WhitePact — an independent runtime authority, governance, and assurance layer for autonomous systems: a five-way governance decision engine (ALLOW / ALLOW_WITH_REDACTION / REQUIRE_APPROVAL / DENY / QUARANTINE), trust scoring, bias detection, guardrails, hallucination detection, compliance mapping (NIST AI RMF / EU AI Act / ISO 42001), cost intelligence, drift monitoring, a public Trust Index / leaderboard / AI Incident Database, and an MCP server (27 tools, 20 resources) with LangChain, LangGraph, and Google ADK trust-gate integrations.
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ WhitePact v1.2.0 │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ Governance │ │ Trust Score │ │ Compliance │ │ Guardrails │ │
│ │ 5-way decide │ │ 6-dim A–F │ │ NIST/EU/ISO │ │ PII + Tox │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ Hallucination│ │ Cost Intel │ │ Red Team │ │ Drift Monitor │ │
│ │ Self-consist.│ │ Route+Budget│ │ 10 attacks │ │ Alerts+Trend │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ AI Passport │ │ BiasBuster │ │ PrivacyLabel │ │ MCP Server │ │
│ │ SHA-256 cert │ │ 6 probes+CI │ │ Federated │ │ 27 tools/HTTP │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Governance Dashboard — FastAPI · Per-org rate limit · Alembic · OTEL │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
What this solves
Every team deploying AI in production faces the same gap: no unified way to prove a model — or an autonomous agent's actions — is safe, fair, compliant, and accountable. Audits are manual, bias is discovered in production, compliance is a spreadsheet, an agent's tool calls go ungoverned, and nobody knows what the LLM bill will be next month.
WhitePact gives you one platform — a REST API, a Python SDK, an MCP server, and a live dashboard — that covers the full governance lifecycle:
| Problem | Module | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Should this agent action be allowed, redacted, held for approval, denied, or quarantined? | WhitePactRuntimeGateway (governance core) |
A five-way GovernanceDecision, deterministic, no LLM call in the decision path |
| Is this model trustworthy? | TrustScoreEngine |
0–100 score, A–F grade, risk level |
| Does it comply with regulations? | ComplianceEngine |
NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act tier, ISO 42001 |
| Is it exposing PII? | GuardrailsEngine |
Block / redact with audit log |
| Is it hallucinating? | HallucinationDetector |
Risk score, unsupported claims |
| Can it be attacked? | RedTeamSimulator |
10 vectors, CVE IDs, safe-refusal rate |
| How much is it costing? | CostTracker + ModelRouter |
Per-model USD, routing to cheapest viable model |
| Is it getting worse over time? | TrustDriftMonitor |
7/30-day trend, severity alerts |
| Is it biased? | BiasBuster |
6 demographic probes, CI gate |
| Is this data labeled privately? | PrivacyLabel |
Federated DP labels, never leaves device |
| Is this media real? | DeepfakeDetector |
Ensemble confidence, method detected |
| Can I trust a third-party MCP server before connecting to it? | SupplyChainScanner |
VERIFIED_FACT / INFERRED_SIGNAL / UNKNOWN verdicts — typosquat, description-content, known-incident checks |
| Is there a tamper-evident record of every governance decision? | EvidenceRepository |
Hash-chained EvidenceRecord, per-org, verify_chain() |
| Does a risky action get a human in the loop? | ApprovalRepository |
Race-safe PENDING → APPROVED/DENIED workflow |
| How does this model rank against others, independently? | Public Leaderboard |
Cross-model trust ranking from actually calling each model's API, not self-reported |
| Can I cite and verify a trust score anywhere? | Trust Index |
Free self-assessed or human-reviewed certified passport, verifiable at /verify/{id}, embeddable badge |
| Has this AI system failed publicly before? | AI Incident Database |
Crowd-reported, moderator-reviewed, hash-chained public registry |
| Should my agent trust this third-party tool before calling it? | rai_check_trust + LangChain/LangGraph/ADK integrations |
Free lookup, plus a real block/pause gate in-agent |
| Can any MCP client govern every AI call? | MCP Server |
27 governance tools over stdio, Streamable HTTP, or legacy HTTP+SSE |
Install
# Governance platform + REST API
pip install "rai-governance-platform[dashboard]"
# With PostgreSQL support
pip install "rai-governance-platform[dashboard,postgres]"
# With Redis + OpenTelemetry
pip install "rai-governance-platform[dashboard,redis,telemetry]"
# With LLM providers
pip install "rai-governance-platform[dashboard,openai,anthropic]"
# Everything
pip install "rai-governance-platform[all]"
The published PyPI package name (rai-governance-platform) and the import
name (responsibleai) predate the WhitePact rename and are kept as-is —
see MIGRATION_WHITEPACT_V2.md Section 3 for why an alias package
(whitepact) was added instead of renaming the published package outright.
