turbopress 0.3.0

Certified low-bit LLM weight quantization: rotation + quarter-power equilibration + trellis-coded quantization, with a KL/top-1/perplexity measurement harness.

turbopress

A production-quality research prototype of TurboPress: a post-training LLM weight-quantization pipeline built on, and measured against, the primitives of TurboQuant (arXiv:2504.19874) (randomized rotation -> optimal scalar quantization -> QJL residual sketch).

Two development rounds, both driven by measurement:

• Round 1 (stage 4 test): does TurboQuant's unbiased QJL residual correction pay off for weights? No — refuted synthetically and on a real pretrained model (details below).
• Round 2 (beyond TurboQuant): three methods that beat the TurboQuant-style scalar baseline at equal bits — trellis-coded quantization (TCQ) with data-free trellis-optimized codebooks, and rotation-aware equilibration with a corrected optimal scaling rule. Verdict tables below.
• Round 3 (scale-up + error feedback + mixed precision): the pipeline moved to the GPU and a bigger model (Qwen3-0.6B); added GPTQ/LDLQ error feedback (Hessian-aware sequential rounding, the biggest known PTQ gain the pipeline was missing); and added per-layer bit allocation by measured KL sensitivity. Results immediately below.

Paper

TurboPress: A Measurement-Driven Study of Rotated Low-Bit Weight Quantization — Equilibration Exponents, Error Feedback, and Per-Layer Bit Allocation. Godson Johnson. Preprint — read it here: paper/turbopress_preprint.pdf (figures regenerate from the raw result logs via paper/make_figures.py).

Abstract. We present TurboPress, an instrumented post-training quantization (PTQ) pipeline for LLM weights, with controlled A/B measurements that isolate the contribution of each design choice at exactly matched bit budgets. Building on incoherence processing (QuIP/QuaRot/QuIP#/QTIP) and on the rotation + optimal-quantizer construction of TurboQuant, TurboPress combines a seeded randomized orthogonal rotation, trellis-coded quantization with data-free trellis-optimized codebooks, GPTQ/LDLQ error feedback, and per-layer bit allocation. The contributions are primarily empirical and analytical rather than a new state of the art: (i) a corrected rotation-aware equilibration exponent — in the weight-only, post-rotation regime the optimal per-channel fold is a quarter power s_j = (E[x_j²]/‖W_:,j‖²)^(1/4), distinct from the AWQ/SmoothQuant square root and from BASE-Q's weight–activation balance; (ii) a rigorous negative result that unbiased (QJL-style) residual correction, while provably debiasing, loses to a finer deterministic quantizer at equal budget for weights; and (iii) an end-to-end measurement on Qwen3-0.6B showing error feedback and trellis coding are complementary (trellis wins at 2 bits; both near-lossless at 4 bits), and that KL-sensitivity-driven mixed precision beats uniform precision at an equal 3.0-bit budget.

Contributions

1. Corrected equilibration exponent (Proposition 1). Under a rotation-based quantizer whose error is isotropic in the rotated basis, the expected output error factorizes as (Σⱼ cⱼ sⱼ²)(Σⱼ mⱼ/sⱼ²) with cⱼ = ‖W_:,j‖², mⱼ = E[x_j²]; Cauchy–Schwarz gives the optimum sⱼ = (mⱼ/cⱼ)^(1/4) — a quarter power, not the square root used by AWQ/SmoothQuant, arising from a different objective than the 1/2 power BASE-Q derives for the joint weight+activation setting.
2. Error feedback in rotated coordinates. GPTQ/LDLQ implemented in the rotated, equilibrated basis via a fast transform of the activation Hessian H_z = R D⁻¹ H D⁻¹ Rᵀ; cuts 2-bit KL 5.0× and 3-bit KL 5.3× over nearest at ~3× lower cost than TCQ, and gptq 3b beats nearest 4b (a full bit saved).
3. Per-layer bit allocation. A measured KL-sensitivity probe plus a greedy budget knapsack beats uniform precision at an equal 3.0-bit budget (KL 0.238 vs 0.276).
4. A refuted hypothesis. Unbiased QJL residual correction for weights loses to deterministic quantization at equal budget, both synthetically and on a real model; the correction's variance exceeds the bias it removes.

