research.md
The decision forge. An MCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows so AI agents cannot skip rigor under time pressure.
What it enforces
Evidence gates (upstream)
| Gate | Trigger |
|---|---|
| 2+ sources for CONFIRMED evidence | finding_create / finding_update fail if upgrading to CONFIRMED with < 2 sources |
| Disconfirmation search required | finding_create / finding_update fail if upgrading to CONFIRMED without documenting what you searched to disprove the claim |
| Content hash for REASONED+ | Source must include content_hash: proving the agent fetched and read the material |
| Web research nudge | Tool returns advisory when findings have no sources |
| Vendor-only warning | Advisory when all sources are VENDOR tier |
| Landscape scan advisory | Nudge on first candidate to document the full option landscape |
Process gates (downstream)
| Gate | Trigger |
|---|---|
| Criteria locked before scoring | candidate_score fails if decision-criteria.md not locked |
| No TBD on scored candidates | candidate_score fails if candidate has _TBD_ claims |
| Peer review before scoring | candidate_score fails if no evaluations/peer-review.md |
Install
pip install research-md
Or install from source:
pip install -e ".[dev]"
MCP configuration
Add to your Claude Code config:
claude mcp add research-md --scope user -- research-md
Or add to .mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"research-md": {
"command": "research-md"
}
}
}
Agent workflow
A typical research session follows this path:
project_set Register project, get research_id
|
finding_create Record claims with evidence grades (UNVERIFIED -> LOW -> REASONED -> CONFIRMED)
| Tool nudges: "Use WebSearch to find sources"
finding_update Add sources, disconfirmation search, upgrade evidence grade
| Gate: CONFIRMED requires 2+ sources + disconfirmation
candidate_create Define options to evaluate
| Advisory: "Document the full landscape before narrowing"
criteria_lock Freeze decision criteria weights
|
peer_review_log Log reviewer assessment
|
candidate_score Score candidates (gated on criteria + peer review + no TBD)
|
project_decide Record the decision with rationale
Evidence grade ladder
| Grade | Meaning | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
UNVERIFIED |
Claim recorded, not yet investigated | None -- tool nudges toward web research |
LOW |
Single source or anecdotal | At least a coherent argument |
REASONED |
Credible source, verified consultation | 1+ source with content_hash: proof |
CONFIRMED |
Confirmed -- validated by evidence | 2+ independent sources + disconfirmation search |
Source quality tiers
Each source is tagged with a tier for awareness (no hard gate):
| Tier | Examples |
|---|---|
PRIMARY |
Census data, RFC specs, user study results |
EXPERT |
PMC papers, RAND reports, Thoughtworks Radar |
SECONDARY |
Blog roundups, tutorials, comparison guides |
VENDOR |
Company blog comparing itself to competitors |
Trilogy conventions
research.md follows shared conventions with ike.md and visionlog. See CONVENTIONS.md for the full standard.
- research.md -- decide with evidence (this tool)
- visionlog -- record the decision as a contract
- ike.md -- execute tasks within those contracts
Config lives at .research/research.json (committed to git).
Targeting pattern: project_set + research_id
Every tool call requires a research_id -- the GUID from .research/research.json. This is an in-memory mapping that does not persist across MCP server restarts.
- Call
project_setwith the project's absolute path - It returns the project's
research_id(a UUID) - Pass that
research_idon every subsequent tool call
If you call a tool without a valid research_id, the server tells you exactly how to fix it.
Project structure
Single project
my-research/
.research/
research.json <- config with project GUID (commit this)
findings/ <- NNNN-slug.md
candidates/ <- slug.md
evaluations/
decision-criteria.md <- criteria table (lock before scoring)
peer-review.md <- reviewer log (required before scoring)
scoring-matrix.md <- generated from locked criteria + candidates
Multi-project root
research-root/
.research/
research.json <- root config (lists subprojects)
vendor-selection/
.research/
research.json <- subproject GUID
findings/
candidates/
evaluations/
Initialize: project_init { path, root: true } then project_init { path, subproject: "name" }.
When you project_set a root, all subprojects are registered automatically.
Tools (20)
Session
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
project_set |
Register a project path, returns its GUID. Also registers subprojects if root. |
project_get |
List all registered projects and their GUIDs for this session. |
Project
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
project_init |
Initialize project structure (single, root, or subproject). |
status |
Project health: evidence gate status, criteria locked, peer review, TBD count, finding/candidate totals. |
Findings
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
finding_create |
Create finding with evidence grade, sources array, and disconfirmation. Nudges toward web research. |
finding_list |
List all findings with status and evidence grade. |
finding_update |
Update status, evidence grade, sources, disconfirmation, or claim. Gates CONFIRMED evidence. |
Candidates
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
candidate_create |
Create candidate for evaluation. Landscape advisory on first candidate. |
candidate_list |
List all candidates with verdict status. |
candidate_update |
Update verdict (provisional/recommended/eliminated) or description. |
candidate_add_claim |
Add binary testable claim to validation checklist. |
candidate_resolve_claim |
Mark a claim Y or N (clears _TBD_). |
Scoring
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
criteria_lock |
Lock decision criteria weights. Required before scoring. |
candidate_score |
Score a candidate against locked criteria. Gated on criteria lock + peer review + no TBD. |
scoring_matrix_generate |
Generate comparison table from locked criteria + scored candidates. |
Peer Review
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
peer_review_log |
Log reviewer name and findings. Required before scoring. |
Decision
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
project_decide |
Record the final decision with rationale. |
project_supersede |
Mark a decided project as superseded by new research. |
research_brief |
Generate a layered research brief from a completed project. |
research_report |
Generate a full untruncated research report. |
Development
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest
ruff check .
License
MIT -- see LICENSE.
Metadata
Release files for research-md 0.5.1
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| research_md-0.5.1.tar.gz | 76.3 kB | With provenance | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| research_md-0.5.1-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 115.6 kB
Release files / research_md-0.5.1.tar.gz
| Download URL | research_md-0.5.1.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 76.3 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
86209ad496a52bf6b03c95e625d1a4deaaa4d3d3896bd99e4269e6b131a02283
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
be4d14aff7f4ef0bd373127da802187a59f806903c23c6d3b226c67fdfe71584
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on May 14, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / research_md-0.5.1-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | research_md-0.5.1-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 39.3 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
aeeed9f5464eec63028cab17707371c5442964bb87e508ca41c022243fcf0930
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
e45575ae81a9938328f152f12a95d5b9a4cf53bcf750d1a73ce2df3484e57f14
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on May 14, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for research-md 0.5.1
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for research_md-0.5.1.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on May 14, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.