30-second quickstart
# Start the governance dashboard
pip install "rai-governance-platform[dashboard]"
uvicorn responsibleai.dashboard.app:app --port 8765
# Evaluate a model (no LLM key needed — supply your own scores)
curl -X POST http://localhost:8765/api/evaluate \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model_name": "gpt-4o",
"provider": "openai",
"fairness": 0.80,
"privacy": 0.85,
"security": 0.82,
"robustness": 0.78,
"compliance": 0.90,
"authenticity": 0.88
}'
{
"trust_score": { "trust_score": 83.65, "grade": "B", "risk": "LOW" },
"compliance": { "overall_score": 80.5, "eu_ai_act_tier": "limited_risk", "violations": 0 },
"passport_id": "rai-a3f7c2b1",
"passport_hash": "4d8e1f2a9c3b7e6d...",
"drift_alert": null
}
Open http://localhost:8765 for the live dashboard and
http://localhost:8765/api/docs for interactive API docs.
Governance core — five-way decisions, not a binary block/allow
src/responsibleai/governance/ (see SPEC.md Sections 4-8 for the full
architecture contract) is a deterministic runtime authority sitting in front
of agent tool calls:
from responsibleai.governance import WhitePactRuntimeGateway, ActionRequest, AuthorityContext
gateway = WhitePactRuntimeGateway()
result = gateway.evaluate(
action=ActionRequest(tool_name="rai_scan", arguments={"text": "..."}),
authority=AuthorityContext(org_id="acme", agent_id="agent-1"),
)
print(result.decision) # GovernanceDecision.ALLOW | ALLOW_WITH_REDACTION | REQUIRE_APPROVAL | DENY | QUARANTINE
- Risk tiering (
governance/risk.py) — every MCP tool is classified against a hardcoded, drift-tested table, not inferred at call time. - Policy engine (
governance/policy.py) — first-match-wins rules withALLOW/DENY/REQUIRE_APPROVALeffects. - Evidence (
governance/evidence.py) — every decision is written to a per-org, hash-chainedEvidenceRecord;verify_chain()detects tampering. Raw argument values are never stored, only field-name keys. - Approval workflow (
governance/approval.py) —REQUIRE_APPROVALdecisions queue a real, race-safeApprovalRequestwith a resolution API, not just a log line. - Supply-chain scanner (
src/responsibleai/supplychain/) — before an agent trusts a third-party MCP server or tool,SupplyChainScannerreturns one of three explicit verdicts (VERIFIED_FACT/INFERRED_SIGNAL/UNKNOWN) — never a single opaque trust score — from typosquat detection, tool-description scanning, and known-incident cross-reference.
No governance decision is LLM-based; see
DETERMINISTIC_VS_PROBABILISTIC.md for why.
MCP Server — govern every AI call from Claude Code, Claude Desktop, or any MCP client
The MCP (Model Context Protocol) server exposes WhitePact as 27 tools and
20 resources (10 canonical resource URIs, dual-advertised under both
whitepact:// and rai:// schemes — see MIGRATION_WHITEPACT_V2.md) to any
MCP-compatible client — Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, or your
own agent runtime. Three transports are supported: stdio, Streamable HTTP
(/mcp, current MCP spec), and legacy HTTP+SSE (/sse + /messages/, kept
for older clients). When a team's client points at this server, every AI
interaction is automatically governed — five-way governance decisions, trust
scoring, guardrails, compliance checks (NIST AI RMF / EU AI Act / ISO 42001),
bias evaluation, drift detection, cost tracking, and hash-chained audit
evidence run on any call without code changes.
