throughline-compose
Compose one requirements graph from many reusable throughline sources — a house style guide, a platform standard, a regulatory baseline — alongside the requirements you write yourself, and work the combined graph as one.
This repository is itself a throughline project: its own design is captured as a
grounded IDD spine of 12 user requirements and 42 system requirements
under idd/vision/, idd/goals/,
idd/user-requirements/,
idd/system-requirements/, and idd/non-goals/, and
published to idd/docs/spec.md. The graph is gated by tl-compose -C idd check --strict and the document by tl-compose -C idd docs --check; these two counts are
rendered from the live spine by the tl:count directive, so they cannot drift.
Status: alpha. The composition engine is built.
tl-compose -C idd checkcomposes the declared[[sources]]into a union graph and validates it, andtl-compose -C idd docsrenders the published document over that same union, resolving borrowed (namespace:UID) targets (SR-0007). Each source resolves from either a localpathor a pinned giturl+refinto a per-user cache (SR-0006). Still pending: thetl-compose source add/update/pinsubcommands for managing source declarations from the CLI (today you edit the[[sources]]tables by hand).
The idea
A team should be able to adopt standard requirement sets by reference, not by copy-paste, and receive upstream revisions without ever forking. Two identity rules make that safe:
- Imported items keep their source-native UID (SR-0002).
Composition never renumbers or copies. Canonical identity is the pair
(source-namespace, UID), so the sameSR-0001may legitimately exist in two sources without collision — the immutable-UID rule is never violated. - The composer controls the namespaces (SR-0001).
The consumer's own
throughline.tomlbinds each source to a short name it chooses (import X as Y). A qualified reference likegds:SR-0001denotes a borrowed item; a bare UID is always local. Renaming a namespace is a local-only change with a bounded blast radius.
Declaring sources
A consumer names the sources it composes in an array of [[sources]] tables in its
own throughline.toml. Each entry binds a namespace to one source, located either
by a pinned git url or by a local path (SR-0006):
# Adopt a published standard by reference, pinned to an edition.
[[sources]]
namespace = "asvs"
url = "https://github.com/rhodium-org/throughline-asvs"
ref = "v4.0.3" # a git tag (normal form), branch, or commit SHA
# Develop a source and its consumer side by side.
[[sources]]
namespace = "house-style"
path = "../house-style" # a directory relative to this project
url+refis the durable, shareable form. Therefpins the exact edition — normally a release tag, but any git ref (branch or commit SHA) works.tl-composefetches the source from its origin on first use into a per-user cache that lives outside any project tree ($TL_COMPOSE_CACHE, else$XDG_CACHE_HOME, else~/.cache/throughline-compose/sources/), keyed by(url, ref). A cached source is reused rather than cloned again, but the reuse is checked. Arefthat is a commit id is reused with no network call. A tag or a branch can be moved by the origin, so the ref is looked up there and the source is refetched if it now points somewhere else — one ref query, no download, when nothing has moved. An origin that cannot be reached fails the run rather than quietly falling back to whatever was cached; setTL_COMPOSE_OFFLINE=1to skip the lookup and compose from the cache as it stands, which also makes an uncached source an error rather than a fetch. Nothing is vendored into your repo, so your own item scan never ingests a borrowed graph.pathis for local development. A directory, relative to the consumer, for working on a source alongside the project that consumes it.- The two are mutually exclusive, and a
urlmust carry aref. Declaring bothpathandurl, or aurlwith noref, is rejected at check time — a dependency can never silently track a moving default. (Arefalongside apathis likewise rejected: a ref only pins aurl.)
Transitive sources
Composing a source composes what it composes
(SR-0045).
If a source you adopt itself declares sources — say house-style composes
asvs — then asvs reaches your union too, and so does everything asvs declares,
to any depth. Each arrives under the label its declaring source gave it, at the
edition that source pinned; you never restate a ref you do not control. The check
summary lists every bound namespace with the path that carried it in:
tl-compose check · 2 source(s) composed: house-style (path ../house-style) [3f1c…], asvs (https://…@v5.0.0) [a91e…] via house-style
Your one lever over a transitive label is an alias on the declared source that carries it (UR-0005):
[[sources]]
namespace = "house-style"
path = "../house-style"
alias = { asvs = "owasp" } # house-style's `asvs` is bound in your union as `owasp`
An alias applies throughout that source's subtree, and every reference the source
wrote against its own label (asvs:SR-0001) resolves to the aliased namespace. A
source's references only ever resolve through its own declarations — a label you
happen to reuse for a different source can never capture them. Your own items may
cite any bound namespace, transitive or direct, by its bound label.
The same edition reaching your union under two labels is bound once, under the first label bound, and the summary says which label was folded into which.
A namespace bound to two different editions fails fast — never a silent merge or
an arbitrary winner (SR-0015). If you declare
asvs at one ref and a source carries asvs at another, or two sources pin the
same standard differently, the compose stops and names both the why (the same
namespace reaches your union at two editions, and the path each came by) and the
fix (pin asvs yourself to the one edition you intend, or set an alias on the
declared source carrying one of them so both compose side by side).
The reexport key of earlier releases is withdrawn: in your own throughline.toml
it is refused with a pointer to alias; inside a source's it is ignored with a note,
so a published edition that used it stays composable.
Moving to a new upstream edition is a one-line change to the ref; the borrowed graph
is never edited. See rhodium-org/idd-example
for a complete worked consumer that adopts throughline-asvs this way.
One tool, one set of guarantees
In a composed project you drive everything through tl-compose, never tl
directly (UR-0002). The architecture keeps that
honest:
tl-composeis a strict superset oftl(SR-0003). Local-graph commands are forwarded to the throughline library unchanged; the union-aware ones —check,docs,query,trace,new,link,ratify,migrateandcontext— are overridden to compose, validate, list and render the combined graph.tl-compose contextnames them from the dispatch table itself (SR-0025), so trust that over any list written by hand, including this one. (Thesourcesubcommands for editing declarations are the remaining superset surface — see the status note above.) The core command set is obtained programmatically, so the two surfaces cannot drift apart.- Composition reuses throughline unchanged (SR-0004).
It merges the sources into one in-memory
Projectand runs throughline's existingvalidate,Index, andfingerprintover that union — no second validation engine. A composed graph is exactly as sound as a native one. - Adopting a source costs one declaration, never a copy of its model
(SR-0026).
A borrowed item is reported against only where you can act: its statuses, attributes,
link vocabulary and grounding are the owning graph's business, so no finding reaches
you whose remedy is a commit in someone else's repo. Your own items are judged under
your model in full, and the seam strictly — a reference into a source must resolve, a
stamp you recorded on a borrowed clause must still match it, and a chain that grounds
inside a source counts as grounded. Adopting a source, or moving its pin, therefore
stays a
[[sources]]change: nothing to restate in your ownthroughline.toml, and nothing to re-restate when the edition moves. - Bare
tl checkfails fast on unresolved cross-source refs (SR-0005). If you run coretlin a composed repo by habit, a namespace-qualified reference it cannot resolve makes it stop and point you attl-compose— never a false clean result. Free external references (a URL, a linked standard) stay opaque, as intended.
Widening the seam for a rule you can answer
The seam above keys on the rule name, and a rule name does not say where the remedy for a finding lies. For nearly every rule the remedy is the owning graph's — exactly what SR-0026 suppresses. But a coverage rule you declared yourself is answered by authoring an item in your own project, so suppressing it hides an obligation you could have met.
Only you know which of the two it is, so you say so:
[[rules.coverage]]
filter = "type == 'system_requirement' and status == 'ratified'"
needs = "incoming:covers"
[seam]
report_on_borrowed = ["coverage"]
Without the [seam] block that rule is silently inert over borrowed items — the
finding names a UID you do not own, so it is dropped and check reports clean. With
it, a borrowed requirement nothing covers is reported in your own vocabulary
(spec:SR-0009) and --strict fails the build.
Two deliberate limits:
- It only ever widens. There is no syntax for switching a built-in seam rule
off. Those are what keep the assembled union coherent — a dangling cross-source
reference, a UID collision, a stamp that no longer matches — and silencing one
would hide the unresolved reference
UR-0002forbids outright. - An unknown rule name is refused when the config is read, not ignored. The defect this closes is a rule that never fires; a typo accepted quietly would reproduce it exactly.
The default is unchanged — a project that declares nothing behaves as it always has, so no existing consumer inherits findings by upgrading (SR-0035).
Composition deliberately lives here, not in the throughline core (NG-0001) — the core stays a single-purpose, offline tool over one graph, consumed here as a library.
Working here
pip install . # pulls throughline transitively; installs tl and tl-compose
tl-compose -C idd context # agent brief, generated from idd/throughline.toml
tl-compose -C idd check --strict # gate the whole graph
tl-compose -C idd docs --check # gate published-document freshness
tl-compose -C idd docs # regenerate idd/docs/spec.md from the graph
License
Created by Dr Henry J Grech-Cini (ORCID 0009-0007-1565-7530).
Copyright © 2026 Henry J Grech-Cini. Released under the Apache License 2.0 — see
LICENSE and NOTICE.
Metadata
Release files for throughline-compose 0.17.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| throughline_compose-0.17.0.tar.gz | 95.2 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| throughline_compose-0.17.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 154.8 kB
Release files / throughline_compose-0.17.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | throughline_compose-0.17.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 95.2 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
36fd6be40e14017ec8c1315e0921fddd589e8b1909e6ee494ae311505a923cf8
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
6bd9d885836bbf894966d46f8f070055536b1ed1e5c8f8c84b5d1a3da0a7abf1
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 14, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / throughline_compose-0.17.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | throughline_compose-0.17.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 59.6 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c94435ce9919a4800671b3a9f1ed92aa4c5ee0e6e0dbe54b01fec3717c38527e
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
0fc1d27adda8c092e55e2129e7a7243e3c9725f53338eeaae8767b4710595c82
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 14, 2026.
Transparency log