Skip to main content

Complete Small Language Model Evaluation Framework - Tracking Latency, Memory, Energy, and Accuracy

Project description

SLiM-Eval

Small Language Model Evaluation Framework โ€” Comprehensive benchmarking for quantized LLMs across performance, energy, and accuracy metrics.

PyPI version Python 3.10+ License: MIT

Team Information

  • Team Name: SLiM-Eval
  • Members:
    • Vishruth Devan (vd2461)
    • Kavin Aravindhan Rajkumar (kr3131)

1. Problem Statement

Current SLM evaluation practices suffer from three fundamental and interconnected gaps:

Gap 1: Efficiency-Blind Benchmarking. Standard evaluation protocols measure correctness (accuracy, F1, BLEU) while ignoring dimensions critical for deployment: inference latency, throughput, memory footprint, and energy consumption. A model ranking first on MMLU may rank last in production viability due to prohibitive latency or energy costs.

Gap 2: Absence of Quantization-Aware Evaluation. While quantization is ubiquitous in production systems, existing benchmarks evaluate models predominantly at baseline precision (FP16/FP32). The relationship between quantization aggressiveness and task-specific accuracy degradation remains uncharacterized, forcing practitioners into conservative precision choices that sacrifice efficiency gains.

Gap 3: Lack of Multi-Objective Optimization Frameworks. SLM deployment inherently requires balancing conflicting objectives like maximizing accuracy while minimizing latency, memory, and energy. However, benchmarks report single-dimensional rankings rather than multi-objective trade-off analyses revealing optimal deployment configurations.

To address these gaps, we introduce SLiM-Eval, a systematic framework for evaluating SLMs across accuracyโ€“efficiency trade-offs under quantization. We evaluate five representative instruction-tuned SLMs (Qwen2.5-3B, Llama-3.2-3B, Phi-3-mini-4k, Gemma-3-4B, and Mistral-7B) across FP16, INT8, and INT4 precision on MMLU, GSM8K, and HellaSwag, with over 200 hours of controlled experiments on NVIDIA A100 GPUs.

๐Ÿ“Š View Full Experiment Logs on Weights & Biases


Overview

SLiM-Eval is a unified framework for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) with different quantization strategies. It measures:

  • Performance: Latency (TTFT, TPOT, E2E) and GPU memory usage
  • Energy: Power consumption and energy efficiency
  • Accuracy: Model quality on standard benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HellaSwag)

Supported Quantization Methods

Precision Method Description
fp16 Baseline Half-precision floating point (no quantization)
int8 GPTQ 8-bit weights and activations (W8A8)
int4 GPTQ 4-bit weights, 16-bit activations (W4A16)

Installation

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.10+
  • CUDA-capable GPU (recommended)
  • CUDA 11.8+ and cuDNN

Setup

We recommend using uv for fast, reliable Python environment management and installation.

uv venv
source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install "slim-eval[all]"

Quick Start

Environment Setup

Set up the required environment variables before running benchmarks:

# Required for accessing gated models (e.g., Llama, Gemma)
export HF_TOKEN=your_huggingface_token

# Optional: Enable Weights & Biases logging
export WANDB_API_KEY=your_wandb_api_key

Basic Usage

Run a complete benchmark suite on a model:

slim-eval run \
  --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
  --precision fp16 \
  --output-dir outputs

This will run the full benchmark suite with:

  • 10 warmup runs + 500 measured runs for stable statistics
  • Batch size of 8 for improved throughput
  • 256 token generation
  • Full accuracy evaluation (MMLU, GSM8K, HellaSwag) with 5-shot
  • 200 energy sample runs for stable power estimates
  • Weights & Biases logging enabled by default

To run multiple precisions, execute separate commands for each:

slim-eval run --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" --precision fp16 --max-model-len 8192
slim-eval run --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" --precision int8 --max-model-len 8192
slim-eval run --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" --precision int4 --max-model-len 8192

Troubleshooting: Quantization & CUDA OOM Errors

After quantization completes and metric evaluation starts, you may sometimes encounter a CUDA out-of-memory (OOM) error. This can happen if the GPU memory is over-allocated during evaluation.

