Sieve Crowd v0.8.0

English | 日本語

Table data anonymization and privacy protection engine

Sieve Crowd is a table-data processing engine that suppresses the risk of identifying individuals in tabular data, so that the data can be shared safely. Building on the principles of k-anonymity and l-diversity, it deterministically performs attribute rounding (generalization) and partial record removal (suppression).

A fully local, zero-dependency, deterministic (100% reproducible) mathematical transformation engine that anonymizes tabular data and disables re-identification. It extends the design philosophy of Sieve-Core into the tabular-data domain.

💡 Concept and design philosophy

Even when personal data is kept safely on your own machine, you sometimes have to provide or publish tabular data that contains it — or you face the risk of leakage. From a statistical standpoint, the combination of attributes such as age, postal code and sex always carries a risk of identifying individuals.

Consider, for example, a dataset of about 600 people. The risk structure becomes clear:

• Before: 574 of the 600 people (96%) were "alone" on the combination of age, postal code and sex — no one else shared their exact values, so an outsider could single them out easily.
• How the transformation works: rather than leaving these isolated records as they are, the engine groups similar records together (by rounding and generalization) so that everyone is hidden inside a safe crowd.
• After: every person belongs to a group of at least 5 (4 look-alikes besides themselves). Even an outsider who tries to identify someone can be right at most 1 in 5 times (20%).

Sieve Crowd does not rely on probabilistic inference or black-box AI. It transforms tabular data into a state in which no one stands out, deterministically, on the basis of the rigorous mathematical models of k-anonymity and l-diversity.

• Deterministic approach: the same input and settings always produce the same output. The result never depends on the execution environment, the clock, or random numbers.
• A measurement, not a promise: after the transformation, the finished table is re-counted to check whether it meets the target safety level. If it falls short, the reason is given on a receipt and the table is not written.
• Explainability: a receipt records the data processing performed for anonymization, so that what was done can be fully traced.

🧩 Sieve series

Sieve is a family of engines that share three design principles — deterministic, zero-dependency, fully local. Each engine handles one observation or one removal, and they connect to each other:

🔥 Main features

• k-anonymity and l-diversity Attributes are generalized so that each record has at least k−1 look-alikes, and the diversity of sensitive values is also guaranteed.
• Zero dependencies, fully local Implemented with the Python standard library only. Data never leaves your computer (no account, offline, no upload).
• Minimal generalization and suppression Data is not rounded more than necessary; resolution is preserved as much as possible while grouping. Records that still cannot form a group are safely removed (suppressed) rather than distorted.
• Role suggestions (hint packs) inspect / plan read the built-in jp-basic pack (on by default since v0.5.1, --no-builtin-hints to exclude) and suggest a role and check value shapes for each column. Japanese personal columns — person names, kana names, addresses, birth dates, emails, phone numbers, My Numbers, card numbers, postal codes (dash forms — 123-4567 since v0.7.3, phone 090-1234-5678 and card 4242-4242-4242-4242 since v0.7.4) — are matched by name and by value, and the pack proposes direct identifiers (id) and quasi-identifiers (qi). A suggestion is written only when the rule shows a name or a value signal on the column (since v0.7.3), and a mismatch with the declared role is observed as role_mismatch. Hints never touch anonymization.
• Pre-flight plan sieve-crowd plan reports, before any search, the exact search-space size (lattice nodes), the suppression budget, the level-0 risk profile and warnings (unreachable k/l, tight limits, many isolated records) — plus, since v0.6.0, the derived keep-vs-qi relations (does a kept column nearly determine a quasi-identifier, in either direction) — so tuning happens before the run, not after.
• Audit the table as it is sieve-crowd audit observes the current table in integers only — equivalence classes and size buckets, which QI column carries the grouping, and, with --subject, the people behind the rows: a class can reach k on rows and still hold fewer than k distinct people, and audit counts those rows instead of judging them.
• Diagnostics in the receipt When records are suppressed, the receipt explains why — crowd sizes, "smaller than k" vs "short of diversity", and a per-column hint of which quasi-identifier one more generalization step would rescue. In aggregates only; never a cell value.
• Custom bins for numeric columns Non-uniform classifications such as 0-19, 20-39, 40-64, 65+ (legal age brackets, income bands) can be given directly as bin edges.
• A policy for missing values missing_value_policy decides what happens to records whose quasi-identifier is empty: star (default) generalizes the value to *; suppress removes the record up front, inside the same counted suppression budget (and refuses with missing_exceeds_budget when they exceed it). No placeholder option — filling values in would turn the missing pattern itself into an identifier.
• Receipt for the record A machine-readable receipt records what was done (rules applied, suppression count, measurements). The receipt contains no personal information.
• Supported formats CSV, JSON and XML (UTF-8). Since the tool does not depend on external libraries, Excel remains out of scope for now.

