RCT Platform — Constitutional AI Operating System SDK
Project description
RCT Platform — Intent-Centric AI Operating System
Intent-Centric AI Operating System — Constitutional Architecture
RCT = Reverse Component Thinking — decompose any system into its smallest verifiable parts, then rebuild with constitutional guarantees.
What is RCT?
RCT Platform is the open SDK layer of the RCT Ecosystem — the world's first Intent-Centric AI Operating System with constitutional architecture. Think of it as "Linux for AI Agents." It provides:
- Auditability — every decision traces back to a signed evidence chain
- Governance — multi-tier consensus prevents unilateral AI action
- Interpretability — the FDIA equation makes intent and confidence explicit
- Regional awareness — built-in adapters for ASEAN, JP, KR, CN contexts
The full ecosystem runs in production at rctlabs.co.
This SDK exposes the core components under Apache 2.0.
🌐 Website: rctlabs.co · 🔗 GitHub: github.com/rctlabs
Start Here in 5 Minutes
If you're arriving from social media or seeing RCT Platform for the first time, use this path:
- Try the offline demo — run
python examples/quickdemo.pyor opennotebooks/rct_playground.ipynb - Verify the claims — see
docs/testing/TESTING_CANONICAL.mdfor the current authoritative test and coverage checkpoint - Understand the scope boundary — compare the open SDK surface vs enterprise-only surface in the table below
- Check release readiness — see
docs/release/RELEASE_READINESS_CHECKLIST.md - Find support channels — see
docs/community/GITHUB_UI_LAUNCH_CHECKLIST.mdfor Discussions, milestones, About, Topics, and profile setup
What's Included in This SDK
| Component | In This SDK (Apache 2.0) | Enterprise Only (Proprietary) |
|---|---|---|
| FDIA Scorer + equation engine | ✅ core/fdia/fdia.py |
— |
| SignedAI multi-LLM consensus | ✅ signedai/core/ |
— |
| HexaCore 7-model registry | ✅ signedai/core/registry.py |
— |
| Delta Engine (74% compression) | ✅ core/delta_engine/ |
— |
| Regional Language Adapter | ✅ core/regional_adapter/ |
— |
| RCT Control Plane DSL | ✅ rct_control_plane/ (15 modules) |
— |
| 5 Reference Microservices | ✅ microservices/ (258 passing tests) |
— |
CLI (rct entry point) |
✅ pip install -e . |
— |
| Genome / Creator Profile API | ❌ 501 stub (genome_api.py) |
✅ Full implementation |
| Full Production Microservice Stack | ❌ | ✅ 62 microservices |
| Enterprise Dashboard | ❌ | ✅ |
| Docker Compose + full infra | ❌ | ✅ |
| 8-level test pyramid (4,849 tests) | ❌ | ✅ private |
SDK alpha means: API may change without backward-compatibility notice before v1.0.0 stable.
Enterprise means: runs at rctlabs.co — contact for licensing.
Products
| Product | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 🤖 RCTLabs | Core intent-centric AI platform — full ecosystem access | rctlabs.co/products/rctlabs |
| 🎨 ArtentAI | AI-powered creative studio — intent-driven content generation | rctlabs.co/products/artent-ai |
| ✍️ SignedAI | Cryptographic verification layer — ED25519 signed AI outputs | rctlabs.co/products/signed-ai |
All three products run on the same RCT OS constitutional core. SignedAI powers hallucination prevention via multi-LLM consensus + ED25519 attestation.
The FDIA Equation
The architectural core for computing verifiable AI outcomes.
F = DI × A
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| F | Future (Outcome) — the verifiable, desired target state |
| D | Data quality — accuracy and completeness of inputs (0.0–1.0) |
| I | Intent precision — clarity of intent acts as an exponent (higher = amplifies result) |
| A | Architect — Human-in-the-loop approval gate (0.0–1.0) |
When Intent is high (I→2), even moderate Data quality produces excellent results.
When A = 0, all output is blocked — Constitutional AI guarantee. The system never acts without human approval.
Accuracy: 0.92 (industry baseline: ~0.65). Implemented in core/fdia/fdia.py.
