Local-first persistent memory for AI agents. SQLite-backed, zero required dependencies, pluggable embeddings, framework adapters and an MCP server.
Project description
remembrane
Local-first persistent memory for AI agents. One SQLite file, zero required dependencies. Exact hybrid recall (vector + BM25 — never approximate), explainable ranking, time-travel over memory history, conflict-aware recall that admits uncertainty, salience learned from task outcomes, optimal token-budget packing, and deterministic behavior you can unit-test in CI. Adapters for LangChain and CrewAI, plus a built-in MCP server.
pip install remembrane
Why
Agents forget everything between sessions. Existing memory solutions are cloud APIs, require a vector database, or drag in a heavyweight framework. remembrane is the opposite:
- One file. Your agent's entire memory is a SQLite database you can copy, back up, diff, or delete.
- Zero required dependencies. The default embedder is pure stdlib.
pip install remembranepulls in nothing else. - Human-like recall. Results are ranked by a composite of similarity, recency decay (memories halve in weight every week by default), and importance. Recalled memories are reinforced — spaced repetition for agents.
- Exact, not approximate. Large systems use approximate nearest-neighbor search and accept missed results. At agent-memory scale, remembrane scores every memory — hybrid vector + BM25 keyword in one pass, guaranteed complete.
- A memory you can debug. Every store/forget/reinforce is journaled. Snapshot, diff, and reconstruct what your agent knew at any point in time. Every recall result explains exactly why it ranked where it did.
- Testable in CI. Deterministic embedder + frozen-time recall = reproducible memory behavior.
remembrane.testingships pytest-friendly assertions. - Framework-agnostic. Use it bare, through the LangChain or CrewAI adapters, or expose it to any MCP-capable agent (like Claude) as an MCP server.
Quick start
from remembrane import MemoryStore
mem = MemoryStore("agent.db") # or ":memory:" for ephemeral
mem.store("User prefers dark mode", importance=0.8)
mem.store("Deploy target is AWS us-east-1", namespace="ops")
results = mem.recall("what theme does the user like?")
print(results[0].memory.content) # → "User prefers dark mode"
print(results[0].score) # similarity × recency × importance
Memory lifecycle
mem.reinforce(memory_id) # strengthen: slower decay, higher rank
mem.forget(memory_id) # delete one
mem.forget(namespace="ops") # delete a namespace
mem.forget(older_than_seconds=30*86400) # prune stale memories
mem.consolidate() # merge near-duplicates
mem.export() # plain dicts, ready for json.dump
Tuning recall
from remembrane import MemoryStore, ScoringConfig
mem = MemoryStore(
"agent.db",
scoring=ScoringConfig(
weight_similarity=0.7,
weight_recency=0.15,
weight_importance=0.15,
half_life_seconds=7 * 24 * 3600, # recency halves every week
),
)
Embedders
The default HashEmbedder is deterministic, offline, and dependency-free — it hashes word and character n-grams. That makes similarity lexical, not semantic. It works well for typical agent memories (facts, preferences, short statements). For true semantic recall, plug in a real model:
from remembrane import MemoryStore, SentenceTransformerEmbedder, OpenAIEmbedder
mem = MemoryStore("agent.db", embedder=SentenceTransformerEmbedder()) # local, pip install remembrane[sentence-transformers]
mem = MemoryStore("agent.db", embedder=OpenAIEmbedder()) # API, pip install remembrane[openai]
Any object with embed(texts) -> List[List[float]] and a dimension attribute works.
Note: don't mix embedders in one database. Vectors from different embedders aren't comparable.
LangChain
from remembrane import MemoryStore
from remembrane.adapters import RemembraneChatMemory
memory = RemembraneChatMemory(MemoryStore("agent.db"), session_id="user-42")
memory.save_context({"input": "my favorite color is teal"}, {"output": "Noted!"})
memory.load_memory_variables({"input": "what color do I like?"})
# {'history': 'human: my favorite color is teal\nai: Noted!'}
Unlike buffer memory, this retrieves the exchanges relevant to the current input — the context window stays small no matter how long the history grows.
CrewAI
from remembrane import MemoryStore
from remembrane.adapters import RemembraneStorage
storage = RemembraneStorage(MemoryStore("crew.db"))
storage.save("the deadline is next friday", metadata={"task": "planning"})
storage.search("when is the deadline?")
MCP server
Give any MCP-capable agent (e.g. Claude Desktop, Claude Code) persistent memory:
pip install remembrane[mcp]
remembrane-mcp --db ~/agent-memory.db
{
"mcpServers": {
"remembrane": {
"command": "remembrane-mcp",
"args": ["--db", "/path/to/agent-memory.db"]
}
}
}
Tools exposed: memory_store, memory_recall, memory_forget, memory_reinforce, memory_stats.