🎯 Use cases

• Keeping data on hand for internal use or in-house sharing, stored and managed safely
• Providing survey or customer data to a university, agency, or analytics contractor
• Publishing statistics or open data from hospitals, schools, or local governments
• Feeding realistic test data into a development environment, safely
• Keeping a record of anonymization and processing for legal or audit purposes

📦 Install

pip install git+https://github.com/neguseatama/sieve-crowd.git

Or from a local clone:

git clone https://github.com/neguseatama/sieve-crowd.git
cd sieve-crowd
pip install .

💻 Quick start

1. Inspect the structure

Reads the file and writes a configuration file that proposes a role for each column (name, quasi-identifier, sensitive value, etc.).

sieve-crowd inspect people.csv --config-out config.json

2. Review and edit the configuration

Edit the generated config.json to define the role of each column.

3. Preview the plan (optional)

Before running, check the size of the search, the suppression budget and the level-0 risk profile — no search is performed, nothing is written:

sieve-crowd plan people.csv -c config.json

4. Run anonymization

sieve-crowd run people.csv -c config.json -o people_safe.csv --report-json receipt.json

Input and output example:

people.csv                                       people_safe.csv   (rows shuffled)
name,birth_date,age,zip,sex,diagnosis            age,zip,sex,diagnosis
Takahashi Hina,1986-11-02,40,1500052,M,none     20-24,15100**,F,cold
Kobayashi Haruto,2003-01-03,23,1000042,F,flu    20-24,16000**,M,none
Yamamoto Aoi,1971-10-04,55,1510061,M,flu        55-59,15100**,M,asthma

🔍 Audit the table as it is (v0.7.0)

sieve-crowd audit observes what the table looks like right now. It generalizes nothing, suppresses nothing, refuses nothing — and judges nothing. Where plan estimates a run and run transforms the table, audit only counts, and every number it reports is an integer: ratios are floored per-mille values (integer division, no floats), so the same table yields byte-identical output everywhere.

sieve-crowd audit people.csv -c config.json                       # the rows
sieve-crowd audit people.csv -c config.json --subject id          # the people behind the rows
sieve-crowd audit people.csv -c config.json --findings-json a.json

• Equivalence classes — how many groups the QI tuple forms, the smallest one, the rows that are alone, the rows below k, the floored per-mille of both, and the rows per fixed size bucket (1, 2, 3, 4, 5-9, 10-49, 50+). These are the same numbers plan reports as its level-0 before block — same names, same numbers.
• Per QI column — distinct values (empty cells excluded), rows whose value is unique in that column, and how many rows would still sit below k with that column dropped from the tuple: which column carries the grouping, in integers.
• Repeated subjects (with --subject COLUMN) — k-anonymity speaks about rows, but a person can sit in several of them. audit counts the people: rows per subject and their buckets, and, per class, the number of distinct subjects — including rows_overstated, the rows in classes that look safe on rows (size ≥ k) but hold fewer than k distinct people.

The subject column must be a configured column whose role is not qi/sensitive (an id column is typical); anything else exits with code 2, naming the column. An empty subject value is treated as a person of its own — two empty cells cannot be told apart, so every empty-subject row is one person with one row, in every subject observation alike. Without --subject the people counts are skipped (subject: null). Warnings restate observations without judging — small_classes (rows below k) and subject_overstated (the overstated rows), in the usual - code: … form, exit code 0. The table is only read; nothing is written except the optional --findings-json (schema 1, aggregates and column names only, never a cell value — subject values included). audit deliberately has no entropy metric: a logarithm would put a float into the output, and floats can differ in their last digits across environments — integers cannot.

