WADE — Workflow for AI-Driven Engineering

AI tools write the code. WADE handles everything else.

Every Wade does the dirty work so the heroes don't have to.

Branches, worktrees, context loading, model routing, PR creation — all the workflow friction that surrounds AI coding sessions. WADE eliminates it. It works with Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Antigravity CLI, and more, and pulls tasks from GitHub Issues, ClickUp, or a committed Markdown file. Run wade init once per project, then drive your work from task numbers while WADE handles the git and GitHub plumbing around every AI session.

Highlights

• Deterministic planning — wade plan turns a goal into validated plan files that become lightweight tasks plus draft PRs, each labeled by complexity.
• Isolated worktrees — every task gets its own git worktree, so parallel sessions never collide or stash-juggle.
• Full context, zero copy-paste — the task, its description, labels, and your project conventions are loaded into the AI automatically.
• Agent guardrails — on hook-capable AI tools, per-session hooks keep the AI inside its worktree and route it through a completion gate before any push; hookless tools fall back to skill rules (see the tool support table).
• Quality gates — opt-in pre-commit lint/test and conventional-commit checks, plus an AI code-review pass before the PR is marked ready.
• Pluggable task providers — GitHub Issues, ClickUp, or a committed Markdown file; PRs and reviews always run through GitHub.
• Multi-tool — automatic model routing by task complexity across every supported AI coding tool.

See It in Action

Starting work on task #42:

Without WADE:

git fetch origin && git checkout main && git pull
git checkout -b feat/issue-42-user-auth
# paste task title + description into AI chat
# explain your branching rules, test locations, linters to run...

With WADE:

wade 42

With no open PR for task #42 yet, WADE starts an implementation session: it creates an isolated git worktree, launches your AI tool with the full task loaded — title, description, labels, and all your project conventions — and Skills guide the AI from first commit to open PR without you touching git again. Want the AI to break the work down first? Run wade plan — planning is a deliberate step, not something wade 42 guesses at from a missing plan.

Finishing work and opening the PR:

Without WADE:

git checkout main && git pull
git checkout feat/issue-42-user-auth
git merge main          # resolve conflicts yourself, if any
git push
gh pr create --title "User Auth (#42)" --body "..."   # write description manually
# don't forget to link the task, clean up the branch...

With WADE (the AI handles all of this):

wade implementation-session done

The AI merges the latest main into the branch, resolves any conflicts, writes the PR description from what it built, and marks it ready for review — you get a clean, already-integrated diff with no noise for your reviewer.

Working on multiple tasks at once:

wade implement-batch 42 43 44   # three worktrees, three AI sessions, zero stashing

Why WADE

Installation

One-line install script (installs uv automatically if missing):

curl -LsSf https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ivanviragine/wade/main/install.sh | sh

Or, if you already have uv or pipx:

uv tool install wade-cli    # recommended
pipx install wade-cli

Requires gh CLI (authenticated) and at least one supported AI coding tool.

gh auth login    # if not already authenticated

To let WADE move issues across a GitHub Projects (v2) board (e.g. to In Progress), also grant the project scope. This is optional — everything else works without it:

gh auth refresh -s project

Quick Start

Initialize WADE in your project (once):

wade init

Then work in two deliberate steps — plan, then implement:

# Plan deliberately — the AI writes validated plan files, each becoming a
# lightweight task plus a draft PR
wade plan

# Start (or resume) implementation on task 42
wade 42

wade <N> routes on the task's PR state, not on whether a plan exists:

• No PR yet, or a closed unmerged one → starts (or resumes) an implementation session.
• Open draft PR → continue the in-flight session (or start it if the worktree is gone).
• Open ready PR → choose to continue working, address review comments, merge, or open the PR in your browser.
• Merged PR → reports the task is already merged and stops — no session.

It never launches a planning session on its own — reach for wade plan when you want planning.

The WADE lifecycle

wade plan ─▶ tasks + draft PRs ─▶ wade <N> ─▶ AI implements in an isolated worktree ─▶ PR opened ─▶ wade review pr-comments <N> ─▶ merge

• You run the entry points: wade plan, wade <N> / wade implement <N>, wade review pr-comments <N>, and wade cd <N>.
• The AI runs the session commands that enforce the workflow and open/update the PR: wade implementation-session {check,sync,done}, wade review-pr-comments-session {check,sync,done,fetch,resolve}, and wade plan-session done.

