VIEWS Evaluation 📊
Part of the VIEWS Platform ecosystem for large-scale conflict forecasting.
⚠️ ATTENTION: Migration Notice (v0.4.0+)
The evaluation ontology has been updated to be more explicit and task-specific. If your pipeline broke after updating, please update your configuration dictionary. The library now distinguishes between regression vs classification tasks, and point vs sample predictions.
Key Changes:
targetsis nowregression_targetsorclassification_targets.metricsis nowregression_point_metrics.- All
uncertaintykeys have been renamed tosample(reflecting that we evaluate draws/samples from a distribution).
| Legacy Key | New Canonical Key |
|---|---|
targets |
regression_targets |
metrics |
regression_point_metrics |
regression_uncertainty_metrics |
regression_sample_metrics |
classification_uncertainty_metrics |
classification_sample_metrics |
⚠️ Legacy keys were REMOVED in 0.4.0 — they no longer work.
Earlier documentation stated that legacy keys still worked and emitted a
DeprecationWarning. That was incorrect: the translation shim lived inEvaluationManager, which was deleted before 0.4.0 was published. There is no fallback and none will be restored.Since 0.5.0, a legacy key fails loudly at
NativeEvaluator.__init__rather than being silently ignored:ValueError: Legacy evaluation config key(s) present: ['targets']. These were removed in 0.4.0 and are NOT translated automatically. Rename them: 'targets' -> 'regression_targets' or 'classification_targets'. See the README migration table.A misspelled evaluation key also fails, naming what it resembles — but the suspected key is only reported, never substituted:
ValueError: Evaluation config key 'regression_target' is not recognised, but closely resembles 'regression_targets' — this looks like a typo. It has NOT been interpreted as 'regression_targets'; nothing is assumed on your behalf. ...Previously a legacy or misspelled metric key produced an empty-but-successful report with no error at all. Migrate using the table above.
An unrecognised key that resembles nothing is ignored, deliberately.
views-pipeline-corepasses its whole combined model config through (NativeEvaluator(context.configs)), so the dict legitimately carries dozens of foreign keys —batch_size,algorithm, and so on. Rejecting unknown keys wholesale would break every model in the platform. See risk register C-33.This removal predates the deprecation policy now in force — see ADR-022, which requires a
DeprecationWarningin a published release plus one full release cycle before any public symbol or config key is removed.
📚 Table of Contents
- Overview
- Quick Start
- Role in the VIEWS Pipeline
- Features
- Installation
- Architecture
- Project Structure
- Contributing
- License
- Acknowledgements
🧠 Overview
The VIEWS Evaluation repository provides a standardized framework for assessing time-series forecasting models used in the VIEWS conflict prediction pipeline. It ensures consistent, robust, and interpretable evaluations through metrics tailored to conflict-related data, which often exhibit right-skewness and zero-inflation.
The library is built on a three-layer architecture with a framework-agnostic NumPy core, ensuring that all mathematical evaluation logic is independent of Pandas or any other data-frame library.
🚀 Quick Start
from views_evaluation import EvaluationFrame, NativeEvaluator
import numpy as np
# 1. Construct EvaluationFrame with NumPy arrays
ef = EvaluationFrame(
y_true=y_true_array,
y_pred=y_pred_array, # shape (N, S) where S >= 1
identifiers={'time': times, 'unit': units, 'origin': origins, 'step': steps},
metadata={'target': 'ged_sb_best'},
)
# 2. Configure and evaluate
config = {
"steps": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6],
"regression_targets": ["ged_sb_best"],
"regression_point_metrics": ["MSE", "RMSLE", "Pearson"],
}
evaluator = NativeEvaluator(config)
report = evaluator.evaluate(ef)
# 3. Access results
report.to_dataframe("step") # pd.DataFrame
report.to_dict() # nested dict
report.get_schema_results("month") # typed metrics dataclass
For the full walkthrough including input formatting and sample evaluation, see
documentation/integration_guide.md.
🌍 Role in the VIEWS Pipeline
VIEWS Evaluation ensures forecasting accuracy and model robustness as the official evaluation component of the VIEWS ecosystem.
Pipeline Integration:
- Model Predictions →
- EvaluationFrame (validated NumPy container) →
- NativeEvaluator (metrics computation) →
- EvaluationReport (structured results)
Integration with Other Repositories:
- views-pipeline-core: Supplies preprocessed data for evaluation.
- views-models: Provides trained models to be assessed.
- views-stepshifter: Evaluates time-shifted forecasting models.
- views-hydranet: Supports spatiotemporal deep learning model evaluations.
✨ Features
- Comprehensive Evaluation Framework: The
NativeEvaluatorprovides structured, stateless evaluation of time series predictions across a 2×2 matrix of regression/classification tasks and point/sample prediction types. - Multiple Evaluation Schemas:
- Step-wise evaluation: groups and evaluates predictions by the respective steps from all models.
- Time-series-wise evaluation: evaluates predictions for each time-series.
- Month-wise evaluation: groups and evaluates predictions at a monthly level.
- Support for Multiple Metrics (see table below for details)
Available Metrics
Metrics are organized by the 2×2 evaluation matrix: task (regression / classification) × prediction type (point / sample).
Regression Point Metrics
| Metric | Key | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Squared Error | MSE |
Average of squared differences | ✅ |
| Mean Squared Log Error | MSLE |
MSE computed on log-transformed values | ✅ |
| Root Mean Squared Log Error | RMSLE |
Square root of MSLE | ✅ |
| Earth Mover's Distance | EMD |
Wasserstein distance between distributions | ✅ |
| Pearson Correlation | Pearson |
Linear correlation between predictions and actuals | ✅ |
| Mean Tweedie Deviance | MTD |
Tweedie deviance (configurable power), ideal for zero-inflated data | ✅ |
| Mean Prediction | y_hat_bar |
Average of all predicted values (diagnostic) | ✅ |
| Magnitude Calibration Ratio | MCR_point |
Ratio of predicted to actual magnitude | ✅ |
| Sinkhorn Distance | SD |
Regularized optimal transport distance | ❌ |
| pseudo-Earth Mover Divergence | pEMDiv |
Efficient EMD approximation | ❌ |
| Variogram | Variogram |
Spatial/temporal correlation structure score | ❌ |
Regression Sample Metrics
| Metric | Key | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous Ranked Probability Score | CRPS |
Calibration and sharpness of probabilistic forecasts | ✅ |
| Threshold-Weighted CRPS | twCRPS |
CRPS emphasizing values above a threshold | ✅ |
| Mean Interval Score | MIS |
Prediction interval width and coverage | ✅ |
| Quantile Interval Score | QIS |
Interval score at specified quantiles | ✅ |
| Coverage | Coverage |
Proportion of actuals within prediction intervals | ✅ |
| Ignorance Score | Ignorance |
Logarithmic scoring rule for probabilistic predictions | ✅ |
| Mean Prediction | y_hat_bar |
Average of all predicted values (diagnostic) | ✅ |
| Magnitude Calibration Ratio | MCR_sample |
Ratio of predicted to actual magnitude | ✅ |
Classification Point Metrics
| Metric | Key | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Precision | AP |
Area under precision-recall curve | ✅ |
Classification Sample Metrics
| Metric | Key | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous Ranked Probability Score | CRPS |
Calibration and sharpness | ✅ |
| Threshold-Weighted CRPS | twCRPS |
CRPS emphasizing values above a threshold | ✅ |
| Brier Score | Brier |
Accuracy of probabilistic binary predictions | ❌ |
| Jeffreys Divergence | Jeffreys |
Symmetric measure of distribution difference | ❌ |
Note: Metrics marked ❌ are defined in the catalog but not yet implemented — requesting them raises a clear
ValueError.
📝 Configuration Schema
The NativeEvaluator accepts a configuration dictionary (EvaluationConfig TypedDict) with the following keys:
| Key | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
steps |
List[int] |
List of forecast steps to evaluate (e.g., [1, 3, 6, 12]). |
regression_targets |
List[str] |
List of continuous targets (e.g., ['ged_sb_best']). |
regression_point_metrics |
List[str] |
Metrics to compute for regression point predictions. |
regression_sample_metrics |
List[str] |
Metrics to compute for regression sample predictions (e.g., ['CRPS']). |
classification_targets |
List[str] |
List of binary targets (e.g., ['by_sb_best']). |
classification_point_metrics |
List[str] |
Metrics to compute for classification probability scores. |
classification_sample_metrics |
List[str] |
Metrics to compute for classification sample predictions. |
evaluation_profile |
str |
Named hyperparameter profile (default: "base"). See views_evaluation/profiles/. |
metric_hyperparameters |
Dict[str, Dict] |
Per-metric overrides that take precedence over the profile. |
Example Configuration:
config = {
"steps": [1, 3, 6, 12],
"regression_targets": ["ged_sb_best"],
"regression_point_metrics": ["MSE", "RMSLE", "Pearson"],
"regression_sample_metrics": ["CRPS", "twCRPS", "MIS", "Coverage"],
"evaluation_profile": "base", # or "hydranet_ucdp"
"metric_hyperparameters": {
"twCRPS": {"threshold": 10.0}, # override profile default
},
}
- Data Integrity Checks: Validates input arrays for shape consistency, NaN/infinity, and required identifiers.
- Framework-Agnostic Core: All evaluation operates on pure NumPy arrays via
EvaluationFrame. - Metric Catalog & Profiles: Hyperparameters are managed through named evaluation profiles with a Chain of Responsibility resolver (model overrides → profile → fail loud).
⚙️ Installation
Prerequisites
- Python >= 3.11
From PyPI
pip install views_evaluation
🏗 Architecture
The library follows a strict three-layer architecture (ADR-011):
Level 0 — Pure Core (NumPy + SciPy + sklearn; no dataframe libraries)
EvaluationFrame Canonical data container (y_true, y_pred, identifiers)
NativeEvaluator Stateless evaluation engine (month/sequence/step schemas)
MetricCatalog Genome registry mapping metrics → functions + required params
native_metric_calculators The metric kernels
Profiles Named hyperparameter sets (base, hydranet_ucdp, ...)
Level 1 — Bridge / Emit
EvaluationReport Results container with dict / DataFrame / MetricFrame export
MetricFrame Typed, provenance-stamped evaluation-of-record (views-frames ADR-020)
Level 2 — Orchestration
External to this repository (e.g. views-pipeline-core)
Each component appears in exactly one level; dependencies flow toward the core (ADR-011).
Key design decisions:
- ADR-011: No Pandas/Polars imports in Level 0 — math is framework-agnostic.
- ADR-013: Fail-loud — all structural failures raise exceptions with actionable messages, never silently degrade.
- ADR-015: Degenerate and empty results — a computation that cannot produce a result raises; it never returns a value standing in for one. A metric may return a number for a degenerate input only where that number is genuinely the answer (e.g.
MCR'sinf), documented and tested. - ADR-022: Evolution and stability — public API removals require a
DeprecationWarningin a prior published release plus one full release cycle. - ADR-042: Metric catalog — each metric declares its required hyperparameters ("genome"); values are resolved via Chain of Responsibility.
🗂 Project Structure
views-evaluation/
├── views_evaluation/
│ ├── __init__.py # Public API exports
│ ├── adapters/
│ │ └── __init__.py # Reserved for future framework bridges
│ ├── evaluation/
│ │ ├── config_schema.py # EvaluationConfig TypedDict (authoritative key set)
│ │ ├── evaluation_frame.py # Core data container
│ │ ├── evaluation_report.py # Results container
│ │ ├── metric_frame.py # Evaluation-of-record emit artifact (needs [frames])
│ │ ├── metric_catalog.py # ADR-042 registry + resolver
│ │ ├── metrics.py # Typed metric dataclasses
│ │ ├── native_evaluator.py # Core evaluation engine
│ │ └── native_metric_calculators.py # Metric implementations
│ └── profiles/
│ ├── base.py # Standard hyperparameter values
│ └── hydranet_ucdp.py # Domain-specific profile
├── tests/ # Green/Beige/Red suites (ADR-020)
├── documentation/
│ ├── ADRs/ # Architecture Decision Records
│ ├── CICs/ # Class Intent Contracts
│ ├── integration_guide.md # Full API walkthrough
│ └── evaluation_concepts.md # Domain concepts
├── pyproject.toml
└── README.md
🤝 Contributing
We welcome contributions! Please follow the VIEWS Contribution Guidelines.
📜 License
This project is licensed under the LICENSE file.
💬 Acknowledgements
Special thanks to the VIEWS MD&D Team for their collaboration and support.
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file views_evaluation-0.5.0.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: views_evaluation-0.5.0.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 38.2 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via:
poetry/2.4.1 CPython/3.11.15 Linux/6.17.0-1020-azure
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
41fcecb7325c097f4d43a24f8560ca46643edf6602270f9f87422c8ab33d5c22
|
|
| MD5 |
473f76b3ada24db899382f3fe6951d60
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
aa52ee58c53d325729d7b7873583ac65e3646544ac3d9c1474d65cc70cc2d5c1
|
File details
Details for the file views_evaluation-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: views_evaluation-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 39.9 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via:
poetry/2.4.1 CPython/3.11.15 Linux/6.17.0-1020-azure
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
a12ee99e326815baa408e46a038fae0de5d842e8095537e1e84a91e1f1e1d34d
|
|
| MD5 |
54845d9f31e98b790c2856a8fb0a73a9
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
6cb354abc2595ee24fec33b7d2293ff9ce3a563642c649153c16d040fced6cff
|