📄 Scan: the whole picture on one page (v0.8.0)

sieve-crowd scan INPUT answers "what does this table look like right now" in a single static HTML page — a reading document, not a dashboard. Without a configuration it assigns provisional roles from the hint-pack candidates (the first candidate per column in the v0.5.2 order; columns without a candidate stay unassigned (provisionally keep), and a suggested id shows as provisional with its output exclusion made explicit); with -c CONFIG it uses the declared roles as they are, and the page becomes plan + audit in one reading. Nothing executes and nothing is searched: the page carries a CSP of default-src 'none' with inline styles only, light/dark, print and phone-width friendly, neutral colors that carry no information. No cell value ever appears — column names, counts, shares, rule ids, file names and the input SHA-256 only — and the same input produces byte-identical bytes (no timestamps, no environment values).

sieve-crowd scan people.csv                                  # provisional roles -> people.scan.html
sieve-crowd scan people.csv -c config.json                   # the declared roles as they are
sieve-crowd scan people.csv -o report.html --lang ja         # any output path, either language
sieve-crowd scan people.csv --subject id                     # the people behind the rows

The page reads top to bottom: a summary in plain sentences; the column list (role, evidence, candidate rule ids, and the finding counts per kind — hidden_chars, japanese_era, leak, mixed_form, role_mismatch, in a fixed order: code, then column name in codepoint order, then the source order); the group sizes as integer-floored bars with their numbers; the per-QI-column observations (audit's); the derived keep-vs-qi pairs (--no-derived skips them); the repeated subjects (--subject, or a note naming columns that could serve); a configuration draft (? for undecided columns, the suggestion's generalizer for the rest) with ready-to-edit plan/run command lines; and an "about this report" section that states the rules above. Every section opens with one or two lines on how to read it, and the wording stays on the observation side — no "safe", "unsafe", "pass" or "fail" anywhere; shares are floored per-mille rendered with one decimal (integer math only).

With no quasi-identifier candidate at all, the group/observation/derived sections are left out and a guidance paragraph takes their place — scan still exits 0. --k sets k for the provisional roles (default 5; with -c it overrides the configured k like on plan), --max-rows keeps audit's meaning (the observation reads every row and notes when the table is larger), --no-hidden-chars skips the invisible-character counts (which attach to keep/qi/sensitive columns only — a provisional id column is never counted). The output goes to INPUT.scan.html — people.tar.csv → people.tar.scan.html — written atomically and unconditionally (there is no --force), or -o PATH / -o - for stdout. The report refuses to overwrite its own input or the config file, and stdin without -o is refused, both with exit 2 and nothing written. Exit codes: 0 ok · 1 I/O · 2 usage/config/input. Hostile column names cannot inject markup (they are escaped, and invisible/control characters display as <U+XXXX> — the chartable's invisible categories plus C0 minus tab/newline, C1 and DEL); names longer than 120 code points shorten for display, the draft keeps the full names.

🧪 Hint packs (built-in on by default)

inspect and plan load hint packs — JSON files that suggest a role and a generalizer for a column and check value shapes, without ever touching the anonymization. Since v0.5.1 the built-in jp-basic pack is loaded by default; --no-builtin-hints turns it off. run never reads a pack: the run path stays byte-for-byte unchanged from v0.4.0 (pass --no-builtin-hints and give no pack, and even the inspect template is the exact v0.4.0 bytes).

sieve-crowd inspect people.csv --config-out config.json              # builtin jp-basic included
sieve-crowd plan   people.csv -c config.json    --findings-json f.json
sieve-crowd inspect people.csv --hint-pack my.json                   # builtin + my.json
sieve-crowd inspect people.csv --config-out t.json --no-builtin-hints  # v0.4.0 byte-exact route

• --hint-pack FILE — load a pack in addition to the built-in (may be given more than once). Load order: the builtin first, then the command-line order; findings.packs / pack_info follow that order. The candidate order is its own contract (v0.5.2), independent of load order and of the order rules are written in a pack: evidence strength (name+value → value → name → stat), then role (id → sensitive → qi, roles outside this list last), then rule id ascending. _suggest follows the first sorted candidate.
• --no-builtin-hints — exclude jp-basic (use only the packs you named; with none named, nothing is loaded and the v0.4.0 byte-exact output survives).
• --findings-json FILE — write the findings as JSON: aggregates and column names only, never a cell value. packs stays a list of pack ids; pack_info adds {id, version, source, sha256} per pack in load order. On plan the file also carries the derived result (derived_summary, v0.6.0) and the invisible-character summary (hidden_chars_summary, v0.7.1) even when no pack is loaded.

Ids are unique across all packs, the builtin included. A user pack reusing jp-basic (or a rule id like jp-phone) is refused with exit code 2; to replace the builtin, give --no-builtin-hints and then reuse its id.