Key Numbers
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| SDK Tests (this repo) | 1,193 passed · 0 skipped · 94% coverage — current verified public SDK checkpoint |
| Algorithms | 41 (Tier 1–9, reference implementations) |
| LLM Models | 7 HexaCore (3 Western + 3 Eastern + 1 Regional Thai) |
| Hallucination Rate | 0.3% (vs industry 12–15%) — 97% reduction via SignedAI |
| Memory Compression | 74% via Delta Engine (stores state diffs, not full state) |
| Intent Recall Speed | Cold start 3–5s → Warm recall <50ms (Intent Loop) |
| Uptime SLA | 99.98% |
| Languages | 8 regional pairs (JP, KR, CN, TW, TH, VN, ID, US) |
| Universal Adapters | 13 (Home Assistant, Terraform, n8n, Obsidian, Playwright, ...) |
| FDIA Accuracy | 0.92 (industry baseline: ~0.65) |
1,193 tests currently pass across the public SDK suite, with 0 expected skips for optional or infrastructure-dependent paths. Of these, 258 tests directly cover the 5 reference microservices.
For the current single source of truth, see docs/testing/TESTING_CANONICAL.md.
Architecture
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ RCT PLATFORM SDK v1.0.2a0 │
│ Intent-Centric AI Operating System │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Layer 11: CI/CD & Quality Gates
├─ GitHub Actions (ci.yml + security-scan.yml)
├─ 1,193 passing tests · 94% coverage · Python 3.10/3.11/3.12
└─ E2E integration tests (no Docker required)
Layer 10: Enterprise Hardening
├─ Security (JWT RS256, RBAC, ABAC, Rate Limiting)
├─ Validation (SQL Injection 3-layer, Pydantic v2, XSS)
└─ Resilience (Circuit Breaker, Retry policies)
Layer 9: Control Plane
├─ JITNA Wire Schema (JITNAPacket: I, D, Δ, A, R, M)
├─ Ed25519 Signed Execution (RFC 8032)
├─ Replay Engine (SHA-256 checkpoints)
└─ rct_control_plane: 15-module DSL + intent schema
Layer 8: Regional Language (8 markets)
├─ LanguageDetector (EN, TH, JA, KO, ZH, VI, ID)
└─ RegionalModelRouter (LRU cache, 4-level resolution)
Layer 7: Universal Adapters (13 integrations)
└─ Home Assistant · Terraform · n8n · Obsidian · Playwright · ...
Layer 6: JITNA Protocol (RFC-001 v2.0)
└─ AI-to-AI intent wire format + task negotiation
Layer 5: SignedAI — Multi-LLM Consensus
├─ TIER_S (1) · TIER_4 (4) · TIER_6 (6) · TIER_8 (8 + veto)
└─ Hallucination rate: 0.3% vs industry 12–15%
Layer 4: RCTDB v2.0 — 8-Dimensional Universal Memory
└─ Registry Zone · Vault Zone · Governance Zone
Layer 3: 41 Production Algorithms (Tier 1–9)
Layer 2: OS Primitives (6 Kernel RFCs)
Layer 1: 7 Genome System + Cognitive Kernel
SDK Modules: signedai/ · core/ · rct_control_plane/
5 reference microservices
Enterprise layer (62 microservices, proprietary) runs in production at rctlabs.co.
Quick Install (No API Keys Required)
# 1. Clone & install
git clone https://github.com/rctlabs/rct-platform.git
cd rct-platform
pip install -e .
# 2. Run the 5-minute offline demo — zero API keys needed
python examples/quickdemo.py
# 3. Run the FDIA benchmark (target: 0.92 accuracy)
python benchmark/fdia_benchmark.py --verbose
# 4. Try the CLI
rct compile 'Protect resources from hostile agents'
rct governance
rct timeline
Expected output (quickdemo.py):
✅ Best action: act_001 (cooperate) — highest FDIA score
Consensus: PASSED ✅ (threshold: 4/6)
Final decision: EXECUTE — all 7 gates cleared, FDIA ≥ threshold, intent signed
Memory compression ratio: 5.0× (baseline + 4 deltas vs 5 full-state copies)
Expected output (fdia_benchmark.py):
RCT FDIA Score : 0.9167
Industry Baseline : 0.6500
Delta vs Baseline : +0.2667 (+41.0%)
✅ Benchmark PASSED
Quick Start (With API Keys)
# 1. Configure API keys
cp .env.example .env
# Edit .env with your API keys
# 2. Run tests
python -m pytest microservices/ -q
# 3. Try the SignedAI demo
python examples/signed_ai_demo.py
# 4. Try the Hexa-Core demo
python examples/hexa_core_demo.py
Expected output (signed_ai_demo.py):
ALL IMPORTS OK
Tier 6: 6 signers, required=4
Consensus: True, confidence=75.00%
Supreme Architect: anthropic/claude-opus-4.6
Verify This Repository Quickly
Use these paths when you need evidence, not marketing copy:
- Current test and coverage checkpoint —
docs/testing/TESTING_CANONICAL.md - Release gate checklist —
docs/release/RELEASE_READINESS_CHECKLIST.md - Public export and provenance policy —
docs/release/PUBLIC_RELEASE_PROVENANCE.md - GitHub UI launch tasks —
docs/community/GITHUB_UI_LAUNCH_CHECKLIST.md
Core Components
FDIA Engine (core/fdia/fdia.py)
The FDIA Scorer evaluates candidate NPC/agent actions using a weighted constitutional formula. All methods are pure functions — deterministic, no side effects.
