vernier 0.2.0

High-performance, parity-preserving COCO-style evaluation

vernier

Fast, parity-preserving evaluation for object detection, instance / panoptic / semantic segmentation, boundary IoU, OKS keypoints, LVIS federated, LRP / oLRP error decomposition, and detection-family calibration (ECE / MCE / reliability). Rust core, Python frontend, optional CLI.

60-second example

Post training, if your predictions are already serialized to JSON (CI gate, post-training inspection):

from pathlib import Path
from vernier.instance import Bbox, CocoDataset, Evaluator

gt_bytes = Path("instances_val2017.json").read_bytes()
dt_bytes = Path("detections.json").read_bytes()

dataset = CocoDataset.from_json(gt_bytes)
summary = Evaluator(iou=Bbox()).evaluate(dataset, dt_bytes)
for line in summary.pretty_lines():
    print(line)

In a training loop, vernier supports overlapping eval with the data loading and inference. The matching kernel runs on a worker thread, so submit(...) returns immediately and the main thread keeps moving. Passing a CocoDataset reuses the parsed-once GT and its per-kernel derivation cache across every epoch (ADR-0020). On a dedicated validation pass (no trainer competing for cores), pass num_threads=N to parallelise the matching kernel inside the worker (ADR-0047):

from pathlib import Path
from vernier.instance import Bbox, CocoDataset, Evaluator

gt = CocoDataset.from_json(Path("instances_val2017.json").read_bytes())
evaluator = Evaluator(iou=Bbox())
with evaluator.background(gt, num_threads=8) as bg:  # default: single core
    for images, targets in val_loader:
        # torchvision detection API shape: list[dict] of length batch_size,
        # each with "boxes" (N,4 xywh), "scores" (N,), "labels" (N,) as
        # torch.Tensor. vernier consumes any DLPack-producing array library
        # (torch, jax, cupy, numpy) zero-copy.
        predictions = model(images)
        bg.submit([
            {"image_id": int(t["image_id"]), **p}
            for t, p in zip(targets, predictions)
        ])
    summary = bg.finalize()
print("AP =", summary.stats[0])

Both end in the same 12-line pycocotools-shaped Summary; docs/tutorials/first-evaluation.md walks each end-to-end.

Benchmarks

Workload	vernier median	Speedup vs alternatives
Instance — bbox AP (val2017)	370 ms	5.8× faster-coco-eval · 16.0× pycocotools
Instance — segm AP (val2017)	987 ms	3.7× faster-coco-eval · 7.0× pycocotools
Instance — boundary AP (val2017)	3.2 s	5.5× faster-coco-eval · 19.3× boundary-iou-api
Instance — keypoints AP (val2017, OKS)	136 ms	12.3× faster-coco-eval · 16.7× pycocotools
Panoptic — PQ (val2017)	10.5 s	3.3× panopticapi †
Semantic — mIoU (val2017)	2.8 s	7.4× mmsegmentation
Instance — LVIS bbox AP (v1 val, perfect-DT)	3.6 s	57.2× lvis-api · 10× lower peak RSS (1.48 GiB vs 15.01 GiB)

^† Panoptic cell exceeded the 5% relative-IQR gate (9.78% on this snapshot — chronically noisy because PNG decode dominates wall time, but ~halved vs the 21% in 0.0.4 after the sparse-remap cache landed in #260). The 3.3× speedup is the load-bearing signal; the precise ratio carries a wider confidence band than the others.

Median total-stage wall time on a KVM VPS (AMD EPYC-Milan, 4 cores × 2 threads = 8 logical CPUs, x86_64 — not a bare-metal Milan box), harness mode release (N=10 measurement reps + 2 warmup, randomised impl order, 5% relative-IQR gate per impl), build profile = cargo release defaults (opt-level=3, lto=thin, codegen-units=1, no target-cpu) — same as the PyPI wheel. Full per-cell breakdown (including IQRs), RSS, and methodology in docs/benchmarks.md; per-library comparison of when to pick which in docs/comparison.md.

Baselines pinned for these numbers — pycocotools==2.0.11, faster-coco-eval==1.7.2, panopticapi @ 7bb4655, boundary-iou-api @ 37d2558, mmsegmentation @ c685fe6 (vendored), lvis-api @ 031ac21 (PyPI lvis==0.5.3). All cells were measured at HEAD 3a509df6c525 (machine fingerprint 37652a58e939 — same fingerprint as the 0.0.4 snapshot, so the speedup deltas vs that release are not confounded by a host change). Each baseline is locked in its own uv-managed venv per ADR-0017.

Install

pip install vernier                  # Python wheel
cargo add vernier-core               # Rust library
cargo install vernier-cli            # `vernier` CLI binary

Wheels ship for linux x86_64 / aarch64 (glibc + musl), macOS x86_64 / arm64, and windows x64. The umbrella vernier crate name on crates.io is held as a 0.0.0 placeholder; vernier-core is the real Rust entry point — see docs/engineering/registry-reservations.md.

Status & validation

Pre-1.0; public API is unstable. See docs/adr/ for the design decisions shaping it.

pycocotools==2.0.11 is the de-facto reference for COCO evaluation — slow, unmaintained, and full of edge-case quirks. Faster reimplementations exist, but each silently fixes some quirks and not others, so you discover the divergences empirically. vernier takes a third path:

• Auditable parity. Every divergence from pycocotools is filed in the quirks survey under ADR-0002 as either strict (bit-equal output, even when vernier's implementation is structurally different) or corrected (opt-in opinionated fix). Strict is the default; corrected fixes are itemized so you always know when your numbers diverge from a reference run. A drop-in shim (vernier.patch_pycocotools()) keeps existing pycocotools-based scripts working with one line.
• Rust core, Python frontend. The matching kernel is pure Rust with runtime SIMD dispatch; the FFI layer is data conversion only. The CLI ships as a static binary, so CI pipelines call vernier without provisioning a Python interpreter.
• One toolkit instead of five. bbox / segm / boundary / keypoints AP, panoptic PQ, semantic mIoU, LVIS federated, oLRP error decomposition, and detection-family calibration all live behind one Python API and one CLI — folded over a single matching pass. Per-paradigm migration guides under docs/migrate/ show how to replace pycocotools, faster-coco-eval, panopticapi, lvis-api, and mmsegmentation one at a time.
• Scenario slicing + cross-run aggregation. A partition manifest (weather, time_of_day, …) feeds vernier eval --manifest for per-slice headline metrics and vernier aggregate for cross-run corruption tables (mPC / rPC) — one matching pass, N slices (ADR-0046).

Per-paradigm parity status:

Paradigm / metric	Oracle	Parity tier	Open caveat
Instance bbox / segm / keypoints AP	pycocotools==2.0.11	strict bit-equal	none
Instance boundary IoU	boundary-iou-api	strict bit-equal	none
Segm + boundary TIDE thresholds (t_b)	none yet	corrected-only	ADR-0022 still proposed; defaults extrapolated, not measured
Panoptic PQ	panopticapi (single-core path)	strict bit-equal	none
Panoptic boundary PQ	bowenc0221/boundary-iou-api (single-core path, same SHA as the instance vendor)	strict bit-equal	ADR-0025 §Z1/Z2 amendment; Cityscapes panoptic (Z3) deferred
Semantic mIoU / FWIoU / pAcc / mAcc	mmseg.IoUMetric vendored at v1.2.2 (ADR-0036, still proposed); cityscapesScripts + ADE20K cross-impl bench externally blocked	strict bit-equal on the four per-class u64 marginals at val2017 scale	ADR-0028; ADE20K-scale bench gated on license-cleared cache
LVIS federated AP	lvis-api (vendored at 031ac21f, ORACLE_LVIS_COMMIT_SHA)	strict bit-equal on the (T, R, K, A) precision tensor at full LVIS v1 val	bench paradigm wired; segm cell waits on evaluate_segm_grid_with_dataset
LRP / oLRP error decomposition (instance bbox / segm / boundary / keypoints)	pure-NumPy oracle (ADR-0043)	strict against the oracle within 1e-9; kemaloksuz/LRP-Error tripwire vendored opt-in	panoptic LRP is a typed NotImplementedError stub — panoptic predictions carry no per-segment scores (ADR follow-up)
Detection-family calibration — ECE / MCE / reliability (instance bbox / segm / boundary / keypoints)	clean-room NumPy oracle (ADR-0018) with isolated P1–P10 quirks survey	strict bit-equal against the oracle (16/16 parity tests)	panoptic (Shape 2) and semantic (Shape 3) calibration deferred on data-model prerequisites; Clopper-Pearson CI documented Phase-2

Three-tier parity model: ADR-0002; per-library comparison: docs/comparison.md.

Three evaluation paradigms

They have different data models, different matching rules, and different parity oracles:

• vernier.instance — detections with scores → bbox / segm / boundary / keypoints AP.
• vernier.panoptic — RGB-encoded panoptic PNGs + segments_info JSON → PQ.
• vernier.semantic — single-channel class-id label maps → mIoU / FWIoU / pAcc / mAcc.

See Three paradigms.

Documentation

• Tutorials — docs/tutorials/
• Migration guides (from pycocotools, faster-coco-eval, panopticapi, lvis-api, mmsegmentation) — docs/migrate/
• How-to — docs/how-to/
• Reference — docs/reference/
• Design / ADRs — docs/adr/
• Comparison vs pycocotools / faster-coco-eval / panopticapi / boundary-iou-api / lvis-api / mmsegmentation — docs/comparison.md

Contributing

Local checks: just lint && just test && just audit. The full contributor workflow (ADR lifecycle, vendoring policy, code style) is in CONTRIBUTING.md. Repository layout and common just recipes are in CLAUDE.md.

License

Dual-licensed under Apache-2.0 or MIT at your option.

Third-party code

vernier vendors a small number of test-only reference implementations to support parity testing. None of this code is included in published wheels or linked into the Rust binary. See THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md for the full inventory and license attributions.