Penalised GLMs and GAM-style pricing models for insurance. SuperGLM combines
explicit feature specs, exact REML, large-n discrete REML, solver-backed
monotone splines, actuarial validation tooling, and deployable fitted
estimators for Poisson, Gamma, NB2, Tweedie, Binomial, Gaussian, and Gaussian
or Gamma location–scale models.
Installation
Install SuperGLM from PyPI:
pip install superglm
Plotly-based interactive charts are optional:
pip install "superglm[plotting]"
The local model editor is included in the normal installation.
Recommended Workflow
For spline-based pricing models, the default path is:
- define explicit feature specs
- fit with
fit_reml()andselection_penalty=0 - compare candidates with
cross_validate(..., fit_mode="fit_reml") - refit on all training data
- evaluate holdout Lorenz and double-lift charts
- serialize the fitted estimator for scoring
from superglm import Categorical, Numeric, Spline, SuperGLM
features = {
"DrivAge": Spline(kind="ps", k=14, knot_strategy="quantile_rows"),
"VehAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=10, knot_strategy="quantile_rows"),
"BonusMalus": Spline(kind="cr", k=12, knot_strategy="quantile_tempered"),
"Area": Categorical(base="most_exposed"),
"LogDensity": Numeric(),
}
model = SuperGLM(
family="poisson",
selection_penalty=0.0,
features=features,
)
model.fit_reml(train_df, y_train, sample_weight=exposure_train, max_reml_iter=30)
mu_holdout = model.predict(holdout_df)
print(model.summary())
Choosing A Fit Path
Selection strength is explicit:
SuperGLM() # no sparse selection
SuperGLM(selection_penalty="auto") # calibrate from the fit data
SuperGLM(selection_penalty=0.05) # fixed selection strength
None and 0.0 disable sparse selection. Automatic calibration occurs only
when requested with "auto". REML accepts only None or 0.0; use spline
select=True when smooth terms should be eligible to shrink inside REML.
fit_reml() with selection_penalty=0
This is the recommended path for spline-heavy GAM-style pricing models. Use it when you want automatic smoothness selection, interpretable smooth terms, and mgcv-style modeling rather than sparse screening.
model = SuperGLM(
family="poisson",
selection_penalty=0.0,
features=features,
)
model.fit_reml(df, y, sample_weight=exposure)
fit_reml(discrete=True)
Use this when the model is still a REML pricing model, but the data is large enough that exact REML becomes expensive. This is the production-scale path for large frequency models.
model = SuperGLM(
family="poisson",
selection_penalty=0.0,
discrete=True,
n_bins=256,
features=features,
)
model.fit_reml(df, y, sample_weight=exposure)
fit() with selection_penalty > 0
Use this when you want sparse screening, compression, or fixed-penalty regularisation. This is a different modeling story from REML smoothness selection.
model = SuperGLM(
family="poisson",
penalty="group_elastic_net",
selection_penalty=0.01,
spline_penalty=0.1,
features=features,
)
model.fit(df, y, sample_weight=exposure)
select=True
select=True on spline terms adds mgcv-style double-penalty shrinkage. This is
the REML-native way to let smooth terms shrink toward linear or zero while
staying in the fit_reml() workflow.
features = {
"DrivAge": Spline(kind="ps", k=14, select=True),
"VehAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=10, select=True),
"Area": Categorical(base="most_exposed"),
}
model = SuperGLM(family="poisson", selection_penalty=0.0, features=features)
model.fit_reml(df, y, sample_weight=exposure)
Distributional Location–Scale Models
SuperLSS jointly models multiple parameters of a response. Gaussian
LS models conditional location and standard deviation:
from superglm import Spline, SuperLSS
from superglm.distributional import GaussianLS, Predictor
lss = SuperLSS(
family=GaussianLS(scale_floor=0.05),
predictors=(
Predictor("location", {"DrivAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=10)}),
Predictor("scale", {"DrivAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=8, select=True)}),
),
)
lss.fit_reml(train_df, y_train)
parameters = lss.predict_parameters(holdout_df) # location and scale
Use this for heteroskedastic continuous outcomes, such as transformed claim
severity. Raw claim frequency still requires a Poisson or negative-binomial
model; Gaussian LS is not a count likelihood. See
distributional location–scale models for inference,
diagnostics, and known limits. Discrete fitting remains available for scalar
SuperGLM models, but SuperLSS currently refuses discrete=True until its
multi-parameter route is complete.
GammaLS models a strictly positive response:
from superglm import Spline, SuperLSS
from superglm.distributional import GammaLS, Predictor
gamma_lss = SuperLSS(
family=GammaLS(),
predictors=(
Predictor("mean", {"DrivAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=10)}),
Predictor("scale", {"DrivAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=8, select=True)}),
),
).fit_reml(train_df, y_train)
Here scale is the coefficient of variation, not variance or Gamma shape. At
unit prior weight, Var(Y | x) = mean² × scale²; under prior precision weight
w (the default semantics), it is mean² × scale² / w. Explicit
weight_semantics="frequency" instead means literal integer row replication.
The mgcv/MSSM dispersion is φ = scale². Gamma support is strictly positive,
so a zero response requires a different model.
The coefficient core is established IRLS/PIRLS/Fisher–Newton repeated penalized
weighted least squares, with EFS/LAML outside it for automatic smoothing; IRLS
itself is not an originality claim. GammaLS provides CDF, quantile, and
expected-shortfall calculations, and predictive simulation uses its quantile.
TweedieLSS is the dense three-predictor model for a nonnegative response with
a point mass at zero. Its predictors are ordered mean, dispersion, then
power; power_lower and power_upper configure an open interval strictly
inside (1, 2):
from superglm import LambdaPolicy, Spline, SuperLSS
from superglm.distributional import Predictor, TweedieLSS
estimate = LambdaPolicy.estimate()
tweedie_lss = SuperLSS(
family=TweedieLSS(power_lower=1.08, power_upper=1.92),
predictors=(
Predictor("mean", {"DrivAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=10, lambda_policy=estimate)}),
Predictor(
"dispersion",
{"DrivAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=8, lambda_policy=estimate)},
),
Predictor("power", {"DrivAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=8, lambda_policy=estimate)}),
),
).fit_reml(
train_df,
y_train,
lambdas={
"mean:DrivAge#wiggle": 1.0,
"dispersion:DrivAge#wiggle": 1.0,
"power:DrivAge#wiggle": 1.0,
},
max_reml_iter=120,
reml_tol=1.0e-4,
max_log_step=1.0,
)
The public Tweedie route is dense and uses observed coefficient curvature.
Prior weights remain the default precision contract; explicit integer
weight_semantics="frequency" means literal row replication. CDF and quantile
calculations and quantile-based predictive simulation are available; Fisher
fallback and discrete=True are not.
Validation And Model Comparison
cross_validate() should be part of the standard pricing workflow, not an
afterthought. It gives fold-level metrics, timing, convergence information, and
out-of-fold predictions for challenger comparisons.
from sklearn.model_selection import KFold
from superglm import cross_validate
from superglm.validation import double_lift_chart, lorenz_curve
cv = cross_validate(
model,
train_df,
y_train,
cv=KFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42),
sample_weight=exposure_train,
fit_mode="fit_reml",
scoring=("deviance", "nll", "gini"),
return_oof=True,
)
lorenz = lorenz_curve(y_holdout, mu_holdout, exposure=exposure_holdout)
print(f"Gini ratio: {lorenz.gini_ratio:.4f}")
lift = double_lift_chart(
y_obs=y_holdout,
y_pred_model=mu_holdout,
y_pred_current=mu_baseline,
exposure=exposure_holdout,
)
Key outputs:
cv.fold_scores: per-fold metrics, fit time, convergence, and EDFcv.mean_scores/cv.std_scores: summary comparisonscv.oof_predictions: out-of-fold predictions for the training rowslorenz_curve(...): ranking power via Ginidouble_lift_chart(...): business-facing champion/challenger evidence
Monotone Splines
SuperGLM supports solver-backed monotone spline fitting. This is the preferred way to enforce business shape constraints inside the model itself.
BSplineSmooth(..., constraint=Constraint.fit.increasing): constrained QP pathCubicRegressionSpline(..., constraint=Constraint.fit.decreasing): constrained QP pathPSpline(..., constraint=Constraint.fit.increasing): SCOP path
from superglm import BSplineSmooth, Constraint, PSpline, SuperGLM
qp_model = SuperGLM(
family="gaussian",
selection_penalty=0.0,
features={
"x": BSplineSmooth(
n_knots=8,
constraint=Constraint.fit.increasing,
),
},
)
scop_model = SuperGLM(
family="gaussian",
selection_penalty=0.0,
features={
"x": PSpline(
n_knots=10,
constraint=Constraint.fit.increasing,
),
},
)
Post-fit isotonic repair still exists, but it should be treated as a manual fallback rather than the main monotone workflow.