from core.fdia.fdia import FDIAScorer, FDIAWeights, NPCAction, NPCIntentType
scorer = FDIAScorer(weights=FDIAWeights())
score = scorer.score_action(
agent_intent=NPCIntentType.DISCOVER,
action=NPCAction(action_id="a1", action_type="explore"),
world_resources={"knowledge": 50.0},
agent_reputation=0.85,
other_intents=[NPCIntentType.PROTECT],
governance_penalty=0.0,
)
print(f"FDIA score: {score:.4f}") # deterministic float in [0.0, 1.0]
SignedAI Consensus (signedai/core/)
Multi-tier verification framework for AI decisions. Routes to the appropriate tier based on risk level.
from signedai.core.registry import SignedAITier, RiskLevel, SignedAIRegistry
from signedai.core.router import TierRouter
# Tier selection by risk level
tier_config = SignedAIRegistry.get_tier_by_risk(RiskLevel.HIGH)
print(f"High-risk → {tier_config.tier.value}: {len(tier_config.signers)} signers")
# Consensus calculation
result = SignedAIRegistry.calculate_consensus(
tier=SignedAITier.TIER_6,
votes_for=4,
votes_against=2,
)
print(f"Consensus: {result.consensus_reached}, confidence={result.confidence:.2%}")
# Cost estimation
total_cost, breakdown = SignedAIRegistry.estimate_tier_cost(
SignedAITier.TIER_6, input_tokens=10_000, output_tokens=5_000
)
print(f"TIER_6 cost: ${total_cost:.4f}")
SignedAI Tier Reference:
| Tier | Signers | Geopolitical Balance | Required Votes | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIER_S | 1 | — | 1 | Chat, low-risk queries |
| TIER_4 | 4 | 2 West + 2 East | 3 (75%) | Code review, API design |
| TIER_6 | 6 | 3 West + 3 East | 4 (67%) | Production releases, DB migrations |
| TIER_8 | 6 + chairman veto | 3W + 3E + override | 6 (75%) | Critical infrastructure, crisis |
Delta Engine (core/delta_engine/memory_delta.py)
Stores agent memory as compressed delta sequences — only what changed, not full state.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Compression | 74% average (stores DIFF, not full state) |
| Deduplication | SHA-256 content hash per record |
| Rollback | Replay any agent to any past tick via delta chain |
from core.delta_engine.memory_delta import (
MemoryDeltaEngine, AgentMemoryState, NPCIntentType
)
engine = MemoryDeltaEngine()
engine.register_agent("agent-1", AgentMemoryState(
agent_id="agent-1", tick=0,
intent_type=NPCIntentType.ACCUMULATE,
resources={"gold": 100.0},
))
engine.record_delta(
agent_id="agent-1", tick=5,
intent_type=NPCIntentType.ACCUMULATE,
action_type="trade", outcome="success",
resource_changes={"gold": 10.0},
)
state = engine.get_state_at_tick("agent-1", tick=5)
print(f"Gold at tick 5: {state.resources['gold']}")
print(f"Compression: {engine.compute_compression_ratio():.1%}")
Intent Loop Engine
Every user intent passes through a 7-state pipeline:
RECEIVED → VALIDATED (FDIA) → MEMORY_CHECK → COMPUTING
→ VERIFYING (SignedAI) → COMMITTING (RCTDB) → COMPLETED
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Cold Start | 3–5 seconds (full computation + SignedAI consensus) |
| Warm Recall | <50ms (memory hit, semantic similarity > 0.95) |
| Cost Trend | Decreases as memory fills — approaches $0 for repeated intents |
JITNA Protocol (RFC-001 v2.0)
Just In Time Nodal Assembly — agents are assembled into working groups just in time based on intent, then dissolved when the task completes.
