Skip to main content

quantity-guard

Physical quantities carry their unit, vertical datum, timezone, and record quality across an AI agent's tool boundary as structured metadata the runtime enforces, rather than as prose the model is trusted to track.

Across 1,901 benchmark runs on six models, every model tested passed a discharge published in cubic feet per second into a parameter declared in cubic metres per second without converting it, on every unguarded run. The answer is 35.3 times too large and nothing in it looks wrong.

pip install quantity-guard

What it prevents

Dimensional analysis alone does not reach the worst cases. A stage of 12.4 ft above a local gage datum and a flood stage of 31.0 ft above NAVD88 are both lengths, so a units library will subtract one from the other and return 18.6 ft, which is not a freeboard. The values are dimensionally compatible and semantically incompatible.

Four checks run at the boundary where tools are called:

check catches
Dimensionality a length where a volumetric flow is required, converting where a conversion exists
Reference frame vertical datums, coordinate systems, and timezones, none visible to dimensional analysis
Carry-over a magnitude reused from an earlier tool with its unit dropped or wrongly relabelled
Provenance a figure in an answer, or entering a tool, that traces to nothing retrieved

Guarding a server you did not write

quantity-guard-mcp wraps an existing MCP server. It reads the server's tool list, merges in declarations from an annotation file, re-advertises the tools with units in the schema, and validates calls in flight.

quantity-guard-mcp --annotations water.toml -- python -m my_server
[tools.read_discharge]
returns = { unit = "cfs" }

[tools.runoff_depth.params]
discharge = { unit = "m**3/s" }
area = { unit = "km**2" }

Arguments are converted into the unit the upstream server already expects, so the server needs no change: a model sending 1250 cfs causes the tool to receive 35.4. Bare numeric results come back labelled, which is what lets carry-over detection work across a server the library knows nothing about. Only annotated tools are guarded; the rest pass through.

demo/usgs_server.py is an ordinary server that states units in prose and answers in bare numbers. Behind the proxy:

schema   discharge x-unit = m**3/s
ok       {"value": 1250.0, "unit": "cfs"}
ERROR    received the bare number 1250, which this tool reads as 1250 m3/s, but
         read_discharge.return returned 1250 cfs and no conversion was applied
ok       {"value": 0.1054, "unit": "mm / d"}

Declaring tools directly

from quantity_guard import quantity_tool

@quantity_tool(
    params={"discharge": {"unit": "m**3/s"}, "area": {"unit": "km**2"}},
    returns={"unit": "mm/day"},
)
def runoff_depth(discharge, area):
    """Depth-equivalent runoff over the contributing area."""
    return discharge / area

The body receives Q values, so arithmetic carries units through. Callers may pass a bare number in the declared unit, a string such as "1250 cfs", or {"value": 1250, "unit": "cfs"}; all normalise before the body runs. A dimensionally wrong argument is refused rather than coerced.

json_schema() emits an MCP tool definition extended with x-unit, x-datum, x-crs, and x-tz. toolbox([...]).schemas("openai" | "anthropic") emits the same declarations in those providers' formats, with dispatch and result wrapping.

Declaration fields

field effect
unit required dimensionality; compatible input is converted, incompatible refused
datum vertical reference; values on another datum are refused, never silently shifted
tz required timezone; a naive timestamp is refused
quality weakest acceptable record, so a tool can decline provisional data
crs coordinate system, checked for equality
sourced value must trace to a tool output, a combination of them, or the question
require_explicit_unit a bare number is refused

Quality flags propagate through arithmetic, taking the weakest input, and USGS single letter codes are accepted directly. A quantity holds one value or a series, and declarations behave identically for both (pip install quantity-guard[arrays]).

Vertical datums

Datums are named reference frames. Two quantities on different datums cannot be differenced or compared, and conversion requires an offset registered explicitly, because the true offset varies with location.

register_station("07374000", Q(1.5, "ft", datum="NAVD88"))

flood_stage - stage                                # DatumMismatch
flood_stage - stage.to_datum("NAVD88")             # Q(17.1 ft)
Q(31.0, "ft", datum="NAVD88").to_datum("NGVD29")   # DatumConversionUnavailable

Differencing two elevations on a shared datum yields a delta carrying no datum, which makes freeboard arithmetic well defined while leaving the sum of two absolute elevations refused.

Carry-over between tools

A bare number entering a tool is read in that tool's declared unit, which is the contract the schema states. The contract breaks when a model reuses a magnitude from an earlier tool without converting it. Within a session the ledger makes this detectable: if the value a tool ends up holding equals one an earlier tool returned while the two are on different footings, no conversion was applied.

with session():
    read_discharge("07374000")                  # returns 1250 cfs
    runoff_depth(discharge=1250, area=29000)
# UnconvertedCarryOver: received the bare number 1250, which this tool reads as
# 1250 m3/s, but read_discharge.return returned 1250 cfs and no conversion was applied

The check is keyed on the value the tool will act on rather than on how it was written, so it covers a dropped unit, a wrongly asserted one ({"value": 1250, "unit": "m**3/s"} over a reading in cfs), and a dropped datum, which gives a wrong answer by an offset rather than a ratio and is the harder of the three to notice.

Provenance

Guarded tools record every quantity crossing their boundary, and two checks read that ledger.

audit_answer classifies each numeric literal in a final answer. sourced matched a recorded output, derived is a sum or difference of recorded outputs, quoted was repeated back from the question, unsourced matched nothing, and unit_mislabelled matched a magnitude but contradicted its unit. Only the last two make audit.ok false.

with session(context=question) as ledger:
    ...
    audit = ledger.audit_answer(answer, context=question)

sourced=True on a parameter closes the gap the answer audit cannot: a fabricated input produces a computed output the audit then reports as sourced, because a tool really did return it.

runoff_depth("1250 cfs", 2915830.0)
# UnsourcedInput: received 2.91583e+06 km2, which no tool returned and the question
# did not supply

manifest() returns the full ledger, enough to re-run a session and check its numbers.

Reading real data

quantity_guard.packs.usgs retrieves from USGS Water Services and keeps what the service publishes: a unit code per variable, a qualifier marking the record provisional or approved, an explicit UTC offset per timestamp, and a site record giving the gage datum.

site, values = usgs.reading("07374000")
values["00060"].value      # Q(234000 ft3/s (provisional))
values["00065"].value      # Q(7.73 ft (GAGE:07374000, provisional))

Reading the site record registers the station datum, so differencing a gage height against an absolute elevation is refused. Network access goes through a replaceable fetch; tests run against recorded responses, and pytest -m live checks them against the service.

Adopting incrementally

enforcement="warn" validates without rejecting: the call proceeds on the raw value and the violation is recorded, so the cost of enforcement can be measured before it is paid.

print(ledger.enforcement_report())
# 2 of 3 tool calls would have been blocked:
#   2x dimensionality_error
#       runoff.discharge: expected a quantity in m**3/s ([length]^3 [time]^-1),
#       received 12.4 ft ([length])

Every violation carries a repair() string stating what was wrong and what to send instead, and invoke() returns it as a tool error rather than raising, so a rejected call stays in the conversation where the model can correct it.

Results

bench/ is a reproducible evaluation. Four conditions hold the tool bodies constant and vary only the schema shown to the model and whether validation is enforced: baseline (plain schema, bare numeric results), schema_only (physical metadata, no enforcement), guarded, and guarded_repair. Eight replicates per cell, 1,901 usable runs.

python -m bench --suite core --model anthropic/claude-opus-5 --replicates 8

Unit carry-over

Runs in which the model skipped the cfs to m3/s conversion, giving an answer 35.3 times too large.

model baseline guarded
Claude Haiku 4.5 8/8 0/8
Claude Sonnet 4.6 8/8 0/8
Claude Opus 5 8/8 0/8
DeepSeek V3.2 8/8 0/8
Qwen3 235B A22B 8/8 0/8
Llama 3.3 70B 3/8 0/8

Capability does not protect against this. The frontier model fails as reliably as the smallest, because the mistake is not one of reasoning: the number arrives with no unit attached, so there is nothing to reason about. Llama 3.3 is lower only because it fails the harness protocol often enough not to reach the computing tool, and when it does reach it, it asserts the wrong unit outright rather than omitting it.

Declaring the unit in the schema removes most but not all of the error and does not order by capability, ranging from 1 to 6 of 8 across models. Enforcement removes it. Task accuracy over the core suite moves from 75-83% at baseline to 94-100% enforced, on the five models that handle the protocol reliably.

