Educational stepwise model selection for statsmodels: AIC, BIC, Adjusted R², and p-values with OLS/GLM support for exploratory analysis.
Project description
step-criterion
Educational and diagnostic stepwise model selection for statsmodels with multiple criteria: AIC, BIC, Adjusted R², and p-values.
This package provides a unified, flexible interface for exploratory stepwise regression with various selection criteria, supporting both OLS and GLM models with advanced features like interaction terms, transformations, and different statistical tests. Designed for educational purposes and model exploration, not production model selection.
✨ Key Features
- 🎯 Main Function:
step_criterion()- unified interface for all selection methods - 📊 Multiple Criteria: AIC, BIC, Adjusted R², and p-value based selection
- 🔧 Convenience Wrappers: Specialized functions for each criterion
- 📈 Model Support: OLS and GLM (including logistic, Poisson, etc.)
- 🧮 Advanced Formulas: Interaction terms, transformations, categorical variables
- ⚡ GLM Flexibility: Multiple test types (likelihood ratio, Wald)
- 🔇 Clean Output: Automatic suppression of technical warnings
- 📋 R-like Results: Familiar ANOVA-style step tables
⚠️ Important Statistical Considerations
This package is designed for educational and exploratory purposes. Stepwise selection has well-documented statistical limitations that users should understand:
🚨 Key Limitations
- P-value Inflation: Multiple testing inflates Type I error rates. P-values from stepwise procedures are biased and should not be used for inference
- Overfitting: Selected models are optimistic and may not generalize well to new data
- Selection Bias: Standard confidence intervals and hypothesis tests are invalid after model selection
- Multiple Comparisons: The more variables considered, the higher the chance of spurious associations
🎯 Recommended Uses
- ✅ Educational: Learning about model selection and variable importance
- ✅ Exploratory Data Analysis: Initial investigation of relationships
- ✅ Diagnostic: Understanding which variables might be relevant
- ✅ Hypothesis Generation: Developing ideas for future confirmatory studies
❌ Not Recommended For
- ❌ Confirmatory Analysis: Final statistical inference or hypothesis testing
- ❌ Production Models: Automated model selection in production systems
- ❌ P-value Reporting: Publishing p-values from stepwise-selected models
- ❌ Causal Inference: Establishing causal relationships
📚 Better Alternatives for Production
For reliable inference and model selection, consider:
- Cross-validation with penalized regression (LASSO, Ridge, Elastic Net)
- Information criteria with proper model averaging
- Bootstrap procedures for selection uncertainty
- Post-selection inference methods when stepwise is unavoidable
- Domain knowledge guided model specification
🚀 Installation
pip install step-criterion
📖 Quick Start
Basic Usage
import pandas as pd
import statsmodels.api as sm
from step_criterion import step_criterion
# Load your data
df = pd.read_csv("your_data.csv")
# Perform stepwise selection with BIC
result = step_criterion(
data=df,
initial="y ~ 1", # Start with intercept only
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x1:x2 + I(x1**2)"},
direction="both", # Forward and backward steps
criterion="bic", # Selection criterion
trace=1 # Show step-by-step progress
)
# View results
print(result.model.summary())
print("\nStep-by-step path:")
print(result.anova)
📚 Comprehensive Documentation
Main Function: step_criterion()
This is the recommended entry point - a unified interface supporting all selection criteria and model types.