Install & CLI

pip install "turbopress[llm]"          # torch + transformers + datasets
# or, from a clone:  pip install -e ".[dev,llm]"

# quantize every decoder linear and write a certified, self-contained artifact
turbopress compress Qwen/Qwen3-4B --bits 3 --out ./out

# measure KL / top-1 agreement / perplexity between any two HF-loadable models
turbopress validate Qwen/Qwen3-4B ./out/Qwen3-4B-turbopress-3bit --out report.json

The full pipeline lives in turbopress/pipeline.py (compress()); the notebook cell scripts/turbopress_onecell.py and the turbopress compress CLI share that one validated code path. Docs: mkdocs serve (see docs/).

Round 3 results (Qwen3-0.6B, GPU, all 196 block linears quantized)

Token-level metrics vs the fp16 model (perplexity 29.11) on 4,096 tokens of real text; equilibration + Hessians calibrated on a disjoint 2,048-token slice. Run: python -m turbopress.real_model --model Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B (RTX 5050, 8 GB).

config	bits/w	KL(fp||q)	top-1	ppl
nearest 2b (TurboQuant-style)	2.012	10.282	0.020	564,874
nearest 3b	3.013	1.641	0.381	138.7
nearest 4b	4.013	0.399	0.670	43.9
tcq 2b S=64 +eq	2.023	1.215	0.450	91.4
tcq 3b S=64 +eq	3.023	0.289	0.710	38.6
tcq 4b S=64 +eq	4.023	0.079	0.843	30.6
gptq 2b +eq (error feedback)	2.023	2.072	0.383	177.1
gptq 3b +eq (error feedback)	3.023	0.312	0.707	36.3
gptq 4b +eq (error feedback)	4.023	0.095	0.844	30.5

Headlines:

• The 4-bit "invisible" claim sharpens with scale, as predicted. On 135M the best 4-bit model was +8.1% perplexity over fp (15.2 vs 14.06); on 0.6B it is +4.6–5.2% (30.5–30.6 vs 29.11) at KL ≈ 0.08–0.10. Bigger model, smaller relative loss — 4-bit is effectively lossless here.
• 2-bit improves meaningfully with scale. The 2-bit perplexity ratio to fp drops from 8.3× on 135M (116 / 14.06) to 3.1× on 0.6B (91.4 / 29.11) for the same tcq+eq method.
• Error feedback is a large, cheap win over the biased baseline. GPTQ/LDLQ cuts 2-bit KL from 10.28 → 2.07 (5.0×) and 3-bit KL from 1.641 → 0.312 (5.3×) vs plain nearest rounding, at ~3× lower quantization cost than TCQ (79 s vs 246 s for the whole model). gptq 3b beats nearest 4b (KL 0.312 vs 0.399) — a full bit saved from error feedback alone.
• Trellis vs error feedback are complementary. At 3–4 bits they are a statistical tie (tcq slightly better KL, gptq slightly better ppl); at the hardest 2-bit setting the joint trellis code still wins clearly (KL 1.22 vs 2.07), because that is where scalar codebook granularity hurts most. The obvious next step is to combine them (block-LDLQ over the trellis, QuIP#/ QTIP-style) rather than pick one.

GPTQ / LDLQ error feedback (gptq.py)

Nearest rounding leaves each layer's output error as a fixed bias with no cross-channel cancellation. LDLQ (QuIP) / GPTQ quantize the input channels sequentially and feed each channel's rounding error forward into the not-yet-quantized channels, weighted by the layer's input Hessian H = E[x x^T], minimizing tr((W − Ŵ) H (W − Ŵ)^T) rather than raw weight MSE. Crucially this runs in the pipeline's rotated, equilibrated coordinates — the random rotation is exactly the incoherence preprocessing that makes LDLQ effective — via rotated_hessian, which forms H_z = R D^-1 H D^-1 R^T with the same fast transform R and equilibration folds D as the quantized layer. The stored form and bit accounting are identical to the plain scalar path; only the codeword each weight rounds to changes.

Per-layer bit allocation by measured KL sensitivity (allocate.py)

Layers are not equally sensitive, so a uniform bit-width wastes budget. For every quantized linear and each candidate width (2/3/4 bits) we quantize only that layer and measure the resulting KL(fp‖quant) — a direct, model-faithful sensitivity signal — then greedily spend a fixed average budget on the upgrades with the best KL-drop-per-added-bit. Run: python -m turbopress.allocate --model Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B --targets 2.5,3.0.

Mean single-layer 2-bit KL by projection type (why allocation helps): the MLP projections dominate sensitivity, attention q/k are nearly free.

down_proj	up_proj	gate_proj	o_proj	v_proj	q_proj	k_proj
0.0088	0.0080	0.0062	0.0047	0.0047	0.0025	0.0016

Allocation vs uniform (TCQ+eq, Qwen3-0.6B, fp ppl 29.11):

budget	model	bits/w	KL(fp||q)	top-1	ppl	mix (2/3/4 bit layers)
3.0 (equal)	mixed	3.023	0.238	0.723	34.8	24 / 149 / 23
3.0 (equal)	uniform 3b	3.023	0.276	0.700	36.6	0 / 196 / 0
2.5	mixed	2.523	0.494	0.609	44.8	101 / 91 / 4
—	uniform 2b	2.023	1.386	0.416	105.2	196 / 0 / 0

• Equal-budget win: at exactly 3.0 bits/weight, allocating unevenly by measured KL sensitivity beats uniform 3-bit — 14% lower KL (0.238 vs 0.276) and 5% lower perplexity — by moving 24 insensitive layers down to 2-bit and 23 sensitive ones up to 4-bit.
• Fractional budgets: 2.5 bits/weight (impossible with a uniform integer width) lands KL 0.494, roughly one third of the way from uniform-2b (1.386) to uniform-3b — i.e. a half-bit spent well recovers most of the 2→3-bit gain.

Mixed precision is an established idea; here it is a measured system feature, and the sensitivity table above is a reusable diagnostic (MLP-heavy sensitivity is consistent with the wider literature).

TurboPress v2 results (SmolLM2-135M, all 210 block linears quantized)

Token-level metrics vs the fp32 model (perplexity 14.06) on 4,096 tokens of real text; equilibration is calibrated on a disjoint 2,048-token slice:

config	bits/w	KL(fp||q)	top-1 agree	ppl
nearest 3b (TurboQuant-style)	3.024	1.647	0.381	74.6
tcq 3b S=64	3.024	1.048	0.471	39.4
tcq 3b S=64 + equil	3.046	0.319	0.700	18.5
nearest 2b (TurboQuant-style)	2.024	9.188	0.011	145,393
tcq 2b S=64	2.024	7.322	0.032	24,293
tcq 2b S=64 + equil	2.046	2.052	0.325	116.1
tcq 4b S=64 + equil	4.047	0.079	0.844	15.2

Headlines, all at (essentially) equal bit budgets:

• 2 bits: perplexity 145,393 -> 116 (a ~1250x improvement over the TurboQuant-style scalar quantizer), KL 4.5x lower.
• 3 bits: KL 5.2x lower; the 3-bit combined method beats the plain 4-bit baseline (KL 0.32 vs 0.40, ppl 18.5 vs 20.5) — a full bit saved.
• 4 bits: ppl 15.2 vs fp32's 14.06 on a 135M model (the hardest size to quantize) — approaching "no visible loss" territory before any error feedback or recovery distillation.

The three beyond-TurboQuant methods

1. TCQ over rotated coordinates (trellis.py): TurboQuant's scalar quantizer is near-optimal only in the memoryless class; trellis-coded quantization (Marcellin & Fischer 1990; QTIP 2024) codes whole rows jointly via Viterbi over an Ungerboeck-partitioned doubled codebook, attacking the ~2.7x gap to the rate-distortion bound. 8.8-27% lower distortion on N(0,1) at 2-3 bits; storage is exactly bits/weight (1 path bit + bits-1 member bits; proven by an encode->decode round-trip test).
2. Data-free trellis-optimized codebooks: the Lloyd-Max codebook is not optimal under a trellis. Because the rotation makes the coordinate distribution known (~N(0,1)), generalized Lloyd with Viterbi assignments runs offline on synthetic Gaussians — no calibration data, deterministic, cached.
3. Rotation-aware equilibration (linear.py): the AWQ/SmoothQuant fold s_j = sqrt(E[x_j^2]) is provably suboptimal under a rotation-based quantizer. Rotation spreads quantization error uniformly, so the output error factorizes as (sum_j c_j s_j^2)(sum_j m_j / s_j^2) with c_j = ||W_col_j||^2, m_j = E[x_j^2]; Cauchy-Schwarz gives the optimum s_j = (m_j / c_j)^(1/4). Empirically ~3x more effective than the sqrt fold; this is the pipeline's only data-dependent stage.

---

Round 1: the QJL-for-weights hypothesis (refuted)

Weight PTQ methods (GPTQ, QuIP#, QTIP, ...) round deterministically, so each layer's output error is a fixed bias. The hypothesis: biases compound through depth worse than zero-mean noise, so spending bits on a QJL sketch that makes each layer's output unbiased should beat spending the same bits on a finer deterministic quantizer.

What the experiments say (seed 0, python -m turbopress.harness)

Single layer (d = 1024, per-output-row sketches, 24 trials)

config	bits/w	rel RMSE	rel bias
nearest 4b	4.016	0.097	0.097
nearest 3b	3.016	0.185	0.185
nearest 2b	2.016	0.342	0.342
stochastic 2b	2.016	0.435	0.224
2b + QJL k=d/8	2.156	1.211	0.247
2b + QJL k=d (=3b)	3.031	0.428	0.087

The theory is confirmed exactly: at an equal ~3-bit budget the QJL correction cuts systematic error by 2.1x (0.185 -> 0.087), and the measured noise matches the analytical variance (pi/2)(d/k) * MSE_2b to within a few percent.

Depth compounding (16-layer ReLU chain + classifier head, fully quantized)

config	bits/w	err@L1	err@L16	KL(fp||q)	top-1 agree
nearest 3b	3.031	0.181	0.50	0.096	0.98
nearest 2b	2.031	0.328	0.76	0.216	0.36
stochastic 2b	2.031	0.413	0.72	0.199	0.19
2b + QJL k=d (=3b)	3.063	0.407	2.29	2.581	0.01
2b + QJL k=d/8	2.188	1.121	1681.79	6023.61	0.00

(isotropic activations shown; the anisotropic run is nearly identical.)

Real pretrained model, round-1 sweep (SmolLM2-135M)

Token-level metrics vs the fp32 model on 4,096 tokens of real text (fp32 perplexity 13.85 in this run; the QJL/stochastic configs remain runnable via LEGACY_CONFIGS in real_model.py):

config	bits/w	KL(fp||q)	top-1 agree	ppl
nearest 4b	4.024	0.431	0.639	21.2
nearest 3b	3.024	1.717	0.364	82.9
nearest 2b	2.024	9.094	0.010	138336
stochastic 2b	2.024	11.427	0.028	1454608
2b + QJL k=d/8	2.172	14.444	0.003	29663051
2b + QJL k=d (=3b)	3.047	9.750	0.018	293934

Residual connections and RMSNorm do damp the compounding (no synthetic-style blow-up: KL ~10, not ~6000), but the verdict does not flip: at an equal ~3-bit budget the QJL-corrected model (KL 9.75) is ~5.7x worse than plain nearest 3-bit (KL 1.72), and the correction does not even beat uncorrected 2-bit. The absolute numbers also show that rotation + optimal scalar quantization alone is far from usable at <=3 bits on a 135M model (small models are the hardest to quantize) — which is precisely why stages 1, 3, 5, and 6 of the plan (activation-aware scaling, trellis coding, error feedback, recovery distillation) carry the real weight.

Findings — the hypothesis is refuted in this setting

1. The QJL correction removes bias exactly as the theory predicts (unit tests verify unbiasedness and the variance bound statistically), but the variance it adds exceeds the bias it removes. The estimator's noise std is sqrt(pi/2) * ||r|| * ||x|| / sqrt(k); even at k = d (a full extra bit/weight) that is ~1.25x the typical uncorrected error <r, x>, and the deterministic 3-bit quantizer at the same total budget has 2.3x lower output RMSE. Exactly this 2.3x appears in the measurements.
2. Variance compounds worse than bias, not better. The correction noise scales with the norm of the incoming (already-corrupted) activations, which creates multiplicative error feedback through depth: k=d/8 explodes; even k=d loses badly to plain 3-bit at equal budget. Stochastic rounding — the classical unbiased baseline — also fails to beat nearest rounding end-to-end.
3. The random rotation already neutralizes activation structure. Adding a dominant fixed mean direction and low-rank structure to the activations (mimicking LLM massive activations) barely changes any number: the seeded rotation decorrelates quantization residuals from activation structure, so the "systematic bias times a repeated activation pattern" failure mode the correction was designed for does not survive the rotation.

