Toolgraph

🚧 Alpha — APIs and defaults may change between 0.x minor releases. Feedback and issue reports are especially welcome: Issues · Discussions

Toolgraph is an advisory control-plane tool, not a runtime security boundary.

A graph-native registry for MCP tools. It crawls MCP servers into a local Ladybug or shared Neo4j graph, lets you author governance (who can call what, what touches which resource, which resources are under which policy), and answers explainable reachability questions over the result:

• Which tools can this agent call that touch a resource under a DENY policy?
• Is this agent allowed to call this tool — and does the call cross a deny policy?
• If this resource (or policy) changes, which agents and tools are affected?

Each answer comes back with the exact graph path as evidence, not a bare boolean, and carries per-edge provenance (crawled fact vs operator assertion vs inferred, with a free-text evidence pointer) so reviewers can verify the claim.

Advisory, not enforcement. toolgraph analyzes and explains; it does not sit in the traffic path and does not block calls at runtime. Think of it as a risk/impact analyzer and policy compiler for your MCP tool estate. Runtime enforcement consumes its product-neutral policy bundle in a gateway; memtomem-stm is the first reference consumer, not a required dependency.

Why a graph (and what the alternatives are)

Discovery (“find a tool like X”) is well served by vector search. Embedding search alone, however, cannot give deterministic reachability or blast-radius answers — Agent → Tool → Resource → Policy is a many-to-many join across four node types, not a similarity problem.

Several structured-metadata approaches can answer the same questions if given the same edges:

• OPA/Rego over a JSON-authored ACL model
• A relational schema with (agent, tool, resource, policy) joins
• A resource-tagged tool registry with namespace + grant tables

toolgraph is one implementation of that model, optimised for: idempotent crawl-then-author flows, explainable paths returned as first-class output, and exposing the same queries over MCP so an agent can audit the registry through the protocol it was crawled from. It does not claim "only a graph can answer this." It claims the graph form makes the authoring + audit ergonomics simple, and that embedding-only registries cannot.

Every edge here is either a crawled fact or an operator-authored assertion; nothing is LLM-guessed.

For observed-usage grant proposals and provenance checks, see the policy proposal guide.

Graph model

(MCPServer)-[:EXPOSES]->(Tool)            # crawled (factual)
(MCPServer)-[:PROVIDES]->(Resource)       # crawled (factual)
(Agent)-[:CAN_CALL]->(Tool)               # authored
(Tool)-[:READS|WRITES]->(Resource)        # authored
(Resource|Tool)-[:GOVERNED_BY]->(Policy)  # authored

Policy{id, effect: ALLOW|DENY, scope, description}.

Quickstart

New to Toolgraph? Start with the first-time user guides: English or Korean.

For the context-engineering and tool-selection roadmap, see the context-engineering report. Contract-shaping decisions are recorded in the ADRs. Maintainers should follow the release runbook.

Install

The recommended local backend is included through the ladybug extra:

uv tool install "toolgraph[ladybug]"
# or: python -m pip install "toolgraph[ladybug]"

That puts toolgraph on your PATH; run uv tool update-shell once if uv says its bin directory is not there yet.

You can also inspect the CLI without a persistent install:

uvx --from "toolgraph[ladybug]" toolgraph --version

git clone https://github.com/memtomem/toolgraph.git
cd toolgraph
uv tool install --from '.[ladybug]' toolgraph

First policy bundle

Once toolgraph is on your PATH, no Docker, Node.js or clone is required:

toolgraph example init toolgraph-quickstart
cd toolgraph-quickstart
toolgraph init
toolgraph crawl --servers servers.yaml
toolgraph ingest-manifest --governance governance.yaml --strict-drift
toolgraph eligible-tools vibe-coder \
  policy-gateway::read_note policy-gateway::publish_note --profile review
toolgraph selection-explain vibe-coder policy-gateway::publish_note --profile review
toolgraph policy compile --agent vibe-coder --profile review \
  --output .toolgraph/policy-bundle.json

For ingest-manifest --dry-run --json and doctor, see the preview and diagnostic requirements, including Neo4j catalog permissions and Ladybug session serialization.

Ladybug is the local single-process backend. Toolgraph commands own the DB sequentially; gateways read only the generated JSON bundle. Use Neo4j for a shared service or multiple concurrent processes. The beginner guides explain the decision output and the memtomem-stm handoff.

For contributors and larger shared/fleet demos, clone the repository and run:

uv sync --group dev --extra ladybug
docker compose up -d --wait
cp .env.example .env
bash scripts/demo.sh
bash scripts/demo-public.sh

.env selects Neo4j. Do not also run toolgraph init in the same directory unless both say the same thing: when TOOLGRAPH_BACKEND or TOOLGRAPH_DB_PATH disagrees with .toolgraph/config.json, commands stop with a configuration error instead of picking one silently. See Configuration and .env for the full order.

The compose file is development-only, uses a known password, and binds Neo4j to loopback. It is not an authenticated production deployment. The demo scripts themselves use disposable Ladybug databases and never reset your configured graph.

The cross-server demo is the headline: ci-bot has no filesystem read grant, yet unsafe-tools ci-bot flags it — because git_show on a different server reaches the same governed secret. The graph form makes the cross-server path explicit without per-server bookkeeping; the same authored edges in a relational or OPA model would catch it too, but operators would have to write the join themselves.

The same wedge appears for proxy/surfacing servers. examples/servers-gate.yaml crawls memtomem + memtomem-stm (a docs proxy whose surfacing engine injects results from the operator's memtomem LTM into every proxied response — see memtomem_stm/proxy/manager.py::ProxyManager._apply_surfacing). examples/governance-gate.yaml flags an agent whose only grants are on proxied docs tools (langchain__*, langfuse__*) — because surfacing makes every such call indirectly read the operator's personal LTM namespace, which their descriptions never mention. Run with:

uv run toolgraph crawl --servers examples/servers-gate.yaml
uv run toolgraph ingest-manifest --governance examples/governance-gate.yaml
uv run toolgraph check-access helper "memtomem-stm::langchain__search_docs_by_lang_chain"

Or step by step, on the base example: examples/servers.yaml crawls the public filesystem MCP server through npx (network on first run), and examples/governance.yaml authors two agents over it, ops-agent and public-bot, with a DENY policy on file:///private/secrets.env. Run it from the repository root against the backend .env selects:

uv run toolgraph check                                   # verify the configured backend (read-only)
uv run toolgraph init-schema                             # constraints (Neo4j) or tables (Ladybug); idempotent
uv run toolgraph doctor                                  # config source, connectivity, schema, graph state
uv run toolgraph crawl --servers examples/servers.yaml   # crawl -> load factual graph
uv run toolgraph ingest-manifest --governance examples/governance.yaml --dry-run   # preview; writes nothing
uv run toolgraph ingest-manifest --governance examples/governance.yaml
# refs to tools no server currently exposes emit a non-fatal DRIFT notice;
# add --strict-drift to reject the manifest instead (CI gating, ADR-0002)

# positive-reachability queries
uv run toolgraph unsafe-tools public-bot          # violations only (default)
uv run toolgraph unsafe-tools public-bot --all    # + operator-declared exceptions
uv run toolgraph check-access public-bot read_file
uv run toolgraph blast-radius "file:///private/secrets.env"

# negative-truth / drift queries — what the graph DOESN'T say but should
uv run toolgraph unmapped-tools                     # granted tools w/ no READS/WRITES yet
uv run toolgraph orphan-policies                    # policies no agent currently reaches
uv run toolgraph unbacked-edges                     # READS/WRITES/GOVERNED_BY w/ no evidence
uv run toolgraph unbacked-edges --include-grants    # also audit CAN_CALL grants
uv run toolgraph drift                              # tools w/ governance but no live EXPOSES
uv run toolgraph destructive-unsafeguarded          # destructive-hinted tools w/ no policy path
uv run toolgraph annotation-contradictions          # authored WRITES vs readOnlyHint claims
uv run toolgraph audit-report                       # whole-graph operational audit summary
uv run toolgraph audit-report --format markdown     # human-readable audit report