step_criterion(
data, # pandas DataFrame
initial, # Initial formula string
scope=None, # Upper/lower bounds for model terms
direction="both", # "both", "forward", or "backward"
criterion="aic", # "aic", "bic", "adjr2", or "p-value"
trace=1, # Verbosity level (0=silent, 1=progress)
family=None, # statsmodels family (None=OLS, or sm.families.*)
glm_test="lr", # For GLM p-value: "lr", "wald", "score", "gradient"
alpha_enter=0.05, # p-value threshold for entering (p-value criterion)
alpha_exit=0.10, # p-value threshold for removal (p-value criterion)
steps=1000, # Maximum number of steps
keep=None, # Optional function to track custom metrics
fit_kwargs=None # Additional arguments passed to model.fit()
)
Selection Criteria
1. AIC (Akaike Information Criterion)
# Using main function
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="aic")
# Using convenience wrapper (allows custom k penalty)
from step_criterion import step_aic
result = step_aic(data=df, initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
k=2.0) # Standard AIC penalty
2. BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion)
# BIC automatically uses log(n) penalty
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="bic")
# Convenience wrapper
from step_criterion import step_bic
result = step_bic(data=df, initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"})
3. Adjusted R² (OLS only)
# Maximizes adjusted R-squared
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="adjr2")
# Convenience wrapper
from step_criterion import step_adjr2
result = step_adjr2(data=df, initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"})
4. P-value Based Selection
# OLS with F-tests
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="p-value",
alpha_enter=0.05, alpha_exit=0.10)
# GLM with likelihood ratio tests
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="p-value",
family=sm.families.Binomial(),
glm_test="lr")
# Convenience wrapper with GLM Wald tests
from step_criterion import step_pvalue
result = step_pvalue(data=df, initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
family=sm.families.Binomial(),
glm_test="wald")
Model Types
Ordinary Least Squares (OLS)
# family=None (default) uses OLS
result = step_criterion(
data=df,
initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="bic"
)
Generalized Linear Models (GLM)
import statsmodels.api as sm
# Logistic regression
result = step_criterion(
data=df,
initial="binary_outcome ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "binary_outcome ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="aic",
family=sm.families.Binomial()
)
# Poisson regression
result = step_criterion(
data=df,
initial="count_outcome ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "count_outcome ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="bic",
family=sm.families.Poisson()
)
# Gamma regression
result = step_criterion(
data=df,
initial="positive_outcome ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "positive_outcome ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="aic",
family=sm.families.Gamma()
)
Advanced Formula Syntax
Using Patsy formula syntax for complex model specifications:
# Interaction terms
scope = {"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x1:x2"} # Specific interaction
scope = {"upper": "y ~ x1 * x2"} # Main effects + interaction
scope = {"upper": "y ~ (x1 + x2 + x3)**2"} # All pairwise interactions
# Transformations
scope = {"upper": "y ~ x1 + I(x1**2) + I(x1**3)"} # Polynomial terms
scope = {"upper": "y ~ x1 + np.log(x2) + np.sqrt(x3)"} # Math functions
# Categorical variables
scope = {"upper": "y ~ x1 + C(category)"} # Categorical encoding
scope = {"upper": "y ~ x1 + C(category, Treatment(reference='A'))"} # Custom reference
# Mixed interactions
scope = {"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + C(group) + x1:C(group) + I(x2**2)"}
GLM Test Options
For GLM models with p-value criterion, choose the appropriate test:
# Likelihood Ratio Test (recommended for most cases)
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ 1", criterion="p-value",
family=sm.families.Binomial(), glm_test="lr")
# Wald Test (faster, asymptotically equivalent)
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ 1", criterion="p-value",
family=sm.families.Binomial(), glm_test="wald")
# Score and Gradient tests (currently mapped to LR with warning)
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ 1", criterion="p-value",
family=sm.families.Binomial(), glm_test="score")
Direction Options