A pack (schema: 1, read as utf-8-sig; optional version string) lists rules. Each rule has a when (matching the column by column_names and/or value_shape), an optional suggest (role + generalizer settings, written into the template under _suggest for that column only — since v0.7.3 only when the rule shows a name or a value signal on the column), an optional check (set / range / luhn / my_number / email_shape, each three-valued: match / mismatch / cannot-check), and an optional leak flag. The value_shape language is bounded on purpose: # one digit, @ one ASCII letter, \X a literal escape, only {m} / {m,n} quantifiers — no alternation, no nesting, so it cannot describe a catastrophic-backtracking pattern.

Value matching folds through the shared chartable (v0.7.1). The value inputs of value_shape, the checks and the leak scan are folded through sieve_crowd/chartable_v1.json — a byte-exact replica of the Sieve Lens canonical table, pinned by sha256 and re-verified on every load — before matching. The fold is a fixed mapping, applied in this order: invisible characters are removed; twins (Cyrillic/Greek look-alikes) and the fullwidth ASCII range (１２３ → 123, ＠ → @) are replaced; the folding spaces (U+00A0, U+3000) become the ASCII space; and only for shape matching (value_shape and the leak scan) the folding dashes — the long-vowel mark ー included — become the ASCII hyphen. The value checks do not fold dashes away, but since v0.7.5 the luhn evaluation alone re-folds its input once more with dashes=True and, when the result is a run of ASCII digits and dashes, matches the dash-stripped digits (the other checks are unchanged). There are no Unicode-database lookups anywhere in the fold, so identical input folds to identical output on every Python build; every printable ASCII character is invariant, so pure-ASCII matching is byte-identical to the pre-0.7.1 behavior. Column-name matching keeps its NFKC normalization (unchanged, still Unicode-database dependent by the v0.5.0 decision — see known limitations).

Leak checks (v0.5.1). A leak: true rule scans each scanned column for identifier-shaped values as tokens: a cell is split on whitespace and punctuation (dashes, +, @, ., _, % stay inside a token), so a number inside prose is found (03-1234-5678 is also tried without its dashes). Space-separated pieces never combine — 03 1234 5678 is not detected (documented constraint). Since v0.7.1 the cell is folded before tokenizing (above), so full-width digits and dashes (０９０－１２３４－５６７８) and long-vowel dashes (090ー1234ー5678) form tokens and are detected — the earlier "full-width never forms a token" constraint is resolved by the fold. Cells longer than 4096 characters are skipped and counted as skipped. On plan only the columns whose declared role is keep, sensitive or qi are scanned (id/drop are never scanned); inspect has no roles and records every column. Counts are reported as leaks[] (count, checked, skipped — plus declared_role on the column, plan only) and, on plan, a warning line on stderr and a code: "leak" element in findings.warnings when a count is 1 or more; inspect prints one candidates-format line instead. The numbers are possibilities, not proof, and warnings never change the exit code.

Derived keep-vs-qi relations (v0.6.0, plan only). For every (keep column X, qi column Q) pair, evaluated in both directions, plan reports when one column is a near-perfect proxy for the other: reveals_qi (X is kept verbatim in the output, so generalizing Q does not hide it — the attacker reads Q off X) and implied_by_qi (the qi value nearly determines the kept value). Every evaluated direction lands in exactly one of four classes: unchecked (fewer than 50 compared records), trivial (a constant column on either side, or every source value unique — the relation carries no information), flagged (the support s is at least 50 and the violations v — records the source value does not pin down to one target value — are at most 1% of s and at most 10% of the excess s−m, where m is the number of distinct source values), and clear (checked, but too many violations). Flagged directions appear as - derived: … lines on stderr (after the hint-pack findings, without a heading of their own) and as code: "derived" elements in findings.warnings (column, declared_role, qi_column, relation, support, violations); the top-level derived_summary counts all four classes and satisfies unchecked + trivial + flagged + clear = 2 × (pairs − skipped_pairs). Values are compared with the engine's own normalization (NFC + strip) and empty cells are excluded. At most 400 pairs are evaluated per plan (skipped_pairs counts the rest). --no-derived skips the whole report; thresholds are code constants, not settings. Column names and counts only — never a cell value.