Vertical datum

Silent errors on a levee freeboard task comparing a forecast water surface on NAVD88 against a crest surveyed on NGVD29, with no converter tool and no signposting.

model baseline guarded
Qwen3 235B A22B 8/8 0/8
Claude Haiku 4.5 3/8 0/8
Llama 3.3 70B 2/8 0/8
Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 5, DeepSeek V3.2 0/8 0/8

Three of six models report 4.5 ft of freeboard where 4.06 ft is correct, overstating the margin by 11% in the direction that matters. The other three notice the datum difference unprompted and fetch the offset.

Fabricated inputs

Runs in which a model passed a drainage area it had not retrieved, on a task where the area tool fails for a station whose area is widely memorised.

model fired
Llama 3.3 70B 12/16
DeepSeek V3.2 1/16
Claude Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 4.6, Opus 5, Qwen3 235B 0/16 each

Llama 3.3 supplies the figure from memory in three quarters of guarded runs, and with the repair loop enabled every one of those runs then reported the value as unavailable. Claude models never attempted it across 48 runs and three separate task designs, so this check is load-bearing for some model families and inert for others.

Scope

A power systems suite (--suite grid) carrying the same carry-over hazard into MW, kV, and MVA did not reproduce it: every model converted correctly on all 192 runs. MW to W and kV to V are SI prefix conversions, which models perform reliably, whereas cfs to m3/s is a factor of 0.0283 with no prefix relationship, which they do not. The hazard is therefore units with no prefix relationship to the declared one, covering customary and legacy systems such as US hydrology, oil and gas, aviation, and building services, rather than units in general.

The audit's own error rate

Measured over 583 correct answers, the answer audit initially flagged 34% of them, rising to 98% on one task. Every cause was a legitimate number: values derived arithmetically, values quoted back from the question, a derived value written without a unit, a figure rounded from 17.1 to 17, and a sign carried in the prose rather than the digits. Re-running over 288 fresh transcripts after those fixes leaves 0% unexplained, while the audit continues to catch genuine unit misstatements in 12% of runs whose final answer was graded correct.

Derivation follows sums and differences of like dimensions, one step deep. Allowing products and quotients as well was measured to accept 53% of randomly chosen numbers on a six-output ledger. With the restriction a random number is accepted 2.6% of the time on a three-output ledger and 8.0% on a six-output one.

The audit answers provenance, not correctness. A freeboard of 18.6 ft computed as 31.0 minus 12.4 is derived, because it came from two recorded outputs; that it used the wrong operation is a physics error, caught by the datum check at the boundary.

Limitations

Coordinate reference systems are carried as a consistency tag and checked for equality, never converted. A scalar has no coordinates to reproject, so reprojection belongs to a geometry type this library does not define.

The timezone check enforces that an offset is present, not that it is correct. A model pairing a UTC clock reading with a local offset passes.

Retrieval covers instantaneous values and site records from USGS Water Services. Framework adapters cover the OpenAI and Anthropic tool formats, not higher-level agent frameworks.

Results come from four task suites in two domains at eight replicates per cell, which separates the large effects reported above but not differences below roughly ten percentage points.

Licence

MIT

Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

quantity_guard-0.5.0.tar.gz (138.0 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

quantity_guard-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl (40.6 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file quantity_guard-0.5.0.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: quantity_guard-0.5.0.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 138.0 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

File hashes

Hashes for quantity_guard-0.5.0.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 04ccb4b17469317882f9fbedcdcc7c5d5639e216c4632cbb97e4febc10293278
MD5 fa05937bd0f92f38b648478fae704916
BLAKE2b-256 530c871f90aa9b57bae1210f78df83bb9fc979b12af541539c9a38cff50675ed

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for quantity_guard-0.5.0.tar.gz:

Publisher: release.yml on Adeniyikayodee/quantity-guard

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file quantity_guard-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: quantity_guard-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 40.6 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

File hashes

Hashes for quantity_guard-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 cccb9d23d5fe60f58e4519b016435adb73dde360c30372e3fd6b71ae39cad22f
MD5 c620cbdc85af5acd8668013f8759c514
BLAKE2b-256 aa2b46b307d4a2cf3f952240f32d78e6895cbd65439b0a4eb8b799ad064bc0aa

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for quantity_guard-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on Adeniyikayodee/quantity-guard

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page