# Both directions (recommended) - can add and remove terms
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ x1", direction="both",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"})
# Forward only - only adds terms
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ 1", direction="forward",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"})
# Backward only - only removes terms
result = step_criterion(data=df, initial="y ~ x1 + x2 + x3", direction="backward",
scope={"lower": "y ~ 1"})
🎯 Convenience Functions
While step_criterion() is the main interface, specialized convenience functions are available:
from step_criterion import step_aic, step_bic, step_adjr2, step_pvalue
# AIC with custom penalty
result = step_aic(data=df, initial="y ~ 1", scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2"}, k=2.5)
# BIC (automatic log(n) penalty)
result = step_bic(data=df, initial="y ~ 1", scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2"})
# Adjusted R² (OLS only)
result = step_adjr2(data=df, initial="y ~ 1", scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2"})
# P-value with custom thresholds
result = step_pvalue(data=df, initial="y ~ 1", scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2"},
alpha_enter=0.01, alpha_exit=0.05)
📊 Results and Output
StepwiseResult Object
All functions return a StepwiseResult object with:
result.model # Final statsmodels Results object
result.anova # Step-by-step path DataFrame
result.keep # Optional custom metrics (if keep function provided)
# Access final model
print(result.model.summary())
print(f"Final AIC: {result.model.aic:.3f}")
print(f"R-squared: {result.model.rsquared:.3f}")
# View selection path
print(result.anova)
Step Path Table (result.anova)
Step Df Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev AIC
0 NaN NaN 15 305.619 308.392
1 + GNP 1.0 54.762 14 250.857 256.402
2 + UNEMP 1.0 8.363 13 242.494 250.812
3 + ARMED 1.0 4.177 12 238.317 249.408
4 + YEAR 1.0 18.662 11 219.655 233.518
🔍 Examples
Note: The following examples demonstrate the package's capabilities for exploratory analysis. Remember that p-values and model selection results should not be used for confirmatory inference.
Example 1: Economic Data with Interactions
import pandas as pd
import statsmodels.api as sm
from step_criterion import step_criterion
# Load Longley economic dataset
longley = sm.datasets.longley.load_pandas().data
longley.rename(columns={'TOTEMP': 'employment'}, inplace=True)
# Stepwise with BIC including interactions and polynomials
result = step_criterion(
data=longley,
initial="employment ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "employment ~ GNP + UNEMP + ARMED + POP + YEAR + GNPDEFL + GNP:YEAR + I(GNP**2)"},
direction="both",
criterion="bic",
trace=1
)
print("Final model:")
print(result.model.summary())
Example 2: Logistic Regression for Binary Classification
# Simulated medical data
np.random.seed(42)
n = 1000
data = pd.DataFrame({
'age': np.random.normal(50, 15, n),
'bmi': np.random.normal(25, 5, n),
'cholesterol': np.random.normal(200, 40, n),
'smoking': np.random.choice([0, 1], n, p=[0.7, 0.3]),
'exercise': np.random.normal(3, 2, n) # hours per week
})
# Create outcome with realistic relationships
logit = (-5 + 0.05*data['age'] + 0.1*data['bmi'] +
0.01*data['cholesterol'] + 2*data['smoking'] - 0.2*data['exercise'])
data['disease'] = (np.random.random(n) < 1/(1+np.exp(-logit))).astype(int)
# Stepwise logistic regression
result = step_criterion(
data=data,
initial="disease ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "disease ~ age + bmi + cholesterol + smoking + exercise + age:smoking + I(bmi**2)"},
direction="both",
criterion="p-value",
family=sm.families.Binomial(),
glm_test="lr",
alpha_enter=0.05,
alpha_exit=0.10,
trace=1
)
print("Logistic regression results:")
print(result.model.summary())
Example 3: Comparing Multiple Criteria
from step_criterion import step_criterion, step_aic, step_bic, step_adjr2
# Compare different selection criteria
criteria_results = {}
for criterion in ['aic', 'bic', 'adjr2']:
result = step_criterion(
data=df,
initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x1:x2 + I(x1**2)"},
criterion=criterion,
trace=0 # Silent for comparison
)
criteria_results[criterion] = {
'formula': result.model.model.formula,
'aic': result.model.aic,
'bic': result.model.bic,
'rsquared_adj': getattr(result.model, 'rsquared_adj', None),
'n_params': len(result.model.params)
}
# Display comparison
comparison_df = pd.DataFrame(criteria_results).T
print("Comparison of selection criteria:")
print(comparison_df)
⚙️ Advanced Usage
Custom Metrics Tracking
def track_metrics(model, score):
