uv-ffi 0.10.8.post5

Persistent in-process execution engine for uv — internal dependency of omnipkg

uv-ffi

Persistent in-process execution engine for uv's package resolver and installer.

While uv is designed as a world-class CLI tool, uv-ffi re-architects its core as a resident engine. By keeping a Tokio runtime, HTTP connection pools, and site-packages metadata warm in memory across calls, it achieves execution speeds limited only by filesystem I/O.

Used internally by omnipkg, but directly callable from any long-lived Python process.

Usage

import sys
sys.path.insert(0, '/path/to/omnipkg/src')
from omnipkg._vendor.uv_ffi import run, invalidate_site_packages_cache

PY = '/path/to/your/python'
BASE = f'pip install --python {PY} --link-mode symlink'

# First call initializes the engine (~65-75ms, one-time cost)
rc, installed, removed = run(f'{BASE} rich==14.3.2')

# Subsequent calls use the warm engine (~5-6ms)
rc, installed, removed = run(f'{BASE} rich==14.3.3')
# -> inst=[('rich', '14.3.3')] rem=[('rich', '14.3.2')]

# If an external tool modified the environment, force a rescan
invalidate_site_packages_cache()
rc, installed, removed = run(f'{BASE} rich==14.3.3')  # ~8ms (includes 2.5ms rescan)

The key is keeping the import alive in a long-lived process. Each new Python subprocess pays ~70ms (interpreter startup + engine init). In a warm daemon worker, the same operation costs ~6ms.

Performance

Measured wall-clock time on Linux (NVMe SSD, Python 3.11, pre-warmed uv cache).

No-op (package already satisfied)

Method	Wall time	user	sys
uv pip install (subprocess)	~11–12ms	0.007s	0.006s
uv-ffi in-process (warm engine)	~0.4–2ms	0.000s	0.000s
Speedup	~6–8×

Real swap (uninstall + reinstall different version)

Method	Wall time	user	sys
uv pip install (subprocess)	~17–20ms	0.010s	0.013s
uv-ffi in-process (warm engine)	~5.4–6.5ms	0.000s	0.002s
Speedup	~2.5–3×

Cache invalidation

Method	Latency	Notes
uv full site-packages rescan	~2.5ms	paid on every CLI invocation
invalidate_site_packages_cache()	~2.5ms	forced rescan, same cost as uv
patch_site_packages_cache(installed, removed)	~25µs	~100× faster than full rescan

The ~5–6ms floor on a real swap is the hardware limit — VFS symlink create/unlink on NVMe. uv-ffi eliminates all software overhead above that floor.

Important: calling uv-ffi via a new subprocess each time (~73ms avg) is slower than calling uv directly (~19ms). The gains only materialize when the engine stays warm across multiple calls in the same process — a daemon, notebook kernel, API server, or test runner.

Cache coherency

uv-ffi holds site-packages state in RAM and trusts it completely. If an external tool (uv, pip, conda) modifies the environment without notifying uv-ffi, the next call may return rc=0, inst=[], rem=[] — a silent false no-op — because the cache believes the target state is already satisfied.

Verified behavior:

[1] uv-ffi swap:                   6.51ms  inst=[('rich', '14.3.3')] rem=[('rich', '14.3.2')]
[2] uv pip install rich==14.3.2:  18.65ms  (disk=14.3.2, cache still thinks 14.3.3)
[3] uv-ffi ask for rich==14.3.3:   0.46ms  inst=[] rem=[]  ← silent no-op, wrong answer
[4] uv-ffi ask for rich==14.3.2:  11.35ms  inst=[('rich', '14.3.2')]  ← rescan + swap

Step 3 returns rc=0 with no action because the cache says 14.3.3 is already installed. The mismatch is only discovered in step 4 when something different is requested.

This is not a bug — it is the fundamental tradeoff of a persistent cache. Callers who need coherency with external tools have two options:

Option A — FS watcher + delta patch (omnipkg's approach) Watch site-packages for filesystem events and call patch_site_packages_cache(installed, removed) on each change. Cost: ~25µs per patch — ~100× faster than a full rescan. Full coherency with no performance penalty on normal calls.

Option B — Force rescan Call invalidate_site_packages_cache() before any call where external modification is possible. Cost: ~2.5ms — same as uv's own site-packages scan cost. Simple, no watcher needed, but loses the sub-millisecond no-op advantage.

If your process is the only thing modifying the environment, neither is needed and you get full speed with no caveats.

Coexistence with vanilla uv

uv-ffi installs are fully compatible with vanilla uv operations in the same environment. uv-ffi writes complete dist-info including RECORD, INSTALLER, and REQUESTED — so uv pip uninstall, uv pip install, and other standard toolchain operations work correctly on packages uv-ffi installed.

Verified:

• uv-ffi installs a package → uv pip uninstall removes it cleanly ✓
• uv pip install modifies a package → uv-ffi subsequent call works correctly ✓
• No warnings, no corrupted dist-info ✓

Note: coherency caveats above still apply — coexistence means no corruption, not automatic cache synchronization.

Architecture

C dispatcher  →  Unix socket
Python daemon →  dedicated uv worker per interpreter
Rust FFI      →  persistent UvEngine (OnceLock)
FS watcher    →  patch_site_packages_cache()

Persistent UvEngine singleton uv CLI pays ~10ms on every invocation for interpreter discovery, platform tagging, cache init, and TLS pool teardown. uv-ffi does this once at import time and holds the engine in a OnceLock. All subsequent calls skip directly to resolution.

Zero-clap fast path Common pip install commands bypass clap argument parsing entirely — internal Rust structs are constructed directly, saving ~2ms per call.

Shared SITE_PACKAGES_CACHE Site-packages metadata is kept in a shared cache across calls. A FORCE_RESCAN atomic flag lets the FS watcher trigger a targeted rescan only when an external write is detected.

Delta cache patching patch_site_packages_cache(installed, removed) surgically updates the in-memory metadata map for a single package in ~25µs — ~100× faster than uv's own ~2.5ms site-packages rescan.

Idempotent initialization Logging and Tokio initialization are guarded so the engine can be loaded safely in any process without double-init panics.

Benchmark methodology

• In-process tests: 10-run alternating swap (rich==14.3.2 ↔ rich==14.3.3) in a single warm Python session
• Subprocess tests: 8 separate subprocess.run calls, new Python process each time
• Interference test: uv subprocess between uv-ffi calls, 1s settle time
• uv cache pre-warmed before all runs
• Hardware: Linux, NVMe Gen4, Python 3.11.14

Version correspondence

uv-ffi versions track the upstream uv release they are built against:

uv-ffi	uv upstream	Notes
0.10.8	0.10.8	Initial release
0.10.8.post1	0.10.8	Persistent UvEngine, delta cache patching, verified uv coexistence

Attribution

This crate links against uv source code from astral-sh/uv, copyright Astral Software Inc., used under the MIT License. See NOTICE for full attribution.

Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Astral Software Inc.