Invisible-character observation (v0.7.1, plan only). plan also scans every cell of every column for invisible characters from the shared chartable — zero-width (U+200B/200C/200D/2060/FEFF), bidi controls, tag characters and variation selectors. Per column it counts rows (rows containing at least one), chars (total) and kinds (sorted names). One warning per keep / qi / sensitive column with rows > 0, in column-name sort order — e.g. - hidden_chars: "memo" (declared keep): 12 row(s) contain invisible characters (zero_width); they stay in the output (kept columns) or …; values that look identical form separate groups (qi columns, in both languages). id/drop columns are counted in the summary only: their values never reach the output verbatim. This is an observation, not a change — no cell is rewritten, run never scans anything, and no cell value or code point ever appears in any output (kind names and counts only). The findings JSON gains warnings elements {code: "hidden_chars", column, declared_role, rows, chars, kinds} and a top-level hidden_chars_summary (columns_checked, columns_flagged); --no-hidden-chars skips the whole observation (on by default).

The built-in jp-basic pack (version 1.6.0 since v0.7.5) covers Japanese postal codes (jp-zip, #{7}, and since v0.7.3 jp-zip-hyphen, #{3}-#{4} — both suggest prefix length 4, so the four partial levels keep the same remaining digits 6·5·4·3 and the dash is never masked; full-width １２３－４５６７ reaches the hyphen shape through the fold; since v0.7.4 the column names are 13 — 郵便番号, 〒番号, 郵便番号1, 郵便番号2, zip_code, postal_code, post_code join, and full-width 郵便番号２ matches as 郵便番号2 through the normalization), birth dates (#{4}-#{2}-#{2} → suggest qi with type: date; added in v0.6.0), kana name columns (jp-name-kana, name-only — furigana/kana/name_kana/last_name_kana/first_name_kana and the Japanese forms フリガナ・ふりがな・カナ・氏名カナ・氏名フリガナ・姓カナ・名カナ・姓フリガナ・名フリガナ suggest role: id, the direct-identifier treatment; added in v0.7.1), person-name columns (jp-person-name, name-only — name/full_name/fullname/first_name/last_name/family_name/given_name/customer_name and the Japanese forms 氏名・名前・お名前・姓名・姓・名・苗字・顧客名 suggest role: id — a person-name-looking column; kept in the output it identifies the person; added in v0.7.2), address columns (jp-address, name-only — address/addr/address1/address2/street/street_address and the Japanese forms 住所・住所1・住所2・現住所・所在地・番地 suggest role: id — an address-looking column; combined with the other columns it reaches a person; added in v0.7.2), and since v0.7.3 four value rules suggest role: id too: email columns (jp-email — email/mail/e-mail/メール plus mail_address/メールアドレス (v0.7.3) and email_address/Eメール (v0.7.5); the email_shape check), phone columns (jp-phone — phone/tel/telephone/mobile/電話/携帯 plus 電話番号/携帯電話 (v0.7.3) and 携帯番号/電話番号1/電話番号2/phone_number/tel_number (v0.7.5); shape #{10,11}; since v0.7.4 the dash form is jp-phone-hyphen, #{2,4}-#{2,4}-#{3,4}, with the same names, suggestion and leak flag), My Number columns (jp-mynumber — my_number/mynumber/マイナンバー/個人番号; shape #{12} and the official residue-11 check digit) and card-number columns (jp-card — card/card_number/credit_card/カード番号/クレジットカード plus card_no/クレジットカード番号 (v0.7.5); shape #{13,19} and Luhn; since v0.7.4 the dash form is jp-card-hyphen, #{4}-#{4}-#{4}-#{4} — since v0.7.5 hyphenated values are luhn-checked too (the dashes are stripped after the fold)), each of them still a leak check; the 47 prefectures as a category hierarchy mapped to the eight-block 地方ブロック grouping (三重 = 近畿, 新潟 = 中部 — one standard fixed inside the pack), plausible ages, and three observation warnings: role_mismatch (a column suggested qi with name+value/value evidence but declared keep/sensitive, or suggested id with name+value evidence but declared keep/qi/sensitive — the id warning fires when the column name matches and the value has the shape; a column whose name does not match is the leak scan's job, and id/drop declarations are never a mismatch), mixed_form (full/half-width forms mixed in a column — NFC keeps them as separate crowds), and japanese_era (values in a 和暦 form). Edit a pack to change a standard; hints never affect a run.

