Research models and strategies for Bitcoin trading
Limen is a research engine for Bitcoin trading. The engine prepares observations, evaluates model and strategy parameters, records research evidence, and carries selected models into inference through Sensors and Cohorts.
Limen supports activity and adaptive bars, feature and target design, classification, continuous and quantile forecasts, rule strategies, and linked learning. Search, controlled perturbations, walk-forward evaluation, costed execution, and protected final assessment connect those choices to recorded outcomes. The research book develops that sequence through two complete executable projects.
Two interfaces, different purposes
Limen offers Python Research and Compiled Research. Python Research defines preparation, fitting, backtesting, and selection through ordinary Python functions and caller-chosen libraries. Compiled Research declares those choices in YAML and executes them through the command-line interface (CLI), within the Manifest contract. Both use the same experiment engine. Indicators, features, targets, scalers, backtesting tools, and inference adapters support composition in Python and declared use in Compiled Research.
Choose your path
| Research choice | Python Research | Compiled Research |
|---|---|---|
| Choose it when | The methodology and components require caller-defined Python. | The experiment fits the declared pipeline and its enforced research constraints. |
| Define the experiment in | Ordinary Python, with caller-chosen libraries and functions. | A strictly typed YAML manifest, compiled and run through the CLI. |
| Control data and models | Supply sources, preparation, models, backtesting, and selection. | Declare sources, splits, features, targets, models, and execution assumptions within the Manifest contract. |
| Checks and evidence | Caller-defined methodology uses component checks and explicit evidence collection. | The configured pipeline applies safeguards and records its definition and selected evidence. |
| Start here | Start Python Research | Start Compiled Research |
Install
Both paths use the same installation:
python -m pip install "vaquum-limen[data]"
Requires Python >=3.10,<3.14 (3.10–3.13) on macOS or Linux. Optional extras: boosting for LightGBM/XGBoost, tabpfn for TabPFN, neural for LSTM/1D CNN, hmm for GaussianHMM, indicators for TA-Lib comparison tooling, stats for statistical helpers, or vaquum-limen[all] for the full stack.
Python Research
Python functions define the research methodology: data acquisition, features, targets, fitting, backtesting, and selection. Ordinary estimators, custom learning stages, and Limen components can participate in the same experiment.
The path is observations → experiment → search → selection → fitted models → Sensor. The complete Python project defines every research component explicitly, including its imports, entry point, and recorded input checks. The excerpts below belong to that complete source.
Define your experiment
Start with a momentum feature and the next bar's open-to-close return:
def features(bars, window):
return bars.with_columns(
(pl.col("close") / pl.col("close").shift(window) - 1).alias("momentum")
)
def prepare_split(bars, round_params):
return features(bars, round_params["window"]).with_columns(
(pl.col("close").shift(-1) / pl.col("open").shift(-1) - 1)
.alias("next_return")
).slice(12).drop_nulls(["momentum", "next_return"])
Split before computing features and forward labels. Each candidate loses the same 12-bar warm-up and its partition's final forward-label row:
def prep(bars, round_params):
# Split before features and labels; no target crosses a boundary.
return {
"train": prepare_split(bars[:960], round_params),
"validation": prepare_split(bars[960:1440], round_params),
}
Fit a scaler and Ridge model on training observations only, then score the validation forecasts with an explicit one-bar policy:
def fit(train, round_params):
return make_pipeline(StandardScaler(), Ridge(alpha=round_params["alpha"])).fit(
train.select("momentum"), train["next_return"].to_numpy()
)
def backtest(validation, forecasts):
positions = np.sign(forecasts)
net = positions * validation["next_return"].to_numpy() - abs(positions) * 0.0002
return float(np.mean(net))
The score uses signed forecasts, fixed notional, and a round-trip cost of two basis points. The caller defines this calculation. Limen's event backtester instead applies a declared execution, product, and funding policy.
Run the experiment
The project searches four candidates, retains their evaluated fitted pipelines and chooses the best validation result per feature window. Alpha breaks ties:
def run_research(bars, experiment_name):
research = bars[:1440]
uel, retained = run_trials(research, experiment_name)
selected = choose_parameters(uel)
sensors = selected_sensors(bars, selected, retained)
cohort = Cohort.from_python(sensors)
return cohort, uel, selected, retained
Use the project and recorded input bundle linked with the example evidence. From the bundle root, run:
python python-research/research.py --scenario selection --data-dir inputs --output-dir results/python
The command checks the recorded source digest and writes research.csv and summary.json. The evaluated models and Cohort remain in caller-owned memory during the run. Import run_research to continue using the returned objects in the same process; the two output files do not restore arbitrary fitted state.
