the coupled loop: it needs a licensed solver in the
loop, and the rotary case is solver-blocked (reports/RPT-007). The
capability status below says what the FSI subpackage does and does not
claim.
Optional extras: [fsi] (aeroelastic coupling, PyNiteFEA), [geom]
(probe-survey geometry gating, trimesh/rtree/scipy), [plot]
(matplotlib for the plotting examples).
Why this package
FlightStream is scripted through an ASCII command file, and the solver is under active development: the FlightStream team is responsive to user requests and works with intermediate hotfix builds that consolidate into stable releases. A fast-moving solver naturally means a scripting command set that evolves from version to version, faster than any single document can track. This package makes the FlightStream version an explicit input: every command it emits is validated against a per-version command database, and old versions are only ever added, never dropped, so campaigns stay reproducible across that evolution.
Every database entry carries a manual page citation, and its status per version (documented, verified, broken) can only be promoted by citing a committed probe report from a licensed machine. Nothing is guessed; the honest gaps are reported as such.
What ships
- Command database with per-version evidence and a manual citation on
every entry, browsable offline via
pyflightstream.help()(including a manual-coverage section) and as a generated docs site; the compatibility matrix carries the live counts. - Validating script builder with curated helpers: phase ordering,
didactic refusals at build time, entity labels (recipes can name
frames, actuators, motions, and boundaries instead of raw indices),
and a solver-setup provenance snapshot recording the effective value
of every solver flag per run. A command a probe measured
brokenin the target version is refused too, because that one produces a complete run with wrong numbers rather than no run at all; the waiver that emits it anyway records the report and the reason in the manifest. - Campaign workspace: an input-artifact library (references, solver presets, boundary groups, geometries, profiles, executables by build id), a run manifest as the single identity authority, output naming templates, campaign pre-flight with zero solver time, and resumable incremental sweeps.
- Runner and parsers: headless execution, anchor-based parsers for the solver outputs, and a pandas table layer (per-result tables, one wide row per run, whole-sweep DataFrame straight from the manifest).
- Run-matrix support as a first-class interface: read, convert, pre-flight, and run the pipe-delimited 15-column matrix format.
- Far-field probe surveys (planar grids, geometry gating, VTK/Tecplot writers, conservation ledgers on xarray) and an aeroelastic coupling subpackage (structural beam, coupled driver, replay harness).
- Architecture overview from the live module docstrings via
pyflightstream.overview(). - Predictable surfaces: a declared-options registry
(
pyflightstream.options), one public exception catalog (pyflightstream.exceptions), test assertions with quantified reports (pyflightstream.testing), and the house conventions rendered byhelp().
Capability status
Not every subpackage carries the same weight of evidence, and until 2026-08-03 nothing said so: an independent review found the feature list above reading as one uniform claim, with the aeroelastic boundary stated only inside the code. The author's decision of 2026-08-03 is that the FSI and probe-survey paths are experimental behind an explicit boundary rather than release-supported, and this table is that boundary.
| Capability | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Command database, script builder, version refusals | supported | tier 1 over every registered version; probe reports under reports/ |
| Parsers, tables, run manifest, reconstruction | supported | tier 1 on committed solver fixtures |
| Campaigns, run matrices, workspace, pre-flight | supported | tier 1 end-to-end with a stub solver |
| Far-field ledgers and probe surveys | experimental | tier 1 on synthetic fields; the licensed far-field acceptance work is deferred, not done |
| FSI structural beam and modal analysis | experimental | tier 1 against analytic beam solutions; examples/wing_static_deflection.py, examples/fsi_campbell_diagram.py |
| FSI coupled driver (the four-phase loop) | experimental | tier 1 offline replay on archived WP1 fixtures only; never run against a live solver in CI |
| Rotary two-way coupling | not validated | reports/RPT-007 states two-way rotor FSI is blocked in this build; docs/srs/roadmap.md records it in the M6 row; no acceptance evidence exists |
Experimental means the interface may change without the deprecation window of NFR-20, and that the evidence behind it is narrower than the supported rows: replaying archived fixtures shows the machine runs, not that its physics is right for a case nobody has measured.