The packs/ directory (v0.6.0; municipality edition since v0.6.2). Hint packs that ship separately from the wheel live here — nothing in packs/ or tools/ is packaged. The municipality edition of jp-municipality-2026 (pack 1.1.0) ships with the repository: the ABR prefecture extract packs/mt_pref_all.csv (47 rows), the 総務省 municipality extract packs/soumu_city_r611.csv (1,747 rows, basis date R6.1.1 = 2024-01-01) and the generated pack packs/jp-municipality-2026.json (load with --hint-pack packs/jp-municipality-2026.json), which carries 1,794 codes, 1,794 five-digit prefixes, 47 prefecture names and 1,714 distinct municipality names in four rules. Both sources follow the 公共データ利用規約（第1.0版） — PDL 1.0 (the 総務省 applies the same terms to its site content) — and the required source citations and edited-data statements are in packs/README.md. The generator tools/make_municipality_pack.py (standard library only) auto-detects the input contract from the header — the prefecture master (lg_code / pref) or the 総務省 list (団体コード / 都道府県名 / 市区町村名) — and merges one of each (either order) into the four-rule pack; two inputs of the same contract, or more than two, exit with code 2. It is deterministic (byte-identical output for the same input, independent of the input order), and contract violations exit with code 2 naming the columns. Regenerating from the two committed extracts with --pack-version 1.1.0 reproduces the committed bytes (T29). The town-level master (156 MB) and the 総務省 政令指定都市 sheet are not redistributed.

⚙️ Settings and options

Main command-line options:

• --dry-run: do not write data; only measure anonymization and assess risk
• sieve-crowd plan people.csv -c config.json: pre-flight estimate of the search space, budget and warnings, including the derived keep-vs-qi relations (--no-derived skips them) and the invisible-character observation (--no-hidden-chars skips it; no search, no output)
• sieve-crowd audit people.csv -c config.json [--subject COLUMN]: observe the current table — classes, per-QI columns, repeated subjects (integers only; no search, no output)
• sieve-crowd scan people.csv [-c config.json] [-o report.html]: one static HTML page of the current state — provisional (or declared) roles, group sizes, per-column observations, derived relations, repeated subjects, and a configuration draft (no search, no cell values, byte-identical per input)
• --lang ja: issue a Japanese receipt (default is English; JSON output is also available)
• --in-format / --out-format: explicitly set the input/output format (csv, json, xml)
• sieve-crowd keygen -o key.txt: generate a cryptographic key for pseudonymization

Exit codes:

• 0: success
• 1: I/O error
• 2: configuration error
• 3: refused (the target anonymization level could not be reached; no output written)

🔬 Tests

python -m unittest discover -s tests -v

All test suites run with no external dependencies (standard library only).

The suite also carries a sha256-pinned replica of the Sieve Schema Contract v1 conformance corpus (44 accept/reject cases, maintained in the sieve-lens repository, which hosts the contract text docs/SCHEMA_CONTRACT_v1.md and the canonical engine sieve_lens_ext/schema.py). The replica exercises Crowd's JSON core (sieve_crowd.jsonio): duplicate keys and NaN/Infinity are refused. The UTF-8 BOM case is a declared divergence — Crowd decodes with utf-8-sig on purpose (spreadsheet exports carry a BOM), so the runner pins the acceptance instead of the refusal, as declared in the contract's conformance matrix (§6).

⚠️ Known limitations and caveats

1. Model assumption — Sieve Crowd protects against an attacker who knows the attributes you declared as qi (quasi-identifiers). It is not a universal shield against re-identification through auxiliary information you did not anticipate.
2. Not a substitute for legal or privacy review — It does not guarantee legal or regulatory compliance under privacy laws or guidelines; it is a tool that supports such review technically.
3. Excel is not supported — Since the tool depends on no external library, the binary .xlsx format remains out of scope for now (use CSV / JSON / XML).
4. Row shuffling — To minimize re-identification risk, the output row order is deterministically shuffled.
5. Column-name matching still depends on the Unicode database — Since v0.7.1 the value matching folds through a fixed, sha256-pinned table, so it no longer depends on the runtime Unicode data. Column names are still matched with NFKC (the v0.5.0 decision), which remains the one place where the Python Unicode database version can influence the result (a future release may fix the column-name normalization too).

📜 Version history

One line per release. The feature sections above always describe the current version; the precise contracts are specified in SPEC (日本語版).

• Since 0.5.0, every release keeps the run path byte-for-byte identical to 0.4.0 — the engine core is frozen, and releases touch only the observation side (inspect / plan, hint packs, docs).
• PyPI carries 0.2.0, 0.3.0, 0.4.0, 0.5.2 and everything from 0.6.0 on; 0.5.0 and 0.5.1 exist as git tags only.

📄 License

MIT License. See LICENSE for details.

👤 Author

• Kai IWASAKI