Implication for the TurboPress research plan: the bit budget for weight quantization is better spent on stronger deterministic quantizers (trellis / vector codebooks, i.e. stage 3) plus cross-layer error feedback (stage 5) and light recovery training (stage 6). The QJL correction remains the right tool where TurboQuant proved it — KV-cache / attention inner products, where errors aggregate across many queries and the error path is shallow. A Wiener-shrunk correction (corr * B^2/(B^2+V)) is MSE-optimal but by the same algebra still loses to nearest 3-bit at equal budget; measuring it is a one-line extension.

The synthetic chain is a worst case (no skips, no LayerNorm), so the A/B was escalated to a real pretrained model (table above): compounding is indeed damped by the architecture, but the equal-budget ranking is unchanged. The negative result stands in both settings.

Package layout

• turbopress/hadamard.py — seeded randomized orthogonal transform R (block-diagonal fast Walsh-Hadamard x Rademacher signs; exact dense QR fallback for odd dims). Guarantees (W R^T)(R x) = W x.
• turbopress/codebooks.py — Lloyd-Max optimal scalar codebooks for N(0,1), computed to fixed point in float64 and validated against closed forms.
• turbopress/quantizer.py — row-wise quantization with nearest rounding (+ alternating scale refinement) or stochastic rounding.
• turbopress/trellis.py — trellis-coded quantization: Ungerboeck trellises from standard rate-1/2 convolutional generators, vectorized Viterbi encoding, data-free trellis-optimized codebooks, and decode_levels for the bit-stream round-trip proof.
• turbopress/qjl.py — 1-bit QJL residual sketch; unbiased inner-product estimator with proof and variance bound in the docstring.
• turbopress/gptq.py — GPTQ/LDLQ error feedback for the rotated scalar quantizer: rotated_hessian maps a raw activation Hessian into the rotated/equilibrated coordinates, and ldlq_quantize_rows runs the Hessian-weighted sequential rounding. Reduces to plain nearest rounding when the Hessian is diagonal (proven in tests).
• turbopress/linear.py — QJLCorrectedLinear.from_linear(nn.Linear, bits, sketch_k, seed, rounding, method="scalar"|"tcq", n_states, col_scale, error_feedback, hessian), a drop-in quantized layer with rotation-aware equilibration, optional LDLQ error feedback, and exact bit accounting via storage_report(). Device-agnostic (CPU/CUDA).
• turbopress/allocate.py — per-layer bit allocation: measure_sensitivity probes each layer's KL at each candidate width, allocate_bits does the greedy knapsack under an average-bit budget, build_mixed_model assembles the mixed-precision network; python -m turbopress.allocate runs the full compare vs uniform.
• turbopress/harness.py — the two synthetic experiments; --quick for a smoke run; results saved to results/harness_results.json.
• turbopress/real_model.py — the real-model sweep: quantizes every linear in the decoder blocks of a Hugging Face causal LM (embeddings/head/norms stay fp) and measures KL / top-1 / perplexity against the reference model on real text. Runs on GPU (--device cuda --dtype float16) and any Llama/Qwen-family model; collects calibration scales + Hessians as needed.
• tests/ — 98 tests: exact math identities, statistical unbiasedness and variance-scaling tests with explicit confidence bounds, trellis round-trip and rate-distortion checks (CPU + CUDA), equilibration optimality checks, LDLQ Hessian-loss-reduction and diagonal-Hessian equivalence, greedy allocation properties, module contracts, harness smoke test, and real-model plumbing tests on a tiny in-memory Llama (no download needed).

Usage

import torch
from torch import nn
from turbopress import QJLCorrectedLinear

layer = nn.Linear(4096, 4096)
act_rms = torch.ones(4096)  # sqrt(E[x_j^2]) from your calibration set
qlayer = QJLCorrectedLinear.from_linear(
    layer, bits=2, method="tcq", n_states=64, col_scale=act_rms, seed=0
)
y = qlayer(torch.randn(8, 4096))
print(qlayer.storage_report())  # true bits/weight incl. scales + equil

python -m pytest tests                                    # full suite (98 tests)
python -m turbopress.harness                              # synthetic experiments, ~4 s on CPU
python -m turbopress.real_model --model Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B   # GPU sweep incl. TCQ + GPTQ, ~20 min
python -m turbopress.allocate  --model Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B    # per-layer bit allocation vs uniform
python -m turbopress.ldlq_micro                           # LDLQ vs nearest microbenchmark

One-cell quantizer (Jupyter / server GPU)

scripts/turbopress_onecell.py is a thin notebook cell over the packaged pipeline (from turbopress.pipeline import compress): after pip install "turbopress[llm]" you can paste it into a single cell on a GPU box, or just run turbopress compress <model> --bits 3. Either way it runs the same validated code path and quantizes any Llama/Qwen/Mistral-family HF model with the TurboPress pipeline (rotate -> quarter-power equilibration -> analytic TCQ), validates KL / top-1 / perplexity against fp16 on WikiText-2, logs to console + file, and writes a downloadable artifact: bit-packed weights at true rate, a standalone run_quantized.py loader/demo (with --export-hf to emit a plain fp16 HF checkpoint), tokenizer/config, and measured metrics — plus a zip of the whole folder. Configure via the os.environ.setdefault(...) lines at the top, any TP_* env var, or the turbopress compress flags. Verified end-to-end: the packed artifact reloads to a bitwise-identical model (state-dict compared tensor by tensor in the built-in self-test).

Scope notes

This is a measurement implementation: codes/signs are stored at true widths for accounting, but the forward pass materializes the dequantized weight (in the model dtype) rather than using packed low-bit kernels — numerics are identical to a packed kernel; only prototype memory/latency are not representative. Runs on CPU or a single GPU (--device/--dtype); everything is seeded and deterministic on a given device. Model sizes are bounded by holding the reference and quantized copies together in memory (Qwen3-0.6B fp16 fits an 8 GB card comfortably).

Related work & positioning

TurboPress does not claim a new frontier method; the pipeline shape (rotation → strong codebook → error feedback → mixed precision) overlaps substantially with recent work. What is defensible here are the two analytical points — the quarter-power equilibration exponent and the QJL-for-weights negative result — plus the controlled, equal-budget measurements.

• Rotation / incoherence processing: QuIP, QuIP#, QuaRot, SpinQuant — random or learned rotations make weights incoherent and render rotated coordinates approximately Gaussian (the regime where the Lloyd–Max scalar quantizer is optimal).
• Quantizers: trellis-coded quantization (Marcellin–Fischer; Ungerboeck set partitioning) applied to LLM weights by QTIP; PVQ is another route.
• Error feedback: OBQ/GPTQ and LDLQ (QuIP) quantize channels sequentially through the inverse Hessian; Qronos generalizes the correction step.
• Activation-aware scaling: SmoothQuant and AWQ rescale by a power of activation magnitude (AWQ grid-searches α∈[0.25, 0.75]); BASE-Q derives a square-root scale for the weight-and-activation setting. Our quarter power is the weight-only, post-rotation optimum — a different objective — and it explains why the empirically favored AWQ exponents and QAM-W's frozen α=0.3 cluster near 1/4. Concurrent recipes (QAM-W, OrbitQuant, PiSO) cover adjacent ground; the exponent for this specific regime is, to our knowledge, unstated elsewhere. Full references are in paper/references.bib.

Limitations (see the paper for detail): evidence is at ≤0.6B parameters (the 2-bit ranking may shift at 7B+); comparisons are against our own controlled configurations, not released GPTQ/AWQ/QuIP#/QTIP checkpoints on WikiText-2 and zero-shot suites; the equilibration result rests on stated isotropic-error modeling assumptions (an approximation, not an exact theorem); and this is a measurement implementation — dequantized weights are materialized in the model dtype, so numerics but not latency match a packed kernel.

Citation

If you use TurboPress, please cite:

@misc{johnson2026turbopress,
  title  = {TurboPress: A Measurement-Driven Study of Rotated Low-Bit Weight
            Quantization -- Equilibration Exponents, Error Feedback, and
            Per-Layer Bit Allocation},
  author = {Johnson, Godson},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Preprint},
  url    = {https://github.com/godsonj64/turbopress}
}

License

Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE and NOTICE.