"""Custom function to track additional metrics during selection"""
return {
'aic': model.aic,
'bic': model.bic,
'rsquared': getattr(model, 'rsquared', None),
'condition_number': np.linalg.cond(model.model.exog)
}
result = step_criterion(
data=df,
initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="bic",
keep=track_metrics # Track custom metrics at each step
)
# View tracked metrics
print(result.keep)
Handling Missing Data
# The package works with statsmodels' missing data handling
result = step_criterion(
data=df_with_missing,
initial="y ~ 1",
scope={"upper": "y ~ x1 + x2 + x3"},
criterion="aic",
fit_kwargs={'missing': 'drop'} # or 'raise', 'skip'
)
🛠️ API Reference
⚠️ Interpretation Warning
Results from this package should be interpreted carefully:
- Use selected models for exploration and hypothesis generation only
- Do not report p-values from stepwise-selected models as if they were from pre-specified models
- Confidence intervals and standard errors are not valid after selection
- Effect sizes may be inflated due to selection bias
- Always validate findings with independent data or proper post-selection methods
Main Function
step_criterion(): Unified stepwise selection interface
Convenience Functions
step_aic(): AIC-based selection with custom penalty parameterstep_bic(): BIC-based selectionstep_adjr2(): Adjusted R²-based selection (OLS only)step_pvalue(): P-value based selection with test options
Return Object
StepwiseResult: Container withmodel,anova, and optionalkeepattributes
🔧 Dependencies
- Python ≥ 3.9
- pandas ≥ 1.5
- numpy ≥ 1.23
- statsmodels ≥ 0.13
📄 License
MIT License - see LICENSE file for details.
🤝 Contributing
Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit issues, feature requests, or pull requests.
📞 Support
- Issues: GitHub Issues
- Documentation: This README and inline docstrings
- Examples: See
examples_usage.ipynbin the repository
🔄 Version History
- 0.1.0: Initial release with comprehensive stepwise selection support
Project details
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file step_criterion-0.2.0.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: step_criterion-0.2.0.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 20.1 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.12.9
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
7ed737b4ae1a3611aa616709019ad2f08be7e8d29ac52f1e8a86bd8b33fe6e31
|
|
| MD5 |
252fce4e5d49094620e700322da967d8
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
4ce7f6cf74ed6c515adc24ba6276c03e9b1f1b8838dfad21bfc2acd37f07594c
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for step_criterion-0.2.0.tar.gz:
Publisher:
publish-pypi.yml on MrRolie/step_criterion
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
step_criterion-0.2.0.tar.gz -
Subject digest:
7ed737b4ae1a3611aa616709019ad2f08be7e8d29ac52f1e8a86bd8b33fe6e31 - Sigstore transparency entry: 414499313
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
MrRolie/step_criterion@5b565fda24284044f0729ac2bec80fa982816e37 -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v0.2.0 - Owner: https://github.com/MrRolie
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
publish-pypi.yml@5b565fda24284044f0729ac2bec80fa982816e37 -
Trigger Event:
push
-
Statement type:
File details
Details for the file step_criterion-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: step_criterion-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 13.5 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.12.9
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
2912fc7f48aa03fdb560656bc9ba507b8073920a8d9a90f95f1e3ae086985297
|
|
| MD5 |
aa77b6c380ad25da26c72258cfa00907
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
6d5a485d3dc7ff231dff5f8763d4309a44b33be22c24bc0376b2e2548a364f8a
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for step_criterion-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl:
Publisher:
publish-pypi.yml on MrRolie/step_criterion
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
step_criterion-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl -
Subject digest:
2912fc7f48aa03fdb560656bc9ba507b8073920a8d9a90f95f1e3ae086985297 - Sigstore transparency entry: 414499320
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
MrRolie/step_criterion@5b565fda24284044f0729ac2bec80fa982816e37 -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v0.2.0 - Owner: https://github.com/MrRolie
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
publish-pypi.yml@5b565fda24284044f0729ac2bec80fa982816e37 -
Trigger Event:
push
-
Statement type: