strands-slm 0.2.1

Self-learning model: a Strands-Agents-expert Qwen3-VL-2B whose weights keep changing at inference — surprise-gated, bounded, with a provable off-switch.

slm — self-learning model

A model whose weights change while it runs. Predict, get surprised, rewrite a small bounded part of yourself, never forget the base.

Every LLM you have used is frozen at deployment. slm wraps a frozen Qwen3-VL-2B post-tuned on the strands-agents codebase with a plastic layer that keeps learning at inference — with a provable off-switch.

For agent builders and continual-learning researchers who want a model that adapts after deployment. Runs on one GPU (validated on an L40S; CPU works for smoke tests). ~1.6M plastic params over a frozen 2.13B base.

pip install strands-slm

Contents: Quickstart · How it works · Results · API · What we learned · Limitations · Reproduce

Quickstart

As a Strands Agents model provider — every turn can change the weights:

from strands import Agent
from strands_tools import shell
from slm import SLM

model = SLM("cagataydev/strands-qwen3-vl-2b")
agent = Agent(tools=[shell], model=model)

agent("use the shell tool to run: echo hello")   # this turn updated the weights

Or drive the learning loop directly:

from slm import StrandsPlasticQwen

m = StrandsPlasticQwen.from_pretrained()
print(m.chat("How do I create a custom tool in Strands Agents?"))

for doc in your_stream:
    m.observe(doc, learn=True)   # predicts; if surprised, rewrites its fast weights
m.reset()                        # bit-exact back to the base

See it happen: demo.ipynb · view on nbviewer

Ask the model a question it cannot know, let it read documents (pure inference), ask again — it knows. Then reset, and it forgets. Executed outputs and plots embedded; validated on an L40S: P(correct) 0.09 → 0.74, greedy answers 3/3, reset Δlogits = 0.

How it works

frozen Qwen3-VL-2B            instinct — never updated, cannot forget
  + strands LoRA (merged)     slow: post-tuned strands-agents expertise
  + plastic LoRA              fast: ~1.6M params over the frozen 2.13B,
                              updated on every observation at inference
  + surprise gate             learn only when prediction error spikes
  + EMA decay                 bounded plasticity — learns AND retains

loss = next-observation prediction error   (the free label from reality)

Results

Measured on a single GPU, seed-replicated. The base model is never updated.

claim	evidence
Domain expert	strands probe NLL 4.85 → 2.22, 8/8 probes improved
Learns while running	continual OOD stream NLL 6.18 → 5.37, pure inference
Does not forget	strands expertise after OOD learning: Δ −0.01
Agent competence grows	held-out tasks 0/4 → 4/4 after 18 curated lessons, 5/5 seeds
Fact memory	15/15 facts at 100% verbatim recall
Fleet learning	two agents' experience files summed losslessly
Persistence	experience survives process death bit-exact
Provable off-switch	reset() is bit-identical to the base, Δlogits = 0
Cost	+0.11–0.25 s/turn learning overhead

The stability–plasticity dial, measured (OOD baseline NLL 4.23):

lr	EMA decay	OOD gain	retention Δ
2e-3	0.98	+0.05	+0.00	too timid
8e-3	0.98	+0.89	+0.03	the sweet spot
1e-2	none	+3.30	+7.09	forgets the base

API

method	what it does
SLM(model_id, plasticity="high", placement="deep")	Strands provider; agent turns learn automatically
.teach(prompt, response)	curated lesson: bind a future query to a desired response
.observe(text, learn=True)	free-form learning; returns pre-update surprise (NLL)
.consolidate(epochs=5)	sleep phase: replay the lesson buffer, harden weak memories
.revise(prompt, old, new)	targeted unlearning: flip a consolidated belief
.save_fast_weights(path) / .load_fast_weights(path)	persist or restore acquired experience
.merge_experience(paths)	fleet learning: compose multiple agents' experience files
.reset()	the off-switch — exactly the base model again
.surprise_log	(turn, NLL) history — watch it learn

What we learned building it

1. Placement determines what can be learned: attention q/v LoRA stores bindings about 4x more sample-efficiently than the LM head.
2. There is a free-learning regime (deep placement, lr 2e-2, decay 0.999): skill acquisition at zero retention cost.
3. You retrieve in the format you learned — render lessons through the real chat template or the knowledge is invisible at inference.
4. Curation is the difference between experience and learning: raw feedback transcripts teach nothing; distilled (task → corrected response) pairs take held-out competence from 0/4 to 4/4.
5. Interleave or lose it: sequential lessons evict each other; replay makes them coexist. Sleep-style consolidation hardens weak memories.
6. Belief revision is a terminal operation: whatever is learned last in a semantic neighborhood wins — order lessons before the revision.

Honest limitations

• A bolt-on linear memory degrades single-prompt in-context recall — softmax attention is already the better mechanism there. The win is persistent cross-sequence adaptation, which the context window cannot retain.
• About a third of naive test-time-training gains in the literature are pure calibration (even zero-information targets help an over-confident head). Our evals control for this with an information-ladder baseline.
• Composition (learned schema x unseen entity) plateaus near 67% at 2B.
• All findings are at 2B scale; scaling behavior is unknown.

Reproduce the post-tune

pip install "strands-slm[train]"
python scripts/build_corpus.py       # strands-agents repos -> corpus.jsonl
python scripts/train_lora.py --steps 1200 --bs 2 --accum 4 --lr 1e-4
python scripts/eval_strands.py       # base vs tuned probes

Private HF repos need HF_TOKEN in the environment, or pass token=.

Citation

If you use slm in your research, please cite:

@software{slm2025,
  title  = {slm: a self-learning Strands-Agents model with a provable off-switch},
  author = {Cali, Cagatay},
  year   = {2025},
  url    = {https://github.com/cagataycali/slm}
}

License

MIT — see LICENSE.