Setup
# Install
pip install "rai-governance-platform[dashboard,mcp]"
# Start the REST API (MCP tools call it internally)
RAI_DB_PATH=/var/lib/rai/governance.db \
RAI_API_KEYS=your-key-here \
uvicorn responsibleai.dashboard.app:app --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8765 &
# Add to Claude Code (~/.claude/claude_desktop_config.json or via /mcp)
{
"mcpServers": {
"whitepact": {
"command": "whitepact-mcp",
"env": {
"RAI_API_URL": "http://localhost:8765",
"RAI_API_KEY": "your-key-here"
}
}
}
}
whitepact-mcp and responsibleai-mcp are the same entry point — see
pyproject.toml's [project.scripts]; both will keep working, use whichever
name you prefer.
Available tools (27)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
rai_scan |
Detect and redact PII + harmful content before it reaches a log |
rai_trust_score |
Composite AI Trust Score (0-100) across 6 governance dimensions |
rai_compliance |
NIST AI RMF / EU AI Act / ISO 42001 compliance evaluation |
rai_hallucination |
Hallucination risk from hedging, consistency, unsupported claims |
rai_cost_estimate |
USD cost of a model API call from token counts |
rai_redteam_payloads |
Adversarial attack payloads (prompt injection, jailbreak, etc.) |
rai_redteam_analyze |
Security report from model responses to red team payloads |
rai_compare_models |
Compare two models across all 6 trust dimensions |
rai_audit_summary |
Governance capability summary (tools, frameworks, attack vectors) |
rai_health |
Status and module availability of the governance engine |
rai_bias_evaluate |
Demographic bias across 6 probe dimensions with confidence intervals |
rai_drift_check |
Trust score drift between a baseline and current evaluation |
rai_passport_generate |
Verifiable, tamper-evident AI Passport for vendor risk assessment |
rai_budget_check |
Spend vs. budget, per-team/model breakdown, month-end projection |
rai_policy_check |
Text/response against a governance policy (blocklists, disclaimers) |
rai_stream_scan |
PII/harm scan across streaming LLM output chunks |
rai_benchmark |
Score responses against truthfulqa / bbq / hellaswag suites |
rai_benchmark_prompts |
Question set for a benchmark suite |
rai_model_route |
Cheapest model that can handle a task, with cost/quality tradeoff |
rai_pii_report |
PII audit report by category with GDPR/CCPA remediation guidance |
rai_incident_log |
Structured governance incident record for audit/SIEM |
rai_eu_ai_act_classify |
EU AI Act risk tier classification with compliance roadmap |
rai_iso42001_gap |
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System gap analysis |
rai_executive_summary |
Board-ready governance summary with RAG status indicators |
rai_org_status |
Governance status snapshot: models, grades, compliance, risk |
rai_webhook_status |
Webhook delivery health, failure analysis, remediation actions |
rai_check_trust |
Free public Trust Index lookup for a third-party model/tool, before an agent invokes it — unlike every other tool above, which evaluates output the caller itself produced |
Agent-framework integrations — LangChain, LangGraph, Google ADK
src/responsibleai/integrations/ wires rai_check_trust directly into three
agent frameworks so an agent can be gated on a tool's public trust score
before invoking it, not just log the call after the fact:
- LangChain (
langchain_middleware.py) —TrustGateMiddleware, awrap_tool_callmiddleware that blocks a call outright when its score is below threshold. Requirespip install "rai-governance-platform[langchain]". - LangGraph (
langgraph_gate.py) —make_trust_gate_node(), a node that pauses the graph withinterrupt()for a human approve/reject decision on a below-threshold call, instead of a hard block. Requirespip install "rai-governance-platform[langgraph]". - Google ADK (
adk_toolset.py) —build_stdio_toolset()/build_http_toolset(), thin factories over ADK'sMcpToolset, which auto-discovers this project's MCP server's tools with no custom glue code. Requirespip install "rai-governance-platform[adk]".
All three, or any subset, install via pip install "rai-governance-platform[agent-frameworks]".
See GAME_CHANGER_BUILD_PLAN.md Phase B for the reasoning behind each.