Feature Highlights
Spline(kind="ps"),Spline(kind="cr"), andSpline(kind="ns")cover the main spline basis choices.OrderedCategorical(...)smooths ordered factor levels without forcing a plain one-hot representation and reports one whole-smooth test rather than separate p-values at arbitrary level positions.collapse_levels(...)lets you merge sparse categorical levels while still expanding back to original levels for inference and plotting.interactions=[(...)]supports spline-categorical, numeric-categorical, tensor, and other interaction types.m=(...)supports multi-order spline penalties with separate REML lambdas.
from superglm import Categorical, OrderedCategorical, Spline, collapse_levels
area_grouping = collapse_levels(train_df["Area"], groups={"Rural": ["E", "F"]})
features = {
"VehAge": Spline(kind="cr", k=10),
"Area": Categorical(base="most_exposed", grouping=area_grouping),
"BonusClass": OrderedCategorical(
order=["A", "B", "C", "D"],
basis=Spline(kind="ps", k=6),
),
}
Weights And Offsets
Weight semantics are declared, not inferred from the family. SuperGLM(..., weight_semantics=...) chooses between two readings of sample_weight=:
"prior"(default) — an EDM prior weight, a statement of precision:Var(Y_i | x_i) = phi * V(mu_i) / w_i. This is what you have when the response is an average, such asincurred / exposureweighted by exposure, and it is the reading R'sglmand glum give their single weight argument."frequency"— a replication count: once feature geometry is fixed, integer weights have the same likelihood and dispersion semantics as repeating rows.
They agree at unit weights and differ everywhere else — dispersion, standard errors, residual degrees of freedom, REML's smoothing parameters, and learned knot placement. See the families guide before carrying one spelling into the other, and the migration note for measured before-and-after figures.
The replication equivalence remains conditional on the constructed design.
Under "frequency", main-effect spline boundaries and adaptive knots honor
replication mass and omit zero-weight rows. Some adaptive interaction and categorical
feature geometry can still depend on the physical row layout, however, so use
fixed or preconstructed feature geometry when exact end-to-end replication
parity matters.
import numpy as np
# Raw count target: offset absorbs exposure, model estimates a rate
model.fit(df, claim_counts, offset=np.log(exposure))
# Rate target: sample_weight carries exposure
model.fit(df, claim_rate, sample_weight=exposure)
Validation helpers such as lorenz_curve(...) and double_lift_chart(...)
still use exposure=..., which is correct for that API.
Deployment
A fitted SuperGLM is the deployment artifact. It already contains:
- registered feature specs
- learned knot geometry and constraints
- fitted coefficients and intercept
- REML smoothing parameters
import pickle
with open("pricing_model.pkl", "wb") as f:
pickle.dump(model, f)
with open("pricing_model.pkl", "rb") as f:
loaded = pickle.load(f)
mu = loaded.predict(score_df)
The loaded model can still score, print summaries, rebuild curves, and produce relativity views without refitting.
Advanced Penalty Objects
At the top-level model API, prefer selection_penalty= and spline_penalty=.
Low-level penalty objects still expose lambda1, for example:
from superglm import GroupElasticNet
penalty = GroupElasticNet(lambda1=0.01, alpha=0.5)
model = SuperGLM(family="poisson", penalty=penalty, features=features)
That is advanced usage. It should not be your default starting point.
Learn More
Metadata
Release files for superglm 0.31.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| superglm-0.31.0.tar.gz | 1.7 MB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| superglm-0.31.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 3.6 MB
Release files / superglm-0.31.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | superglm-0.31.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 1.7 MB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
5fdab2ef0463e995303c044a4f8ffb22caa5a9ab09f958864e955337fadfea18
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
b16faa90333c043c3bd54d7b097cbbab4408e50319f40187dfe156e8f8797696
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 7, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / superglm-0.31.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | superglm-0.31.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 1.9 MB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
3cf86f56c70b1f83586341485a0eaffb77617c84a8ba3d5bcfd95989b3cefe4b
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
fbbd63f1c36f4c2ee0bcadb9cf8bd600b670516d9136c17886fd9a08c3d25d9f
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 7, 2026.
Transparency log