Commands

Commands you run

Short aliases: wade p (plan), wade i <N> (implement), wade r <N> (review pr-comments).

Interactive pickers (the arrow-key menus commands like wade task create show) wrap long choices to the terminal width instead of cropping them, so no option text is lost in narrow terminals and the list reflows automatically on resize.

Session commands the AI runs

These are invoked by the AI during a session — you normally don't run them by hand.

Most workflow commands accept --ai <tool>, --model <model>, --effort <level>, --permission-mode <tier>, and --yolo to override configured defaults. implement, review pr-comments, and the wade <N> shorthand also accept --network / --no-network (see Codex sandbox); the shorthand forwards the flag to whichever session it routes to. implement additionally supports --detach (new terminal tab), --cd (print worktree path only), and --base <branch> (see Planning & base branches).

Planning & base branches

wade plan runs an AI planning session and then, from the validated plan files it produces, creates a lightweight task plus a draft PR for each one (labeled by complexity). Plan files are strictly validated before they become tasks — a PLAN*.md missing a valid ## Complexity or a conventional-commit title is dropped with a loud error rather than silently becoming a task with no complexity label.

wade plan --issue <N> re-plans an existing task. If the session produces a single plan file, it's attached to #N and the task stays open. If the session decides the work should be split into several independent pieces (2+ plan files), #N is superseded: a new task + draft PR is created per plan file, a comment and a > **Superseded by ...** banner are added to #N, and it's closed as not planned (confirmed via prompt unless --yolo/non-interactive). If any plan file fails to become a task, #N is left open with a warning instead of superseding on a partial split.

Base branch

By default WADE branches from and merges into the project's configured main branch (project.main_branch in .wade.yml, falling back to the repo's detected default). To target a different branch — e.g. develop or a release/* branch — declare it once, at planning time, in an optional ## Base Branch section of the plan file:

## Base Branch
develop

The draft PR is then branched from and targeted at develop, and wade implement cuts the worktree from it and merges back into it. Omit the section to keep the default (main). The base is persisted as the draft PR's own base, so wade implement <N> recovers it automatically — no extra flags needed.

To choose or override the base at implement time, pass --base:

wade implement 42 --base develop   # branch from, target, and merge into develop

--base overrides the plan-declared base and retargets the existing draft PR to match. A malformed base value is rejected up front — whether declared in the plan (fails wade plan-session done) or passed as --base (fails fast when you run wade implement); a well-formed base branch that does not exist fails draft-PR creation with an actionable message. Changing the base of a PR whose work is already in flight — whether by re-running planning or by wade implement --base — is not applied silently: it requires explicit confirmation, because the branch's existing history cannot be moved onto the new base without discarding it.

Reviews & bot triggers

WADE splits review into an AI review pass you or the agent can invoke, and external bot triggers for services like CodeRabbit, Codex, and Bugbot.

To fetch the unresolved comments themselves during a review session, the agent runs wade review-pr-comments-session fetch <N>; it resolves individual threads with wade review-pr-comments-session resolve.

The auto-launched review session

The auto-launched review session — the one started when you pick "Wait for reviews" after wade implementation-session done and comments land — resolves its tool, model, effort, and autonomy tier from a dedicated ai.review_pr_comments section (the same keys every ai.<command> section accepts: tool, model, effort, mode, permission_mode / yolo, network_access, enabled, timeout):

ai:
  review_pr_comments:
    tool: claude
    model: claude-sonnet-5
    effort: high
    permission_mode: yolo   # auto-launched review runs unattended

With this set, the review session runs in the configured tier even when the implementation session ran without it (the permission_mode: yolo above starts the review session with no prompts). With ai.review_pr_comments unset, tool / model / autonomy fall back to the global ai.* defaults (default_tool, default_model, ai.permission_mode / ai.yolo) — not through ai.implement.*. Projects that relied on ai.implement.tool / model implicitly governing the review session should set ai.review_pr_comments.tool / model (or the global defaults). An explicit wade implement --yolo / --permission-mode still carries into the auto-launched review session.