Available resources (20)
10 canonical resources, each advertised under both the whitepact:// and
rai:// URI schemes (dual scheme is additive — see
MIGRATION_WHITEPACT_V2.md; the table below shows the canonical URI):
| Resource | URI | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| Health | whitepact://health |
Current health status of the governance service |
| Model pricing catalog | whitepact://models/catalog |
Supported models with per-token pricing |
| Compliance frameworks | whitepact://compliance/frameworks |
NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 |
| Red team categories | whitepact://redteam/categories |
Adversarial attack categories |
| Trust dimensions | whitepact://trust/dimensions |
The 6 dimensions behind the Trust Score |
| Bias probe catalog | whitepact://bias/probes |
Available bias probes and scoring interpretation |
| Governance policy template | whitepact://governance/policy |
Default policy template for rai_policy_check |
| Trust grade reference | whitepact://trust/grades |
Grade thresholds, risk tiers, deployment guidance |
| NIST AI RMF checklist | whitepact://compliance/checklist/nist |
Actionable NIST implementation checklist |
| EU AI Act checklist | whitepact://compliance/checklist/eu-ai-act |
Compliance checklist for high-risk operators |
MCP registry manifest
server.json at the repository root is the official MCP registry manifest
(schema 2025-12-11). It is not yet submitted — see
compliance/MCP_DISTRIBUTION_GUIDE.md for the specific, real blockers
(a PyPI release matching the manifest's version, GitHub namespace
verification, and a real hosted transport URL).
Python SDK
Trust scoring
from responsibleai import TrustScoreEngine, PassportGenerator
engine = TrustScoreEngine()
score = engine.compute(
fairness=0.80, privacy=0.85, security=0.82,
robustness=0.78, compliance=0.90, authenticity=0.88,
)
print(f"{score.overall:.1f} / 100 Grade: {score.grade} Risk: {score.risk_level}")
# → 83.7 / 100 Grade: B Risk: LOW
passport = PassportGenerator().generate(
model_name="gpt-4o", provider="openai", trust_score=score,
compliance_summary={"overall": 80.5},
)
print(passport.passport_id)
passport.export_html("passport.html")
Guardrails — block PII before it reaches a log
from responsibleai import GuardrailsEngine
guardrails = GuardrailsEngine()
result = guardrails.scan("Customer SSN is 123-45-6789, email: alice@company.com")
print(result.is_blocked) # True
print(result.pii_count) # 2
print(result.redacted_text) # "Customer SSN is [SSN], email: [EMAIL]"
Hallucination detection
from responsibleai import HallucinationDetector
detector = HallucinationDetector()
result = detector.analyze(
"AI will replace all human jobs by 2025.",
candidates=[
"AI will automate some repetitive tasks.",
"AI creates new job categories alongside displacing others.",
],
)
print(f"Risk: {result.hallucination_risk:.2f} Level: {result.risk_level}")
Compliance — NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001
from responsibleai import ComplianceEngine
engine = ComplianceEngine()
report = engine.evaluate(
fairness_score=0.80, privacy_score=0.85,
security_score=0.82, robustness_score=0.78,
compliance_maturity=0.90, use_case="credit_scoring",
)
print(f"Score: {report.compliance_score * 100:.1f}%")
print(f"EU AI Act tier: {report.eu_ai_act_tier.value}") # high_risk
Red team simulation
from responsibleai import RedTeamSimulator
simulator = RedTeamSimulator()
report = simulator.run_all()
print(f"Security score: {report.security_score:.1f}/100")
print(f"Vulnerabilities: {len(report.vulnerabilities)}")
for v in report.critical_vulnerabilities:
print(f" [{v['cwe_id']}] {v['name']}")
Cost intelligence
from responsibleai import CostTracker, ModelRouter, TokenUsage, BudgetPolicy
tracker = CostTracker(db_path="~/.responsibleai/data.db",
policy=BudgetPolicy(monthly_limit_usd=500.0))
usage = TokenUsage.create(
provider="openai", model="gpt-4o",
input_tokens=2000, output_tokens=800, team="product",
)
record = tracker.record(usage)
print(f"This call: ${record.total_cost:.4f}")
print(f"Month to date: ${tracker.total_cost(30):.2f}")
router = ModelRouter()
decision = router.route("Classify this email as spam or not spam", "balanced")
print(f"Recommended: {decision.recommended_model} ${decision.estimated_cost_per_1k:.4f}/1k tokens")
Trust drift monitoring
from responsibleai import TrustScoreEngine, TrustDriftMonitor
monitor = TrustDriftMonitor(db_path=":memory:", alert_threshold=5.0)
engine = TrustScoreEngine()
for fairness in [0.90, 0.88, 0.85, 0.72]:
score = engine.compute(fairness=fairness, privacy=0.85, security=0.80,
robustness=0.80, compliance=0.85, authenticity=0.85)
alert = monitor.record("gpt-4o", "openai", score)
if alert:
print(f"Drift alert! {alert.severity}: {alert.delta:.1f} pt drop")
Governance Dashboard
A production FastAPI application with a dark-mode SPA.