# selector surface (ADR-0005) — batch, deterministic, no relevance scoring
uv run toolgraph rank-features public-bot \
  filesystem::read_file filesystem::list_directory filesystem::write_file
uv run toolgraph eligible-tools public-bot \
  filesystem::read_file filesystem::list_directory --profile strict
uv run toolgraph selection-explain public-bot filesystem::list_directory --profile strict

# portable control-plane artifact for memtomem-stm or another MCP gateway
uv run toolgraph policy compile --agent public-bot --profile strict \
  --output policy-bundle.json

On this example public-bot reaches the governed secret through read_file, so unsafe-tools public-bot returns one violation row and audit-report reports status: fail. list_directory has a grant but no authored READS/WRITES, so strict rejects it as UNMAPPED; --profile review lets it through. The strict bundle compiled for public-bot therefore marks every crawled tool rejected: most have no grant at all.

policy compile evaluates every currently exposed qualified tool, fingerprints the crawled tool contract, and writes canonical JSON with private permissions and atomic replacement. Each tool appears exactly once in the bundle; a duplicated catalog row fails compilation instead of shipping. The bundle carries a collision-safe graph_state: {instance_id, generation} plus governance and catalog digests. Toolgraph still does not claim that it blocked a call: a gateway consumes the bundle, chooses review or strict behavior, and records the enforcement action (ADR-0010). Re-run ingest-manifest before compilation when upgrading a graph that predates the governance-digest field.

Artifact workflows

These commands exchange files with other systems, so each needs an input the step-by-step block does not produce:

• <run-id> is the run identifier of the orchestrator that will run the agent (SyncMill, or any stable string you use to correlate the run).
• <control-plan.json> is a body-free toolgraph.control-plan document written by an orchestrator such as SyncMill. The repository ships a valid sample at contracts/fixtures/control-plan-v1.json.
• <report.json> is a Tracegraph review-candidate report. The vendored sample is contracts/tracegraph/v1.json. <candidate-id> is printed by review-candidates list.

# advisory run artifact for syncmill/tracegraph correlation
uv run toolgraph preflight public-bot filesystem::read_file filesystem::list_directory \
  --profile review --run-id <run-id> --out preflight.json

# body-free orchestration topology + principal/tool-surface preflight
uv run toolgraph control-preflight <control-plan.json> \
  --profile review --out control-preflight.json

# human review of Tracegraph T3 findings (no graph or policy mutation)
uv run toolgraph review-candidates list <report.json>
uv run toolgraph review-candidates annotate <report.json> <candidate-id> \
  --status accepted --reviewer operator --note "manual policy review approved"

# accepted evidence -> current-policy work plan (still no policy mutation)
uv run toolgraph policy review-plan <report.json> --agent public-bot \
  --profile review --output policy-review-plan.json

The two samples name principals and tools that the base example graph does not contain, so against it they produce advisory_warn and a review-plan row whose current reason is TOOL_NOT_FOUND. They show the commands work; real inputs come from the orchestrator and Tracegraph runs against your own fleet.

preflight wraps the same deterministic selector rules and stamps the result with a bracketed graph_generation. It remains advisory: rejected candidates produce decision: advisory_warn and exit 0. Unknown agents produce unresolved_identity, never a false allow. Resource URIs in evidence are scrubbed of userinfo and query strings before the artifact is written. Pass --features only when the consumer needs the full selector feature rows. With --out the artifact is written privately and atomically, and the command prints a result envelope carrying artifact_digest — the SHA-256 of the exact file bytes in the ecosystem's sha256:<hex> form, so a run report can record the value as-is and a consumer can verify it with sha256sum. Digests cover bytes, not parsed JSON: a consumer that re-serializes the artifact is hashing a different document. Without --out the artifact itself goes to stdout. SyncMill P3.1 may enforce this evidence before orchestration, but the producer artifact and Toolgraph exit-code contract remain advisory (ADR-0008).

control-preflight accepts a versioned, body-free upper-bound control graph. It checks one start and end, reachability, acyclicity, terminal paths, bounded model fan-out, and aggregate call/parallel limits. It then evaluates every declared principal and qualified candidate tool inside one collision-safe graph_state bracket. The canonical private result is still advisory and exits successfully for policy or structural warnings; an orchestrator such as SyncMill decides whether those warnings block a run. Prompts, outputs, patches, credentials, commands, memory bodies, and filesystem paths do not belong in either exchange artifact. Toolgraph does not execute, persist, resume, or observe the declared workflow (ADR-0013).

review-candidates is the G3 human-review boundary (ADR-0009). It consumes Tracegraph's body-free schema-v1 report and projects only run_id, versioned pattern identity, qualified tool_key, and the analyzed artifact digest. Unknown additive v1 fields are discarded; unknown major versions fail closed. The original report is never edited. annotate appends open / accepted / dismissed events to <REPORT>.toolgraph-review.json, bound to the SHA-256 of the exact report bytes and written under a local lock with atomic replacement. The sidecar path is resolved before load, lock, and replacement so symlink aliases cannot split history. Successful replacement fsyncs both the file and its parent directory where the platform supports it. Local review notes may cite paths but reject credential-shaped content. If a genuine parent-directory fsync error occurs after replacement, the event remains successful and visible while a durability warning is written to stderr; retrying would append a duplicate event.

Candidate ids use the same exact-tuple UUIDv5 as SyncMill's merged board import-review-candidates consumer (SyncMill PR #57), so the two human review surfaces can be correlated without sharing storage. Their states remain independent: Toolgraph accepted is only a policy-review disposition. It does not complete a SyncMill board item, modify governance, change selector output, or increment graph_generation.

policy review-plan is the explicit next step after acceptance (ADR-0012). It selects only currently accepted candidates, evaluates their qualified tool keys against one agent/profile, binds the result to the current graph instance and generation, and writes a private atomic work-plan artifact. It deliberately sets decision_mode: "human_required" and automatic_change: false: an operator still edits the governance manifest, runs ingest-manifest, reviews the resulting decision/blast radius, and then runs policy compile. Trace evidence never grants, denies, or creates an exception by itself.

Configuration and .env

The runtime config file is chosen in this order:

1. toolgraph --config PATH <command> (a global option, before the subcommand). A file that is missing or unreadable is a usage error, exit 2.
2. TOOLGRAPH_CONFIG.
3. .toolgraph/config.json in the working directory, which toolgraph init writes.

Besides the required "schema_version": 1, the file holds only the backend and the Ladybug database path. With --config, the file decides both and TOOLGRAPH_BACKEND / TOOLGRAPH_DB_PATH are ignored. Without it, either variable fills in a value the file does not have, and a variable that disagrees with the file stops the command (exit 1):

ERROR: conflicting backend configuration (.toolgraph/config.json): TOOLGRAPH_BACKEND=neo4j but the config file says ladybug. Pass --config to choose the file, or unset the variable.

The TOOLGRAPH_DB_PATH form reads TOOLGRAPH_DB_PATH=... but the config file says .... Backend names are compared ignoring case and surrounding spaces, and paths after resolving them, so equivalent spellings are not a conflict. --help still works under a conflict, and doctor reports it as a FAIL. toolgraph init is not blocked, because it writes the file that settles the question, but plain init writes ladybug: with TOOLGRAPH_BACKEND=neo4j still set, the conflict remains. Use init --backend neo4j, or remove the variable. When it comes from .env, unsetting it in the shell is not enough: the next command loads it again, so edit .env.

With no file and no variables, the backend is neo4j at NEO4J_URI (default bolt://localhost:7687). That is why a command run outside an initialized directory tries to reach Neo4j. toolgraph init defaults to Ladybug, with its database at .toolgraph/toolgraph.lbug.

NEO4J_URI, NEO4J_USER, NEO4J_PASSWORD, NEO4J_DATABASE, and the default input paths TOOLGRAPH_SERVERS / TOOLGRAPH_GOVERNANCE (used when crawl --servers / ingest-manifest --governance is omitted) always come from the environment, with or without --config.

The CLI loads .env from the working directory before every subcommand, serve included. It never overrides a variable that is already set, and a TOOLGRAPH_CONFIG inside it is honored. Importing toolgraph as a library does not read .env.

Exit codes

Per ADR-0003 this table is a contract: query commands reserve stdout for their JSON (diagnostics go to stderr) and exit 0 by default — gating is opt-in.

An error outside these classes, such as a rejected Neo4j password, exits 1 with a Python traceback instead of an ERROR: line.

A typo'd name exits 2 under --fail-on-deny so it can't pass a CI gate as a clean run.

Note for CI scripts: exit 2 is overloaded. Click uses 2 for usage errors (a bad flag or parameter), and --fail-on-deny uses 2 for not-found/ambiguous verdicts. The two are indistinguishable by exit code alone — a gate that must tell them apart should also check stderr (verdict trips print the JSON verdict on stdout first; usage errors print click's usage text).

Distinguishing what the graph doesn't know

• check-access verdicts include AGENT_NOT_FOUND (the agent string matches no Agent node — typo or deleted agent) and TOOL_NOT_FOUND. The two are not collapsed into NOT_GRANTED, so an operator iterating on names can tell which case they're in. Every response carries agent_found: bool and found for the tool — True/False when tool resolution ran, and null on the AGENT_NOT_FOUND branch (the tool was not looked up). Callers should use result.get("found") so the three-state shape doesn't trip indexing.
• When verdict: "DENY", the response also carries all_authorized: bool — true when every deny_evidence row is authorized_but_governed (an operator-declared exception). Lets a caller detect "DENY only because of by-design grants" without aggregating per-row classifications.
• blast-radius returns found: false when the node argument matches no Resource or Policy. A typo'd URI is no longer indistinguishable from impacted: []. blast-radius accepts a URI-shaped argument as either a resource URI or a policy id — if the lexical URI pattern matches no Resource node, it retries against Policy ids before declaring not-found (so a policy id like urn:secret or mailto:ops works as a node).
• unsafe-tools (CLI) and the unsafe_callable_tools MCP tool both default to classification='violation' only; pass --all (CLI) or include_authorized: true (MCP) to see operator-declared exceptions too. Neither lets a typo'd agent look like an agent with zero unsafe tools: the MCP tool carries agent_found: false, and the CLI prints AGENT_NOT_FOUND on stderr and exits 1.

Result classification

unsafe-tools and check-access results carry a classification:

• violation — the agent reaches a DENY-governed resource and the operator has not declared the reach intentional.
• authorized_but_governed — operator declared expected_exceptions in the manifest covering this (agent, tool, resource?, policy); the row carries the operator's stated exception_reason.

This replaces the bare "unsafe" framing: review tooling can filter to violation rows and stop drowning reviewers in by-design grants.

Provenance on every edge

Each edge — crawled or authored — carries source (crawled | operator_asserted | inferred), confidence (high | medium | low), and evidence (free-text pointer: URL, ticket id, commit SHA, source location — prefer symbol anchors like path/to/file.py::Class.method over file:line, which rots as the cited source evolves). Queries surface this on every result so a reviewer can see whether a DENY verdict rests on a crawled fact or an unverified assertion:

data_access:
  - tool: "memtomem-stm::langchain__search_docs_by_lang_chain"
    resource: "memory:claude:toolgraph"
    mode: READS
    provenance:
      source: inferred
      confidence: high
      evidence: "memtomem_stm/proxy/manager.py::ProxyManager._apply_surfacing -> memtomem_stm/surfacing/engine.py::SurfacingEngine.surface"

governed_by bindings carry their own provenance — why this resource is under this policy, which is often a different citation from the data-flow edge. Bare-string entries are still accepted (no evidence, equivalent to the old shape); add an object item to cite the binding's source:

governed_by:
  "memory:claude:toolgraph":
    - policy: operator-ltm-confidentiality
      provenance:
        source: operator_asserted
        evidence: "~/.memtomem/config.json (namespace.rules)"
  "file:///srv/app/.env": [secrets-deny]   # bare string — no evidence

When a DENY fires via a resource path, the result row includes both provenance (the data-flow edge that put the row in front of you) and policy_provenance (the binding evidence, attached only when the author cited one).

Tool annotations are self-claims, not facts

The crawler stores MCP tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) as Tool-node properties on the same crawl pass that owns the node, and clears any hint the server stops sending (ADR-0006).

Their provenance is crawled / medium — deliberately one tier below EXPOSES/PROVIDES (high). "The server advertised this tool" is protocol-observable; "this tool is read-only" is the server's own unverified claim about itself, and a lying or sloppy server can hint anything. Letting hints launder into the same confidence tier as protocol facts would defeat the provenance model.

Annotations never auto-create READS/WRITES/GOVERNED_BY edges — they only feed two audit queries that join self-claims against authored truth:

• destructive-unsafeguarded — tools hinting destructive with no GOVERNED_BY path at all (direct or via any resource they touch). An authoring priority queue at zero authoring cost, not a verdict.
• annotation-contradictions — authored WRITES edges on tools hinting readOnlyHint: true. One side is wrong; each row cites both provenances (the hint's crawl pass, the authored edge's evidence pointer) and the operator picks the stronger evidence.

Selector surface (deterministic, ADR-0005)

toolgraph can serve tool selection as a context-engineering layer: shrink a candidate catalog deterministically before any relevance ranker sees it (ADR-0005, background in the report). Three batch-first entry points (CLI + MCP) run a fixed number of queries regardless of candidate count — per-candidate check-access calls scale linearly, which is unacceptable on the online path:

• rank-features AGENT CANDIDATES… — per-candidate facts in input order: resolution (found / ambiguous / tool_key), grant, verdict, DENY classification + evidence paths, drift, mapping, evidence coverage, the four annotation self-claims, and a rule-based risk_score from this fixed table (first match wins): 1.0 DENY violation · 0.8 drifted · 0.6 unmapped · 0.4 unbacked load-bearing edge · 0.2 authorized_but_governed · 0.0 otherwise.

• eligible-tools AGENT CANDIDATES… --profile strict — hard filter with reject reasons and policy-evidence paths. Profiles are named rule sets, not learned thresholds:

  Profile	Use	Rejects
  strict (default)	production agents	everything but a clean, fully-authored ALLOW: not-found / ambiguous / not-granted / any DENY / drifted / unmapped
  review	human-in-the-loop	not-found / ambiguous / not-granted / DENY violations / drifted (operator exceptions and unmapped pass)
  explore	offline eval / sandbox	not-found / ambiguous / not-granted / drifted only

• selection-explain AGENT TOOL — compact human-readable reasons for one decision, for operators and end users.

Hard boundary: no relevance scoring, no learning, ever — those belong to the consumer. A learned model may rerank the eligible list but may never override a hard reject (NOT_GRANTED, violation, drifted). Ambiguous bare names are never auto-resolved — the consumer must re-submit the server-qualified key. An unknown agent returns agent_found: false (CLI: AGENT_NOT_FOUND on stderr, exit 1): selection should abort, because a typo'd agent is a context-construction error, not an empty catalog.

MCP responses carry graph_generation (ADR-0004) so consumers can cache features per graph state. Cache identity is the pair (graph_instance_id, graph_generation), not the integer alone: generations restart with the graph.

A response also carries graph_state_verified. It is true when the read was bracketed by a stable graph state, and false when the graph moved under every retry — in which case all three state fields are null:

{"graph_generation": null, "graph_instance_id": null,
 "graph_state": null, "graph_state_verified": false}

An unverified response is still the answer to your question, but it must not be cached and must not be attributed to a graph state. Nothing enforces that for you: null is a usable dictionary key and two unverified responses compare equal on it. A consumer that turns eligibility into an authorization decision should reject or retry rather than proceed on one.

If the graph backend is temporarily unavailable, every MCP tool returns isError: true with a typed structuredContent envelope instead of exposing driver-specific text:

{
  "error_kind": "backend_unavailable",
  "retryable": true,
  "message": "Toolgraph backend is temporarily unavailable; retry later."
}

Only this exact discriminator is an availability signal. Validation, configuration, query-contract, and unexpected failures keep the normal MCP error behavior and should fail loud. Successful CLI output and Python result shapes are unchanged; only the exception type surfaced on an outage differs (see below).

Outages are typed once at the backend seam — driver.session() and verify_connectivity() raise BackendUnavailableError — so the server layer never inspects driver-specific exception types. retryable is read from the annotations the server actually advertises for that tool, rather than assumed: every current tool is a pure graph read. Anything else fails closed to retryable: false — a tool that does not advertise readOnlyHint, an unknown tool, and any case where the annotations cannot be read at all. Treat retryable: false as "do not assume a retry is safe", not as proof that the operation writes.

API change for embedders. Because outages are typed at that seam, code calling driver.session() or verify_connectivity() directly now sees BackendUnavailableError where it previously saw neo4j.exceptions ServiceUnavailable, SessionExpired, ConnectionAcquisitionTimeoutError, or DatabaseUnavailable. Catch BackendUnavailableError (or its BackendLockedError subclass) instead; the original driver exception is preserved as __cause__. Configuration, authentication, and Cypher/client errors are untouched, as is the still-raw get_driver() escape hatch. Note that is_backend_unavailable() narrowed with it: it classifies only BackendUnavailableError, so exceptions raised straight out of get_driver() no longer answer yes. Route retry-sensitive calls through driver.session().

Wiring the shipped consumer (memtomem-stm)

The first consumer of this surface is the memtomem-stm proxy (memtomem-stm#465): at startup it consults eligible_tools + rank_features over MCP stdio (toolgraph serve) and feeds the verdicts into its tool-exposure hard filter. The gate exhibit carries the consumer's default agent_id (stm-proxy) as a wiring fixture, so the consult path is demoable against the exhibit graph. Load it first with the gate demo's crawl and ingest-manifest commands under Quickstart: ingesting examples/governance.yaml afterwards, as the step-by-step block does, replaces the gate governance and removes stm-proxy.

uv run toolgraph eligible-tools stm-proxy \
  "memtomem-stm::langchain__search_docs_by_lang_chain" --profile strict
# -> rejected: DENY_GOVERNED (fail closed — the consumer's production default)
uv run toolgraph eligible-tools stm-proxy \
  "memtomem-stm::langchain__search_docs_by_lang_chain" --profile review
# -> eligible (the operator-declared exception passes under review)

Live wiring differs from the exhibit in one important way: the proxy builds candidate refs as "<upstream-connection-name>::<raw-tool-name>" from its own upstream config, while the exhibit crawls the proxy itself (server memtomem-stm, prefixed tool names like langchain__…). For a live deployment, crawl the proxy's upstreams directly so graph server names match the STM connection keys — or map them in the consumer's config:

"toolgraph": {
  "enabled": true,
  "agent_id": "stm-proxy",
  "query_profile": "strict",
  "server_name_map": { "docs-langchain": "langchain-docs" }
}

("docs-langchain" is the STM upstream connection key; "langchain-docs" is the name that upstream was crawled under in this graph.) Refs that don't resolve come back TOOL_NOT_FOUND and are handled by the consumer's on_tool_not_found knob — if every candidate is rejected as not-found, the name mapping (not governance) is what's wrong.

toolgraph as an MCP server

toolgraph exposes its governance and audit queries as MCP tools, so an agent can ask the registry about itself over the same protocol toolgraph crawls:

uv run toolgraph serve            # stdio
uv run toolgraph serve --http     # streamable-http

All thirteen tools are pure graph reads and advertise readOnlyHint / idempotentHint. Each one has a CLI counterpart, though names, flags and result shapes do not always match:

Every successful MCP result also carries graph_generation, graph_instance_id, graph_state and graph_state_verified (see the selector section above); of the CLI counterparts in this table, only audit-report prints them, and only in its JSON format. For an unknown agent, the selector tools return agent_found: false over MCP, where the CLI exits 1. An unknown profile or more than 4096 candidates is a tool error carrying the message over MCP and a usage error (exit 2) on the CLI.

The other commands have no MCP tool: example init, init, init-schema, check, doctor, crawl, ingest-manifest, reset, serve, preflight, control-preflight, policy compile / review-plan / propose, and review-candidates list / annotate.

Inputs

• servers.yaml — MCP servers to crawl (stdio command/args, or a url for streamable-http; sse is accepted for legacy servers that predate it).
• governance.yaml — authored agents, policies, CAN_CALL grants, READS/WRITES data access, GOVERNED_BY mappings, and expected_exceptions for intentional DENY-zone reach. Per-edge provenance is optional everywhere. See examples/.

