Multi-agent system for extracting requirements from data privacy and tech regulation statutes
Project description
TechRegParser
A multi-agent system for extracting requirements from data privacy and tech regulation statutes using the Anthropic Agent SDK.
Features
-
Multi-agent architecture: Specialized agents for different tasks:
- Statute Reader: Parses statute structure (definitions, applicability, rights, duties, exemptions, enforcement)
- Section Analyzer: Extracts specific requirements with exact citations
- Citation Verifier: Validates all citations against the original text
- Requirement Classifier: Categorizes requirements (disclosure, operational, technical, enforcement)
-
Model Configuration:
- Orchestrator: Uses Opus for complex coordination
- Subagents: Use Sonnet for specialized tasks
-
Anti-hallucination measures:
- Every requirement must have a direct quote from the statute
- Two-pass verification (extract then verify)
- Confidence scoring for citations
- Flagging of unverified requirements
-
Diagnostics and logging:
- Phase 1 logs section/definition counts on success, or a clear warning on failure
- Parse failures log the raw agent response details for debugging
-
Statute interpretation skill: Incorporates statutory interpretation guidance from legal experts
-
PDF Support: Can parse both text files and PDFs (with pdfplumber or pypdf)
Installation
# Install from PyPI
pip install techreg-parser
# With PDF support
pip install techreg-parser[pdf]
# Or install locally for development
pip install -e .
Usage
Command Line
# Analyze a statute and output JSON
techreg-parser path/to/statute.txt --output results.json
# Analyze a PDF statute
techreg-parser path/to/statute.pdf --output results.json
# Output markdown report
techreg-parser path/to/statute.txt --output analysis.md --format markdown
# Skip citation verification (faster but less reliable)
techreg-parser path/to/statute.txt --no-verify
Python API
import asyncio
from TechRegParser import TechRegParserOrchestrator, OrchestratorConfig
async def main():
config = OrchestratorConfig(
verify_citations=True,
classify_requirements=True,
)
parser = TechRegParserOrchestrator(config=config)
result = await parser.analyze_statute(
statute_path="path/to/texas_privacy_law.txt",
output_format="json"
)
# Access results
for req in result.requirements:
print(f"Requirement: {req.description}")
print(f" Citation: {req.citation.section}")
print(f" Category: {req.category.value}")
print(f" Verified: {req.verified}")
print()
# Export to file
await parser.export_results(result, "output.json", format="json")
asyncio.run(main())
Architecture
+-------------------+
| Orchestrator |
| (Opus Model) |
+--------+----------+
|
+--------------------+--------------------+
| | | |
+-------v----+ +----v-----+ +-----v------+ +-----v------+
| Statute | | Section | | Citation | |Requirement |
| Reader | | Analyzer | | Verifier | | Classifier |
| (Sonnet) | | (Sonnet) | | (Python) | | (Sonnet) |
+------------+ +----------+ +------------+ +------------+
Requirement Categories
- DISCLOSURE: Must be stated in privacy policy/notice
- OPERATIONAL: Internal compliance processes (response times, procedures)
- TECHNICAL: System/UI implementation (GPC signals, security measures, link placement, UI elements)
- LEGAL FRAMEWORK: Enforcement mechanisms, penalties, AG authority, cure periods
Output
The analysis produces:
- Requirements: List of all extracted requirements with citations
- Definitions: All defined terms from the statute
- Structure: Full statute section tree (IDs, types, titles, line ranges) — included by default in JSON export for the viewer's Structure tab
- Verification: Status of citation verification
- Classification: Category for each requirement
Key Principles
Based on lessons from analyzing tech regulation statutes:
- Start with definitions sections to anchor interpretation — defined terms control meaning throughout
- Separate disclosure requirements from operational and technical requirements
- Tech regulation statutes follow predictable architecture (definitions, scope, rights, duties, exemptions, enforcement)
- Obligations and defined terms vary across jurisdictions and regulatory domains — never assume uniformity
- Work section by section, not requirement by requirement — structure drives accurate extraction
- Every extracted requirement must trace back to a specific statutory provision with a verbatim quote
Requirements
- Python 3.11+
- Anthropic Agent SDK (
claude-agent-sdk) - Pydantic 2.0+
- Optional: pdfplumber or pypdf for PDF support
License
MIT
Project details
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file techreg_parser-0.1.1.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: techreg_parser-0.1.1.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 69.2 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.12.3
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
0f57d8e4d917be940efdcc3f56855fadee0247f9a5f07abdd1e547a8fc9acaf2
|
|
| MD5 |
8571a537c4b9e723ffb249430da70c00
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
6c54a2e3c834764d8547d558966262058ff0d596b4265a4b56a836e534de3827
|
File details
Details for the file techreg_parser-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: techreg_parser-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 73.4 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.12.3
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
e8b0873e921e1b552470fc9809f152aa0881d22a935bd688fe9a4a1040051213
|
|
| MD5 |
7f2816a124d2e6077f0604c1b4cffbc4
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
6717d30fb6f0d20a9b0b3df3ed62c7b3ae4004cd3b11f9d7e0c5a878d9a590f8
|