# Development (auth off, SQLite in-memory)
RAI_AUTH_ENABLED=false uvicorn responsibleai.dashboard.app:app --port 8765
# Production (auth + persistent DB)
RAI_API_KEYS=your-key-here \
RAI_DB_PATH=/data/responsibleai.db \
uvicorn responsibleai.dashboard.app:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8765 --workers 4
# Docker
docker compose up -d
REST API endpoints
| Method | Path | Description |
|---|---|---|
GET |
/api/health |
Health — DB, auth, OTEL, version |
GET |
/api/metrics |
Uptime, request count, error rate, monthly spend |
POST |
/api/evaluate |
Full evaluation → trust + compliance + passport |
GET |
/api/trust-score/{model}/{provider} |
Score history + drift trend |
GET |
/api/models |
All evaluated models |
POST |
/api/scan |
Guardrails — PII detection + redaction |
POST |
/api/hallucination |
Hallucination risk analysis |
POST |
/api/cost/record |
Record token usage |
GET |
/api/cost/summary |
Cost breakdown by model / team / day |
POST |
/api/cost/analyze |
Prompt efficiency — detect bloat |
POST |
/api/cost/route |
Route task to cheapest viable model |
GET |
/api/cost/models |
Full model pricing catalogue |
GET |
/api/drift/{model}/{provider} |
Drift trend + history |
GET |
/api/audit |
Paginated audit log (org-scoped) |
GET |
/api/audit/export |
Export audit log as JSONL or CSV |
GET |
/api/audit/summary |
Audit counts grouped by endpoint |
GET |
/api/redteam/payloads |
Red team payload library (10 vectors) |
POST |
/api/redteam/analyze |
Analyze model responses for vulnerabilities |
GET |
/api/billing/usage |
Token spend and budget status |
GET |
/api/leaderboard |
Public cross-model trust leaderboard (no auth) |
GET |
/api/leaderboard/{model}/{provider}/history |
Trend over time for one model (no auth) |
GET |
/api/leaderboard/{model}/{provider}/diagnostic |
Per-prompt findings — PRO plan required |
POST |
/api/trust-index/assess |
Free, public self-assessment against the open Trust Index standard |
GET |
/api/trust-index/verify/{passport_id} |
Verify a cited Trust Index score (no auth) |
GET |
/api/trust-index/check |
Free, public — trust score + incident count for a named model/tool, by exact name (no auth); what rai_check_trust and the LangChain/LangGraph/ADK integrations call |
GET |
/api/trust-index/registry |
Every assessed model/tool, certified and self-reported, newest first (no auth) — data source for the public /registry page |
GET |
/api/trust-index/certified |
Directory of certified passports (no auth) |
POST |
/api/trust-index/certify/{passport_id} |
Certify a passport — super-admin only |
GET |
/api/trust-index/badge/{passport_id}.svg |
Embeddable trust badge (Self-Assessed / Certified), no auth |
POST |
/api/incident-db/report |
Report a publicly observed AI incident (no auth, rate-limited) |
GET |
/api/incident-db |
Browse published incidents — filter by model, provider, severity, type (no auth) |
GET |
/api/incident-db/check |
Pre-deployment exact-match incident check for a model/provider — PRO/ENTERPRISE |
GET |
/api/incident-db/verify |
Recompute the hash chain over every published entry (no auth) |
POST |
/api/orgs/{org_id}/keys/{key_id}/mfa/enroll |
Enroll an API key in TOTP MFA |
POST |
/api/orgs/{org_id}/keys/{key_id}/mfa/verify |
Verify a TOTP code / backup code |
GET/POST |
/api/governance/evidence |
Read/write hash-chained governance evidence records |
GET/POST |
/api/governance/approvals |
Queue and resolve REQUIRE_APPROVAL decisions |
Interactive docs at /api/docs. Public leaderboard page at /leaderboard —
see compliance/LEADERBOARD_METHODOLOGY.md for the published scoring
methodology and scripts/run_leaderboard_eval.py to run evaluations. Open
Trust Index standard and passport verification at /verify/{id} — see
compliance/TRUST_INDEX_SPEC.md. Free, zero-signup self-assessment at
/assess; browse every assessed model/tool at /registry. /llms.txt
points AI crawlers/answer engines at these as canonical sources — see
GAME_CHANGER_STRATEGY.md for why.