Two reference exhibits:

• examples/servers-gate.yaml + governance-gate.yaml — the 2-server wedge demo (memtomem + memtomem-stm). Proves toolgraph composes cross-server reach a vector registry of tool descriptions cannot.
• examples/servers-fleet.yaml + governance-fleet.yaml — a 7-server fleet (the two above + filesystem, fetch, memory, sequential-thinking, time) with minimal but real governance. Validates that per-server authoring is minute-scale, not hour-scale. (Caveat: the original single-pass took ~48s because the author had already read the surfacing-engine source for the gate exhibit; an unfamiliar operator on unfamiliar servers should plan for 2–5 minutes per server.)

Layout

toolgraph/
  cli.py                the `toolgraph` command (commands: see the CLI/MCP table above)
  config.py             config file, environment and .env resolution
  health.py             `doctor` checks
  crawler/              connect to MCP servers (stdio, streamable-http, legacy sse), enumerate tools/resources
  manifest/             parse + ingest authored governance (idempotent, with --dry-run)
  graph/
    driver.py           backend lifecycle for Ladybug and Neo4j
    schema.py           Neo4j constraints / Ladybug tables and the schema version
    loader.py           idempotent load of crawl results
    queries.py          governance and audit queries
    selector.py         deterministic selector surface (ADR-0005)
    store.py            graph ports used by the policy services
  server/               MCP server exposing the queries as MCP tools
  preflight.py          advisory preflight artifact
  control_plan.py       control-plan validation and control-preflight
  policy_bundle.py      policy bundle compiler
  policy_review.py      accepted trace evidence -> policy review plan
  policy_propose.py     grant proposals from observed gateway usage
  review_candidates.py  Tracegraph review-candidate intake and annotations
  artifacts.py          canonical JSON, private atomic writes, digests
  artifact_safety.py    evidence scrubbing and artifact identity checks
  redaction.py          credential-free labels for endpoints and diagnostics
  models.py             pydantic models for crawl results and authored governance
  errors.py             errors whose message is safe to return to a caller
  uris.py               resource-URI canonicalization
  yaml_loader.py        fail-closed YAML loading
  quickstart/           files `toolgraph example init` copies out
contracts/              JSON Schemas for the exchanged artifacts, their fixtures, vendored Tracegraph contract
examples/               crawl targets and manifests for the repository demos (see examples/README.md)
scripts/                demos, smoke harnesses, release and dependency-audit helpers
docs/                   guides, ADRs, release runbook
tests/

Tests

uv run pytest          # uses a real Neo4j via testcontainers (no Cypher mocking)
make test-unit         # the tests that need no Docker (-m "not neo4j")

Scope

Toolgraph stays an advisory analyzer. In: factual crawl, authored governance with per-edge provenance (including per-governed_by-binding), reachability and audit queries over the result, violation vs operator-exception classification, found flags so unknown nodes are distinguishable from empty results, a deterministic selector, and portable artifacts (policy bundle, preflight, control preflight, review plan) that other systems act on.

Idempotency is fully declarative: ingest-manifest re-applies authored edges (CAN_CALL/READS/WRITES/GOVERNED_BY) AND prunes Agent + Policy nodes the manifest no longer mentions, so renaming a policy in YAML does not leave the old Policy node behind. Stale prov_* properties on Policy nodes from earlier shapes are also cleaned at re-ingest.

Expected-exception validation enforces a full reachability invariant — the operator can't declare an exception that fails to classify any row (typo'd agent, no CAN_CALL grant, resource not governed by the policy, or a wildcard exception with no tool→policy path are all caught at ingest with a clear warning).

Still deferred (no plan to start until use proves them out): LLM-inferred dependency/version edges, vector search, an official-registry importer, and runtime enforcement. toolgraph remains an analyzer; the runtime-enforcement wedge belongs to gateways like Kong.

Contributing, security, and license

• Contributing: CONTRIBUTING.md — development setup, pull-request conventions, and the Contributor License Agreement.
• CLA: CLA.md. Signing is one-time per GitHub account per repository; the workflow comments on your first pull request with instructions.
• Code of conduct: CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md — applies to issues, pull requests and discussions.
• Security: SECURITY.md — please use private vulnerability reporting rather than a public issue.
• License: Apache License 2.0 — see LICENSE. Copyright 2025-2026 DAPADA Inc. and memtomem contributors.