Triggering external bot reviews

External review bots (CodeRabbit, Codex, Bugbot) normally auto-review on push, but WADE can post a trigger comment to force a fresh review — after addressing comments, pushing fixups, or when a bot has paused. The workflow gains an explicit trigger phase: implement → done → trigger bots → poll/address comments.

wade review trigger <N>            # post every enabled bot's trigger to #N's PR
wade review trigger <N> --bot codex --bot bugbot   # only a named subset
wade review trigger <N> --dry-run  # print what would be posted, post nothing

Each bot reports its own status line — posted / skipped (disabled) / failed: <error> / would post (dry-run). A failing post for one bot never stops the others; the command exits non-zero only when the PR can't be resolved, an unknown --bot name is given, or every attempted post fails. An explicit --bot <name> triggers that bot even if it is enabled: false.

The bots and their trigger phrases live in an optional top-level bot_review: block. It is fully defaulted — a project with no block still triggers CodeRabbit, Codex, and Bugbot — and every field is overridable:

bot_review:
  auto_trigger: false            # opt-in; when true, `done` posts triggers after it pushes
  arrival_timeout: 300           # seconds to wait for an enabled bot to review HEAD
  ack_timeout: 900               # longer ceiling once a bot acknowledges (👀/+1 reaction)
  bots:
    - { name: coderabbit, trigger: "@coderabbitai review", enabled: true }
    - { name: codex,      trigger: "@codex review",        enabled: true }
    - { name: bugbot,     trigger: "bugbot run",           enabled: true }

Each bot's name keys both --bot selection and the per-bot auto-trigger marker (a file under .wade/), so it must be unique and a safe identifier — letters, digits, ., _, - only (no path separators or spaces). A duplicate or invalid name is rejected when the config loads, not only under wade check-config.

With auto_trigger: true, both wade implementation-session done and wade review-pr-comments-session done post the enabled bots' triggers after a successful push, at most once per bot per commit SHA (repeated done/sync on the same commit post nothing further; a bot whose post failed retries). The manual wade review trigger command always fires and ignores those markers, so a same-SHA done still auto-triggers independently. wade init can enable auto_trigger (default off) and writes the block for you. Whatever a bot posts back is untrusted context — the review session's verify-before-fixing rule still applies.

Expectation-verified completion. WADE no longer reports a review "done" just because no blocking comments are present — it verifies that every enabled bot has actually posted a review covering the latest commit. While an expected bot has not, wade review pr-comments / poll / fetch keep waiting (and name the bot) rather than printing "All review comments resolved". The wait is bounded by arrival_timeout (default 300s); past it the bot stops blocking and is surfaced distinctly (⚠ No review from <bot>), never silently swallowed into "done". A bot that acknowledges with a reaction (👀 / +1) is treated as actively reviewing and waited for up to the longer ack_timeout (default 900s). Latency note: because all three bots ship enabled, a repo without one installed adds up to arrival_timeout to each review check before proceeding — disable an unused bot (enabled: false) to remove its floor. ack_timeout must be >= arrival_timeout.

Guardrails & completion gates

Session guards

When WADE creates a worktree it installs hooks into whichever tools your project uses, so session rules are enforced in code rather than left to the agent to honour. Guards are written per-worktree at session start — upgrading WADE is enough to pick up improvements, with no re-init or migration.

The session-completion guard keys on the same fact done records — a sha-keyed .wade/done@<HEAD> marker written when done's gates pass — so it nudges only when the branch has commits ahead of its base and done has not finalized the current commit. An early "stopping to ask a question" turn (no commits ahead) never triggers it. The plan-completion guard is the planning counterpart: it nudges once if a plan session is about to end with no valid plan file (a title with a conventional-commit prefix plus a ## Complexity). Both fail open — a session is never trapped.

Independently of that nudge, wade plan now strictly validates plan files before creating tasks: a PLAN*.md missing a valid ## Complexity or a conventional-commit title is dropped with a loud error instead of silently becoming a task with no complexity label.

wade task create enforces the same conventional-commit title rule (the type list is the single Python source in utils/conventional.py): a non-conventional --title (or a plan file's # Title) is rejected, and interactive create re-prompts. The PR title is derived from the task title verbatim, so this is what keeps a wade-opened PR from ever failing the PR Title Lint CI check; done also blocks on — and syncs — a stale non-conventional title on an already open PR (see the completion-gate table below).

Like wade plan, wade task create also reads a ## Complexity section from the task body (from --body, a plan file, or interactive input): when present, its value is attached as a complexity:X label on top of the project label — the same signal that drives automatic model routing, so a hand-created task routes to the right model just like a planned one. Labeling is best-effort: a failure to apply the label never fails task creation, and a body with no ## Complexity section just skips it. An explicit --label complexity:X takes precedence over the body value, so the task never ends up with two conflicting complexity labels.

If some files pass and others fail, an interactive run asks whether to continue with the valid ones; --yolo and non-interactive runs continue without asking. If you decline, or if every plan file fails validation, no tasks are created — the generated PLAN*.md are preserved to a temp directory so you can fix the reported errors and re-run instead of regenerating from scratch.

Both write guards cover shell commands as well as file edits, so a redirect like printf x > ../other-repo/app.py is blocked, not just an Edit call. Shell coverage is best-effort defense-in-depth: it catches ordinary commands, not deliberate obfuscation (variable indirection, command substitution, subshells).

The remaining supported tools (OpenCode, VS Code, Antigravity IDE) expose no hook mechanism WADE can install into, so they receive neither guard — session rules there rest on the skill files alone.

Completion gates

wade implementation-session done (and review-pr-comments-session done) is the authoritative completion gate: it refuses to finalize until the work is actually ready, then writes the .wade/done@<HEAD> marker and pushes. Each gate has an escape hatch under a done: block in .wade.yml (all default on):

A pre-push git hook (done.pre_push_backstop, default on) backs the gate up: a push of the session branch without a current .wade/done@<sha> marker is refused, so committing-and-pushing straight past done doesn't work. It is worktree-scoped (never touches your main checkout or sibling worktrees) and chains to any pre-existing pre-push hook. Honesty: git push --no-verify bypasses the backstop in one flag — this is a quality/backstop layer that makes the gate hard to skip, not an airtight boundary.

done also writes a ## Review Status line into the PR body recording the review outcome — reviewed at <sha>, skipped via --skip-review, gate disabled (done.require_review: false / ai.review_implementation.enabled: false), or completed at the review-pass cap — with the review-pass count. A skipped or never-run review is therefore visible to reviewers in the PR itself, not just in the worktree-local .wade/ markers that are discarded when the session ends.

Task Providers

WADE can pull tasks from three backends — pick one when you run wade init:

PRs and reviews always flow through GitHub, regardless of the task provider. Non-GitHub providers compose a delegate that forwards every PR/review operation — review-thread listing and resolution, PR comments, and review status — to GitHub via the gh CLI, so wade review pr-comments, the auto-poll loop, and wade review-pr-comments-session fetch / resolve behave identically across providers. Only where a task itself lives differs.

Markdown provider

Useful when you want tasks versioned alongside the code, with no external service. Each task is one ## heading in the file:

# Wade Issues

## #47239185 Add login feature

<!-- wade
state: open
labels: feature, complexity:medium
-->

Description body here. Sub-headings, code blocks, anything markdown.

• The file is resolved against the main worktree, so every linked worktree reads/writes the same physical file. No textual merge conflicts on ISSUES.md.

• IDs are random 8-digit decimal so two parallel wade implement sessions in different worktrees can't collide. They stay numeric so existing #NN checklist refs in tracking-issue bodies still work.

• Configure via .wade.yml:

  provider:
    name: markdown
    settings:
      path: ISSUES.md      # relative to repo root, or absolute
      auto_commit: false   # if true, close_task auto-commits the change
  

• After a PR merges, provider.close_task flips the section's state to closed in ISSUES.md. By default the file is left modified in your working tree — commit it yourself. Set auto_commit: true to have wade commit the change with a chore: close #N message; failures (not a git repo, hook rejection, signing required) are logged and swallowed so the close itself never blocks.

• Tracking tasks with - [ ] #N checklist bodies work the same as with GitHub Issues — markdown's find_parent_issue scans every section's body for child refs.

Permission modes, autonomy & sandboxing

Permission modes

--permission-mode sets how much autonomy the AI tool is granted — an axis independent of the delegation --mode (which controls how a tool is dispatched: prompt/interactive/headless). The tiers, most→least permissive, are yolo > auto > accept-edits > default:

--yolo is a back-compat alias for --permission-mode yolo; an explicit --permission-mode wins when both are given. The same values are accepted in .wade.yml as ai.permission_mode (global) or ai.<command>.permission_mode (per-command), with yolo: true still honored as the alias. A tier a tool doesn't support is downgraded automatically (e.g. auto → accept-edits on non-Claude tools) with a warning — WADE forwards the requested tier and crossby owns the downgrade ladder. Headless launches are always read-only — any of deps / review_plan / review_implementation / review_batch dispatched in headless delegation mode runs at default regardless of the configured tier, and no --yolo is forwarded to the subprocess. The interactive variants honor the tier: wade review plan, wade review implementation, wade review batch, and wade task deps all accept --yolo / --permission-mode (matching wade review pr-comments), and ai.review_batch.yolo: true / ai.deps.yolo: true apply when those commands run interactively; the auto-launched review session honors its own tier via ai.review_pr_comments (see above). plan is not a permission mode — it's driven separately — and is rejected (warn + fall back to default) if configured.

The resolved permission mode is always displayed at launch, on every path (TTY, non-TTY, headless, all-flags-explicit), with a one-line descriptor — so a default session states what default means, and what is shown always equals what is applied.

Headless review budget

Those headless commands auto-scale their subprocess budget from the prompt size and reasoning effort (600s floor → 1500s ceiling), so a large diff or a high-effort run no longer times out at a flat budget. If a run does time out, wade keeps whatever partial output the reviewer produced (rather than discarding it) and retries once with a longer budget (1.5x the first attempt, always strictly more time than the run that just timed out), bounded to a ~62.5-minute worst-case total that the pre-launch advisory announces. Set ai.<command>.timeout (seconds) to override: an explicit value is used verbatim and turns off both the scaling and the retry — the escape hatch when your terminal/orchestrator enforces a hard tool-timeout (set it just under that limit).

A headless reviewer also gets told its own deadline: the plan/code/batch review prompt states the current attempt's budget in seconds, so it can prioritize the highest-severity findings and wrap up before being cut off rather than getting killed mid-thought. Interactive and self-review (prompt) reviews have no subprocess kill, so they get "no hard deadline" wording instead.

Codex sandbox & network policy

When WADE launches Codex in a linked worktree, Codex runs under --sandbox workspace-write, which confines writes to the worktree tree. A worktree's git metadata, however, lives outside that tree (<main>/.git/worktrees/<wt> and <main>/.git), so without extra grants every git write — git add/commit, ref updates, stash, and wade sync/done — fails with Unable to create …/index.lock or could not write index. WADE fixes this automatically: it passes the worktree's absolute path to the launcher, which grants those out-of-root git-metadata dirs as sandbox writable roots (the OS sandbox otherwise stays fully enabled — this widens nothing else). This is transparent; no Codex config or manual approval is needed, and it only affects Codex (every other tool ignores it).

Filesystem writes and network access are independent. The metadata grant above makes local git work (stage, commit, stash, ref updates, and the local legs of sync/done) succeed with network off. Only operations that reach the network — git fetch (hence sync) and git push (hence the network leg of done) — need network access, which is disabled by default. Enable it explicitly per invocation with --network on wade implement / wade review pr-comments, or in .wade.yml:

ai:
  network_access: true          # default for the interactive session commands
  implement:
    network_access: false       # per-command override wins

The policy applies to the interactive session commands — wade implement and wade review pr-comments — which are the ones that run sync/done and so may need fetch/push. The headless/analytical paths (plan, deps, review plan/implementation/batch) are always network-off by design: they never fetch or push, so ai.network_access does not apply to them and no flag enables it there. Precedence for the commands that honor it is --network/--no-network > ai.<command>.network_access > ai.network_access > off. WADE always passes an explicit pin, so an ambient network_access = true in your own Codex config.toml can never silently enable network for a WADE-managed sandbox. Enabling network never disables the sandbox and never changes approval-policy semantics.

wade implementation-session check (and the review equivalent) verifies this is actually working: on top of IN_WORKTREE / IN_MAIN_CHECKOUT / NOT_IN_GIT_REPO, it now reports WORKTREE_GIT_BLOCKED (exit code 3) when a worktree's git metadata is not writable — naming the blocked path — so a session launched without the correct grant is caught before it wastes work.

Supported AI Tools

Adapters, model/effort resolution, and per-tool config (allowlists, hooks) are powered by crossby, WADE's AI-tool-integration dependency.

In .wade.yml, refer to a tool by its config ID, which matches the binary above except for VS Code (vscode) and Antigravity CLI (antigravity-cli). Antigravity IDE (config ID antigravity) is launch-only — WADE opens your workspace in the desktop app; its workflow files are provisioned via the Antigravity CLI's shared .agents/ layout.

Agent Skills

wade installs Skills that teach your AI agent the workflow — task format, planning rules, implementation session rules, and dependency analysis. Skills, the AGENTS.md workflow pointer, and any tool-specific configuration are set up automatically for every session (when you run wade plan/wade implement/wade review, or a standalone wade task deps), for every supported tool. Nothing to configure manually.

Session communication

While a session works, it reports by exception: terse on success — just the actionable handles (task/PR numbers, URLs, the next command), no running recap. When something needs your attention or a decision only you can make, the agent reports it in 1–2 sentences with brief context, its complexity (easy/medium/complex/very_complex), and a recommendation. It then asks through the native question component, with the recommended option first and labelled "(recommended)".

Each session ends with a compact emoji step-status summary instead of a prose recap: one glyph per step (✅ done · ⚠️ needs your attention · ❌ failed/blocked · ⏭️ skipped/disabled) on a single line, the handles, an explicit attention line (either "Nothing needs your attention" or the items that do), and a bold Next: action. Every finite-choice decision — including whether to exit — is a native dialog with the recommended option first.

Extension Hooks

Configure automated setup when worktrees are created via wade implement or wade implement-batch. Add a hooks section to .wade.yml:

hooks:
  post_worktree_create: scripts/setup-worktree.sh
  copy_to_worktree:
    - .env
    - .env.example

post_worktree_create — A setup script to run after each worktree is created. Use it to install dependencies, run builds, or prepare the environment so worktrees are ready to use immediately.

copy_to_worktree — Files to copy from the project root into the worktree before running the hook. Useful for secrets and config files (e.g., .env) that are gitignored and wouldn't otherwise be present in a new worktree.

See templates/setup-worktree.sh.example for a starter script.

Repo-quality gates

Three opt-in, off-by-default quality gates enforce code hygiene at the commit boundary (and in-turn). Nothing is installed unless you configure it:

hooks:
  pre_commit:
    lint: ./scripts/check.sh --lint   # runs on `git commit`; non-zero blocks it
    test: ./scripts/test.sh           # runs on `git commit`; non-zero blocks it
  commit_msg:
    conventional: true                # rejects a non-Conventional-Commit subject
  post_tool_use:
    enabled: true                     # feed lint findings back to the agent in-turn
    lint_cmd: ruff check              # FILE-SCOPED linter (the edited path is appended)
    timeout: 10                       # seconds; the linter is skipped on overrun

• pre_commit installs a per-worktree pre-commit git hook that runs the configured lint, then test, command(s). A non-zero exit blocks the commit and surfaces to the agent as a normal error. Set only the step(s) you want. Running the full test suite on every commit can be slow — prefer a fast subset there, or use lint alone.
• commit_msg installs a per-worktree commit-msg git hook that validates the subject line against Conventional Commits. A non-conforming subject blocks the commit. A BREAKING CHANGE: footer only marks an already-typed commit as breaking (an alternative to the subject !); it does not exempt the subject from the type requirement.
• post_tool_use feeds lint findings back to the agent in-turn — the cheapest moment to fix them, while the edit is still in working memory. It is file-scoped: lint_cmd runs on just the edited path (appended as a positional arg), on tools whose hooks can inject context back to the agent (Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot; Antigravity CLI is skipped). If lint_cmd is unset, wade falls back to pre_commit.lint run whole-repo on every edit — which is slower and may error on an unexpected positional arg, so prefer configuring a file-scoped lint_cmd. This layer never blocks.

Like the pre-push backstop, the git hooks are worktree-scoped (never touch your main checkout or sibling worktrees) and chain to any pre-existing hook of the same name. Honesty: git commit --no-verify bypasses the pre-commit and commit-msg hooks in one flag — these are quality gates that make messy or untested commits hard to land, not airtight enforcement boundaries.

Shell Integration

To make wade cd <N> actually change your directory (instead of just printing the path), add this to your shell profile:

eval "$(wade shell-init)"

Tab completion:

wade --install-completion bash   # or zsh / fish

Upgrading

wade update

Detects your install method (uv tool, pipx, Homebrew) and upgrades automatically, then refreshes all managed project files.

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md.

License

MIT