CLI
remembrane --db agent.db store "the user prefers dark mode" --importance 0.8
remembrane --db agent.db recall "what theme?"
remembrane --db agent.db list
remembrane --db agent.db stats
remembrane --db agent.db export > backup.json
Conflict-aware recall
Every other memory system silently resolves contradictions and returns one confident answer — which is how agents end up confidently wrong. remembrane surfaces the tension and lets the agent adjudicate (or ask the user):
mem.store("the user lives in London")
mem.store("the user moved to Tokyo, no longer in London")
for c in mem.conflicts("where does the user live?"):
print(c.describe())
# Conflicting memories (likely, change_markers=['longer', 'moved', 'no']):
# older: 'the user lives in London' (recalled 4x)
# newer: 'the user moved to Tokyo, no longer in London' (recalled 0x)
mem.resolve(keep_id=newer.id, drop_ids=[older.id], reason="user confirmed Tokyo")
Detection is deterministic and free (anchor-word overlap + change markers + numeric mismatches — honest heuristics, not hidden LLM judgments). Resolutions are journaled, so every settled conflict stays auditable via log() and as_of(). Also exposed as the memory_conflicts / memory_resolve MCP tools and remembrane conflicts CLI.
Salience earned from outcomes
Cloud systems decide what matters at write time, with an LLM call you pay for on every memory. remembrane inverts it: writes are free, and importance is earned by helping:
results = mem.recall("how do I deploy this?")
# ... agent completes its task using results[0] ...
mem.mark_useful(results[0].memory.id) # this memory rises
mem.mark_useless(results[2].memory.id) # this one fades
Feedback accumulates into a usefulness signal (sigmoid-squashed into ranking, neutral at zero). Memories that keep helping outrank memories that merely match — learned per-deployment, from real outcomes, with zero LLM calls.
Token-budget packing
Agents don't want "top 5 results"; they want the best use of the context window space they have left:
context = mem.pack("user preferences", budget_tokens=800)
sum(r.tokens for r in context) # <= 800, guaranteed
pack() scores every candidate exactly, suppresses near-duplicates so the budget is never spent saying the same thing twice, then solves the selection exactly (0/1 knapsack) — the returned set maximizes total relevance within the budget. Deterministic, no LLM, microseconds. Pass token_estimator=your_tokenizer for exact counts.
Time travel
Every mutation is journaled, so the past is queryable:
mem.snapshot("before-research")
# ... agent runs, learns things, forgets things ...
mem.diff("before-research")
# {'added': [{'content': 'competitor launched a new pricing tier', ...}],
# 'removed': [...], 'changed': [...]}
mem.as_of("before-research") # full memory state at that point
mem.log() # newest-first history of every operation
Or from the CLI: remembrane snapshot v1, remembrane diff v1, remembrane log.
"What did my agent believe last Tuesday, and what changed its mind?" is now an answerable question.
Explainable recall
No black boxes — every result carries its full ranking breakdown:
r = mem.recall("what theme does the user like?")[0]
r.explain()
# {'score': 0.6087, 'components': {'vector_similarity': 0.71, 'keyword_bm25': 1.0,
# 'combined_similarity': 0.81, 'recency': 0.98, 'importance': 0.8}, ...}
r.explain_text()
# 'score 0.609 = similarity 0.812 (vector 0.713, keyword 1.000) + recency 0.984 + importance 0.80 | recalled 3x'
Testing your agent's memory
Deterministic recall means memory behavior is unit-testable — something no cloud memory API can offer:
from remembrane.testing import assert_recalls, assert_recalls_first, assert_not_recalls
def test_agent_remembers_allergies():
mem = build_agent_memory()
assert_recalls_first(mem, "any food allergies?", "peanuts")
assert_not_recalls(mem, "any food allergies?", "dark mode", k=1)
Pass now=... to recall() to freeze time and make recency scoring reproducible.
Merging memories
Memory files are portable — merge two agents' brains, with near-duplicate absorption:
mem.merge_from("other-agent.db") # {'added': 12, 'merged': 3}
mem.merge_from("backup.db", namespaces=["prefs"], dedupe_threshold=0.95)
CLI: remembrane --db a.db merge b.db
How ranking works
score = 0.7·similarity + 0.15·recency + 0.15·importance
recency = exp(−ln2 · age / half_life)
age is measured from the memory's last access, not creation — every recall resets the decay clock. Frequently-used memories stay vivid; untouched ones fade. In the default hybrid mode, similarity is 0.65·cosine + 0.35·bm25. All weights, the mode, and the half-life are configurable.
Design choices
- SQLite over a vector DB — agent memory stores are small (thousands, not billions, of rows). Brute-force cosine over a few thousand vectors is sub-millisecond, and you gain transactions, a single portable file, and zero infra.
- No background daemon — decay is computed at read time, so nothing runs when your agent doesn't.
- Duck-typed adapters —
remembranenever imports langchain or crewai; the adapters match their interfaces structurally, so there are no version-pinning fights.
Development
git clone https://github.com/satyasairay/remembrane
cd remembrane
pip install -e .[dev]
pytest
License
MIT
Project details
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file remembrane-0.3.0.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: remembrane-0.3.0.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 32.8 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.14.3
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
5b14ad37de88880c658fbae0cd5057a0cce6deeabcf7380b74d9a4be3a3cfa90
|
|
| MD5 |
d2d7cc6c70dfcf9cd8df14dca3dba9a3
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
a9168720dc9537a555e5f6076124c642ae56c7aae2d5dccb69e32241596b34e4
|
File details
Details for the file remembrane-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: remembrane-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 31.3 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.14.3
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
4130084ef1cc001020e55a69c88a35a1c147c4d4b0db21146685a8564f284fb8
|
|
| MD5 |
9fa9cd059ca69af04a0683e5d65ecb1d
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
5145a527f52a12440f0e381e6d21dce9d751ccb53ca8a03c82b74c9fb5b784b5
|