Skip to main content

RedCrown

Localized model benchmarking with receipts. Run head-to-head evals across every model, provider, and config on your own data, locally, then turn the results into ranked, receipted proof you can hand to a client, a CFO, or a regulator.

Agents and harnesses run benchmarks for free. RedCrown is the neutral layer that turns them into a decision you can defend, and keeps re-proving it as prices and models change. Run anywhere, prove here.

Install

pip install redcrown

Unreleased source checkout functionality: python -m redcrown.cli matrix-plan previews explicit model/prompt axes offline and optionally exports a new private experiment file with --output. It never runs the experiment. See the matrix contract for the JSON schema, bounds and separate execution boundary. Published 0.1.19 does not include it.

The unreleased hosted matrix workspace, private regression diagnosis, and continuous-evaluation substrate remain disabled by default. Their scope, validation, and separate rollout gates are in the R3–R5 local record.

Requires Python 3.11+. The CLI has a small dependency footprint; server extras (pip install "redcrown[server]") are only needed if you run the API yourself.

Quickstart (no keys needed)

Try the bundled offline demo in about five seconds, no provider keys required:

redcrown eval --sample extract

This runs a small bundled extraction sample using stub outputs. The output says demo mode because no real models are called. Connect your provider keys in ~/.redcrown/credentials.json (or via redcrown login) for real quality scores.

Bring your own data (text tasks)

If you have a CSV or JSONL file of inputs, import it directly:

redcrown build-dataset --from-csv mydata.csv --task classify --out exp.json
redcrown eval exp.json --report-json out.json

CSV/JSONL columns:

column required notes
input yes the text sent to the model
reference no expected output (ground truth); omit to use the no-labels path below
id no stable row ID; auto-generated if absent

--task values: extract, classify, summarize, qa

The importer fills in the provider scaffold for you. Edit exp.json to swap in the candidates you want to compare before running.

Score outputs you already have (no model calls)

If another harness produced the outputs, score them locally with a deterministic metric. This command never connects to a provider or needs an API key:

redcrown score score-request.json --report-json scored.json

score-request.json uses items (item_id, input, reference) and candidates (id, label, outputs) from the ScoreOutputsRequest schema. For tabular workflows, keep the items in CSV and put one candidate output per JSONL line:

redcrown score --items-csv items.csv --outputs-jsonl outputs.jsonl \
  --metric exact_match --quality-bar 0.8 --report-json scored.json
{"candidate_id":"model-a","item_id":"row1","output":"billing","latency_ms":42}

CSV accepts item_id (or id), input, and reference. JSONL also accepts candidate_label, error, cost_usd, and latency_ms. Omitted cost or latency stays unknown rather than being treated as zero. The resulting file can be sent to RedCrown with redcrown push scored.json.

Check prompt/model changes locally

Starting with 0.1.19, export private evidence for offline regression checks:

redcrown score baseline-request.json --evidence-json baseline-evidence.json
redcrown score candidate-request.json --evidence-json candidate-evidence.json
redcrown check candidate-evidence.json --baseline baseline-evidence.json \
  --policy policy.json --format json

Use the same nonblank experiment_id and the same evaluation items/references in both score requests. Each selected candidate needs a complete configuration declaration, for example:

{
  "experiment_id": "support-routing",
  "quality_metric": "exact_match",
  "items": [{"item_id": "one", "input": "Refund request", "reference": "billing"}],
  "candidates": [{
    "id": "external-a",
    "configuration": {
      "provider": "external-harness",
      "model": "routing-model-v1",
      "prompt": "Return the routing category.",
      "system_prompt": null,
      "params": {},
      "source_revision": null,
      "endpoint_revision": null
    },
    "outputs": [{"item_id": "one", "output": "billing"}]
  }]
}

All seven configuration fields are required; null declares an absent setting, not an unknown one. RedCrown scores these supplied outputs but does not witness their generation. Configuration assurance remains declared. Keep secrets out of declarations and evidence files.

Example policy.json (choose thresholds for your own requirements):

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "requirements": {"quality": {"minimum": 0.85, "maximum_regression": 0.01}}
}

When a report has multiple candidates, specify --candidate-id and --baseline-candidate-id; checks never select a winner automatically. Quality gates require complete scored coverage. Missing or incompatible evidence cannot silently pass. JSON is the supported policy format; YAML is deferred. Cost and latency rules remain indeterminate until measurement provenance is supported.

check makes no network, provider, or authentication calls. Exit 0 means pass; exit 2 means fail or indeterminate; exit 1 means a command, file, or policy error. JSON, Markdown, and text results describe the same decision.

eval --evidence-json also exports private raw evidence; real evaluations may call providers. Keep a stable id in the experiment across those evaluations. --report-json remains the upload format for push; it is different from the private raw format consumed by check. Keep private evidence out of public CI artifacts. Select baseline and policy files from a trusted source.

The exp.json schema

Every eval is a plain JSON file. Here is a minimal 2-candidate text example you can copy, edit, and run:

{
  "name": "classify-support-tickets",
  "quality_metric": "similarity",
  "quality_bar": 0.75,
  "reference_source": "labels",
  "pipeline": [
    {
      "id": "step1",
      "order": 1,
      "name": "classify",
      "input_type": "text",
      "output_type": "text",
      "input_binding": "dataset",
      "incumbent_candidate_id": "gpt4o-mini",
      "candidates": [
        {
          "id": "gpt4o-mini",
          "provider": "openai",
          "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
          "label": "GPT-4o Mini (incumbent)"
        },
        {
          "id": "gpt-oss-20b",
          "provider": "groq",
          "model": "openai/gpt-oss-20b",
          "label": "GPT-OSS 20B via Groq"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "dataset": [
    {
      "id": "row1",
      "payload": { "kind": "text", "text": "My invoice is wrong." },
      "reference": "billing"
    },
    {
      "id": "row2",
      "payload": { "kind": "text", "text": "App crashes on login." },
      "reference": "bug"
    }
  ]
}

Required fields: name, quality_metric, quality_bar, reference_source, pipeline[].incumbent_candidate_id, pipeline[].candidates[].id, pipeline[].candidates[].provider, pipeline[].candidates[].model, dataset[].id, dataset[].payload.text.

No labels? Use the incumbent as reference

If you do not have labeled ground truth, leave reference off your dataset rows and set reference_source: "incumbent":

{
  "reference_source": "incumbent",
  ...
  "dataset": [
    { "id": "row1", "payload": { "kind": "text", "text": "My invoice is wrong." } }
  ]
}

RedCrown scores every candidate against your current model's own output, so you only need to beat or match what you run today. This is the fastest path to a cost proof when you have real traffic but no labeled examples.

Running a full eval

# run the fan-out locally, on your machine, with your keys
redcrown eval exp.json --report-json out.json

# (optional) sign in once per machine via device-code OAuth
redcrown login

# (optional) push the results to a shareable, no-login proof page
redcrown push out.json --proof-link

redcrown eval ranks every config on cost, quality, and latency against your own ground truth and names the cheapest one that clears your quality bar. Example:

RANKED  transcription · cheapest config at or above your 0.85 quality bar
  deepgram · nova-3-medical    quality 0.883    $294/mo   winner, 40% cheaper
  aws · transcribe-standard    quality 0.879    $487/mo   incumbent
  openai · whisper-1           quality 0.820    $122/mo   below your bar

That run is published as a live, no-login proof page: https://app.redcrown.ai/proof/O9iYVdWuaYjaL6mnImeIsD6TB1W_S6h4Frbx04YqAYQ

Note on build-dataset primock57: this command downloads the PriMock57 clinical-transcription corpus, which requires git-lfs. It is an audio eval designed for transcription benchmarking, not a general first step. Start with redcrown eval --sample extract or build-dataset --from-csv instead.

Free by construction

Evals run on your machine with your own provider keys, so RedCrown never sees your raw data and the run costs you nothing beyond your own inference. Only the results you choose to push become a cloud proof. --no-receipts keeps raw outputs local and uploads aggregates only.

Already ran an eval elsewhere?

You do not have to run anything through RedCrown to get a proof. Take the results from an eval you already ran, as a JSON in the RedCrown results format, and push them:

redcrown push results.json --proof-link

You get the same ranked, receipted, shareable report. The fastest path, with no install, is the web app at https://app.redcrown.ai/upload.

Eval your own OpenAI-compatible endpoint locally

If you have a private or self-hosted API that speaks the OpenAI chat-completion format, point redcrown eval at it without ever uploading your endpoint secret:

export REDCROWN_CUSTOM_HTTP='{"base_url":"https://api.example.com/v1","auth_header_name":"Authorization","auth_value":"Bearer sk-...","body_style":"openai"}'
redcrown eval exp.json

Set a candidate in your exp.json with "provider": "custom_http" and any "model" string your endpoint recognises. The JSON connection stays local; it is read directly from the env var at eval time and is never persisted or uploaded.

For coding agents (MCP)

Coding agents (Claude, Cursor, Codex) drive the whole loop over the hosted MCP server at mcp.redcrown.ai: scaffold an experiment, run it, review outputs, and mint a proof. The server is open source: https://github.com/RedCrown-ai/redcrown-mcp

License

Proprietary. (c) RedCrown.ai

Metadata

Release files for redcrown 0.1.20

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for redcrown 0.1.20
File Size Uploaded
redcrown-0.1.20.tar.gz 850.0 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for redcrown 0.1.20
File Interpreter ABI Platform
redcrown-0.1.20-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 1.3 MB

Release files / redcrown-0.1.20.tar.gz

Download URL redcrown-0.1.20.tar.gz
Size 850.0 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
8f1b9b74ccac537e995d71c2602b16ae6a0c498b835cfd52dafcdb48bc0633a0
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
50b6f158734985e7c956920a27c9b64e53b22c7ed46ea445881628f724ab9cc4
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.12.13

Release files / redcrown-0.1.20-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL redcrown-0.1.20-py3-none-any.whl
Size 474.0 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
af73caa67657eb7481f1372e583039db6ea308075d10fdebd2899103da722f4a
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
2e30da953df7b73aec13a49c3151a178ba88ed3216f4f5491cd0f63401c24e77
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.12.13

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

0.1.23

2 release files

0.1.22

2 release files

0.1.21

2 release files

This release

0.1.20 This release

2 release files

0.1.19

2 release files

0.1.18

2 release files

0.1.17

2 release files

0.1.9

2 release files

0.1.8

2 release files

0.1.7

2 release files

0.1.6

2 release files

0.1.5

2 release files

0.1.4

2 release files

0.1.3

2 release files

0.1.2

2 release files

0.1.1

2 release files

0.1.0

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page