pytest-review 0.1.2

A pytest plugin that reviews the quality of your tests

pytest-review

A pytest plugin that reviews the quality of your tests.

Overview

pytest-review analyzes your test suite and provides actionable feedback on test quality. It detects common anti-patterns, missing assertions, overly complex tests, and more.

Features

• Static Analysis: AST-based detection of test quality issues
• Dynamic Analysis: Runtime performance tracking
• Multiple Output Formats: Terminal, JSON, and HTML reports
• Configurable: Customize thresholds and enable/disable analyzers
• Quality Scoring: Get a letter grade (A-F) for your test suite

Analyzers

Analyzer	Description
assertions	Detects empty tests, trivial assertions (assert True), tautologies
naming	Checks for descriptive test names, proper snake_case
complexity	Flags tests with too many statements, deep nesting, high cyclomatic complexity
patterns	Identifies anti-patterns: bare except, time.sleep, print statements
isolation	Detects global state modifications, class attribute mutations
performance	Tracks slow tests at runtime
smells	Detects test smells: assertion roulette, duplicate asserts, eager tests, magic numbers

Installation

pip install pytest-review

Quick Start

Run pytest with the --review flag:

pytest --review

Example output:

====================== pytest-review: Test Quality Report ======================
  [X] tests/test_example.py:15 [test_empty] Test has no assertions
      Suggestion: Add at least one assertion to verify expected behavior
  [!] tests/test_example.py:20 [test_complex] Test has cyclomatic complexity of 12
      Suggestion: Simplify test logic or split into multiple tests
----------------------------------- Summary ------------------------------------
  Tests analyzed: 25
  Errors: 2
  Warnings: 5
  Info: 3
  Quality: NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

  Overall Score: 72.0/100 (C)
================================================================================

Command Line Options

Option	Description
--review	Enable test quality review
--review-format	Output format: terminal (default), json, html
--review-output	Write report to file
--review-strict	Fail if quality errors are found
--review-min-score	Minimum required score (0-100)
--review-only	Comma-separated list of analyzers to run

Examples

# Generate HTML report
pytest --review --review-format=html --review-output=report.html

# Generate JSON report
pytest --review --review-format=json --review-output=report.json

# Run only specific analyzers
pytest --review --review-only=assertions,naming

# Fail CI if score below 80
pytest --review --review-min-score=80

# Strict mode: fail on any errors
pytest --review --review-strict

Configuration

Configure pytest-review in your pyproject.toml:

[tool.pytest-review]
enabled = true
strict = false
min_score = 0

[tool.pytest-review.analyzers]
assertions = { enabled = true, min_assertions = 1 }
naming = { enabled = true, min_length = 10 }
complexity = { enabled = true, max_statements = 20, max_depth = 3, max_complexity = 5 }
patterns = { enabled = true }
isolation = { enabled = true }
performance = { enabled = true, slow_threshold_ms = 500, very_slow_threshold_ms = 2000 }
smells = { enabled = true, max_assertions_without_message = 1, check_magic_numbers = true }

Skipping Tests

Use the review_skip marker to exclude specific tests from review:

import pytest

@pytest.mark.review_skip
def test_intentionally_complex():
    # This test won't be analyzed
    ...

Scoring System

The quality score is calculated using weighted categories:

Category	Weight	Analyzers
Assertions	30%	assertions
Clarity	25%	naming, smells
Isolation	20%	isolation
Simplicity	15%	complexity, patterns
Performance	10%	performance

Severity penalties:

• Error: -15 points per issue
• Warning: -5 points per issue
• Info: -1 point per issue

Critical penalties (applied globally):

• Missing assertions: -20 points
• Trivial assertions: -10 points

Grade Scale

Grade	Score Range
A	90-100
B	80-89
C	70-79
D	60-69
F	0-59

Issue Types

Errors (X)

Critical issues that indicate likely bugs or useless tests:

• assertions.missing - Test has no assertions
• assertions.trivial - Trivial assertion like assert True
• assertions.tautology - Comparing value to itself

Warnings (!)

Issues that may indicate problems:

• naming.non_descriptive - Generic names like test_foo
• complexity.too_many_statements - Test too long
• complexity.too_deep - Excessive nesting
• complexity.too_complex - High cyclomatic complexity
• patterns.bare_except - Catches all exceptions
• patterns.sleep_in_test - Uses time.sleep()
• isolation.global_modification - Modifies global state
• smells.assertion_roulette - Multiple assertions without messages
• smells.duplicate_assert - Duplicate assertion statements
• smells.ignored_test - Test is skipped with decorator

Info (i)

Suggestions for improvement:

• naming.too_short - Name could be more descriptive
• patterns.print_statement - Debug print left in test
• performance.slow_test - Test runs slowly
• smells.magic_number - Literal number in assertion
• smells.eager_test - Test verifies multiple methods

Acknowledgments

• The smells analyzer is inspired by the pytest-smell project from the dissertation "Detecting Test Smells in Python" by Maxim Pacsial.
• Test smell concepts are based on research by Van Deursen et al. ("Refactoring Test Code", 2001) and Meszaros ("xUnit Test Patterns", 2007).

Contributing

Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit a Pull Request.

License

MIT License - see LICENSE for details.