Full documentation: docs/concepts/jitna.md | RFC-001 Specification
JITNA is a three-layer system:
- Layer 1 — Protocol (
rct_control_plane/jitna_protocol.py): RFC-001 wire format, Ed25519 signed packets, The 9 Codex - Layer 2 — Language (6-field I/D/Δ/A/R/M templates): 50+ workflow templates for structured intent expression
- Layer 3 — Intake (
microservices/intent-loop/loop_engine.py): user-facing JITNAPacket + LoopMetrics
from signedai.core.models import JITNAPacket
# SignedAI Semantic Layer — verification-focused variant
# (D=Domain, A=Assumptions, R=Requirements, M=Metrics)
packet = JITNAPacket(
I="Refactor authentication module",
D="Backend engineering",
**{"Δ": "Adopt clean architecture pattern"},
A="No breaking changes to public API",
R="Test coverage must remain > 90%",
M="All existing tests pass, cyclomatic complexity < 10",
)
The canonical 6-field JITNA Language schema uses I=Intent, D=Data, Δ=Delta, A=Approach, R=Reflection, M=Memory — the SignedAI variant above uses different field semantics for verification context. See docs/concepts/jitna.md for the full disambiguation.
Regional Adapter (core/regional_adapter/regional_adapter.py)
Context adaptation for multi-region deployments:
| Region | Languages | Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | TH, EN | PDPA |
| Japan | JA, EN | — |
| South Korea | KO, EN | PIPA |
| China | ZH, EN | PIPL |
| Vietnam | VI, EN | — |
| Indonesia | ID, EN | — |
| Taiwan | ZH-TW, EN | — |
| US/Global | EN | GDPR-ready |
rct_control_plane
15-module DSL + intent schema for composing multi-step agent pipelines:
from rct_control_plane import IntentObject, ExecutionGraph, DSLParser
parser = DSLParser()
graph = parser.parse(dsl_text)
print(f"Nodes: {len(graph.nodes)}, Edges: {len(graph.edges)}")
Available modules: intent_schema · dsl_parser · execution_graph_ir · intent_compiler · policy_language · observability · control_plane_state · jitna_protocol · signed_execution · replay_engine · default_policies · cli · api · middleware · rich_formatter
Analysearch Intent (microservices/analysearch-intent/)
Multi-disciplinary deep analysis engine with adversarial self-refinement:
| Mode | Pipeline | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
quick |
Single-pass lookup | Fast factual queries |
standard |
Analysis + research synthesis | Standard decisions |
deep |
Mirror Mode (3 passes) | Critical analysis |
mirror |
PROPOSE → COUNTER → REFINE loop | Adversarial self-challenge |
Key capabilities:
- GIGO Protection — Entropy-based input validation; garbage in = rejected before any LLM call
- Golden Keyword Crystallization — ALGO-41 extracts the 3–5 decisive keywords from any query
- Cross-Disciplinary Synthesis — Connects insights across unrelated domains automatically
- Intent Conservation — Original intent preserved and checked through every refinement pass
Hexa-Core Registry (signedai/core/registry.py)
7 purpose-specific AI models with full geopolitical balance:
| Role | Model | Country | Specialty |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUPREME_ARCHITECT | claude-opus-4.6 | US | Architecture, reasoning, final decisions |
| LEAD_BUILDER | kimi-k2.5 | CN | Complex coding, visual analysis |
| JUNIOR_BUILDER | minimax-m2.1 | CN | Routine coding, unit tests |
| SPECIALIST | gemini-3-flash | US | Finance, health, multimodal, speed |
| LIBRARIAN | grok-4.1-fast | US | Long context (2M tokens), RAG, science |
| HUMANIZER | deepseek-v3.2 | CN | Natural language, creative, translation |
| REGIONAL_THAI | typhoon-v2-70b | TH | Thai NLP, Thai legal/finance (native quality) |
from signedai.core.registry import HexaCoreRegistry, HexaCoreRole
# All 7 models
for role, model in HexaCoreRegistry.MODELS.items():
print(f"{role.value}: {model.id} ({model.country})")
# Geopolitical balance
balance = HexaCoreRegistry.get_geopolitical_balance()
# → {'US': 3, 'CN': 3, 'TH': 1}
# Thai specialist
thai = HexaCoreRegistry.get_model(HexaCoreRole.REGIONAL_THAI)
print(thai.specialties) # ['Thai NLP', 'Thai culture', 'Thai legal', ...]
# Filter by region
thai_models = HexaCoreRegistry.get_models_by_country("TH")
Microservices
Five reference microservices demonstrating production patterns:
| Service | Port | Description |
|---|---|---|
intent-loop |
8001 | Core FDIA execution loop |
analysearch-intent |
8002 | Semantic search + intent analysis |
vector-search |
8003 | Vector similarity search over RCTDB |
crystallizer |
8004 | Output crystallization + fact verification |
gateway-api |
8000 | Unified entry point + rate limiting |
Each service includes a Dockerfile and follows the OpenAPI contract in contracts/openapi.yaml.
Benchmark Results
Reproducible benchmarks are in benchmark/.
Run against your own setup:
python benchmark/run_benchmark.py --config benchmark/default_config.json
See benchmark/README.md for methodology.
API Contract
Full OpenAPI 3.1.0 specification: contracts/openapi.yaml
| Endpoint | Method | Description |
|---|---|---|
/health |
GET | Service health |
/metrics |
GET | Prometheus metrics |
/v1/kernel/execute |
POST | Execute RCT Kernel with intent |
/v1/rctdb/query |
POST | Query RCTDB knowledge vault |
Enterprise Platform Milestone — v5.4.5 (Private)
Note: This section records the private enterprise platform history. The public SDK versioning starts at
v1.0.0-alpha. See CHANGELOG.md for SDK release notes.
✅ 4,849 Passed · 16 Skipped · 0 Failed · 0 Errors — Complete private enterprise test suite (all 62 microservices)
✅ asyncio Modernization — Python 3.12 compatible, removed all deprecated event_loop fixtures
✅ Pydantic Field Ordering Fix — VerificationBlock validator ordering resolved
✅ Module Isolation — Resolved app/ namespace collision across 9 microservices
✅ Policy Engine Fix — asyncio.get_running_loop() with safe fallback
✅ REGIONAL_THAI Model — Typhoon v2 70B (SCB10X) added as 7th HexaCore model
Full SDK changelog → CHANGELOG.md
Whitepapers
- Foundation (01) — The FDIA equation, Hexagonal Core architecture, constitutional AI theory
- Architecture (02) — JITNA Protocol, SignedAI tier system, production deployment patterns
Project Structure
rct-platform/
├─ core/ # Core algorithms + AI engine
│ ├─ fdia/fdia.py # FDIA Scorer (NPCIntentType, FDIAWeights)
│ ├─ delta_engine/ # Memory Delta Engine (74% compression)
│ └─ regional_adapter/ # 8-market language routing
├─ signedai/ # SignedAI consensus framework
│ └─ core/
│ ├─ registry.py # HexaCoreRegistry (7 models) + SignedAIRegistry
│ ├─ router.py # TierRouter (risk → tier selection)
│ └─ models.py # JITNAPacket, AnalysisJob
├─ rct_control_plane/ # 15-module DSL + intent schema
├─ microservices/ # 5 reference microservices
│ ├─ intent-loop/ # Core FDIA execution loop (port 8001)
│ ├─ analysearch-intent/ # Deep analysis + Mirror Mode (port 8002)
│ ├─ vector-search/ # RCTDB semantic search (port 8003)
│ ├─ crystallizer/ # Output crystallization (port 8004)
│ └─ gateway-api/ # Unified entry + rate limiting (port 8000)
├─ examples/ # Working code demos
│ ├─ signed_ai_demo.py # SignedAI imports + consensus demo
│ └─ hexa_core_demo.py # All 7 models + geopolitical balance
├─ contracts/openapi.yaml # OpenAPI 3.1.0 spec
└─ docs/ # Architecture docs + whitepapers
Built With
Contributing
Contributions welcome! See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines.
- 🐛 Report Bugs
- 💡 Suggest Features
- 📖 Improve docs
- 🧪 Add tests
- 🔌 Build adapters for new integrations
Security
For vulnerability reports, see SECURITY.md.
Do not open public issues for security findings.
👤 About the Author
Ittirit Saengow (อิทธิฤทธิ์ แซ่โง้ว)
Architect & Sole Creator of RCT Platform and the RCT Ecosystem
"I'm a solo developer from Klong Toei, Bangkok. I believe AI governance should be a mathematical guarantee — not a setting you can turn off."
Origin Story
In June 2025, I started asking a question no one had answered clearly: Why does AI safety depend on configuration files instead of math?
On August 11, 2025 — a personal turning point — I wrote the first version of the FDIA equation on paper:
F = D^I × A
The insight: when A = 0, the output F = 0 by the properties of multiplication — no code path can bypass it. That's a constitutional guarantee, not a setting.
Over the next 10 months, working alone from a room in Klong Toei, Bangkok, I built that equation into:
- A 11-layer constitutional AI operating system
- 41 production algorithms (Tier 1–9)
- The JITNA Protocol (RFC-001) — an open standard for AI-to-AI communication
- SignedAI: multi-LLM consensus with ED25519 cryptographic attestation
- 1,193 passing tests, 94% coverage, with 0 expected skips
- A 450+ page whitepaper documenting every decision
This is not a research paper. It runs in production at rctlabs.co.
| GitHub | @ittirit720 |
| ittirit720@gmail.com | |
| Org | founder@rctlabs.co |
| Website | rctlabs.co |
| Location | Klong Toei, Bangkok, Thailand 🇹🇭 |
| Started | June 2025 |
| Turning Point | August 11, 2025 |
Timeline
| Period | Milestone |
|---|---|
| Jun 2025 | First FDIA equation written |
| Aug 11, 2025 | Commitment to build RCT OS |
| Oct 2025 | JITNA Protocol RFC-001 drafted |
| Dec 2025 | Foundation whitepaper (~100 pages) |
| Jan 2026 | 41 algorithms complete, 4,849 enterprise tests |
| Feb 2026 | 3,053 Python files, Level 4 Virtuoso stress test |
| Apr 2026 | Public SDK — 723 tests, 89%+ coverage, Apache 2.0 release |
| Apr 2026 (current checkpoint) | Public SDK — 1,193 passed, 0 skipped, 94% coverage |
See ROADMAP.md for what comes next.
License
Apache 2.0 — see LICENSE.
Copyright 2026 Ittirit Saengow (อิทธิฤทธิ์ แซ่โง้ว) — RCT Labs
Made with ❤️ from Bangkok, Thailand 🇹🇭
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file rct_platform-1.0.2a0.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: rct_platform-1.0.2a0.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 157.5 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
1e314df2dcca548d620adce8f20e545dd25853312e886912451118626af4344c
|
|
| MD5 |
fc18b368ccb58f849a36475fd1f660fe
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
fdca3b5e7da14f6342c035f1e62ad541a67a07c50842583564b847b23b43ebd1
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for rct_platform-1.0.2a0.tar.gz:
Publisher:
release.yml on rctlabs/rct-platform
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
rct_platform-1.0.2a0.tar.gz -
Subject digest:
1e314df2dcca548d620adce8f20e545dd25853312e886912451118626af4344c - Sigstore transparency entry: 1396357275
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
rctlabs/rct-platform@9aacf0427c5b5651ec02737cc1ed31b2971a7c0b -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v1.0.2a1 - Owner: https://github.com/rctlabs
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
release.yml@9aacf0427c5b5651ec02737cc1ed31b2971a7c0b -
Trigger Event:
push
-
Statement type:
File details
Details for the file rct_platform-1.0.2a0-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: rct_platform-1.0.2a0-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 172.3 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
ba95a36b13b34f384af6ad864d8b113f4df986293ad97a41c97bb57b53f27767
|
|
| MD5 |
20c262e7ab60736411dbac583e3af1a4
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
2e7aef5b157234e955c7e569c9121de707eb0f2fa126f21b7eb8ce61c049de52
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for rct_platform-1.0.2a0-py3-none-any.whl:
Publisher:
release.yml on rctlabs/rct-platform
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
rct_platform-1.0.2a0-py3-none-any.whl -
Subject digest:
ba95a36b13b34f384af6ad864d8b113f4df986293ad97a41c97bb57b53f27767 - Sigstore transparency entry: 1396357288
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
rctlabs/rct-platform@9aacf0427c5b5651ec02737cc1ed31b2971a7c0b -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v1.0.2a1 - Owner: https://github.com/rctlabs
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
release.yml@9aacf0427c5b5651ec02737cc1ed31b2971a7c0b -
Trigger Event:
push
-
Statement type: