python-peass 2.0.1.3

python-peass: Perceptual Evaluation methods for Audio Source Separation

python-peass

This project was ported by Gemini 3.5 Flash from https://gitlab.inria.fr/bass-db/peass/-/tree/22c7fc4ef670f8bb6eea9ab4abea98323006b769/v2.0.1

A Python port of the PEASS v2.0.1 (Perceptual Evaluation methods for Audio Source Separation) toolkit [1].

Installation

For standard execution, you can install the package directly:

pip install "python-peass[numba]"

If you require high-speed execution (using optimized vector libraries like Intel MKL or Apple Accelerate), it is recommended to install NumPy and SciPy via Conda first, and then install the package:

conda install numpy scipy
pip install "python-peass[numba]"

Quick Start Examples

1. Perceptual Quality Score Evaluation

Evaluate estimated audio files saved on disk:

from peass import predict_perceptual_evaluation_scores

original_files = [
    "audio/target_source.wav",
    "audio/interference_1.wav",
    "audio/interference_2.wav"
]
estimate_file = "audio/estimated_target.wav"

scores = predict_perceptual_evaluation_scores(original_files, estimate_file)

print(f"Overall Perceptual Score (OPS):  {scores.overall_perceptual_score:.1f}/100")
print(f"Target Preservation Score (TPS): {scores.target_perceptual_score:.1f}/100")
print(f"Interference Rejection (IPS):    {scores.interference_perceptual_score:.1f}/100")
print(f"Artifact-free Score (APS):       {scores.artifact_perceptual_score:.1f}/100")

2. Score Evaluation with Waveform and File Expositions

To run the full perceptual scoring pipeline and simultaneously output the physically separated WAV files (True target, Target distortion, Interference, and Artifacts) to a specific output folder:

from peass import predict_perceptual_evaluation_scores, DecompositionConfiguration

original_files = [
    "audio/target_source.wav",
    "audio/interferer.wav"
]
estimate_file = "audio/estimated_target.wav"

# 1. Configure the output directory for file-writing
config = DecompositionConfiguration(destination_directory="./output_directory/")

# 2. Set return_decomposition=True to expose the physical waveforms and file paths
scores = predict_perceptual_evaluation_scores(
    original_files,
    estimate_file,
    configuration=config,
    return_decomposition=True
)

# 3. Print overall scores
print(f"Overall Perceptual Score (OPS): {scores.overall_perceptual_score:.1f}/100")

# 4. Access the file paths of the generated WAV files on disk
print(f"True target file saved at:      {scores.decomposition_files.true_target}")
print(f"Interference file saved at:     {scores.decomposition_files.interference}")
print(f"Artifacts file saved at:        {scores.decomposition_files.artifacts}")

# 5. Read the raw NumPy arrays directly from memory
target_distortion_array = scores.decomposition_waveforms.target_distortion

3. Independent Subband Least-Squares Decomposition

You can run the auditory Gammatone/least-squares decomposition engine independently to obtain the isolated physical sub-components:

import numpy as np
from peass import decompose_distortion_components

# In-memory arrays
target_array = np.random.randn(16000, 1)
noise_array = np.random.randn(16000, 1)
estimate_array = target_array + 0.05 * noise_array

# Run subband least-squares decomposer
result = decompose_distortion_components(
    source_files=[target_array, noise_array],
    estimate_file=estimate_array,
    sampling_frequency_hz=16000.0
)

waveforms = result.waveforms
true_target, target_distortion, interference, artifacts = (
    waveforms.true_target,
    waveforms.target_distortion,
    waveforms.interference,
    waveforms.artifacts
)

---

Scientific Highlights

Traditional evaluation metrics rely purely on linear energy ratios [1]. However, human hearing relies on non-linear auditory transduction, temporal masking, and cognitive thresholds [2]. This package replaces traditional energy ratio metrics (SDR, SIR, SAR) with perceptually motivated objective scores— OPS, TPS, IPS, and APS—which align closely with subjective human listening evaluations [1].

peass executes a multi-stage cognitive simulation pipeline to assess separation quality:

1. Subband Least-Squares Decomposition: Signals are divided into subbands using a complex-valued Hohmann Gammatone Filterbank [1, 3]. Overlapping temporal frames are projected onto estimated subspaces to isolate physical target distortion, interference, and artifact components [1].
2. Inner Hair Cell Transduction: Approximates the shearing limits of physical hair bundles via half-wave rectification and first-order 1 kHz membrane-limit lowpass filters [1, 2].
3. Auditory Nerve Adaptation: Models physiological forward masking and metabolic neural depletion via five cascaded stages of non-linear feedback loops [2].
4. Perceptual Assimilation: Models cognitive threshold masking where noise below a target reference threshold is partially assimilated or masked [2].
5. Score Prediction: Feeds weighted similarity percentiles into a multi-criteria trained sigmoidal neural network to output scores scaled from 0 to 100 [1].

---

Test Suite & CI/CD

The validation suite implements rigorous numerical, physical, and integration checks. You will need to pip install -r requirements.txt to set up.

Regression Verification

We test our output waveforms directly against the original .wav reference waveforms generated by the official MATLAB PEASS toolbox (located in references/peass_master_22c7fc4e/v2.0.1/example/). Python's outputs must achieve a cross-correlation coefficient exceeding $0.95$ with the MATLAB reference to pass.

Parallel Execution

To run the test suite across multiple CPU cores using pytest-xdist, execute:

pytest -n auto

---

References

1. V. Emiya, E. Vincent, N. Harlander, and V. Hohmann, "Subjective and objective quality assessment of audio source separation", IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 19(7):2046–2057, 2011.
2. R. Huber and B. Kollmeier, "PEMO-Q — A New Method for Objective Audio Quality Assessment Using a Model of Auditory Perception", IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 14(6):1902–1911, 2006.
3. V. Hohmann, "Frequency analysis and synthesis using a Gammatone filterbank", Acustica/Acta Acustica, 88(3):433–442, 2002.