Production features
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Authentication | Bearer token (RAI_API_KEYS) with RBAC (OWNER / ADMIN / ANALYST / VIEWER) |
| MFA | TOTP (RFC 6238) on the interactive login step, org-enforceable, single-use backup codes |
| Field-level encryption | Opt-in (RAI_FIELD_ENCRYPTION_KEY) on audit_log.ip_address, incident reporter contact info, webhook secrets, MFA secrets — with key-rotation support (MultiFernet) |
| Per-org rate limiting | Each Bearer token gets its own rate limit bucket (SHA-256 keyed) — no shared global pool |
| CORS | Configurable origins (RAI_ALLOWED_ORIGINS) |
| Security headers | CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options |
| Structured logging | JSON via structlog + request IDs |
| Database | SQLite (default) or PostgreSQL (RAI_DATABASE_URL) with Alembic migrations |
| Observability | OpenTelemetry traces + metrics (RAI_OTEL_ENDPOINT) |
| Webhooks | HMAC-signed delivery with DB-persisted retry queue (survives restarts) |
| Exception handling | No raw stack traces reach clients |
| Governance evidence | Hash-chained, per-org, tamper-evident (GET /api/governance/evidence) |
Database migrations (Alembic)
Schema changes are managed with Alembic. Run alembic history for the
current, authoritative migration count and table list — this number changes
frequently enough that a hardcoded count here goes stale fast; the command
itself is the source of truth.
# Upgrade to latest schema
RAI_DB_PATH=/var/lib/rai/governance.db alembic upgrade head
# PostgreSQL
RAI_DB_URL=postgresql://user:pass@host:5432/responsibleai alembic upgrade head
# Show migration history
alembic history
# Generate a new migration after changing engine.py
alembic revision --autogenerate -m "add_new_column"
All migrations use render_as_batch=True so they run on both SQLite and
PostgreSQL without changes.
Webhook notifications
Register an endpoint and receive signed events when governance thresholds fire.
# Register a Slack webhook
curl -X POST http://localhost:8765/api/webhooks \
-H "Authorization: Bearer your-key" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"name": "ops-slack",
"url": "https://hooks.slack.com/services/...",
"events": ["drift_alert", "budget_exceeded", "guardrail_triggered"],
"provider": "slack",
"secret": "hmac-secret-for-signature-verification",
"max_retries": 5
}'
Deliveries are persisted to the database. If the server restarts during a retry cycle, the background worker picks up where it left off on next boot. Retry schedule: 1 s → 5 s → 30 s → 2 min → 10 min.
Verify payloads with the X-RAI-Signature-256: sha256=<hex> header.
Docker
git clone https://github.com/Guruprasath-Annadurai/Whitepact.git
cd Whitepact
python3 -c "import secrets; print(secrets.token_urlsafe(32))"
cp .env.example .env
# Edit .env — set RAI_API_KEYS
docker compose up -d
# Dashboard: http://localhost:8765
# API docs: http://localhost:8765/api/docs
PostgreSQL + Redis (horizontal scaling)
# .env
RAI_DATABASE_URL=postgresql://rai:secret@db-host:5432/responsibleai
RAI_REDIS_URL=redis://redis-host:6379/0
RAI_OTEL_ENDPOINT=http://otel-collector:4318
pip install "rai-governance-platform[dashboard,postgres,redis,telemetry]"
# Run migrations before first start
RAI_DB_URL=postgresql://rai:secret@db-host:5432/responsibleai alembic upgrade head
The async database layer uses SQLAlchemy with connection pooling
(pool_size=10, max_overflow=20, pool_pre_ping=True). Rate limiting
switches to Redis-backed storage when RAI_REDIS_URL is set.
BiasBuster — bias evaluation in CI
# Fail CI when demographic bias exceeds threshold
biasbuster run \
--provider openai --model gpt-4o \
--probes gender-bias,racial-bias,cultural-bias \
--threshold 0.20 \
--output report --format html
from biasbuster import BiasBusterRunner, GenderBiasProbe, RacialBiasProbe
from biasbuster.providers import OpenAIProvider
import asyncio
async def main():
provider = OpenAIProvider(api_key="sk-...", model="gpt-4o")
runner = BiasBusterRunner(provider=provider)
suite = await runner.run([
GenderBiasProbe(threshold=0.20),
RacialBiasProbe(threshold=0.20),
])
print(f"Score: {suite.overall_score:.4f} {'PASSED' if suite.passed else 'FAILED'}")
asyncio.run(main())
Available probes: gender-bias, racial-bias, age-bias, religious-bias, occupational-stereotype, cultural-bias
Scoring: TF-IDF cosine divergence + length asymmetry + VADER sentiment divergence, 95% bootstrap confidence intervals, intersectional co-failure amplification (×1.15).
PrivacyLabel — on-device federated labeling
from privacylabel import FederatedClient, FedAvgAggregator
client = FederatedClient(
node_id="hospital-node-01",
provider=MyProvider(),
epsilon_per_round=0.1,
total_epsilon=1.0,
delta=1e-6,
gradient_clip=1.0,
)
# Raw data stays on disk — only privatised gradients leave the device
summary = await client.train_round("data/local_records.jsonl")
print(f"Privacy budget used: ε={summary.privacy_spent['spent_epsilon']:.3f}")
Implements Laplace, Gaussian, Exponential, and DP-SGD mechanisms. Byzantine-robust aggregation via Weiszfeld geometric median.
GitHub Actions — bias gate in CI
- name: Bias evaluation
run: |
pip install "rai-governance-platform[openai]"
biasbuster run \
--provider openai --model gpt-4o-mini \
--probes gender-bias,racial-bias,cultural-bias \
--threshold 0.20
env:
OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }}
Environment variables
| Variable | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
RAI_DB_PATH |
governance.db |
SQLite path |
RAI_DB_URL |
(unset = SQLite) | Full SQLAlchemy URL — takes priority over RAI_DB_PATH |
RAI_DATABASE_URL |
(unset) | Alias for RAI_DB_URL |
RAI_API_KEYS |
(empty = auth off) | Comma-separated bearer tokens |
RAI_AUTH_ENABLED |
true |
Toggle auth enforcement |
RAI_REDIS_URL |
(unset = in-memory) | Redis URL for distributed rate limiting |
RAI_RATE_LIMIT_DEFAULT |
100/minute |
Per-org rate limit (keyed by Bearer token) |
RAI_OTEL_ENDPOINT |
(unset = disabled) | OTLP HTTP endpoint |
RAI_OTEL_SERVICE_NAME |
responsibleai |
Service name for traces |
RAI_ALERT_THRESHOLD |
5.0 |
Trust score drop that triggers drift alert |
RAI_MONTHLY_BUDGET_USD |
10000.0 |
Monthly AI spend limit |
RAI_LOG_LEVEL |
INFO |
Log level |
RAI_LOG_JSON |
true |
Structured JSON logs |
RAI_HOST |
127.0.0.1 |
Bind address |
RAI_PORT |
8765 |
Port |
Dual-prefixed WHITEPACT_* equivalents for these are also read where
MIGRATION_WHITEPACT_V2.md documents them — the RAI_* names remain the
primary, always-supported form.
Development
git clone https://github.com/Guruprasath-Annadurai/Whitepact.git
cd Whitepact
python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e ".[dev]"
# Full test suite (1,538 tests, 85% coverage, as of this writing)
pytest
# Dashboard tests only
RAI_DB_PATH=:memory: RAI_AUTH_ENABLED=false pytest tests/test_dashboard_api.py
# Webhook persistence tests
pytest tests/test_webhook_persistence.py
# MCP server tests
pytest tests/test_mcp_server.py
# Lint + type check
ruff check src/ tests/
mypy src/responsibleai src/biasbuster
Roadmap
- v0.1 — BiasBuster: gender probe, 4 providers, CLI, CI integration
- v0.2 — Racial / age / religious / occupational probes, HTML reporter, PrivacyLabel federated DP
- v0.3 — Cultural bias, intersectional analysis, DeepfakeDetector ensemble
- v0.4 — Cost Intelligence (CostTracker, ModelRouter, 16-model pricing), Trust Drift Monitor
- v0.5 — Governance Dashboard (FastAPI), Trust Score, AI Passport, Guardrails, Hallucination, Compliance, Red Team, CI/CD, Docker, SLA
- v0.6 — Async PostgreSQL (SQLAlchemy), Redis rate limiting, OpenTelemetry APM, LLM integration tests
- v1.0 — WebSocket drift alerts, Prometheus endpoint, multi-tenant RBAC, org management API
- v1.1 — MCP server (10 tools, 5 resources), audit log API, red team API, billing API, Alembic migrations, per-org rate limiting, DB-persisted webhook retry queue
- v1.2 — Public Leaderboard, Trust Index/Passports + embeddable badges, AI Incident Database, TOTP MFA, expanded field encryption, DB-persisted webhooks, full dashboard UI rebuild, white-label branding, a genuinely live hosted instance — see
CHANGELOG.mdfor the full list - WhitePact migration (in progress across
1.2.0) — governance decision core, MCP Streamable HTTP + OAuth/OIDC, risk tiering + policy engine, hash-chained evidence, approval workflow, MCP trust/supply-chain scanner, HA Helm deployment, supply chain security (SBOM/provenance), release engineering, MCP registry manifest, open source governance — seeMIGRATION_WHITEPACT_V2.mdfor the full phase-by-phase log and what's still not done - v2.0 onward — see
VERSION_ROADMAP.mdfor the phase-by-phase plan through v6.0 - Strategic direction —
GAME_CHANGER_STRATEGY.mdlays out an infrastructure-first bet (free public trust registry, an agent-native trust-check primitive, AI-answer-engine citability) as an alternative to the enterprise-SaaS path, withGAME_CHANGER_BUILD_PLAN.mdbreaking it into concrete engineering phases against the current codebase
Further reading
SPEC.md— the current architecture contractMIGRATION_WHITEPACT_V2.md— phase-by-phase migration log, what's done and what's explicitly notDEFINITION_OF_DONE.md— closing report: what's real today, what isn't, verifiableTHREAT_MODEL.md— threat model for the current attack surfaceDETERMINISTIC_VS_PROBABILISTIC.md— why governance decisions are deterministicSLA.md,ENTERPRISE_SECURITY.md,SECURITY.md— enterprise/security posture, stated honestlycompliance/SOC2_ALTERNATIVE_PATH.md— real, free, independently verifiable trust signals for now; the honest path to a real SOC 2 when there's budget for one
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file rai_governance_platform-1.2.2.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: rai_governance_platform-1.2.2.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 864.0 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
6890df58de6e3f46fa29ae93ebe93dc712b70bded221d45b72307887f47527e6
|
|
| MD5 |
759355b0afd26db606fcfecf94a4d22b
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
37b2cc5aaa260feac7bc23f11a8ba1d09e15a9e230e53ad6e9a0093833d731a5
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for rai_governance_platform-1.2.2.tar.gz:
Publisher:
publish.yml on Guruprasath-Annadurai/Whitepact
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
rai_governance_platform-1.2.2.tar.gz -
Subject digest:
6890df58de6e3f46fa29ae93ebe93dc712b70bded221d45b72307887f47527e6 - Sigstore transparency entry: 2436570973
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
Guruprasath-Annadurai/Whitepact@92a9fc47e03e183249132b7868286f3a35f6596d -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v1.2.2 - Owner: https://github.com/Guruprasath-Annadurai
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
publish.yml@92a9fc47e03e183249132b7868286f3a35f6596d -
Trigger Event:
push
-
Statement type:
File details
Details for the file rai_governance_platform-1.2.2-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: rai_governance_platform-1.2.2-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 429.9 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
5776b2331247031a271ae2d99af96607bf439826b5d6704e3ed8718905bef185
|
|
| MD5 |
81f5ec5b8f14e22479b87361a1812e4b
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
daa09fa627ad358c8e9f0d89fa812f03dae34ff2f5e819c09f4d4e439e374a56
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for rai_governance_platform-1.2.2-py3-none-any.whl:
Publisher:
publish.yml on Guruprasath-Annadurai/Whitepact
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
rai_governance_platform-1.2.2-py3-none-any.whl -
Subject digest:
5776b2331247031a271ae2d99af96607bf439826b5d6704e3ed8718905bef185 - Sigstore transparency entry: 2436570996
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
Guruprasath-Annadurai/Whitepact@92a9fc47e03e183249132b7868286f3a35f6596d -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v1.2.2 - Owner: https://github.com/Guruprasath-Annadurai
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
publish.yml@92a9fc47e03e183249132b7868286f3a35f6596d -
Trigger Event:
push
-
Statement type: