Soma
Governance framework that makes AI coding agents trustworthy.
Soma makes AI agents trustworthy by providing observably traceable governance — evidence-based rule selection, AST analysis tools, and adaptive rule lifecycle management. Rules that stop proving themselves expire. Rules that keep proving themselves get promoted. Claims that don't match evidence are caught.
The Problem: Ungoverned AI coding agents waste significant portions of tokens in circular rework loops, hallucinated API calls, and broken assumptions. Static rule files (
.cursorrules,CLAUDE.md) help but never adapt, and the agent can simply ignore them.The Solution: Soma provides JIT context injection, adaptive rule lifecycle, and pre-commit enforcement hooks to reduce waste. Rules are scored by Wilson-bounded fitness intervals and pruned when they stop proving value.
Internal naming convention: Soma uses a biological metaphor internally (genome, organs, cells) to model rule evolution — see the codebase for details.
See the NOTICE and PRIVACY.md files for our full Data Privacy Statement.
Quick Start
Install
# Clone
git clone https://github.com/nseney1/Soma-Governance.git && cd Soma-Governance
# Install the CLI (Python 3.9+)
pip install -e .
# Or install from PyPI
pip install soma-governance
# Set up governance (auto-detects Gemini, Claude Code, Cursor, or Copilot)
soma init --yes
# See what's active
soma status
soma: command not found(common under zsh afterpip install --user)? Runpython3 -m soma_cli doctorfor the exactPATHline for your shell, or see QUICKSTART.md.
Alternative install methods
# Global install via Makefile (Gemini / Antigravity)
make install
# Install rules for specific platforms
soma install --platform gemini # Google Gemini
soma install --platform copilot # GitHub Copilot
soma install --platform claude # Claude Code
soma install --platform kiro # AWS Kiro
soma install --platform mcp # Any MCP-compatible agent
MCP Server (Recommended)
Add Soma as an MCP server in your AI agent's config. Set SOMA_WORKSPACE to the governed project (the directory containing .soma/). No API key is needed because the host agent supplies the model.
{
"mcpServers": {
"soma": {
"command": "python3",
"args": ["-m", "soma_mcp"],
"env": {
"SOMA_WORKSPACE": "/path/to/your/project",
"SOMA_EXECUTION_ENABLED": "1"
}
}
}
}
Works with Gemini Antigravity, Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.
Capabilities: With SOMA_EXECUTION_ENABLED omitted, the server exposes eleven read tools and four write tools. Write tools are discoverable but require a receipt. Setting SOMA_EXECUTION_ENABLED=1 additionally exposes four execute tools, which also require receipts.
| Tier | Available tools |
|---|---|
| Read (default) | soma_request_receipt, soma_scan, soma_list_cells, soma_grade, soma_coverage, soma_fitness, soma_audit_security, soma_audit_performance, soma_poll_verification, soma_list_rules, soma_rule_fitness |
| Write (default; receipt required) | soma_report_outcome, soma_capture_insight, soma_create_cell, soma_create_rule |
| Execute (opt-in; receipt required) | soma_propose_change, soma_verify_changes, soma_checkpoint, soma_generate_manifest |
Receipt flow for write and execute tools:
- Call
soma_request_receiptwith the intended tool name inoperationand the exact tool arguments inarguments. Forsoma_report_outcome, those arguments must include a non-empty, retry-stableidempotency_key. - Call that tool with the same arguments plus the returned
receipt.
Receipts expire after 300 seconds and are single-use. They are bound to the current MCP session, canonical workspace, operation, exact arguments, target-file state, and governance rule state. If a target file or any active rule changes before redemption, request a new receipt. Receipts authorize a specific state-bound operation; they do not authenticate a person. Reusing the same soma_report_outcome idempotency key with the same payload is a no-op; changing the payload for that key fails closed.
Asynchronous verification: For long-running adversarial Layer 2 checks, soma_verify_changes accepts async_mode: true. The tool immediately returns a job_token, executing verification in a background worker thread. Host agents can poll job status and retrieve signed receipts via the read-only soma_poll_verification tool without blocking.
SDK
pip install soma-governance
from soma_sdk import Governance
gov = Governance(project_root='.')
landscape = gov.fitness_landscape(bayesian=True)
coverage = gov.coverage_report()
grade = gov.grade()
gov.signal('wall-gae-truncation', 'tp', metric={'survival_day': 12})
const { Governance } = require('soma-governance');
const gov = new Governance('.');
const grade = await gov.grade();
const entropy = await gov.entropy();
CLI Commands
All governance workflows are available via the soma CLI:
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
soma init |
Set up governance for Gemini, Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, or Kiro |
soma genesis |
Scan codebase architecture, generate adaptive governance rules |
soma status |
Show active rules and fitness stats |
soma report |
Session report card with compliance metrics |
soma doctor |
System health check — verifies installation integrity |
soma verify |
Layer 1 AST analysis on changed files (--layer1-only available) |
soma checkpoint |
Quality checks (--pre-commit for git hooks) |
soma hook |
Native lifecycle hooks (pre-commit, safety-gate, pre-invocation, session-close) |
soma sync |
Reconcile evidence JSONL with rule frontmatter (--dry-run, --json) |
soma oracle |
Rule health classification — healthy, noisy, expired, unobserved |
soma promote |
Evaluate rules for promotion (candidate → invariant → core). --force --cell <id> for manual |
soma demote |
Evaluate rules for demotion (high FP rate or dormant). --force --cell <id> for manual |
# Quick quality check before committing
soma checkpoint
# AST analysis (Layer 1)
soma verify
# Rule health dashboard
soma oracle --json
# See what rules earned promotion
soma promote --dry-run
Architecture
Soma models governance as a layered system of rules, skills, and automation. Every component maps to a specific role:
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 📐 CORE RULES (genome/) 18 Rules — inherited defaults │
│ 🔧 AGENT SKILLS (organs/) 15 Skills — complex behaviors │
│ ⚙️ CORE & CLI (soma_core/, soma_cli/) Pure Python Governance & CLI │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🛡️ VERIFICATION AST analysis tools │
│ Layer 1: AST-based checks (import guards, complexity, coverage) │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 📋 ADAPTIVE RULES (.soma/cells/) → Per-Repo Governance │
│ Vacuoles · Chloroplasts · Walls · Membranes · Plasmodesmata │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
| Layer | Directory | What It Contains |
|---|---|---|
| Core Rules | genome/ |
18 rules — inherited behavioral defaults, rarely changed. |
| Agent Skills | organs/ |
15 skills — complex multi-step behaviors like adaptive-reviewer, genesis, security-audit. |
| Core & CLI | soma_core/, soma_cli/ |
Pure Python governance engine, cross-platform CLI, and evidence pipeline. |
| Verification | immune_system/ |
AST analysis tools for code checking. |
| Adaptive Rules | .soma/cells/ |
Per-repo adaptive invariants. Generated, tested, evolved, or retired. |
📐 Core Rules
The system's foundational rules — 19 rules that define inherited behavior. Always-on rules are loaded every session; conditional rules activate on demand.
| Rule | Trigger | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| providence | always_on | Codebase grounding, no hallucinations, diagnose-before-repair |
| cost-optimization | always_on | Token efficiency, diffs-only edits, FPSR metric (>80%) |
| subagent-delegation | always_on | Context protection, concurrency limits, delegation floor |
| architectural-tenets | model_decision | Pragmatism, trade-off analysis, scale-to-zero |
| atomic-workstream-protocol | model_decision | Atomic 2-5 file micro-step decomposition and verification gates |
| polyglot-standards | model_decision | Unified entrypoints (Makefiles), containerization |
| feature-specs | model_decision | PRD structure, acceptance criteria, documentation |
| testing | model_decision | Behavioral testing, sad paths, ast.parse ban |
| documentation | model_decision | ADRs, actionable READMEs, Mermaid diagrams |
| destructive-ops | model_decision | Dry-run mandates for IaC, database mutations, bulk git |
| git-workflow | model_decision | Conventional commits, .gitignore verification |
| desktop-automation | model_decision | PyAutoGUI/xdotool safety, focus verification |
| core-change-protocol | model_decision | Approval gates for genome/enzyme modifications |
| tdd-protocol | model_decision | Test-driven development with sequential phase gates |
| optional-import-guard | model_decision | try/except guards on optional dependencies |
| hgt-resource-consolidation | model_decision | Cross-project rule sharing governance |
| ci-green-before-release | model_decision | Requires green CI before release or deployment |
| gitflow-review-gate | model_decision | Enforces reviewed Gitflow branch transitions |
| no-pre-existing-excuse | model_decision | Requires fixing relevant pre-existing failures instead of dismissing them |
🔧 Agent Skills
Complex multi-step behaviors — each skill performs a specialized function.
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
| adaptive-reviewer | Auto-escalating review orchestrator with subagent nesting |
| domain-researcher | Compiles verified external facts (wikis, API docs) |
| genesis | Codebase onboarding: four-stage read-only reconnaissance |
| governance-auditor | Mechanical per-rule PASS/FAIL compliance checks |
| incident-debug | SRE: reproduce → isolate → diagnose → fix → verify |
| performance-audit | Hot-path allocations, O(n²) patterns, GC pressure |
| post-mortem | Blameless retrospective analysis, pattern extraction |
| readme-writer | Scannable, copy-pasteable developer READMEs |
| refactoring-pilot | Mikado Method, incremental moves across 4+ files |
| security-audit | AppSec Engineer: OWASP Top 10, hardcoded secrets |
| session-monitor | Live waste trajectory tracking, periodic probes |
| session-preflight | Pre-flight: venv health, git state, test suite verification |
| spec-synthesizer | Cross-references multi-lens findings into prioritized plans |
| staff-review | Multi-lens fan-out (10 lenses) with staff-level synthesis |
| visual-analyst | Screen & UI analysis: game state, regressions |
📋 Adaptive Rules
Adaptive rules are the per-repository governance layer — atomic, dynamically generated invariants that live exclusively inside your repository (.soma/cells/).
| Rule Type | Role | What It Does |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuole | Anti-pattern trap | Catches known anti-patterns (e.g., "Don't use raw coordinates") |
| Chloroplast | Best-practice injector | Injects idiomatic patterns (e.g., "Use async FastAPI conventions") |
| Cell Wall | Non-negotiable boundary | Non-negotiable safety gate (e.g., "Never skip GAE truncation") |
| Membrane | Selective review trigger | Forces elevated review when sensitive areas change |
| Plasmodesmata | Cross-service contract | Governs data shapes and APIs between services |
Rule Lifecycle
Adaptive rules operate on an evidence-based lifecycle:
Generate → Score (Confidence Decay) → Adapt → Differentiate → Prune / Retire → Promote
↑ |
└──────────────────────── External Fitness Signals (CI/CD, tests, metrics) ─────┘
Lifecycle operators: Differentiation (vacuoles harden into walls), Confidence Decay (confidence decays unless reinforced), Retirement (immediate eviction on excess false positives), Horizontal Transfer (cross-project sharing with probation), Version History (provenance tracking).
Fitness scoring: Wilson-bounded fitness scoring with credible intervals — rules are scored by true positive rate using Wilson score intervals for statistically rigorous confidence bounds. Laplace smoothing (tp + 1) / (triggers + 2) provides the point estimate; Wilson bounds determine promotion and pruning thresholds. The Python SDK and CLI use the canonical parse_cell_file parser; the dependency-light MCP path uses its documented standard-library frontmatter parser.
Credit assignment: Scope-narrowed credit assignment with per-file conservation — when multiple rules match the same changed file, each rule's fitness signal is weighted by 1/N (where N = matching rules for that file). Fractional credit is stored deterministically rather than randomly rounded. Canonical events are recorded in .soma/evidence/signals.jsonl with credit and provenance metadata.
Structured crossover: Structured field-level rule merging — two high-fitness rules can be crossed to produce offspring with combined hypotheses, max impact weight, merged target paths (union), and reset fitness counters. Lineage tracking records parent IDs, generation number, and creation method.
Tournament selection: Tournament selection for rule competition — random k-sample selection identifies the highest-fitness rule per round. Read-only operation preserves rule state. Handles null fitness, oversized k, and empty rule directories gracefully.
Tiered enforcement: Rules earn their enforcement tier through demonstrated defect prevention — advisory (prompt injection) → mechanical (pre-commit block) → gate (CI block). Enforcement ladder evaluates rule invariants and applies tier-appropriate blocking.
Quorum sensing: Multi-rule consensus for high-confidence decisions — when ≥N rules trigger simultaneously on the same changed files, Soma detects a systemic issue and escalates the review mode to the highest minimum_mode among triggered rules. Quorum events are logged to JSONL for trend analysis.
Gate enforcement DSL: Rules can declare invariants in frontmatter (e.g., import_banned, file_must_exist) that are evaluated against changed files. Violations are enforced according to the rule's enforcement tier: advisory warns without blocking, gate exits non-zero in CI.
Planned features: See ROADMAP.md for upcoming work.
⚙️ Core Architecture & Scripts
Soma is implemented as a pure-Python governance system with zero runtime dependencies. See SCRIPTS.md for the complete reference catalog of CLI commands, verification scripts, SDK modules, and core engines.
Configuration
Copy soma.conf.example → soma.conf to customize.
| Variable | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
SOMA_PLATFORM |
gemini |
Target AI platform: gemini, kiro, copilot, claude, mcp |
SOMA_INFERENCE_PROVIDER |
auto |
LLM provider: auto, gemini, anthropic, openai, prompt-only |
DEFAULT_REVIEW_MODE |
gale |
Session default review intensity |
CELL_TELOMERE_DAYS |
30 |
Days for fitness confidence to halve |
CELL_TELOMERE_WALL |
null |
Walls (invariants) never decay |
TEAM_SIZE |
solo |
Team topology: solo, small, team, enterprise |
Cross-OS Support
| OS | Shell | Install | Uninstall | Core Rules | Agent Skills | Hooks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Bash | make install or soma install |
make uninstall or soma uninstall |
✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| macOS | Zsh / Bash | make install or soma install |
make uninstall or soma uninstall |
✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| WSL | Bash | make install or soma install |
make uninstall or soma uninstall |
✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Windows (Git Bash) | Bash | make install or soma install |
make uninstall or soma uninstall |
✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Windows (PowerShell) | PowerShell | soma install |
soma uninstall |
✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Windows Support: As of v0.93.0, Windows PowerShell 5.1, PowerShell 7, and Git Bash have full parity with native lifecycle hooks (
soma hook) and UTF-8 encoding (BUG-014, BUG-032). Details: Known Issues — Windows.
How Soma Differs
Soma replaces passive prompt files with active lifecycle-managed governance: JIT context loading prevents bloat, adaptive rules trap repo-specific bugs, and AST analysis catches violations deterministically.
For design analysis, see ABSTRACT.md.
Testing & CI
Test Suite
make test # Full validation + pytest
make validate # Shell syntax, Python compilation, JSON templates
make doctor # System health check
See CONTRIBUTING.md for test guidelines and execution instructions.
CI/CD Pipeline
GitHub Actions runs on ubuntu-latest, macos-latest, and windows-latest:
- Linux/macOS: Shell syntax validation → Python compilation → pytest → hardcoded path audit → script count invariant (≥16) → privacy audit → dry-run install sweep (all 5 platforms) → claim registry verification
- Windows: PowerShell AST parsing → dry-run install with rule count assertion
Documentation Gating
Every feature claim in this README is tracked in docs/project/CLAIM_REGISTRY.json. A claim can only appear in README when:
- Its behavioral test suite exists and passes
- It has a Claim Registry entry with status
unlocked - The CI gate (
soma_core.enforcement) confirms no regressions
Features that are planned but not yet shipped are listed in ROADMAP.md.
Documentation
| Document | Audience | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Blog Post | Everyone | "Your AI agent's rules file is a gentleman's agreement..." |
| PRIVACY.md | Users | Data privacy boundaries and LLM opt-in details |
| CHANGELOG | Users | Release history |
| Bug Registry | Contributors, agents | Every known bug, fixed and open, with root cause and regression test |
| Known Issues — Windows | Windows users | Open Windows bugs, workarounds, and impact |
| SECURITY | Security researchers | Supported versions, private vulnerability reporting, scope |
| ROADMAP | Users | Planned features and their tracking status |
| PHYLOGENY | Contributors | Phase-by-phase evolutionary narrative |
| MECHANISM_DESIGN | Contributors | Formal mechanism design mapping |
| SCRIPTS | Contributors | Full automation script catalog |
| METRICS | Users | Empirical measurement methodology |
| ABSTRACT | Researchers | Research paper abstract |
| CONTRIBUTING | Contributors | Contribution guidelines |
Uninstalling
Remove installed governance rules and configuration across platforms:
soma uninstall # Remove Soma files for active platform
soma uninstall --platform gemini # Target a specific platform (gemini, kiro, copilot, claude, mcp)
soma uninstall --dry-run # Preview what would be removed without deleting
soma uninstall --local # Remove from project-local directory
Or via Makefile:
make uninstall # Uses SOMA_PLATFORM from soma.conf or default (gemini)
License
Apache 2.0 — Copyright 2026 Nicholas Seney See NOTICE for Data Privacy details.
Metadata
Release files for soma-governance 0.103.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| soma_governance-0.103.0.tar.gz | 548.5 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| soma_governance-0.103.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 889.6 kB
Release files / soma_governance-0.103.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | soma_governance-0.103.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 548.5 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
b6d29acc430a57ce53721bf0b62622b2f748f559dea5bd54be6ce98c9da6ffa9
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
4bd76ee2585336fcd1f7e49bcf96cd1979d9e065d316933431981b8e4a29b1d2
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 6, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / soma_governance-0.103.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | soma_governance-0.103.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 341.0 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
d438754e71d2073e393c3ccce2c35c7141acd2da7b964aa5890a7949c4987e5a
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
2394ae00e417b464c7c11e6e0a37f5663c3ff3f84f1a06f058f9087b2b4d21fc
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 6, 2026.
Transparency log