  • Recommended Fix: Reduce the --gpu-memory-utilization parameter (e.g., set --gpu-memory-utilization 0.6 or lower) to ensure there is enough free memory for evaluation.
  • Quick Fix: Simply re-run the same command. If quantization has already completed, the quantized model is saved locally and will be loaded directly, so the process will resume from evaluation without repeating quantization.

If quantization fails or the CUDA process crashes, it's possible that partially quantized files remain in the quantized-models/ directory. To resolve this:

  • Clean Up: Delete the affected model's directory inside quantized-models/ to remove any incomplete or corrupted files. Then, re-run your command to trigger a fresh quantization.

Performance-Only Benchmark

Quick latency and memory profiling (reduced runs for faster results):

slim-eval run \
  --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
  --precision fp16 \
  --tasks performance \
  --num-runs 50 \
  --num-warmup 5

Accuracy Evaluation

Run model quality benchmarks (uses 5-shot by default):

slim-eval run \
  --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
  --precision fp16 \
  --tasks accuracy \
  --accuracy-tasks "mmlu gsm8k hellaswag"

Analyze Previous Results

Generate visualizations from saved results:

slim-eval analyze --input-dir outputs --output-dir analysis_results

CLI Reference

Main Command: slim-eval run

Model & Precision Options

  • --models: HuggingFace model IDs or local paths (space-separated for multiple)
  • --precision: Quantization precision to evaluate
    • Choices: fp16, int8, int4
    • Default: fp16

Benchmark Tasks

  • --tasks: Space-separated list of benchmarks to run
    • performance: Latency & memory usage
    • energy: Power consumption tracking
    • accuracy: Model quality metrics
    • Default: performance accuracy energy (full suite)

Performance Benchmark Options

  • --num-warmup: Warmup iterations before measurement (default: 10)
  • --num-runs: Number of measured inference runs (default: 500)
  • --batch-size: Concurrent requests per iteration (default: 8)
  • --prompt: Input prompt for latency tests (default: "Explain one interesting fact about large language models.")
  • --max-new-tokens: Tokens to generate per request (default: 256)

Energy Benchmark Options

  • --energy-sample-runs: Number of energy-tracked requests (default: 200)

Accuracy Benchmark Options

  • --accuracy-tasks: Space-separated lm-eval tasks to run (default: mmlu gsm8k hellaswag)
  • --num-fewshot: Few-shot examples (default: 5)
  • --accuracy-limit: Limit examples per task for quick testing (default: None - run full benchmark)
  • --accuracy-batch-size: Global batch size (default: 32)
  • --accuracy-batch-size-{task}: Per-task batch size overrides

vLLM Configuration

  • --gpu-memory-utilization: GPU memory fraction for vLLM (default: 0.8)
  • --max-model-len: Maximum context window for inference (default: 8192)

GPU Selection

  • --gpu-index: Select NVIDIA GPU index to use, 0-based (default: 0)

Weights & Biases Integration

  • --wandb-enabled: Enable Weights & Biases logging (default: True)
  • --wandb-project: W&B project name (default: slim-eval)
  • --wandb-api-key: W&B API key (or set WANDB_API_KEY env var)
  • --wandb-run-name: W&B run name (leave empty for auto-generation)

Quantization Options

  • --calibration-dataset: Dataset for calibration (default: HuggingFaceH4/ultrachat_200k)
  • --calibration-split: Dataset split (default: train_sft)
  • --num-calibration-samples: Calibration samples (default: 512)
  • --max-sequence-length: Max sequence length for calibration (default: 2048)

Output Options

  • --output-dir: Results directory (default: outputs)
  • --quantized-models-dir: Pre-quantized model cache (default: quantized-models)

Analysis Command: slim-eval analyze

slim-eval analyze \
  --input-dir outputs \
  --output-dir analysis_results \
  --accuracy-tasks mmlu gsm8k hellaswag

Analysis Options

  • --input-dir: Directory containing benchmark results to analyze (default: outputs)
  • --output-dir: Directory to write analysis results (plots, CSVs, etc.) (default: outputs)
  • --accuracy-tasks: Accuracy tasks to include in analysis (default: mmlu gsm8k hellaswag)
  • --gpu-index: Select NVIDIA GPU index to use (default: 0)