Command-line tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
pyfs-qa |
Tier 2 command-validity probes, Tier 3 physics regression and cross-version drift, status promotion from committed reports |
pyfs-workspace |
Initialize the managed campaign workspace tree |
pyfs-matrix |
Convert and pre-flight run matrices |
pyfs-fsi |
The structural executable of the aeroelastic coupling loop |
Supported FlightStream versions
"Supported" covered four different states, so it is now four named
values (pyflightstream.SupportLevel), every one of them derived from
the evidence rather than declared:
| Version | Vendor name | Support level | What that means here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26.000 | 26.0 | registered |
Ordered in the registry, no command carries evidence for it, so nothing can be built yet |
| 26.100 | 26.1 | documented |
Commands drafted from the manual with page citations, none measured against a running solver |
| 26.120 | 26.12 | operational |
Probe evidence from a licensed machine, and the minimal end-to-end workflow builds |
| 26.121 | 26.12 | operational |
Hotfix build 1. It inherits the 26.120 records except where a probe on this build overrode them; the compatibility matrix marks every inherited cell and counts them |
import pyflightstream
for row in pyflightstream.support_table():
print(row.summary)
operational is the level that claims a user can get from geometry to
a loads file, and it is checkable rather than asserted: it holds only
when pyflightstream.support.minimal_workflow(version) builds, which a
tier 1 test builds for every version reported at that level.
Canonical identifiers use the 26.XXX scheme, the last digit indexing
vendor hotfix builds, so 26.121 is hotfix build 1 of the 26.12 release.
The vendor ships both 26.120 and 26.121 under the one release name
"26.12", so that name no longer selects a build and is refused with
both candidates named; pass the canonical identifier. The ordered list
in src/pyflightstream/commands/_meta.yaml is the only ordering
authority, and it orders releases, not support: 26.100 is newer than
26.000 and both sit below 26.120. Supported versions are only ever
added, never dropped. The compatibility matrix in the docs is generated
from the database at build time.
What is each folder?
| Folder | Purpose in plain language |
|---|---|
src/pyflightstream/ |
The package, one subpackage per pipeline stage (versions, commands, script, results, cases, run, workspace, post, qa, plus fsi, probes, farfield) |
src/pyflightstream/commands/ |
The command database: what exists in which FlightStream version, with manual page citations |
tests/ |
Tier 1 tests, runnable anywhere, no FlightStream needed |
reports/ |
Committed evidence from licensed machines: command validity (compat), physics regression, drift, and research cards |
docs/ |
Documentation source (ProperDocs); reference pages are generated from the database, never committed |
examples/ |
Runnable example scripts in percent format |
guide/ |
LaTeX source of the user guide (the built pdf never enters Git) |
deprecated/ |
Discontinued public items, grouped here instead of scattered at the top level |
.claude/skills/ |
Maintenance procedures (version updates, command additions, QA runs, releases) |
_private/ |
Local only, never committed: FlightStream manuals, executables, research geometry, the design documents and the plan ledger |
Development setup
Maintainers: several machine-specific environment variables locate local
tooling and session state and are not in Git. A fresh clone must set
them in .claude/settings.local.json; CLAUDE.md (Session protocol)
is their single home, lists them, and states what each one does when
unset. The count is deliberately not repeated here: it lived in two
places and went stale in this one.
pip install -e .[dev,fsi,geom]
pre-commit install
pytest
Tier 1 (the pytest suite) runs anywhere. Tier 2 (command validity
probes) and Tier 3 (physics regression) require a local FlightStream
license and are documented in CONTRIBUTING.md. The docs build with
properdocs build --strict.
License
MIT. Contributions must be original or MIT-compatible; code derived from the AGPL pyFlightscript package is not accepted. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
Release files for pyflightstream 0.4.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pyflightstream-0.4.0.tar.gz | 586.6 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pyflightstream-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 963.8 kB
Release files / pyflightstream-0.4.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | pyflightstream-0.4.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 586.6 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
20fb39e6c48260c7d7dcc20d8e6ac026f4419315a7b5fe16ad87fd69a1af64fc
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
ed73b6fd3ecd442fce6a8fed3bc229ff3b06689977baaaab739db6c5b4556cb3
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Aug 4, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / pyflightstream-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | pyflightstream-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 377.1 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
7ef92dc13b5ee3b8a380f2e1f67ef3dfc729d4958880b28588e16cf9cf1e3269
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
60b47b1490b295163ad34c9353de483ad10c930be3d45a689411ef9e7bd9eac9
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Aug 4, 2026.
Transparency log