Create a Sensor
The function above wraps each selected evaluated pipeline with Sensor.from_model. The Sensor reuses the fitted scaler and model, selects the feature names recorded during fitting, and blocks null or nonfinite features and decisions before the selection cutoff. sensor.predict(history) returns the latest numeric forecast or an explicit unavailable reason. Availability remains a separate declared clock.
Python functions supply preparation and its causal assumptions. Sensor.from_python accepts arbitrary fitted state and inference logic, with custom prediction and output mapping. Captured fitted state preserves explicitly retained estimators in a .uel object. The project restores those estimators and verifies their forecasts. See Python Sensor construction.
Create a sensor cohort
Python selection supplies the cohort members. The project combines two selected Sensors with Cohort.from_python, averaging compatible next-bar return forecasts. cohort.predict(history) returns the aggregated prediction. Members declare the same output_id to identify compatible meanings; Limen checks timestamp alignment and preserves unavailable results. Binary voting and custom aggregation support other declared outputs. See Python cohorts.
This recorded case fits on the first 960 observations, compares candidates on the next 480, and reserves the final 480 for later inference and assessment. The complete project extends to adaptive bars, fitted feature transformations, targets, search and feedback, recovery, walk-forward evaluation, calibration, event execution, and holdout decisions. A linked-learning case fits Ridge forecasts and an XGBoost residual correction, retains both stages, and selects the correction depth on validation.
Continue with custom SFDs, UEL, or search and feedback.
Compiled Research
Compiled Research executes a declared pipeline. The Manifest specifies data, chronological splits, preparation, model, and parameter space. The CLI validates and compiles the complete YAML definition before execution.
The complete Compiled project starts with a recorded-data logistic experiment. Its selection declaration fixes the source, dates, train-fitted target/scaler, execution policy and validation objective:
Read the full YAML manifest
# region declaration
schema_version: "1.0"
metadata:
name: book_compiled_selection
mode: development
sfd:
manifest:
type: ml
# region recorded_source
data_source:
method: limen.data.HistoricalData.get_any_file
params:
file_path_or_url: inputs/spot_15m_20250101_20250531.parquet
# endregion recorded_source
split_dates:
train_start: "2025-01-01"
train_end: "2025-01-15"
val_start: "2025-01-15"
val_end: "2025-01-18"
test_start: "2025-01-18"
test_end: "2025-01-22"
# region momentum_indicator
indicators:
- func: limen.indicators.roc
params:
period: 1
group: momentum
# endregion momentum_indicator
# region fitted_target
target:
name: quantile_flag
class: limen.targets.QuantileBinaryTarget
fit_params:
source_column: roc_1
quantile: 0.5
transform_params:
shift: -1
# endregion fitted_target
# region validation_objective
objective:
metric: backtest_total_return
direction: maximize
# endregion validation_objective
backtest:
source_interval_seconds: 900
fee_bps: 1.0
slip_bps: 0.0
product:
kind: cash_spot
instrument: BTCUSDT
base_currency: BTC
quote_currency: USDT
quantity_step: 1.0e-9
min_notional: 0.0
# region fitted_scaler
scaler:
from_params: scaler_type
# endregion fitted_scaler
reference_architecture: limen.sfd.reference_architecture.logreg_binary
params:
scaler_type: [logreg]
C: [1.0, 0.5]
random_state: [42]
uel:
output_path: compiled-cli
n_permutations: 2
search_strategy:
type: grid
output_format: csv
# region assessment
assessment:
metric: val_backtest_total_return
direction: maximize
top_k: 1
predict: true
# endregion assessment
# endregion declaration
From the example bundle root, run that exact declaration through the installed CLI:
limen run --no-progress-bar compiled-research/selection.yaml
The command validates and compiles the declaration, executes two candidates and writes results/dev/compiled-cli. The CLI lifecycle also exercises template initialization, explicit validation/profiling, dry compilation, immutable committed definitions, recovery and project backup.
limen assess compiled-research/selection.yaml --results results/dev/compiled-cli
After execution, limen assess applies the YAML's validation selection, reconstructs the selected Sensors, and binds their Cohort. Reconstruction refits under the recorded pipeline. When results.csv is present, Trainer compares eligible overlapping numeric metrics within declared tolerances. The comprehensive YAML continues through feature ablation, PCA, calibration, threshold selection, full recording, and inference. Separate declarations cover model families, rule strategies, adaptive bars, linked learning, protected research, and final assessment; the supported-workflow table records their admission boundaries.
| Artifact | What it records |
|---|---|
| Copied YAML manifest | The experiment definition. |
metadata.json |
Run configuration and provenance metadata. |
results.csv |
Candidate results. |
round_data.jsonl.gz |
Round identities, parameters, and payloads selected by the recording policy. |
Row evidence and recovery depend on the recording policy. Choose it before a run when later replay or continuation needs those payloads.
Continue with the CLI workflow, Manifest contract, or end-to-end workflow.
Shared safety
Both interfaces use the experiment engine and reusable research components. Python functions compose or replace those components. Compiled Research connects their safeguards through the declared pipeline.
Common foundations
The Mutable Search Queue (MSQ) and Universal Experiment Loop (UEL) provide parameter identities, explicit budgets, round results, and convergence-warning records. Search includes grid, seeded shuffled traversal, random, and Sobol strategies, with feedback-driven queue updates. Reducers prune the remaining queue from observed results. Compatible checkpoint and full-recording artifacts support continuation, while factorization reuses eligible preparation across candidates. Search seeds control candidate ordering; model, data, and environment identities remain separate. See search and recovery.
Sensors wrap fitted state and distinguish usable predictions from unavailable decisions. Cohorts check member timestamp alignment before aggregation. Python adapters preserve declared continuous forecasts or signed exposure through compatible aggregation. Native Cohorts aggregate binary decisions under their member-output contract; model and fold compatibility governs admission. See selected behavior for selection, cutoffs, and output meanings.
In Python Research, safeguards follow the selected Limen components. Caller-defined replacements supply their own checks and evidence.
What Compiled Research adds
The CLI validates schema, component references, parameter links, split declarations, and execution settings before running. Its native architectures cover binary classification, continuous and quantile forecasts, neural sequences, latent states, linked learning, and explicit rule strategies. Preparation supports grouped indicators, fitted targets and scalers, causal feature transformations, PCA, sampling, and controlled ablation. The model-choice chapter connects model outputs to execution and reconstruction contracts. The declared pipeline coordinates the following controls:
| Common pitfall | Pipeline protection |
|---|---|
| Features or forward labels crossing evaluation boundaries | Split raw observations before bar formation, indicators, features and target construction. Forward targets are constructed within each partition. |
| Fitting preprocessing on future data, or feeding labels into the model | Fit target thresholds, scalers, PCA and fitted feature transformations on training data. Reuse that state elsewhere; exclude the target and its declared source columns from model features. |
| Calibrating probabilities or decision thresholds on the test set | Fit configured calibration and thresholds on validation, then reuse them on test data and at inference. |
| Warm-up effects, missing features and misaligned prices | Carry historical context; align retained features with original prices by timestamp, then score predictions in that row order. Packaged ML templates enable strict null checking, marking affected rounds as failed. |
| Invalid rule conditions or history windows | Validate condition identities, dependencies and temporal parameters; evaluate trailing persistence and recency within each split. |
| Inflated returns from omitted trading assumptions | Apply execution lag, fees, slippage and notional settings through the selected backtester. Configured stops verify OHLC provenance and use explicit gap and same-bar exit rules. |
| Impossible fills, unavailable prices or incorrect funding charges | Configured event execution checks availability clocks, source coverage, exposure, quantity and collateral rules. Funding adapters validate units, schedules and valuation evidence and separate accrual from settlement. |
| Research and inference using different pipelines | Trainer reconstructs the declared pipeline, compares eligible recorded numeric metrics when results.csv is present, and checks available recorded bindings. Compiled Sensors carry manifest and permutation identities and reuse fitted preprocessing; artifact-backed Cohorts bind selected member identities. |
See the preparation contract, backtest mechanics and inference contract for each control's scope.
Additional validation, when enabled
- Walk-forward validation refits each fold with declared purge and embargo gaps. Recorded fold Sensors carry their fitting and selection cutoffs into compatible cohorts. Purge and embargo lengths must cover the declared label horizon.
- A validation-return objective binds supported threshold tuning and reducers to validation execution. DSR and PBO reports assess retained research evidence; failed or unavailable criteria are reported rather than stopping the run.
- Opt-in project holdout reservations exclude reserved observations from admitted research, recovery, and replay. Frozen selection binds the chosen members and assessment scenarios before final observations are consumed. Protected research and final assessment have distinct model and workflow requirements.
Compilation does not establish arbitrary feature causality, data correctness or future performance. Validation used for tuning is selection evidence; statistical reports do not create an untouched holdout.
Research scope
Limen covers research from recorded observations to reusable Sensors and Cohorts: preparation, model and rule comparison, robustness analysis, execution policy, selection, and assessment. Its built-in components focus on Bitcoin markets. The surrounding Vaquum tools have distinct roles:
| Tool | Role |
|---|---|
| Origo | Ingests Bitcoin market data, forms bars and publishes datasets for research and live consumers. |
| Grid | Provides the visual workspace for authoring and running Limen manifests, monitoring sweeps, analysing parameter effects and uncertainty, and building sensor cohorts from recorded results. |
| Nexus | Turns prediction signals into trading decisions, applying risk checks and capital allocation. |
| Praxis | Submits and manages venue orders, tracks fills and positions, and records trade outcomes. |
Sensors and Cohorts also expose inference interfaces for integration with other trading systems.
Risk boundary
Limen is research software. Benchmark and backtest outputs are not investment advice, trading advice, regulatory approval, or a promise of future performance. Past performance is not predictive, and trading digital assets can result in total loss of capital.
Supply chain and provenance
Limen makes its package origin, build process and release evidence inspectable:
- Reviewed source. Protected merges require approval and passing checks for tests, coverage, static analysis, dependency vulnerabilities and packaging.
- Controlled builds. Workflow actions are pinned to full commit hashes; CI requirements are installed with hash verification. Packaging checks build the wheel and source distribution twice in the same CI environment, with a fixed timestamp, and compare their SHA-256 digests.
- Dependency maintenance. Weekly dependency update proposals accompany vulnerability audits of declared core dependencies. Exceptions require a recorded reason and expiry date.
- Verifiable releases. PyPI publishing authenticates through OpenID Connect using Trusted Publishing. GitHub releases carry the same wheel and source distribution, build-provenance attestations, SHA-256 digests and a CycloneDX software bill of materials (SBOM) describing the release environment.
Limen holds OpenSSF Best Practices Silver, based on a public project self-assessment. Silver's requirements include repeatable builds, cryptographically signed releases, dependency inventory and monitoring, automated testing and documented security assurance.
See how to verify a release, inspect the security assurance case, or report a vulnerability.
Learn more
| Path | Guides |
|---|---|
| Python Research | Complete Python project, search and feedback, custom SFDs. |
| Compiled Research | CLI, Manifest, end-to-end workflow. |
| Research design | Bars, features, targets, model choice, rules. |
| Research evaluation | Robustness, trading behavior, research evidence, final holdout. |
| Model reuse | Linked models, selected behavior, Trainer, Cohort. |
See the documentation hub, Roadmap, and Security Assurance Case.
Contributing
Contribution starts through CONTRIBUTING.md, docs changes, or open issues.
Before contributing, start with the Developer docs.
Support
Use SUPPORT.md for support routes and scope boundaries.
Vulnerabilities
Report vulnerabilities privately through GitHub Security Advisories. Do not report vulnerabilities through public issues.
Citations
Published work should cite:
Vaquum Limen [Computer software]. (2026). Retrieved from GitHub.
Machine-readable citation metadata lives in CITATION.cff.
License
Metadata
Release files for vaquum-limen 6.0.1
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vaquum_limen-6.0.1.tar.gz | 8.0 MB | With provenance | Details for vaquum_limen-6.0.1.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vaquum_limen-6.0.1-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for vaquum_limen-6.0.1-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 9.5 MB
Release files / vaquum_limen-6.0.1.tar.gz
| Download URL | vaquum_limen-6.0.1.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 8.0 MB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
365e9e0a4bf507f7c2cda167d41ef766dc783065ce363ced7ff55a0f177b83c9
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
dd89cfa2f6b127184efc5a2b231393095bbae222e8cb363558ea6c73ada1f88f
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.13
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 29, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / vaquum_limen-6.0.1-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | vaquum_limen-6.0.1-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 1.6 MB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c827a73ddd6866448e00816fc3e6125959811e1a31732f2b04f3b0260d740847
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
cdc9d4445f79fe454db8ff935993e28c0144539d0008d5b0d69ea36ee6a43f32
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.13
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 29, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for vaquum-limen 6.0.1
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for vaquum_limen-6.0.1.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 29, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.