Skip to main content
SodaMem

Evidence-grounded temporal memory for AI agents.

Every memory can name the turn it came from, and knows when it stopped being true.

License Python LongMemEval LoCoMo Discussions

English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Français · Español · Deutsch · Português

Cost-accuracy trade-off on LongMemEval-S: SodaMem sits in the high-accuracy, low-cost quadrant

Accuracy against estimated API cost per question. The quadrant that matters is up and to the left.


pip install "sodamem[chroma,llm]"
from sodamem import SodaMem
from sodamem.llm import create_provider_from_env      # SODAMEM_LLM_API_KEY etc.
from sodamem.memory.ingest.extractor import FactEventExtractorV2

# Writing needs a model to extract facts with; reading never does.
mem = SodaMem.open("./data", extractor=FactEventExtractorV2(create_provider_from_env()))

mem.ingest(
    [{"role": "user", "content": "Actually I moved from Kauai to Oahu."}],
    user_id="u1", session_id="s1", session_time="2023-05-25",
)

block = mem.build_context("where am I staying?", user_id="u1", token_budget=1000)
print(block.text)        # prompt-ready — zero LLM calls
print(block.citations)   # the exact evidence behind every line of it

SodaMem.open() creates ./data if it isn't there. Only .ingest() needs the extractor — drop that argument for a read-only store and search / build_context work exactly the same.

Nothing about you leaves the machine. No telemetry, no analytics, no callback — the only outbound request the default install ever makes is a one-time download of the 90 MB MiniLM embedding model into ~/.cache/chroma/, and after that it talks to nothing but your disk. Pre-seed that cache and it runs air-gapped.


Why another memory layer

Most memory systems store what you said. The questions that break them are when it stopped being true and where it came from — and those need a data model, not a bigger vector index.

the question the usual answer SodaMem
Where did this memory come from? a similarity score and some metadata FactEvent → SourceSpan → RawTurn, a foreign-key chain down to the exact turn
The user changed their mind — now what? overwrite; the old value is gone ADD-only plus a SUPERSEDES edge; the old version closes with a valid_until and stays readable
"I moved to Chicago last year" vs "I move next year" one timestamp four time axes: occurred / valid / said / stored
What does one retrieval cost? an LLM call per retrieval build_context makes zero, and returns a prompt-ready block with citations
Same query twice — same answer? depends on the model's sampling deterministic fusion: same store, same query, same result
Why did it forget X? no answer /v1/events records every add, supersede and delete, with its reason

Each row is expanded below, and each one is something you can check in this repository rather than take on faith.

Every memory carries its receipt

A retrieved memory is not a floating string. It points at the turn that produced it:

evidence_id  = ev_fact:fact_6ada707b…
support      = "Can you recommend a good beach on Oahu that's not too crowded?"
predicate    = user wants a not-too-crowded beach on Oahu
entities     = location=Oahu | occasion=birthday
source       = session_40 / turn_10          ← the exact turn, not "some chat"
date         = 2023-05-25

FactEvent → SourceSpan → RawTurn is a foreign-key chain, not a similarity score. When a user asks "why do you think that about me?" there is an answer. When compliance asks where a stored fact came from, there is a row.

Four time axes, not one timestamp

field question it answers
occurred_start / occurred_end when the event happened
valid_from / valid_until when the fact was true
document_time when the user said it
created_at when we stored it

One timestamp cannot separate "I moved to Chicago last year" from "I will move next year", and cannot express a fact that stopped being true.

Corrections are ADD-only: a new version plus a SUPERSEDES edge, never an in-place rewrite. PATCH /v1/memories/{id} closes the old version with a valid_until and leaves it readable — that is the whole difference from DELETE.

Two retrieval tiers, and the cheap one is genuinely free

tier LLM calls for
search / build_context zero the default path: deterministic BM25 + vector + entity fusion
answer planner loop hard multi-hop questions worth the tokens

build_context returns a prompt-ready block with citations and makes no model call. Most systems hand you a list of records and leave the assembly — and the token budgeting, and the dedup — to you.

There is a third, in-between tier: build_context(organizer=...) runs an LLM-backed organizer (value-board, enumeration-sweep) over the retrieved set for questions like "list every X you know about me". It is Python-only on purpose — /v1/context never accepts one, so the zero-LLM guarantee on that route cannot be flipped by a request parameter.