Repository Structure

SLiM-Eval/
โ”œโ”€โ”€ slim_eval/                      # Main package
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ __init__.py
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ cli.py                      # Command-line interface (Typer-based)
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ evaluator.py                # Main orchestrator for benchmarks
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ quantization.py             # GPTQ quantization management
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ analysis.py                 # Results visualization & analysis
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ utils.py                    # Utilities (caching, model info)
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ benchmarks/
โ”‚       โ”œโ”€โ”€ __init__.py
โ”‚       โ”œโ”€โ”€ base.py                 # Base benchmark class
โ”‚       โ”œโ”€โ”€ performance.py          # Latency & memory tracking (vLLM)
โ”‚       โ”œโ”€โ”€ energy.py               # Power consumption monitoring (NVML)
โ”‚       โ””โ”€โ”€ accuracy.py             # lm-eval integration
โ”œโ”€โ”€ outputs/                        # Benchmark results (per model/precision)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ quantized-models/               # Cached quantized models
โ”œโ”€โ”€ analysis_results/               # Generated plots and analysis
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ plots/                      # Visualization outputs
โ”œโ”€โ”€ pyproject.toml                  # Package configuration & dependencies
โ”œโ”€โ”€ README.md                       # This file
โ””โ”€โ”€ LICENSE                         # MIT License

Core Components

Component Description
cli.py Typer-based CLI with run and analyze commands
evaluator.py Orchestrates model loading, quantization, and benchmark execution
quantization.py GPTQ quantization using llmcompressor with calibration
benchmarks/performance.py Measures TTFT, TPOT, E2E latency, throughput via vLLM
benchmarks/energy.py GPU power monitoring using NVIDIA Management Library
benchmarks/accuracy.py Wraps lm-evaluation-harness for MMLU, GSM8K, HellaSwag
analysis.py Generates plots, Pareto analysis, and summary statistics

Output Files

After running benchmarks, the output directory contains:

outputs/
โ””โ”€โ”€ {model_name}/
    โ””โ”€โ”€ {model_name}_{precision}/
        โ”œโ”€โ”€ energy.json           # Energy metrics
        โ”œโ”€โ”€ gsm8k.json            # GSM8K accuracy results
        โ”œโ”€โ”€ hellaswag.json        # HellaSwag accuracy results
        โ”œโ”€โ”€ mmlu.json             # MMLU accuracy results
        โ””โ”€โ”€ performance.json      # Latency & memory metrics

After running analysis:

analysis_results/
โ”œโ”€โ”€ complete_results.json         # Combined metrics (JSON)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ executive_summary.txt         # Human-readable summary
โ”œโ”€โ”€ quantization_impact.csv       # Quantization comparison
โ”œโ”€โ”€ results_table.csv             # Combined metrics table
โ”œโ”€โ”€ results_table.tex             # LaTeX table
โ”œโ”€โ”€ summary_statistics.csv        # Statistical summary
โ””โ”€โ”€ plots/
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ latency_comparison.png    # Latency visualizations
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ memory_comparison.png     # Memory usage charts
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ energy_comparison.png     # Energy efficiency plots
    โ””โ”€โ”€ accuracy_comparison.png   # Model quality comparison

Quantized Model Storage

When running benchmarks with int8 or int4 precision, SLiM-Eval automatically quantizes models and caches them for future use:

quantized-models/
โ””โ”€โ”€ {model_name}_{precision}/
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ config.json
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ model.safetensors (or model-*.safetensors for sharded models)
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ tokenizer.json
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ tokenizer_config.json
    โ””โ”€โ”€ special_tokens_map.json
  • Location: Controlled by --quantized-models-dir (default: quantized-models)
  • Reuse: If a quantized model already exists, it will be loaded directly without re-quantization
  • Storage: Quantized models are typically 2-4x smaller than fp16 models

To force re-quantization, delete the corresponding directory in quantized-models/.

Results

Models Evaluated

We benchmarked 5 instruction-tuned small language models across 3 precision modes (FP16, INT8, INT4):

Model Parameters Size (FP16)
Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct 2.43B 5.75 GB
Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct 3.96B 5.98 GB
Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct 3.82B 7.12 GB
Gemma-3-4B-it 4.30B 8.64 GB
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 6.71B 13.50 GB

Complete Results Table

Model Precision Latency (ms) Tokens/s Energy (kWh) MMLU GSM8K HellaSwag
Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct fp16 215.2 1189.2 0.021 60.5% 67.8% 52.8%
Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct int8 98.9 1517.1 0.014 60.5% 67.2% 52.8%
Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct int4 132.2 1936.1 0.011 58.8% 60.1% 52.0%
Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct fp16 237.8 1076.7 0.021 70.5% 79.8% 60.0%
Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct int8 179.6 1425.1 0.012 69.5% 72.6% 59.6%
Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct int4 236.1 1084.2 0.011 68.3% 71.8% 58.5%
Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct fp16 145.8 1186.3 0.017 66.4% 65.7% 56.0%
Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct int8 147.8 811.9 0.015 65.6% 64.9% 55.2%
Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct int4 152.7 1583.0 0.011 64.2% 53.5% 54.9%
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 fp16 183.3 714.7 0.038 61.8% 50.0% 65.9%
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 int8 126.4 989.2 0.021 61.7% 47.1% 65.7%
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 int4 112.7 1420.5 0.014 60.6% 45.5% 65.4%
Gemma-3-4B-it fp16 259.8 966.2 0.027 58.4% 76.4% 56.0%

Quantization Impact Analysis

Model Precision Speedup Energy Reduction MMLU Drop GSM8K Drop HellaSwag Drop
Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct int8 2.18ร— 35.3% 0.05% 0.89% -0.08%
Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct int4 1.63ร— 49.1% 2.89% 11.30% 1.57%
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 int8 1.45ร— 45.0% 0.16% 5.77% 0.36%
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 int4 1.63ร— 62.6% 1.98% 8.95% 0.73%
Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct int8 1.32ร— 45.7% 1.38% 9.03% 0.66%
Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct int4 1.01ร— 50.6% 3.16% 9.98% 2.49%
Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct int8 0.99ร— 12.6% 1.20% 1.15% 1.55%
Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct int4 0.95ร— 35.0% 3.30% 18.48% 1.99%

Key Visualizations

Accuracy Comparison Across Models and Precisions

Accuracy Comparison

Figure 1: Accuracy comparison across all models and precision modes. Phi-3-mini achieves the highest overall accuracy, while mathematical reasoning (GSM8K) shows the most sensitivity to quantization.

Speedup by Model Architecture

Speedup Analysis

Figure 2: Quantization speedup varies dramatically by architecture. Llama-3.2-3B achieves 2.18ร— speedup with INT8, while Qwen2.5-3B shows minimal improvement (0.99ร—).

Pareto Frontier: Latency vs Accuracy

Pareto Latency-Accuracy

Figure 3: Pareto frontier analysis reveals optimal configurations. Points on the frontier represent configurations where no other option offers both better latency AND accuracy.

Pareto Frontier: Energy vs Accuracy

Pareto Energy-Accuracy

Figure 4: Energy-accuracy trade-off analysis. Llama-3.2-3B (INT4) offers the best energy efficiency while maintaining competitive accuracy.

Task-Specific Accuracy Degradation

Task Accuracy Degradation

Figure 5: Mathematical reasoning (GSM8K) degrades 3-10ร— more than factual tasks (MMLU, HellaSwag) under quantization, indicating task-specific sensitivity.

Energy Consumption Analysis

Energy Consumption

Figure 6: Energy consumption per inference across models. INT4 quantization reduces energy by 35-63% compared to FP16 baselines.

Key Observations

  1. Architecture-Dependent Quantization Benefits: Llama-3.2-3B benefits most from INT8 quantization (2.18ร— speedup), while Qwen2.5-3B shows minimal improvement, suggesting that quantization effectiveness is highly architecture-dependent.

  2. Task Sensitivity: Mathematical reasoning tasks (GSM8K) are significantly more sensitive to quantization than factual knowledge (MMLU) or commonsense reasoning (HellaSwag). GSM8K accuracy drops 9-18% under INT4, while MMLU drops only 1-3%.

  3. Diminishing Returns with INT4: While INT4 offers better energy efficiency than INT8, the additional speedup is often marginal (or negative for some models), while accuracy degradation accelerates significantly.

  4. Pareto-Optimal Configurations:

    • For latency-critical applications: Llama-3.2-3B (INT8) โ€” 98.9ms latency with minimal accuracy loss
    • For accuracy-critical applications: Phi-3-mini (FP16) โ€” 70.1% average accuracy
    • For energy-constrained deployments: Llama-3.2-3B (INT4) โ€” 0.011 kWh per inference, 57.0% avg accuracy
  5. Memory Behavior: Surprisingly, memory usage remains relatively constant across precision modes due to vLLM's KV cache allocation strategy, suggesting memory savings require explicit KV cache quantization.

Key Metrics

Performance Metrics

  • TTFT (Time to First Token): Initial response latency
  • TPOT (Time Per Output Token): Per-token generation speed
  • E2E Latency: Total end-to-end time
  • Throughput: Tokens generated per second
  • GPU Memory: Peak memory usage during inference

Energy Metrics

  • Power Draw: GPU power consumption (watts)
  • Total Energy: Energy used per request (joules)
  • Tokens per Joule: Energy efficiency metric

Accuracy Metrics

  • MMLU: Multitask Language Understanding (0-100%)
  • GSM8K: Grade School Math (exact match %)
  • HellaSwag: Commonsense reasoning (normalized accuracy %)

Environment Variables

  • HF_TOKEN: HuggingFace API token for accessing gated models
  • WANDB_API_KEY: Weights & Biases API key for logging

Parameter Guide

max_sequence_length vs max_model_len

  • max_sequence_length: Used during quantization calibration to limit calibration sample length
  • max_model_len: Used during inference to set vLLM's maximum context window

Examples

Full Evaluation Workflow

Complete example to reproduce our benchmarks:

# 1. Set up environment
export HF_TOKEN=your_huggingface_token
export WANDB_API_KEY=your_wandb_api_key

# 2. Create and activate virtual environment (using uv)
uv venv
source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[all]"

# 3. Run full benchmark suite for a model across all precisions
slim-eval run --models "Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct" --precision fp16 --max-model-len 8192 \
  --wandb-enabled --wandb-project slim-eval --wandb-run-name "fp16 Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct"

slim-eval run --models "Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct" --precision int8 --max-model-len 8192 \
  --wandb-enabled --wandb-project slim-eval --wandb-run-name "int8 Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct"

slim-eval run --models "Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct" --precision int4 --max-model-len 8192 \
  --wandb-enabled --wandb-project slim-eval --wandb-run-name "int4 Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct"

# 4. Analyze results and generate visualizations
slim-eval analyze --input-dir outputs --output-dir analysis_results

Compare Multiple Models

# Run each model/precision combination separately
slim-eval run --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B" --precision fp16 --tasks "performance accuracy"
slim-eval run --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B" --precision int4 --tasks "performance accuracy"
slim-eval run --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B" --precision fp16 --tasks "performance accuracy"
slim-eval run --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B" --precision int4 --tasks "performance accuracy"

# Analyze combined results
slim-eval analyze --input-dir outputs --output-dir multi_model_comparison

Quick Accuracy Check

slim-eval run \
  --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
  --precision fp16 \
  --tasks accuracy \
  --accuracy-limit 100 \
  --accuracy-tasks mmlu

Energy-Focused Benchmark

slim-eval run \
  --models "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
  --precision fp16 \
  --tasks energy \
  --energy-sample-runs 50

With Weights & Biases Logging

export WANDB_API_KEY=your_api_key
slim-eval run \
  --models "Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct" \
  --precision fp16 \
  --max-model-len 8192 \
  --wandb-enabled \
  --wandb-project slim-eval \
  --wandb-run-name "fp16 Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct" \
  --tasks "energy performance accuracy"

Requirements

Core dependencies (auto-installed):

  • PyTorch 2.8.0
  • vLLM 0.11.0
  • llmcompressor 0.7.1
  • transformers 4.55.2
  • lm-eval 0.4.9.2
  • pandas, matplotlib, seaborn

See pyproject.toml for the complete dependency list.

Citation

If you use SLiM-Eval in your research, please cite:

@software{slim_eval2025,
  author = {Devan, Vishruth and Rajkumar, Kavin Aravindhan},
  title = {SLiM-Eval: Small Language Model Evaluation Framework},
  year = {2025},
  url = {https://github.com/vishruthdevan/SLiM-Eval}
}

License

This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.

Acknowledgments and Citations

We gratefully acknowledge the following open-source projects and model sources that SLiM-Eval depends on. If you use SLiM-Eval or any of these components in your research or deployments, please consider citing them.

Core Framework

vLLM (Efficient LLM Inference)

For the inference engine used in performance benchmarking:

@inproceedings{kwon2023efficient,
  title={Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention},
  author={Woosuk Kwon and Zhuohan Li and Siyuan Zhuang and Ying Sheng and Lianmin Zheng and Cody Hao Yu and Joseph E. Gonzalez and Hao Zhang and Ion Stoica},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles},
  year={2023}
}

llmcompressor (Quantization)

For model quantization and compression support:

@software{llmcompressor2024,
  title={{LLM Compressor}},
  author={Red Hat AI and vLLM Project},
  year={2024},
  month={8},
  url={https://github.com/vllm-project/llm-compressor}
}

lm-evaluation-harness (Accuracy Benchmarking)

For language model accuracy evaluation:

@misc{eval-harness,
  author       = {Gao, Leo and Tow, Jonathan and Abbasi, Baber and Biderman, Stella and Black, Sid and DiPofi, Anthony and Foster, Charles and Golding, Laurence and Hsu, Jeffrey and Le Noac'h, Alain and Li, Haonan and McDonell, Kyle and Muennighoff, Niklas and Ociepa, Chris and Phang, Jason and Reynolds, Laria and Schoelkopf, Hailey and Skowron, Aviya and Sutawika, Lintang and Tang, Eric and Thite, Anish and Wang, Ben and Wang, Kevin and Zou, Andy},
  title        = {The Language Model Evaluation Harness},
  month        = {07},
  year         = {2024},
  publisher    = {Zenodo},
  version      = {v0.4.3},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.12608602},
  url          = {https://zenodo.org/records/12608602}
}

Models

@misc{qwen2.5-3b,
  title        = {Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct},
  howpublished = {Hugging Face model},
  url          = {https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct},
  year         = {2025}
}

@misc{llama3.2-3b,
  title        = {Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct},
  howpublished = {Hugging Face model},
  url          = {https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct},
  year         = {2025}
}

@misc{phi3-mini-4k,
  title        = {Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct},
  howpublished = {Hugging Face model},
  url          = {https://huggingface.co/microsoft/phi-3-mini-4k-instruct},
  year         = {2025}
}

@misc{gemma3-4b,
  title        = {Gemma-3-4B-it},
  howpublished = {Hugging Face model},
  url          = {https://huggingface.co/gemma-ai/Gemma-3-4B-it},
  year         = {2025}
}

@misc{mistral7b,
  title        = {Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3},
  howpublished = {Hugging Face model},
  url          = {https://huggingface.co/mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3},
  year         = {2025}
}

Maintained by: @vishruthdevan and @KavinAravindhan Issues: GitHub Issues

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

slim_eval-0.1.2.tar.gz (45.6 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

slim_eval-0.1.2-py3-none-any.whl (41.5 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file slim_eval-0.1.2.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: slim_eval-0.1.2.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 45.6 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.7

File hashes

Hashes for slim_eval-0.1.2.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 2bc6146e0c0c24a5e57d67c9c2f12487df1bee216f0a65af268a1ed4f340b8f5
MD5 4ffb6bd4d06a21a4dfe35bb41faddce7
BLAKE2b-256 64efa41129fcd360eed96966b876c0c50c9f5617f31e7eadf0e612274ae5221f

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for slim_eval-0.1.2.tar.gz:

Publisher: python-publish.yml on vishruthdevan/SLiM-Eval

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file slim_eval-0.1.2-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: slim_eval-0.1.2-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 41.5 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.7

File hashes

Hashes for slim_eval-0.1.2-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 4c835280ec60d057bcfc7dd3a444b486ce30ad5c3809ceb0a4bfca78c383cc5c
MD5 00f40ec61371077c4c2aea4da501966f
BLAKE2b-256 87b81535164f6ccb0e69175daad98c0d1e9ce6de7d75be040f9f146588f5ad72

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for slim_eval-0.1.2-py3-none-any.whl:

Publisher: python-publish.yml on vishruthdevan/SLiM-Eval

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page