Retrieval you can audit

Same query, same store, same result, every time. /v1/events records every add, supersede and delete with its reason, so "why did the agent forget X" is answerable after the fact instead of a shrug.


Benchmark

LongMemEval: SodaMem 92.8%, Hindsight 91.4%, Mem0 OSS 91.0%

92.8% (464/500) on LongMemEval.

reader / planner / judge deepseek-v4-flash
judge prompts the LongMemEval benchmark's own evaluate_qa.py templates, byte-identical
store longmemeval_s_500_Hobs_entitysubj, 500 users / 235,840 facts

Every answer and every retrieved memory is published in benchmarking/artifacts/ — 500 answers verbatim, 8,427 evidence rows. Re-grade them with any judge, or hand the retrieved context to your own reader and see what the number does. Neither needs access to anything of ours.

LoCoMo: SodaMem 86.88%, MemMachine 91.69%, Hindsight 89.61%, MIRIX 85.38%, Memobase 75.78%, Mem0 OSS 66.88%

86.88% (1338/1540) on LoCoMo. End-to-end QA accuracy, LLM-as-judge.

reader / planner / judge deepseek-v4-flash
judge prompts the LongMemEval benchmark's own templates, byte-copied
store locomo10_Hobs, 10 user stores / 2,905 fact events
code a pre-release build — this repository's published history begins at v0.1.0

No per-question artifacts are published for LoCoMo — no answers, no retrieved context, no run directory. What is published is the LoCoMo section of benchmarking/README.md: the per-category breakdown, the per-conversation spread, provenance and repro steps.


Install

extra what it adds
(base) data model, storage, BM25 retrieval, ingest — four dependencies, none heavy
chroma vector search + the local ONNX embedder (SodaMem.open() needs this)
llm OpenAI-compatible providers (OpenAI / DeepSeek / Gemini wire format)
anthropic the Anthropic provider (its own SDK)
answer the planner + reader answer path
server the HTTP service (FastAPI + uvicorn — three packages, deliberately)
mcp MCP server surface

Base install pulls pydantic, numpy, rank-bm25, python-dateutil — and a CI gate fails the build if that list grows by accident.


Use it from anywhere

HTTPadd / search / context / answer, plus batch write, supersede, events, metrics, token usage:

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  localhost:8000/v1/context \
  -d '{"user_id":"u1","query":"what do they prefer?","token_budget":1000}'

/v1/context and /v1/search both take a JSON body; /v1/context also answers a plain GET with query params, since it is a pure read.

SDKs — TypeScript over HTTP (sdk-ts/, zero runtime dependencies, ESM + CJS). Python talks to the library directly — import sodamem and you are already past the network.

Agent frameworks — LangGraph, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents SDK, Vercel AI SDK. Scope is bound when you construct the tools and never appears in the schema the model sees: a user_id the model can choose is a user_id it can hallucinate.

MCP — 8 tools, including entity_timeline (one entity's history in order, each item still pointing at its source) and explore_memory (walk the graph outward). Six are reads and always available; the two that mutate (add_memories, delete_memory) appear only under SODAMEM_MCP_ALLOW_WRITE=true, which sodamem install writes for you into the client config it generates.

Web console — browse and inspect memories per tenant, shipped in the image.


Coding tools

sodamem daemon ensure            # the one process that owns the stores
sodamem install claude-code      # wire a client to it

Every client gets the MCP tool surface. Four also get hooks, so memory is recalled and retained without the model having to decide to call a tool — which in a coding session it mostly doesn't, because it's busy reading files.

What hooks can do is not uniform, because the hook systems aren't. This is what each client actually supports, and sodamem clients prints the same thing:

Client Recall Retain
Claude Code every prompt every turn + session end
GitHub Copilot CLI every prompt every turn
Cursor session start (project brief)
Codex CLI session start (project brief)
Claude Desktop, VS Code, Windsurf, Zed, OpenCode MCP tools only MCP tools only

Cursor's beforeSubmitPrompt can read a prompt but cannot inject anything (its docs list exactly three events that can, and that isn't one), and neither Cursor nor Codex hands a hook a transcript path — so there is nothing for a retain hook to read. Those two get a project brief at session start and write through the add_memories tool. We don't install a hook that can only ever do nothing.

Three things worth knowing before you run it:

One daemon, many editors. Per-user stores are SQLite without WAL, so exactly one process may open them (ADR 0001 §2). install therefore points every client at a running service by default rather than letting each spawn its own — and if you deliberately choose a local store (--local-store), a second client now refuses to start instead of quietly corrupting the first one's data.

Memories are scoped to the repo. install derives a project_id from the git root (a git worktree resolves to its parent repo, so one branch per task is not one memory bank per task). Narrowing, not partitioning: anything you told SodaMem outside a project still surfaces inside every project, and dropping the key answers "how did I fix this in the other repo?".

Retain needs extraction credentials. Recall is zero-LLM and works without them; storing facts does not. sodamem daemon ensure says so up front rather than accepting every write and failing the job afterwards.

sodamem install claude-code --dry-run      # print what would change
sodamem install cursor vscode zed          # several at once
sodamem daemon status                      # what is actually answering

Existing config is merged, not replaced — other MCP servers, other settings and hand-written TOML comments survive — and the first write of any file leaves a .sodamem-backup beside it.

Self-hosting

One command:

cp .env.example .env      # then set SODAMEM_API_KEY
docker compose up -d

That builds the image, starts the server on http://localhost:8000, serves the web console at http://localhost:8000/console, and persists all data in a named Docker volume (sodamem-data, mounted at /data inside the container) — nothing is written to the host filesystem directly, and nothing survives only in the container's writable layer.

The console is compiled inside the image (a dedicated console-builder stage), so nothing on the host needs Node installed. Running the server outside Docker is different: console/dist won't exist until you run npm install && npm run build in console/, and until then the API starts normally and just logs that the console isn't mounted.

Auth is on by default. docker-compose.yml never sets SODAMEM_AUTH_DISABLED — the server refuses to start if SODAMEM_API_KEY is unset (see server/settings.py), so there is no accidentally-open deployment. Set the key in .env before the first docker compose up.

Every other knob (SODAMEM_LLM_PROVIDER, SODAMEM_STORE_CACHE_MAX, SODAMEM_CORS_ORIGINS, ...) is documented with defaults in .env.example.

Run exactly one worker. --workers 1 is a correctness constraint, not a throughput setting: per-user stores are SQLite databases opened without WAL, and two processes writing the same user's store corrupt it. The shipped CMD states it explicitly, and the server takes an exclusive lock on its data root at startup — a second process pointed at the same directory refuses to start with data_root_locked rather than quietly corrupting data. Horizontal scaling needs an external job store first (docs/adr/0001-control-plane-db.md).

Calling it

# liveness — unauthenticated, touches no store
curl http://localhost:8000/health
# {"status":"ok","version":"0.0.1","schema_version":1,"auth":"enabled"}

# a real endpoint needs the API key (Authorization: Bearer, or X-API-Key)
curl http://localhost:8000/v1/search \
  -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SODAMEM_API_KEY" \
  -d '{"user_id":"alice","query":"favorite color"}'

Full route list and request/response shapes are in server/models.py and served live at /docs (Swagger UI) once the container is up.

Operating it

/v1/admin/* answers the questions that otherwise need a shell inside the container. The web console's Ops page is the same data with a UI.

# effective configuration — every secret reported as set/not-set, never masked
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $SODAMEM_API_KEY" localhost:8000/v1/admin/config

# mint a named key; the plaintext is returned ONCE and is not recoverable
curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer $SODAMEM_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"name":"ci-pipeline"}' localhost:8000/v1/admin/keys

# who called what, most recent first (rolling window, not an archive)
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $SODAMEM_API_KEY" localhost:8000/v1/admin/requests

# disk + workload shape
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $SODAMEM_API_KEY" localhost:8000/v1/admin/stats

Named keys exist for attribution, not isolation: every request records which key made it, so "who is hammering /v1/search" has an answer. There are no roles or per-key scopes — any live key can read ops data and manage other keys. SODAMEM_API_KEY keeps working exactly as before and cannot be revoked through the API, which makes it the way back in if every named key is revoked.

Latency and cost

Both are instruments, not numbers we ask you to take on faith.

# per-route latency percentiles over this process's recent requests
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $SODAMEM_API_KEY" localhost:8000/v1/metrics

# cumulative LLM token spend, split by ingest vs answer
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $SODAMEM_API_KEY" localhost:8000/v1/usage

Both are in-process and reset on restart — counters for "what is this deployment doing right now", not a billing record. For anything that has to outlive a restart, scrape the Prometheus endpoint instead:

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $SODAMEM_API_KEY" localhost:8000/metrics

It exposes request counts (a true monotonic counter, not the latency ring), duration quantiles in seconds, and cumulative LLM tokens per operation. It sits behind the same API key as everything else, so a scrape config needs a bearer_token. There is no OpenTelemetry exporter: OTel earns its cost on distributed tracing, and this is one process — scraping covers the actual need at zero added dependencies. Routes with no traffic are absent rather than reported as zero, because a zero reads as "this is instantaneous" or "this is free".

We do not publish a headline latency number: it depends on hardware, store size, embedder and concurrency to a degree that makes a single figure close to meaningless. Measure it on your own deployment with /v1/metrics.

For cost, /v1/usage splits ingest from answer deliberately: ingest is output-token heavy and answer is input-heavy, so a single total hides the only comparison worth making.

Maintenance

Entity profiles are rebuilt on demand, never on a timer — SodaMem ships no scheduler, because when to spend those tokens is a deployment decision:

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $SODAMEM_API_KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  localhost:8000/v1/maintenance/dream -d '{"user_id":"u1","async":true}'

Idempotent, resumable, and safe to overlap: a second call while one is running returns status:"already_running" and does nothing. The response carries remaining_stale, so a cron entry that just runs every hour converges without anyone having to pick a batch size.

Data

All state lives under the sodamem-data volume: per-user stores, the Chroma vector index, and the control-plane database (/data/.control/) holding job records, API keys and the request log. Job status now survives a restart — GET /v1/jobs/{id} no longer answers 404 for a job that was in flight during a deploy. Back it up like any other named volume:

docker run --rm -v sodamem-data:/data -v "$PWD":/backup alpine \
  tar czf /backup/sodamem-data.tar.gz -C /data .

Upgrading

git pull
docker compose up -d --build

The named volume is untouched by a rebuild — only the image changes. Check schema_version in /health before and after if you're jumping multiple releases; a store-schema bump would need a migration note here (none exist yet).

Running without Compose

docker build -t sodamem .
docker run -d \
  -e SODAMEM_API_KEY=... \
  -p 8000:8000 \
  -v sodamem-data:/data \
  sodamem

Contributing

Bugs, features and PRs are welcome. Read CONTRIBUTING.md first — it describes four rules CI enforces that the code itself does not announce.

CONTRIBUTING.md setup, and the four things CI checks that you cannot guess from reading the source
SECURITY.md how to report a vulnerability privately, and where the trust boundary actually is
CHANGELOG.md what changed per release, and what pre-1.0 compatibility does and does not promise
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md Contributor Covenant 2.1

Acknowledgements

Early contributions from @sunjiajunsunjiajun and @Lum1104 helped shape the work this project grew out of. Thank you.

License

Apache-2.0. Copyright 2026 FENGRONG WAN.

Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

sodamem-0.1.0.tar.gz (337.4 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

sodamem-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl (380.0 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file sodamem-0.1.0.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: sodamem-0.1.0.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 337.4 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

File hashes

Hashes for sodamem-0.1.0.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 e5ddd1da232d03e3e4b9a880126be33be9276098bbdea367ee0cdf9933f22333
MD5 62bf55283277bdf691ab14100f0ba3c1
BLAKE2b-256 90a8443f03ccae767b4c435550ab752724cb0e6644d82c1a4c4c6af69bd11160

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for sodamem-0.1.0.tar.gz:

Publisher: release.yml on SodaMem/SodaMem

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file sodamem-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: sodamem-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 380.0 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

File hashes

Hashes for sodamem-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 1fd9e9ac0a30178ab1a29e8d506917efb9e10c1dd993d92a4a491f3e641ad7b9
MD5 2cee0ed3eeeebb44c97e8d2c316b8f3d
BLAKE2b-256 b78f995f08ad22133c0832a8a866f4772a0bebc7ce5934bef530a0151735b7ba

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for sodamem-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on SodaMem/SodaMem

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page